SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
'Cruel, Vindictive, Authoritarian': Rudy Giuliani Tops List of Trump's Candidates for Secretary of State
And if not Giuliani, it could be pro-war John Bolton, who has called for the bombing of Iran
Nov 15, 2016
Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani is in the running to be President-elect Donald Trump's secretary of state, according to the Wall Street Journal, which spoke with anonymous sources "familiar with the matter."
Speaking at the WSJ's CEO Council meeting on Monday, Giuliani indicated he would prefer that position to attorney general.
As some have noted, the combined power of Giuliani's destructive law enforcement policies in New York--which included implementing controversial programs like stop-and-frisk and "broken windows" policing--and Trump's frightening proposals for the U.S., could make the country more dangerous both for marginalized communities and for law enforcement agencies.
Indeed, as David Sirota noted at the International Business Times on Tuesday, appointing Giuliani to secretary of state would put him "in a position to approve arms transfers to countries that helped make him rich after he termed-out as mayor of New York and began working in the private sector nearly 15 years ago."
On Monday, Giuliani indicated that, if appointed, his foreign policies would focus on continuing the fight against the Islamic State (ISIS). "ISIS, short-term I believe, is the greatest danger and not because ISIS is in Iraq and in Syria, but because ISIS did something al Qaeda never did--ISIS was able to spread itself around the world," he said at the CEO Council meeting.
However, he did not elaborate on any concrete plans of action the Trump administration would take to defeat ISIS. Trump has repeatedly said he wants to keep those strategies "secret."
Giuliani has also previously called the groundbreaking nuclear treaty with Iran "one of the worst deals America ever made," and has encouraged Trump to undo it--although on Monday he hinted it would be lower on his to-do list, saying of the agreement, "You have to set priorities. So if the priority is, let's eliminate ISIS, maybe you put that off a little bit. And you get rid of ISIS first. And then you get back to that."
The other top candidate for secretary of state is John Bolton, a former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations and former undersecretary of state for arms control and international security under then-President George W. Bush. When asked Monday who was the better choice, Giuliani responded, "Maybe me, I don't know."
In strict terms, that may be true. Bolton was a chief supporter of the U.S. invasion of Iraq and last year called for the bombing of Iran. He also recently said Trump should "abrogate the Iran nuclear deal in his first days in office." As Gareth Porter wrote Tuesday, "[i]f Bolton were nominated as secretary of state, it would be an open invitation for more plotting of schemes within the Trump administration for the war against Iran that Bolton still craves."
To many observers, both choices are unappealing, even if one is arguably less bad than the other. As Jeremy Stahl writes at Slate, "belligerent rhetoric seems to be the theme of a potential Giuliani State Department, which I suppose is better than the alternative of Bolton and almost certain military action. (It's possible that Bolton was floated as a name for secretary of state to make Giuliani appear less horrifying. If that was the plan, it worked on me.)"
Still, Giuliani's rise to the top of the list brings more than enough worrying prospects.
As The Intercept reporter Liliana Segura wrote on Twitter, "Giuliani made a career as a cruel, vindictive, authoritarian and his ascent will be a horror show no matter the post."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani is in the running to be President-elect Donald Trump's secretary of state, according to the Wall Street Journal, which spoke with anonymous sources "familiar with the matter."
Speaking at the WSJ's CEO Council meeting on Monday, Giuliani indicated he would prefer that position to attorney general.
As some have noted, the combined power of Giuliani's destructive law enforcement policies in New York--which included implementing controversial programs like stop-and-frisk and "broken windows" policing--and Trump's frightening proposals for the U.S., could make the country more dangerous both for marginalized communities and for law enforcement agencies.
Indeed, as David Sirota noted at the International Business Times on Tuesday, appointing Giuliani to secretary of state would put him "in a position to approve arms transfers to countries that helped make him rich after he termed-out as mayor of New York and began working in the private sector nearly 15 years ago."
On Monday, Giuliani indicated that, if appointed, his foreign policies would focus on continuing the fight against the Islamic State (ISIS). "ISIS, short-term I believe, is the greatest danger and not because ISIS is in Iraq and in Syria, but because ISIS did something al Qaeda never did--ISIS was able to spread itself around the world," he said at the CEO Council meeting.
However, he did not elaborate on any concrete plans of action the Trump administration would take to defeat ISIS. Trump has repeatedly said he wants to keep those strategies "secret."
Giuliani has also previously called the groundbreaking nuclear treaty with Iran "one of the worst deals America ever made," and has encouraged Trump to undo it--although on Monday he hinted it would be lower on his to-do list, saying of the agreement, "You have to set priorities. So if the priority is, let's eliminate ISIS, maybe you put that off a little bit. And you get rid of ISIS first. And then you get back to that."
The other top candidate for secretary of state is John Bolton, a former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations and former undersecretary of state for arms control and international security under then-President George W. Bush. When asked Monday who was the better choice, Giuliani responded, "Maybe me, I don't know."
In strict terms, that may be true. Bolton was a chief supporter of the U.S. invasion of Iraq and last year called for the bombing of Iran. He also recently said Trump should "abrogate the Iran nuclear deal in his first days in office." As Gareth Porter wrote Tuesday, "[i]f Bolton were nominated as secretary of state, it would be an open invitation for more plotting of schemes within the Trump administration for the war against Iran that Bolton still craves."
To many observers, both choices are unappealing, even if one is arguably less bad than the other. As Jeremy Stahl writes at Slate, "belligerent rhetoric seems to be the theme of a potential Giuliani State Department, which I suppose is better than the alternative of Bolton and almost certain military action. (It's possible that Bolton was floated as a name for secretary of state to make Giuliani appear less horrifying. If that was the plan, it worked on me.)"
Still, Giuliani's rise to the top of the list brings more than enough worrying prospects.
As The Intercept reporter Liliana Segura wrote on Twitter, "Giuliani made a career as a cruel, vindictive, authoritarian and his ascent will be a horror show no matter the post."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani is in the running to be President-elect Donald Trump's secretary of state, according to the Wall Street Journal, which spoke with anonymous sources "familiar with the matter."
Speaking at the WSJ's CEO Council meeting on Monday, Giuliani indicated he would prefer that position to attorney general.
As some have noted, the combined power of Giuliani's destructive law enforcement policies in New York--which included implementing controversial programs like stop-and-frisk and "broken windows" policing--and Trump's frightening proposals for the U.S., could make the country more dangerous both for marginalized communities and for law enforcement agencies.
Indeed, as David Sirota noted at the International Business Times on Tuesday, appointing Giuliani to secretary of state would put him "in a position to approve arms transfers to countries that helped make him rich after he termed-out as mayor of New York and began working in the private sector nearly 15 years ago."
On Monday, Giuliani indicated that, if appointed, his foreign policies would focus on continuing the fight against the Islamic State (ISIS). "ISIS, short-term I believe, is the greatest danger and not because ISIS is in Iraq and in Syria, but because ISIS did something al Qaeda never did--ISIS was able to spread itself around the world," he said at the CEO Council meeting.
However, he did not elaborate on any concrete plans of action the Trump administration would take to defeat ISIS. Trump has repeatedly said he wants to keep those strategies "secret."
Giuliani has also previously called the groundbreaking nuclear treaty with Iran "one of the worst deals America ever made," and has encouraged Trump to undo it--although on Monday he hinted it would be lower on his to-do list, saying of the agreement, "You have to set priorities. So if the priority is, let's eliminate ISIS, maybe you put that off a little bit. And you get rid of ISIS first. And then you get back to that."
The other top candidate for secretary of state is John Bolton, a former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations and former undersecretary of state for arms control and international security under then-President George W. Bush. When asked Monday who was the better choice, Giuliani responded, "Maybe me, I don't know."
In strict terms, that may be true. Bolton was a chief supporter of the U.S. invasion of Iraq and last year called for the bombing of Iran. He also recently said Trump should "abrogate the Iran nuclear deal in his first days in office." As Gareth Porter wrote Tuesday, "[i]f Bolton were nominated as secretary of state, it would be an open invitation for more plotting of schemes within the Trump administration for the war against Iran that Bolton still craves."
To many observers, both choices are unappealing, even if one is arguably less bad than the other. As Jeremy Stahl writes at Slate, "belligerent rhetoric seems to be the theme of a potential Giuliani State Department, which I suppose is better than the alternative of Bolton and almost certain military action. (It's possible that Bolton was floated as a name for secretary of state to make Giuliani appear less horrifying. If that was the plan, it worked on me.)"
Still, Giuliani's rise to the top of the list brings more than enough worrying prospects.
As The Intercept reporter Liliana Segura wrote on Twitter, "Giuliani made a career as a cruel, vindictive, authoritarian and his ascent will be a horror show no matter the post."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.