SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Supreme Court Divided on Immigration Bill Challenged by 'Politics of Hate'
Case concerns two executive actions that would defer deportation for roughly 4 million undocumented immigrants
Apr 18, 2016
The U.S. Supreme Court reportedly appeared divided on a challenge to President Barack Obama's immigration executive actions as a 90-minute oral argument session wrapped up on Monday afternoon.
The case, brought by 26 Republican-led states and spearheaded by Texas Governor Greg Abbott, concerns two deportation protections that would shield roughly 5 million undocumented parents of American citizens and legal residents, as well as about 100,000 people brought to the U.S. as children.
Now, with only eight members sitting on the panel following the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in February, the court could end in a 4-4 deadlock--which would leave in place a previous ruling by a lower court that blocked the plan, without setting a Supreme Court precedent.
Immigration and workers' rights groups on Monday called on the court to uphold the programs, known as the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA).
"It is a monumental day for millions of immigrant families across the U.S.," said Jose P. Garza, executive director of the Texas-based Workers Defense Project/Proyecta Defensa Laboral, which held a rally on the courthouse steps in Washington, D.C. as justices heard arguments inside.
"Today, Workers Defense Project members and their families are in D.C. to send a message to our national leaders that we're tired of our families being torn apart, and that we're united and stronger than ever," Garza said. "Texas is ground zero for DAPA/DACA, and nearly 70 percent of Texans support comprehensive immigration reform. Should the Supreme Court side with immigrant families, millions of hardworking individuals will be able to live without fear of being torn from their family, come out of the shadows, and strengthen our economy."
Service Employees International Union (SEIU) president Mary Kay Henry added in a statement, "Millions of American families know that President Obama's DAPA and expanded DACA stand on the right side of justice. We have faith that justice will prevail over the politics of hate and the Supreme Court will rule in favor of these programs."
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan all voiced support for the administration's policy. Sotomayor noted that the government has limited resources to carry out deportations and said that the more than 4 million immigrants awaiting reprieve were "living in the shadows" and "are here whether we want them or not."
A decision is expected in June or July.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
barack obamadacadeportationsimmigrationobama administrationruth bader ginsburgservice employees international unionsonia sotomayortexasus supreme courtmass deportations
The U.S. Supreme Court reportedly appeared divided on a challenge to President Barack Obama's immigration executive actions as a 90-minute oral argument session wrapped up on Monday afternoon.
The case, brought by 26 Republican-led states and spearheaded by Texas Governor Greg Abbott, concerns two deportation protections that would shield roughly 5 million undocumented parents of American citizens and legal residents, as well as about 100,000 people brought to the U.S. as children.
Now, with only eight members sitting on the panel following the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in February, the court could end in a 4-4 deadlock--which would leave in place a previous ruling by a lower court that blocked the plan, without setting a Supreme Court precedent.
Immigration and workers' rights groups on Monday called on the court to uphold the programs, known as the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA).
"It is a monumental day for millions of immigrant families across the U.S.," said Jose P. Garza, executive director of the Texas-based Workers Defense Project/Proyecta Defensa Laboral, which held a rally on the courthouse steps in Washington, D.C. as justices heard arguments inside.
"Today, Workers Defense Project members and their families are in D.C. to send a message to our national leaders that we're tired of our families being torn apart, and that we're united and stronger than ever," Garza said. "Texas is ground zero for DAPA/DACA, and nearly 70 percent of Texans support comprehensive immigration reform. Should the Supreme Court side with immigrant families, millions of hardworking individuals will be able to live without fear of being torn from their family, come out of the shadows, and strengthen our economy."
Service Employees International Union (SEIU) president Mary Kay Henry added in a statement, "Millions of American families know that President Obama's DAPA and expanded DACA stand on the right side of justice. We have faith that justice will prevail over the politics of hate and the Supreme Court will rule in favor of these programs."
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan all voiced support for the administration's policy. Sotomayor noted that the government has limited resources to carry out deportations and said that the more than 4 million immigrants awaiting reprieve were "living in the shadows" and "are here whether we want them or not."
A decision is expected in June or July.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
The U.S. Supreme Court reportedly appeared divided on a challenge to President Barack Obama's immigration executive actions as a 90-minute oral argument session wrapped up on Monday afternoon.
The case, brought by 26 Republican-led states and spearheaded by Texas Governor Greg Abbott, concerns two deportation protections that would shield roughly 5 million undocumented parents of American citizens and legal residents, as well as about 100,000 people brought to the U.S. as children.
Now, with only eight members sitting on the panel following the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in February, the court could end in a 4-4 deadlock--which would leave in place a previous ruling by a lower court that blocked the plan, without setting a Supreme Court precedent.
Immigration and workers' rights groups on Monday called on the court to uphold the programs, known as the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA).
"It is a monumental day for millions of immigrant families across the U.S.," said Jose P. Garza, executive director of the Texas-based Workers Defense Project/Proyecta Defensa Laboral, which held a rally on the courthouse steps in Washington, D.C. as justices heard arguments inside.
"Today, Workers Defense Project members and their families are in D.C. to send a message to our national leaders that we're tired of our families being torn apart, and that we're united and stronger than ever," Garza said. "Texas is ground zero for DAPA/DACA, and nearly 70 percent of Texans support comprehensive immigration reform. Should the Supreme Court side with immigrant families, millions of hardworking individuals will be able to live without fear of being torn from their family, come out of the shadows, and strengthen our economy."
Service Employees International Union (SEIU) president Mary Kay Henry added in a statement, "Millions of American families know that President Obama's DAPA and expanded DACA stand on the right side of justice. We have faith that justice will prevail over the politics of hate and the Supreme Court will rule in favor of these programs."
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan all voiced support for the administration's policy. Sotomayor noted that the government has limited resources to carry out deportations and said that the more than 4 million immigrants awaiting reprieve were "living in the shadows" and "are here whether we want them or not."
A decision is expected in June or July.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.