

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
In a head-to-head contest, Hillary Clinton has maintained a comfortable lead over her likely presidential opponent Donald Trump. However, new polling out Tuesday shows that Clinton's advantage shrinks to just four points when pitted in a four-way match-up, such as is expected come November.
The new CNN/ORC survey (pdf) finds that when pitted against Trump, Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson, and Green Party candidate Jill Stein, Clinton claims 42 percent of the vote. Trump follows with 38 percent, while Johnson and Stein claim 9 and 7 percent, respectively.
When pitted solely against Trump, CNN/ORC finds that Clinton leads by 5 points—a slightly smaller margin than Monmouth University's 7-point advantage on Monday.
Only 22 percent of registered voters said they remain undecided about supporting a major-party candidate, and of that group, more than a third said they would opt for either Johnson or Stein if given the choice. As CNN notes, neither third-party candidate "is guaranteed a ballot slot in all states, but one or both will appear in several key competitive states, including Florida, Colorado, and Ohio."
Stein's campaign is hopeful they will get the longtime environmental activist on the ballot in 47 states.
The reluctance to back either Clinton or Trump echoes the consistently high "unfavorability" ratings that have plagued both major-party candidates.
In this latest survey, 56 percent of respondents said they had an unfavorable opinion of the former secretary of state, while only 41 percent viewed her favorably. The results for the billionaire real estate mogul are even worse: 60 percent of Americans hold an unfavorable opinion, compared with just 38 percent who see him in a more positive light.
CNN reports:
When asked whether they would be excited by a Trump or Clinton presidency, fewer than 3-in-10 muster that level of enthusiasm for either. More say they would be afraid (56% if Trump were elected, 46% Clinton) or embarrassed (56% if Trump won, 39% if Clinton did), and just a handful say they would be proud (35% say so about Clinton, 24% Trump). About half (47%) say they would be hopeful if Clinton won, while 44% say so if Trump were to win.
Neither presumptive nominee has wrapped up universal support within their own party. Among Republican and Republican-leaning voters, 51% say the party should nominate Trump, 48% would prefer someone else. On the Democratic side, 55% of Democrats and Democratic-leaners say they'd pick Clinton as their party's nominee, 43% say they would pick Democratic rival Bernie Sanders.[...]
Stein and Johnson hold particular appeal among those Democrats and Republicans who would rather see their party nominate someone other than the presumptive nominee, with Johnson holding 16% among those Republicans and Republican-leaners who would prefer to nominate someone other than Trump, and Stein at 18% among those Democrats and Democratic-leaners who favor Sanders.
CNN/ORC results are based on telephone interviews with 1,001 American adults between June 16-19, with a margin of error of plus or minus three percent.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In a head-to-head contest, Hillary Clinton has maintained a comfortable lead over her likely presidential opponent Donald Trump. However, new polling out Tuesday shows that Clinton's advantage shrinks to just four points when pitted in a four-way match-up, such as is expected come November.
The new CNN/ORC survey (pdf) finds that when pitted against Trump, Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson, and Green Party candidate Jill Stein, Clinton claims 42 percent of the vote. Trump follows with 38 percent, while Johnson and Stein claim 9 and 7 percent, respectively.
When pitted solely against Trump, CNN/ORC finds that Clinton leads by 5 points—a slightly smaller margin than Monmouth University's 7-point advantage on Monday.
Only 22 percent of registered voters said they remain undecided about supporting a major-party candidate, and of that group, more than a third said they would opt for either Johnson or Stein if given the choice. As CNN notes, neither third-party candidate "is guaranteed a ballot slot in all states, but one or both will appear in several key competitive states, including Florida, Colorado, and Ohio."
Stein's campaign is hopeful they will get the longtime environmental activist on the ballot in 47 states.
The reluctance to back either Clinton or Trump echoes the consistently high "unfavorability" ratings that have plagued both major-party candidates.
In this latest survey, 56 percent of respondents said they had an unfavorable opinion of the former secretary of state, while only 41 percent viewed her favorably. The results for the billionaire real estate mogul are even worse: 60 percent of Americans hold an unfavorable opinion, compared with just 38 percent who see him in a more positive light.
CNN reports:
When asked whether they would be excited by a Trump or Clinton presidency, fewer than 3-in-10 muster that level of enthusiasm for either. More say they would be afraid (56% if Trump were elected, 46% Clinton) or embarrassed (56% if Trump won, 39% if Clinton did), and just a handful say they would be proud (35% say so about Clinton, 24% Trump). About half (47%) say they would be hopeful if Clinton won, while 44% say so if Trump were to win.
Neither presumptive nominee has wrapped up universal support within their own party. Among Republican and Republican-leaning voters, 51% say the party should nominate Trump, 48% would prefer someone else. On the Democratic side, 55% of Democrats and Democratic-leaners say they'd pick Clinton as their party's nominee, 43% say they would pick Democratic rival Bernie Sanders.[...]
Stein and Johnson hold particular appeal among those Democrats and Republicans who would rather see their party nominate someone other than the presumptive nominee, with Johnson holding 16% among those Republicans and Republican-leaners who would prefer to nominate someone other than Trump, and Stein at 18% among those Democrats and Democratic-leaners who favor Sanders.
CNN/ORC results are based on telephone interviews with 1,001 American adults between June 16-19, with a margin of error of plus or minus three percent.
In a head-to-head contest, Hillary Clinton has maintained a comfortable lead over her likely presidential opponent Donald Trump. However, new polling out Tuesday shows that Clinton's advantage shrinks to just four points when pitted in a four-way match-up, such as is expected come November.
The new CNN/ORC survey (pdf) finds that when pitted against Trump, Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson, and Green Party candidate Jill Stein, Clinton claims 42 percent of the vote. Trump follows with 38 percent, while Johnson and Stein claim 9 and 7 percent, respectively.
When pitted solely against Trump, CNN/ORC finds that Clinton leads by 5 points—a slightly smaller margin than Monmouth University's 7-point advantage on Monday.
Only 22 percent of registered voters said they remain undecided about supporting a major-party candidate, and of that group, more than a third said they would opt for either Johnson or Stein if given the choice. As CNN notes, neither third-party candidate "is guaranteed a ballot slot in all states, but one or both will appear in several key competitive states, including Florida, Colorado, and Ohio."
Stein's campaign is hopeful they will get the longtime environmental activist on the ballot in 47 states.
The reluctance to back either Clinton or Trump echoes the consistently high "unfavorability" ratings that have plagued both major-party candidates.
In this latest survey, 56 percent of respondents said they had an unfavorable opinion of the former secretary of state, while only 41 percent viewed her favorably. The results for the billionaire real estate mogul are even worse: 60 percent of Americans hold an unfavorable opinion, compared with just 38 percent who see him in a more positive light.
CNN reports:
When asked whether they would be excited by a Trump or Clinton presidency, fewer than 3-in-10 muster that level of enthusiasm for either. More say they would be afraid (56% if Trump were elected, 46% Clinton) or embarrassed (56% if Trump won, 39% if Clinton did), and just a handful say they would be proud (35% say so about Clinton, 24% Trump). About half (47%) say they would be hopeful if Clinton won, while 44% say so if Trump were to win.
Neither presumptive nominee has wrapped up universal support within their own party. Among Republican and Republican-leaning voters, 51% say the party should nominate Trump, 48% would prefer someone else. On the Democratic side, 55% of Democrats and Democratic-leaners say they'd pick Clinton as their party's nominee, 43% say they would pick Democratic rival Bernie Sanders.[...]
Stein and Johnson hold particular appeal among those Democrats and Republicans who would rather see their party nominate someone other than the presumptive nominee, with Johnson holding 16% among those Republicans and Republican-leaners who would prefer to nominate someone other than Trump, and Stein at 18% among those Democrats and Democratic-leaners who favor Sanders.
CNN/ORC results are based on telephone interviews with 1,001 American adults between June 16-19, with a margin of error of plus or minus three percent.