SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Whistleblower Revelations Expose 'Lie' that Snowden Had a Choice
Author Mark Hertsgaard tells Democracy Now! that Edward Snowden 'had no choice' but to go public with leaks
May 23, 2016
Recent revelations that expose how the U.S. government retaliates against national security whistleblowers show why it was necessary for Edward Snowden to go public with his mass surveillance leaks, author Mark Hertsgaard said in an interview with Democracy Now! on Monday.
One day after high-ranking Department of Defense official John Crane exposed the Pentagon's legacy of retaliation against whistleblowers, Hertsgaard--author of the book Bravehearts: Whistle-Blowing in the Age of Snowden--told Democracy Now! host Amy Goodman, "you see that really Edward Snowden had no other choice but to go public."
Herstgaard said:
I think that's what's important about John Crane's story, is it puts the lie to what Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are saying and have been saying about Edward Snowden from the beginning. 'He broke the law, bring him home. He should face the music,' is what Hillary Clinton said. 'Face the music. He could have been a whistleblower,' Hillary Clinton added, 'and he would have gotten a very good reception, I think.' Well, I would just like to invite Secretary Clinton, tell that to Thomas Drake, tell that to John Crane, that you would have gotten a good reception by following the whistleblower law inside of the Pentagon.
Snowden reacted to Crane's revelations by calling for an overhaul of whistleblower protections, telling the Guardian on Monday, "We need iron-clad, enforceable protections for whistleblowers, and we need a public record of success stories. Protect the people who go to members of Congress with oversight roles, and if their efforts lead to a positive change in policy--recognize them for their efforts. There are no incentives for people to stand up against an agency on the wrong side of the law today, and that's got to change."
Watch Hertsgaard's interview below:
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Recent revelations that expose how the U.S. government retaliates against national security whistleblowers show why it was necessary for Edward Snowden to go public with his mass surveillance leaks, author Mark Hertsgaard said in an interview with Democracy Now! on Monday.
One day after high-ranking Department of Defense official John Crane exposed the Pentagon's legacy of retaliation against whistleblowers, Hertsgaard--author of the book Bravehearts: Whistle-Blowing in the Age of Snowden--told Democracy Now! host Amy Goodman, "you see that really Edward Snowden had no other choice but to go public."
Herstgaard said:
I think that's what's important about John Crane's story, is it puts the lie to what Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are saying and have been saying about Edward Snowden from the beginning. 'He broke the law, bring him home. He should face the music,' is what Hillary Clinton said. 'Face the music. He could have been a whistleblower,' Hillary Clinton added, 'and he would have gotten a very good reception, I think.' Well, I would just like to invite Secretary Clinton, tell that to Thomas Drake, tell that to John Crane, that you would have gotten a good reception by following the whistleblower law inside of the Pentagon.
Snowden reacted to Crane's revelations by calling for an overhaul of whistleblower protections, telling the Guardian on Monday, "We need iron-clad, enforceable protections for whistleblowers, and we need a public record of success stories. Protect the people who go to members of Congress with oversight roles, and if their efforts lead to a positive change in policy--recognize them for their efforts. There are no incentives for people to stand up against an agency on the wrong side of the law today, and that's got to change."
Watch Hertsgaard's interview below:
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Recent revelations that expose how the U.S. government retaliates against national security whistleblowers show why it was necessary for Edward Snowden to go public with his mass surveillance leaks, author Mark Hertsgaard said in an interview with Democracy Now! on Monday.
One day after high-ranking Department of Defense official John Crane exposed the Pentagon's legacy of retaliation against whistleblowers, Hertsgaard--author of the book Bravehearts: Whistle-Blowing in the Age of Snowden--told Democracy Now! host Amy Goodman, "you see that really Edward Snowden had no other choice but to go public."
Herstgaard said:
I think that's what's important about John Crane's story, is it puts the lie to what Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are saying and have been saying about Edward Snowden from the beginning. 'He broke the law, bring him home. He should face the music,' is what Hillary Clinton said. 'Face the music. He could have been a whistleblower,' Hillary Clinton added, 'and he would have gotten a very good reception, I think.' Well, I would just like to invite Secretary Clinton, tell that to Thomas Drake, tell that to John Crane, that you would have gotten a good reception by following the whistleblower law inside of the Pentagon.
Snowden reacted to Crane's revelations by calling for an overhaul of whistleblower protections, telling the Guardian on Monday, "We need iron-clad, enforceable protections for whistleblowers, and we need a public record of success stories. Protect the people who go to members of Congress with oversight roles, and if their efforts lead to a positive change in policy--recognize them for their efforts. There are no incentives for people to stand up against an agency on the wrong side of the law today, and that's got to change."
Watch Hertsgaard's interview below:
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.