Obama Quietly Undercutting Climate Legacy With Foreign Fossil Fuel Investments: Investigation
Under Obama, Ex-Im Bank has gotten three times more financing than during George W. Bush's terms
President Barack Obama's climate credentials are being undermined by a federal agency in his administration that is putting billions of taxpayer dollars into foreign fossil fuel projects.
So finds a Columbia School of Journalism and Guardian investigation published Wednesday which looks at the U.S. Export-Import Bank, or Ex-Im Bank, which is tasked with promoting U.S. exports.
Based on documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, their investigation found: "Since January 2009, the U.S. Export-Import Bank has signed almost $34bn worth of low-interest loans and guarantees to companies and foreign governments to build, expand, and promote fossil fuel projects abroad."
That total is roughly "three times more financing than the taxpayer-backed bank provided during George W. Bush's two terms, and almost twice the amount financed with loans and guarantees under the administrations of Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and Bill Clinton--combined"
The biggest investment was almost $5bn in 2012 to Dow Chemical and Saudi Aramco for a power boiler and heat exchange manufacturing for a new petrochemical plant in the kingdom.
The financing hit a peak of $10bn in 2013. In that year, as climate advocacy group Friends of the Earth (FOE) has noted, Obama "announced an end to public financing for coal plants abroad, except in limited circumstances."
The new reporting continues:
Our investigation shows the president's domestic climate policies, including the 1.1bn ton carbon reduction promised with his new vehicle engine efficiency standards and the 2.5bn ton carbon savings the pending clean power plan is estimated to make, will largely be erased by the bank's overseas emissions.
The climate impact of greenhouse gas emissions is the same, the reporting notes, whether they are spewed out from somewhere in the U.S. or elsewhere in the world. The investigation adds:
Using information from the Energy Information Administration, if the Clean Power Plan were enacted this year, over the next 15 years it would reduce U.S. carbon emissions by about 2.5bn tons. That is nearly the same number that the Ex-Im Bank's overseas fossil fuel projects will produce over 15 years, assuming they were all running at full capacity.
It's not the first time the bank has come under fire for fueling climate change.
Environment advocacy group Pacific Environment, for example, said in 2012 that "[t]he Obama Administration is supporting skyrocketing export subsidies for dirty fossil fuels" via the bank. "Ex-Im Bank's worsening fossil fuel binge makes a mockery out of the U.S. Government's stated efforts to curb climate change and President Obama's pledge to phase out fossil fuel subsidies," said Doug Norlen, the group's policy director, at the time.
ThinkProgress also wrote last year that
FOE has been fighting against Ex-Im's practices since 2002, when the group issued a lawsuit against the bank over its support of natural gas projects. The group has been trying to make sure the bank stops financing fossil fuel projects that can be harmful to the environment and local people, and instead finance renewable energy projects, such as solar and wind. FOE is also pushing for the Ex-Im Bank to have a high level of transparency with properly enforced regulations."
The Ex-Im Bank's future, however, is uncertain. Politico writes that it "has been operating at less than full capacity for nearly a year and a half." The New York Times reports: "In December, the bank's bipartisan supporters in Congress secured the agency's reopening," but Senate Banking Chairman Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) "bottled up President Obama's nomination of a third member for the bank's five-person board. Only the board can approve transactions of more than $10 million; without a quorum of three it cannot," the Times wrote.
For his part, President-elect Donald Trump said last year, "I'd be against it" and called the bank "a lot of excess baggage."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
President Barack Obama's climate credentials are being undermined by a federal agency in his administration that is putting billions of taxpayer dollars into foreign fossil fuel projects.
So finds a Columbia School of Journalism and Guardian investigation published Wednesday which looks at the U.S. Export-Import Bank, or Ex-Im Bank, which is tasked with promoting U.S. exports.
Based on documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, their investigation found: "Since January 2009, the U.S. Export-Import Bank has signed almost $34bn worth of low-interest loans and guarantees to companies and foreign governments to build, expand, and promote fossil fuel projects abroad."
That total is roughly "three times more financing than the taxpayer-backed bank provided during George W. Bush's two terms, and almost twice the amount financed with loans and guarantees under the administrations of Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and Bill Clinton--combined"
The biggest investment was almost $5bn in 2012 to Dow Chemical and Saudi Aramco for a power boiler and heat exchange manufacturing for a new petrochemical plant in the kingdom.
The financing hit a peak of $10bn in 2013. In that year, as climate advocacy group Friends of the Earth (FOE) has noted, Obama "announced an end to public financing for coal plants abroad, except in limited circumstances."
The new reporting continues:
Our investigation shows the president's domestic climate policies, including the 1.1bn ton carbon reduction promised with his new vehicle engine efficiency standards and the 2.5bn ton carbon savings the pending clean power plan is estimated to make, will largely be erased by the bank's overseas emissions.
The climate impact of greenhouse gas emissions is the same, the reporting notes, whether they are spewed out from somewhere in the U.S. or elsewhere in the world. The investigation adds:
Using information from the Energy Information Administration, if the Clean Power Plan were enacted this year, over the next 15 years it would reduce U.S. carbon emissions by about 2.5bn tons. That is nearly the same number that the Ex-Im Bank's overseas fossil fuel projects will produce over 15 years, assuming they were all running at full capacity.
It's not the first time the bank has come under fire for fueling climate change.
Environment advocacy group Pacific Environment, for example, said in 2012 that "[t]he Obama Administration is supporting skyrocketing export subsidies for dirty fossil fuels" via the bank. "Ex-Im Bank's worsening fossil fuel binge makes a mockery out of the U.S. Government's stated efforts to curb climate change and President Obama's pledge to phase out fossil fuel subsidies," said Doug Norlen, the group's policy director, at the time.
ThinkProgress also wrote last year that
FOE has been fighting against Ex-Im's practices since 2002, when the group issued a lawsuit against the bank over its support of natural gas projects. The group has been trying to make sure the bank stops financing fossil fuel projects that can be harmful to the environment and local people, and instead finance renewable energy projects, such as solar and wind. FOE is also pushing for the Ex-Im Bank to have a high level of transparency with properly enforced regulations."
The Ex-Im Bank's future, however, is uncertain. Politico writes that it "has been operating at less than full capacity for nearly a year and a half." The New York Times reports: "In December, the bank's bipartisan supporters in Congress secured the agency's reopening," but Senate Banking Chairman Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) "bottled up President Obama's nomination of a third member for the bank's five-person board. Only the board can approve transactions of more than $10 million; without a quorum of three it cannot," the Times wrote.
For his part, President-elect Donald Trump said last year, "I'd be against it" and called the bank "a lot of excess baggage."
President Barack Obama's climate credentials are being undermined by a federal agency in his administration that is putting billions of taxpayer dollars into foreign fossil fuel projects.
So finds a Columbia School of Journalism and Guardian investigation published Wednesday which looks at the U.S. Export-Import Bank, or Ex-Im Bank, which is tasked with promoting U.S. exports.
Based on documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, their investigation found: "Since January 2009, the U.S. Export-Import Bank has signed almost $34bn worth of low-interest loans and guarantees to companies and foreign governments to build, expand, and promote fossil fuel projects abroad."
That total is roughly "three times more financing than the taxpayer-backed bank provided during George W. Bush's two terms, and almost twice the amount financed with loans and guarantees under the administrations of Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and Bill Clinton--combined"
The biggest investment was almost $5bn in 2012 to Dow Chemical and Saudi Aramco for a power boiler and heat exchange manufacturing for a new petrochemical plant in the kingdom.
The financing hit a peak of $10bn in 2013. In that year, as climate advocacy group Friends of the Earth (FOE) has noted, Obama "announced an end to public financing for coal plants abroad, except in limited circumstances."
The new reporting continues:
Our investigation shows the president's domestic climate policies, including the 1.1bn ton carbon reduction promised with his new vehicle engine efficiency standards and the 2.5bn ton carbon savings the pending clean power plan is estimated to make, will largely be erased by the bank's overseas emissions.
The climate impact of greenhouse gas emissions is the same, the reporting notes, whether they are spewed out from somewhere in the U.S. or elsewhere in the world. The investigation adds:
Using information from the Energy Information Administration, if the Clean Power Plan were enacted this year, over the next 15 years it would reduce U.S. carbon emissions by about 2.5bn tons. That is nearly the same number that the Ex-Im Bank's overseas fossil fuel projects will produce over 15 years, assuming they were all running at full capacity.
It's not the first time the bank has come under fire for fueling climate change.
Environment advocacy group Pacific Environment, for example, said in 2012 that "[t]he Obama Administration is supporting skyrocketing export subsidies for dirty fossil fuels" via the bank. "Ex-Im Bank's worsening fossil fuel binge makes a mockery out of the U.S. Government's stated efforts to curb climate change and President Obama's pledge to phase out fossil fuel subsidies," said Doug Norlen, the group's policy director, at the time.
ThinkProgress also wrote last year that
FOE has been fighting against Ex-Im's practices since 2002, when the group issued a lawsuit against the bank over its support of natural gas projects. The group has been trying to make sure the bank stops financing fossil fuel projects that can be harmful to the environment and local people, and instead finance renewable energy projects, such as solar and wind. FOE is also pushing for the Ex-Im Bank to have a high level of transparency with properly enforced regulations."
The Ex-Im Bank's future, however, is uncertain. Politico writes that it "has been operating at less than full capacity for nearly a year and a half." The New York Times reports: "In December, the bank's bipartisan supporters in Congress secured the agency's reopening," but Senate Banking Chairman Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) "bottled up President Obama's nomination of a third member for the bank's five-person board. Only the board can approve transactions of more than $10 million; without a quorum of three it cannot," the Times wrote.
For his part, President-elect Donald Trump said last year, "I'd be against it" and called the bank "a lot of excess baggage."