SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Want Congress to Fulfill Oversight of the Executive? Demand Support for This Resolution
House Judiciary Committee to consider on Tuesday resolution of inquiry into potential Trump conflicts
Feb 27, 2017
Anti-Trump groups are calling for constituents to put pressure on their lawmakers Monday to thwart Republicans from quelling a resolution that would make the president disclose his potential conflicts of interest and ties to Russia.
Introduced earlier this month by Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), the resolution of inquiry directs Attorney General Jeff Sessions to give to the U.S. House documents "relating to the financial practices" of President Donald Trump, including "any criminal or counterintelligence investigation" targeting him, foreign government investment in any of Trump's holdings, his "proposal to maintain an interest in his business holdings," the Foreign Emoluments Clause, and any other documents relating to potential conflicts of interest.
The House Judiciary Committee, on which Nadler is the second-most senior member, is considering the resolution on Tuesday. As the Washington Post explained:
Under House rules, a resolution of inquiry is referred to a committee, which has 14 legislative days to debate and vote on whether how it should be reported to the floor. If the committee does not take action in that 14-day span, the measure can be called up on the House floor for a debate and vote.
"But rejection by the Judiciary panel all but assures the measure will never see a floor vote," Politico also noted last week.
According to Nadler, having the committee (which is expected to kill it) consider the resolution rather than the full chamber--and having them do so on Tuesday--is "an act of cowardice."
" House Republicans chose to consider this resolution in committee--as opposed to allowing debate on the House floor--because they would prefer that only a few of their safest members be forced to take a vote on this matter. The Majority must decide between conducting basic oversight of President Trump, on the one hand, or being complicit in potential misdeeds by Trump and his associates, on the other," he said in a statement Friday.
And, given the extensive media coverage that will come on Tuesday to cover Trump's first address to a joint Congress, Nadler said the scheduling is "an obvious attempt to bury our debate."
He referred to the resolution as a "simple request for information," adding: "Members of Congress have an obligation to conduct oversight of the Executive Branch."
The Loyal Opposition, an anti-Trump group inspired by the Indivisible Guide, is urging people to call the committee members and urge support for the resolution of inquiry.
The Indivisible Guide also issued a series of tweets Monday morning about the resolution, and similarly encouraged people to tell their congressmen to add their support for the measure.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Anti-Trump groups are calling for constituents to put pressure on their lawmakers Monday to thwart Republicans from quelling a resolution that would make the president disclose his potential conflicts of interest and ties to Russia.
Introduced earlier this month by Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), the resolution of inquiry directs Attorney General Jeff Sessions to give to the U.S. House documents "relating to the financial practices" of President Donald Trump, including "any criminal or counterintelligence investigation" targeting him, foreign government investment in any of Trump's holdings, his "proposal to maintain an interest in his business holdings," the Foreign Emoluments Clause, and any other documents relating to potential conflicts of interest.
The House Judiciary Committee, on which Nadler is the second-most senior member, is considering the resolution on Tuesday. As the Washington Post explained:
Under House rules, a resolution of inquiry is referred to a committee, which has 14 legislative days to debate and vote on whether how it should be reported to the floor. If the committee does not take action in that 14-day span, the measure can be called up on the House floor for a debate and vote.
"But rejection by the Judiciary panel all but assures the measure will never see a floor vote," Politico also noted last week.
According to Nadler, having the committee (which is expected to kill it) consider the resolution rather than the full chamber--and having them do so on Tuesday--is "an act of cowardice."
" House Republicans chose to consider this resolution in committee--as opposed to allowing debate on the House floor--because they would prefer that only a few of their safest members be forced to take a vote on this matter. The Majority must decide between conducting basic oversight of President Trump, on the one hand, or being complicit in potential misdeeds by Trump and his associates, on the other," he said in a statement Friday.
And, given the extensive media coverage that will come on Tuesday to cover Trump's first address to a joint Congress, Nadler said the scheduling is "an obvious attempt to bury our debate."
He referred to the resolution as a "simple request for information," adding: "Members of Congress have an obligation to conduct oversight of the Executive Branch."
The Loyal Opposition, an anti-Trump group inspired by the Indivisible Guide, is urging people to call the committee members and urge support for the resolution of inquiry.
The Indivisible Guide also issued a series of tweets Monday morning about the resolution, and similarly encouraged people to tell their congressmen to add their support for the measure.
Anti-Trump groups are calling for constituents to put pressure on their lawmakers Monday to thwart Republicans from quelling a resolution that would make the president disclose his potential conflicts of interest and ties to Russia.
Introduced earlier this month by Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), the resolution of inquiry directs Attorney General Jeff Sessions to give to the U.S. House documents "relating to the financial practices" of President Donald Trump, including "any criminal or counterintelligence investigation" targeting him, foreign government investment in any of Trump's holdings, his "proposal to maintain an interest in his business holdings," the Foreign Emoluments Clause, and any other documents relating to potential conflicts of interest.
The House Judiciary Committee, on which Nadler is the second-most senior member, is considering the resolution on Tuesday. As the Washington Post explained:
Under House rules, a resolution of inquiry is referred to a committee, which has 14 legislative days to debate and vote on whether how it should be reported to the floor. If the committee does not take action in that 14-day span, the measure can be called up on the House floor for a debate and vote.
"But rejection by the Judiciary panel all but assures the measure will never see a floor vote," Politico also noted last week.
According to Nadler, having the committee (which is expected to kill it) consider the resolution rather than the full chamber--and having them do so on Tuesday--is "an act of cowardice."
" House Republicans chose to consider this resolution in committee--as opposed to allowing debate on the House floor--because they would prefer that only a few of their safest members be forced to take a vote on this matter. The Majority must decide between conducting basic oversight of President Trump, on the one hand, or being complicit in potential misdeeds by Trump and his associates, on the other," he said in a statement Friday.
And, given the extensive media coverage that will come on Tuesday to cover Trump's first address to a joint Congress, Nadler said the scheduling is "an obvious attempt to bury our debate."
He referred to the resolution as a "simple request for information," adding: "Members of Congress have an obligation to conduct oversight of the Executive Branch."
The Loyal Opposition, an anti-Trump group inspired by the Indivisible Guide, is urging people to call the committee members and urge support for the resolution of inquiry.
The Indivisible Guide also issued a series of tweets Monday morning about the resolution, and similarly encouraged people to tell their congressmen to add their support for the measure.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.