SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
More 'Boots on the Ground' as Obama Again Bolsters Endless Iraq War
Department of Defense announces "boots on the ground" deployment, says U.S. troops are needed to fight ISIS
Apr 18, 2016
Signaling further escalation of U.S. military force in Iraq, U.S. Secretary of Defense Ash Carter announced Monday that 217 additional troops would be deployed to Iraq and that the U.S. will also be supplying Apache helicopters and millions in aid to Kurdish Peshmerga forces in an effort to fight ISIS.
"The 217 additional forces will be a mixture of advisers, and troops providing protection for other forces, aviation support and fire support," reports the Hill, citing Pentagon sources. "They will increase the authorized troop level in Iraq from 3,870 to 4,087."
During the announcement, no mention was made of President Obama's repeated vows that the U.S. would never have "boots on the ground" in a combat operation in Iraq again.
The news is unsurprising to many, particularly those critics who have noted the steady mission creep of U.S. forces in Iraq in the four and half years since the Iraq War was declared officially over in December 2011.
But the announcement marks a milestone: it is the first time that officials have not attempted to argue that an escalation of force in Iraq does not break President Obama's insistent promises that ground troops would not be deployed for a combat operation in Iraq. President Obama defended his actions with this claim when he was criticized for starting the current escalation of U.S. military force in Iraq with a deployment of special forces in 2014.
Indeed, when U.S. stepped up its troop presence in Iraq last month, government officials attempted to excuse the increase by making the somewhat convoluted argument that the deployed U.S. marines were being used only for "security," and thus didn't count as "boots on the ground."
During Monday's announcement, however, officials did not attempt to make a similar defense of the escalation of force.
In fact, officials claimed the troops were needed on the front lines--on the ground, in a combat capacity--in order to help Iraqi and Kurdish forces defeat ISIS, with an eye toward retaking Mosul from the so-called Islamic State.
"Until now, U.S. advisers have worked with the Iraqis at the headquarters level, well back from the front lines," the AP notes.
The announcement directly contradicts Secretary of State John Kerry's statements made a mere ten days ago, when he told reporters that "whatever troops we have in Iraq, whatever troops are committed to this effort, are at the request of the government of Iraq. And at this point in time, I'm not aware that there's some additional request," as the Hill reported.
The latest deployment also violates promises the U.S. made to the government of Iraq regarding its military presence in the country.
"The U.S. deal with Iraq capped the number of U.S. ground troops in the nation at 3,870 troops," writes Jason Ditz at Antiwar.com, "though the Pentagon has repeatedly conceded that the number of troops in the country at any given time is closer to 5,000, with the rest classified as 'temporary' and not subject to the cap."
"Even though the Iraqi government has mostly looked the other way at the US skirting their deal, large new deployments would virtually oblige Abadi to say something," Ditz argues, "as the premier is already facing pressure from parliament for allowing so many ground troops in."
Critics took to social media to condemn the continued escalation of U.S. forces in Iraq:
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Signaling further escalation of U.S. military force in Iraq, U.S. Secretary of Defense Ash Carter announced Monday that 217 additional troops would be deployed to Iraq and that the U.S. will also be supplying Apache helicopters and millions in aid to Kurdish Peshmerga forces in an effort to fight ISIS.
"The 217 additional forces will be a mixture of advisers, and troops providing protection for other forces, aviation support and fire support," reports the Hill, citing Pentagon sources. "They will increase the authorized troop level in Iraq from 3,870 to 4,087."
During the announcement, no mention was made of President Obama's repeated vows that the U.S. would never have "boots on the ground" in a combat operation in Iraq again.
The news is unsurprising to many, particularly those critics who have noted the steady mission creep of U.S. forces in Iraq in the four and half years since the Iraq War was declared officially over in December 2011.
But the announcement marks a milestone: it is the first time that officials have not attempted to argue that an escalation of force in Iraq does not break President Obama's insistent promises that ground troops would not be deployed for a combat operation in Iraq. President Obama defended his actions with this claim when he was criticized for starting the current escalation of U.S. military force in Iraq with a deployment of special forces in 2014.
Indeed, when U.S. stepped up its troop presence in Iraq last month, government officials attempted to excuse the increase by making the somewhat convoluted argument that the deployed U.S. marines were being used only for "security," and thus didn't count as "boots on the ground."
During Monday's announcement, however, officials did not attempt to make a similar defense of the escalation of force.
In fact, officials claimed the troops were needed on the front lines--on the ground, in a combat capacity--in order to help Iraqi and Kurdish forces defeat ISIS, with an eye toward retaking Mosul from the so-called Islamic State.
"Until now, U.S. advisers have worked with the Iraqis at the headquarters level, well back from the front lines," the AP notes.
The announcement directly contradicts Secretary of State John Kerry's statements made a mere ten days ago, when he told reporters that "whatever troops we have in Iraq, whatever troops are committed to this effort, are at the request of the government of Iraq. And at this point in time, I'm not aware that there's some additional request," as the Hill reported.
The latest deployment also violates promises the U.S. made to the government of Iraq regarding its military presence in the country.
"The U.S. deal with Iraq capped the number of U.S. ground troops in the nation at 3,870 troops," writes Jason Ditz at Antiwar.com, "though the Pentagon has repeatedly conceded that the number of troops in the country at any given time is closer to 5,000, with the rest classified as 'temporary' and not subject to the cap."
"Even though the Iraqi government has mostly looked the other way at the US skirting their deal, large new deployments would virtually oblige Abadi to say something," Ditz argues, "as the premier is already facing pressure from parliament for allowing so many ground troops in."
Critics took to social media to condemn the continued escalation of U.S. forces in Iraq:
Signaling further escalation of U.S. military force in Iraq, U.S. Secretary of Defense Ash Carter announced Monday that 217 additional troops would be deployed to Iraq and that the U.S. will also be supplying Apache helicopters and millions in aid to Kurdish Peshmerga forces in an effort to fight ISIS.
"The 217 additional forces will be a mixture of advisers, and troops providing protection for other forces, aviation support and fire support," reports the Hill, citing Pentagon sources. "They will increase the authorized troop level in Iraq from 3,870 to 4,087."
During the announcement, no mention was made of President Obama's repeated vows that the U.S. would never have "boots on the ground" in a combat operation in Iraq again.
The news is unsurprising to many, particularly those critics who have noted the steady mission creep of U.S. forces in Iraq in the four and half years since the Iraq War was declared officially over in December 2011.
But the announcement marks a milestone: it is the first time that officials have not attempted to argue that an escalation of force in Iraq does not break President Obama's insistent promises that ground troops would not be deployed for a combat operation in Iraq. President Obama defended his actions with this claim when he was criticized for starting the current escalation of U.S. military force in Iraq with a deployment of special forces in 2014.
Indeed, when U.S. stepped up its troop presence in Iraq last month, government officials attempted to excuse the increase by making the somewhat convoluted argument that the deployed U.S. marines were being used only for "security," and thus didn't count as "boots on the ground."
During Monday's announcement, however, officials did not attempt to make a similar defense of the escalation of force.
In fact, officials claimed the troops were needed on the front lines--on the ground, in a combat capacity--in order to help Iraqi and Kurdish forces defeat ISIS, with an eye toward retaking Mosul from the so-called Islamic State.
"Until now, U.S. advisers have worked with the Iraqis at the headquarters level, well back from the front lines," the AP notes.
The announcement directly contradicts Secretary of State John Kerry's statements made a mere ten days ago, when he told reporters that "whatever troops we have in Iraq, whatever troops are committed to this effort, are at the request of the government of Iraq. And at this point in time, I'm not aware that there's some additional request," as the Hill reported.
The latest deployment also violates promises the U.S. made to the government of Iraq regarding its military presence in the country.
"The U.S. deal with Iraq capped the number of U.S. ground troops in the nation at 3,870 troops," writes Jason Ditz at Antiwar.com, "though the Pentagon has repeatedly conceded that the number of troops in the country at any given time is closer to 5,000, with the rest classified as 'temporary' and not subject to the cap."
"Even though the Iraqi government has mostly looked the other way at the US skirting their deal, large new deployments would virtually oblige Abadi to say something," Ditz argues, "as the premier is already facing pressure from parliament for allowing so many ground troops in."
Critics took to social media to condemn the continued escalation of U.S. forces in Iraq:
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.