

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
In a head-to-head contest, Hillary Clinton has maintained a comfortable lead over her likely presidential opponent Donald Trump. However, new polling out Tuesday shows that Clinton's advantage shrinks to just four points when pitted in a four-way match-up, such as is expected come November.
The new CNN/ORC survey (pdf) finds that when pitted against Trump, Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson, and Green Party candidate Jill Stein, Clinton claims 42 percent of the vote. Trump follows with 38 percent, while Johnson and Stein claim 9 and 7 percent, respectively.
When pitted solely against Trump, CNN/ORC finds that Clinton leads by 5 points—a slightly smaller margin than Monmouth University's 7-point advantage on Monday.
Only 22 percent of registered voters said they remain undecided about supporting a major-party candidate, and of that group, more than a third said they would opt for either Johnson or Stein if given the choice. As CNN notes, neither third-party candidate "is guaranteed a ballot slot in all states, but one or both will appear in several key competitive states, including Florida, Colorado, and Ohio."
Stein's campaign is hopeful they will get the longtime environmental activist on the ballot in 47 states.
The reluctance to back either Clinton or Trump echoes the consistently high "unfavorability" ratings that have plagued both major-party candidates.
In this latest survey, 56 percent of respondents said they had an unfavorable opinion of the former secretary of state, while only 41 percent viewed her favorably. The results for the billionaire real estate mogul are even worse: 60 percent of Americans hold an unfavorable opinion, compared with just 38 percent who see him in a more positive light.
CNN reports:
When asked whether they would be excited by a Trump or Clinton presidency, fewer than 3-in-10 muster that level of enthusiasm for either. More say they would be afraid (56% if Trump were elected, 46% Clinton) or embarrassed (56% if Trump won, 39% if Clinton did), and just a handful say they would be proud (35% say so about Clinton, 24% Trump). About half (47%) say they would be hopeful if Clinton won, while 44% say so if Trump were to win.
Neither presumptive nominee has wrapped up universal support within their own party. Among Republican and Republican-leaning voters, 51% say the party should nominate Trump, 48% would prefer someone else. On the Democratic side, 55% of Democrats and Democratic-leaners say they'd pick Clinton as their party's nominee, 43% say they would pick Democratic rival Bernie Sanders.[...]
Stein and Johnson hold particular appeal among those Democrats and Republicans who would rather see their party nominate someone other than the presumptive nominee, with Johnson holding 16% among those Republicans and Republican-leaners who would prefer to nominate someone other than Trump, and Stein at 18% among those Democrats and Democratic-leaners who favor Sanders.
CNN/ORC results are based on telephone interviews with 1,001 American adults between June 16-19, with a margin of error of plus or minus three percent.
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
In a head-to-head contest, Hillary Clinton has maintained a comfortable lead over her likely presidential opponent Donald Trump. However, new polling out Tuesday shows that Clinton's advantage shrinks to just four points when pitted in a four-way match-up, such as is expected come November.
The new CNN/ORC survey (pdf) finds that when pitted against Trump, Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson, and Green Party candidate Jill Stein, Clinton claims 42 percent of the vote. Trump follows with 38 percent, while Johnson and Stein claim 9 and 7 percent, respectively.
When pitted solely against Trump, CNN/ORC finds that Clinton leads by 5 points—a slightly smaller margin than Monmouth University's 7-point advantage on Monday.
Only 22 percent of registered voters said they remain undecided about supporting a major-party candidate, and of that group, more than a third said they would opt for either Johnson or Stein if given the choice. As CNN notes, neither third-party candidate "is guaranteed a ballot slot in all states, but one or both will appear in several key competitive states, including Florida, Colorado, and Ohio."
Stein's campaign is hopeful they will get the longtime environmental activist on the ballot in 47 states.
The reluctance to back either Clinton or Trump echoes the consistently high "unfavorability" ratings that have plagued both major-party candidates.
In this latest survey, 56 percent of respondents said they had an unfavorable opinion of the former secretary of state, while only 41 percent viewed her favorably. The results for the billionaire real estate mogul are even worse: 60 percent of Americans hold an unfavorable opinion, compared with just 38 percent who see him in a more positive light.
CNN reports:
When asked whether they would be excited by a Trump or Clinton presidency, fewer than 3-in-10 muster that level of enthusiasm for either. More say they would be afraid (56% if Trump were elected, 46% Clinton) or embarrassed (56% if Trump won, 39% if Clinton did), and just a handful say they would be proud (35% say so about Clinton, 24% Trump). About half (47%) say they would be hopeful if Clinton won, while 44% say so if Trump were to win.
Neither presumptive nominee has wrapped up universal support within their own party. Among Republican and Republican-leaning voters, 51% say the party should nominate Trump, 48% would prefer someone else. On the Democratic side, 55% of Democrats and Democratic-leaners say they'd pick Clinton as their party's nominee, 43% say they would pick Democratic rival Bernie Sanders.[...]
Stein and Johnson hold particular appeal among those Democrats and Republicans who would rather see their party nominate someone other than the presumptive nominee, with Johnson holding 16% among those Republicans and Republican-leaners who would prefer to nominate someone other than Trump, and Stein at 18% among those Democrats and Democratic-leaners who favor Sanders.
CNN/ORC results are based on telephone interviews with 1,001 American adults between June 16-19, with a margin of error of plus or minus three percent.
In a head-to-head contest, Hillary Clinton has maintained a comfortable lead over her likely presidential opponent Donald Trump. However, new polling out Tuesday shows that Clinton's advantage shrinks to just four points when pitted in a four-way match-up, such as is expected come November.
The new CNN/ORC survey (pdf) finds that when pitted against Trump, Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson, and Green Party candidate Jill Stein, Clinton claims 42 percent of the vote. Trump follows with 38 percent, while Johnson and Stein claim 9 and 7 percent, respectively.
When pitted solely against Trump, CNN/ORC finds that Clinton leads by 5 points—a slightly smaller margin than Monmouth University's 7-point advantage on Monday.
Only 22 percent of registered voters said they remain undecided about supporting a major-party candidate, and of that group, more than a third said they would opt for either Johnson or Stein if given the choice. As CNN notes, neither third-party candidate "is guaranteed a ballot slot in all states, but one or both will appear in several key competitive states, including Florida, Colorado, and Ohio."
Stein's campaign is hopeful they will get the longtime environmental activist on the ballot in 47 states.
The reluctance to back either Clinton or Trump echoes the consistently high "unfavorability" ratings that have plagued both major-party candidates.
In this latest survey, 56 percent of respondents said they had an unfavorable opinion of the former secretary of state, while only 41 percent viewed her favorably. The results for the billionaire real estate mogul are even worse: 60 percent of Americans hold an unfavorable opinion, compared with just 38 percent who see him in a more positive light.
CNN reports:
When asked whether they would be excited by a Trump or Clinton presidency, fewer than 3-in-10 muster that level of enthusiasm for either. More say they would be afraid (56% if Trump were elected, 46% Clinton) or embarrassed (56% if Trump won, 39% if Clinton did), and just a handful say they would be proud (35% say so about Clinton, 24% Trump). About half (47%) say they would be hopeful if Clinton won, while 44% say so if Trump were to win.
Neither presumptive nominee has wrapped up universal support within their own party. Among Republican and Republican-leaning voters, 51% say the party should nominate Trump, 48% would prefer someone else. On the Democratic side, 55% of Democrats and Democratic-leaners say they'd pick Clinton as their party's nominee, 43% say they would pick Democratic rival Bernie Sanders.[...]
Stein and Johnson hold particular appeal among those Democrats and Republicans who would rather see their party nominate someone other than the presumptive nominee, with Johnson holding 16% among those Republicans and Republican-leaners who would prefer to nominate someone other than Trump, and Stein at 18% among those Democrats and Democratic-leaners who favor Sanders.
CNN/ORC results are based on telephone interviews with 1,001 American adults between June 16-19, with a margin of error of plus or minus three percent.