"Wolf in Sheep's Clothing": Rights Groups Sue Indiana Over Abortion Law
ACLU and Planned Parenthood say new law, which bans abortions in cases of fetal abnormalities, is unconstitutional and demeaning
The ACLU and Planned Parenthood have filed a lawsuit against Indiana over its restrictive new abortion law, signed in March by Governor Mike Pence, which bans abortions in cases of fetal abnormalities and imposes a litany of other restrictions and requirements.
The lawsuit (pdf), filed Thursday in U.S. district court by ACLU Indiana and the Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky (PPINK), states that the legislation is unconstitutional and seeks an injunction to block its enforcement. The law is set to go into effect on July 1.
"The United States has repeatedly stressed that a woman, not the state, is to determine whether or not to obtain an abortion," ACLU-IN legal director Ken Falk said. "The state of Indiana's attempt to invade a woman's privacy and to control her decision in this regard is unprecedented and unconstitutional."
Indiana House Enrolled Act 1337 prohibits abortions in the early stages of pregnancy based on fetal abnormalities and also mandates the burial or cremation of aborted or miscarried remains; restricts fetal tissue donation; and requires abortion providers to have admitting privileges at hospitals.
It also requires doctors to report if a fetal abnormality was present before an abortion--which would undermine a Planned Parenthood principle not to ask patients why they are seeking the procedure--and to inform patients of the ban as part of Indiana's state-mandated "informed consent" process, which the ACLU said violates the First Amendment.
Reproductive health advocates previously called the legislation "one of the worst anti-abortion bills in the country."
Jane Henegar, ACLU-IN executive director, said Thursday that the new restrictions "demean women and threaten the quality of their health care."
Betty Cockrum, CEO and president of PPINK, added, "This law is clearly another attempt by the governor to end access to safe, legal abortions by imposing more unnecessary and unconstitutional restrictions on women, our health care centers, and our staff."
The National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum also released a statement in support of the lawsuit that read, "This law is cloaked in the language of civil rights and equality for women, but it is a wolf in sheep's clothing. Rather than lifting the status of women, this law is nothing more than a cynical, deceptive attempt to ban abortions."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The ACLU and Planned Parenthood have filed a lawsuit against Indiana over its restrictive new abortion law, signed in March by Governor Mike Pence, which bans abortions in cases of fetal abnormalities and imposes a litany of other restrictions and requirements.
The lawsuit (pdf), filed Thursday in U.S. district court by ACLU Indiana and the Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky (PPINK), states that the legislation is unconstitutional and seeks an injunction to block its enforcement. The law is set to go into effect on July 1.
"The United States has repeatedly stressed that a woman, not the state, is to determine whether or not to obtain an abortion," ACLU-IN legal director Ken Falk said. "The state of Indiana's attempt to invade a woman's privacy and to control her decision in this regard is unprecedented and unconstitutional."
Indiana House Enrolled Act 1337 prohibits abortions in the early stages of pregnancy based on fetal abnormalities and also mandates the burial or cremation of aborted or miscarried remains; restricts fetal tissue donation; and requires abortion providers to have admitting privileges at hospitals.
It also requires doctors to report if a fetal abnormality was present before an abortion--which would undermine a Planned Parenthood principle not to ask patients why they are seeking the procedure--and to inform patients of the ban as part of Indiana's state-mandated "informed consent" process, which the ACLU said violates the First Amendment.
Reproductive health advocates previously called the legislation "one of the worst anti-abortion bills in the country."
Jane Henegar, ACLU-IN executive director, said Thursday that the new restrictions "demean women and threaten the quality of their health care."
Betty Cockrum, CEO and president of PPINK, added, "This law is clearly another attempt by the governor to end access to safe, legal abortions by imposing more unnecessary and unconstitutional restrictions on women, our health care centers, and our staff."
The National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum also released a statement in support of the lawsuit that read, "This law is cloaked in the language of civil rights and equality for women, but it is a wolf in sheep's clothing. Rather than lifting the status of women, this law is nothing more than a cynical, deceptive attempt to ban abortions."
The ACLU and Planned Parenthood have filed a lawsuit against Indiana over its restrictive new abortion law, signed in March by Governor Mike Pence, which bans abortions in cases of fetal abnormalities and imposes a litany of other restrictions and requirements.
The lawsuit (pdf), filed Thursday in U.S. district court by ACLU Indiana and the Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky (PPINK), states that the legislation is unconstitutional and seeks an injunction to block its enforcement. The law is set to go into effect on July 1.
"The United States has repeatedly stressed that a woman, not the state, is to determine whether or not to obtain an abortion," ACLU-IN legal director Ken Falk said. "The state of Indiana's attempt to invade a woman's privacy and to control her decision in this regard is unprecedented and unconstitutional."
Indiana House Enrolled Act 1337 prohibits abortions in the early stages of pregnancy based on fetal abnormalities and also mandates the burial or cremation of aborted or miscarried remains; restricts fetal tissue donation; and requires abortion providers to have admitting privileges at hospitals.
It also requires doctors to report if a fetal abnormality was present before an abortion--which would undermine a Planned Parenthood principle not to ask patients why they are seeking the procedure--and to inform patients of the ban as part of Indiana's state-mandated "informed consent" process, which the ACLU said violates the First Amendment.
Reproductive health advocates previously called the legislation "one of the worst anti-abortion bills in the country."
Jane Henegar, ACLU-IN executive director, said Thursday that the new restrictions "demean women and threaten the quality of their health care."
Betty Cockrum, CEO and president of PPINK, added, "This law is clearly another attempt by the governor to end access to safe, legal abortions by imposing more unnecessary and unconstitutional restrictions on women, our health care centers, and our staff."
The National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum also released a statement in support of the lawsuit that read, "This law is cloaked in the language of civil rights and equality for women, but it is a wolf in sheep's clothing. Rather than lifting the status of women, this law is nothing more than a cynical, deceptive attempt to ban abortions."