

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
In the wake of the Paris climate talks, environmental groups on Thursday called for a "People's Injunction" against corporate proposals for major pipelines across Canada, charging that the resultant boom in tar sands extraction would be incompatible with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's stated commitment to keeping global warming under 1.5 degrees Celsius.
TransCanada announced on Thursday that it "has filed an amendment to its existing application with the National Energy Board" to build the Energy East pipeline that would stretch from eastern to western Canada. The company claims that the proposed changes, at a cost hike of 30 percent, include "route and scope changes that come in direct response to efforts to avoid sensitive environmental areas."
But a coalition of green groups, including Council of Canadians and Ecology Ottawa, declared Thursday that the pipeline must not be built at all.
"Estimates show the upstream production emissions of the pipeline, in Alberta alone, would be as high as 32 million metric tons of [carbon dioxide equivalent] a year, or 7 million new vehicles, while total life-cycle emissions are estimated at a staggering 220 million metric tons per year--more than what's allowable under the new climate pledge," the organizations warned in a joint statement.
"If Canada wants to be taken seriously on the world's stage, then the first step is keeping their climate promises here at home."
--Aurore Fauret, 350.org
"The climate math for building Energy East doesn't add up," said Andrea Harden-Donahue of the Council of Canadians. "Trudeau's Liberal government has agreed with world leaders in Paris to limit warming to 1.5deg Celsius, a target that will require a rapid transition to a fossil free future, definitely not a new massive tar sands pipeline. The action on the ground starts now."
Indigenous communities along the proposed route of Energy East have staged numerous protests and acts of civil disobedience against the pipeline, which would cut through their land and endanger their waterways and public health. "Our Anishinaabe laws and values tell us everything we need to know about Energy East; that is why we say no," Chief Fawn Wapioke of Iskatewizaagegan, Shoal Lake 39 First Nation, declared this summer at an Indigenous march along the proposed route.
Meanwhile, the U.S.-based corporation Kinder Morgan this week filed a written argument to Canadian regulators seeking permission to build the Trans-Mountain Pipeline to ship crude oil from Alberta to British Columbia.
"Whether it's TransCanada's Energy East filing, or Kinder Morgan's pushing for the Trans-Mountain pipeline at the National Energy Board in Calgary... we know that neither project can be built if this government is going to have a shot at keeping temperature rise below 1.5 degrees Celsius," said Aurore Fauret of climate group 350.org in a statement released on Thursday.
"That's why today we're launching the 'People's Injunction' to stop Prime Minister Trudeau and his government from breaking their first big climate promise and allowing these two pipelines to proceed at the National Energy Board without considering their climate impacts and without listening to community voices--especially First Nations," Fauret continued. "If Canada wants to be taken seriously on the world's stage, then the first step is keeping their climate promises here at home."
Just last month, a coalition of climate groups called on Trudeau to immediately halt and address the country's "costly, broken" pipeline review process--a promise he made on the campaign trail.
In a public pledge, organizers warned that if Trudeau doesn't "honor his word by January 15th, then we, the people, will take action to enforce this 'People's Injunction.'"
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In the wake of the Paris climate talks, environmental groups on Thursday called for a "People's Injunction" against corporate proposals for major pipelines across Canada, charging that the resultant boom in tar sands extraction would be incompatible with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's stated commitment to keeping global warming under 1.5 degrees Celsius.
TransCanada announced on Thursday that it "has filed an amendment to its existing application with the National Energy Board" to build the Energy East pipeline that would stretch from eastern to western Canada. The company claims that the proposed changes, at a cost hike of 30 percent, include "route and scope changes that come in direct response to efforts to avoid sensitive environmental areas."
But a coalition of green groups, including Council of Canadians and Ecology Ottawa, declared Thursday that the pipeline must not be built at all.
"Estimates show the upstream production emissions of the pipeline, in Alberta alone, would be as high as 32 million metric tons of [carbon dioxide equivalent] a year, or 7 million new vehicles, while total life-cycle emissions are estimated at a staggering 220 million metric tons per year--more than what's allowable under the new climate pledge," the organizations warned in a joint statement.
"If Canada wants to be taken seriously on the world's stage, then the first step is keeping their climate promises here at home."
--Aurore Fauret, 350.org
"The climate math for building Energy East doesn't add up," said Andrea Harden-Donahue of the Council of Canadians. "Trudeau's Liberal government has agreed with world leaders in Paris to limit warming to 1.5deg Celsius, a target that will require a rapid transition to a fossil free future, definitely not a new massive tar sands pipeline. The action on the ground starts now."
Indigenous communities along the proposed route of Energy East have staged numerous protests and acts of civil disobedience against the pipeline, which would cut through their land and endanger their waterways and public health. "Our Anishinaabe laws and values tell us everything we need to know about Energy East; that is why we say no," Chief Fawn Wapioke of Iskatewizaagegan, Shoal Lake 39 First Nation, declared this summer at an Indigenous march along the proposed route.
Meanwhile, the U.S.-based corporation Kinder Morgan this week filed a written argument to Canadian regulators seeking permission to build the Trans-Mountain Pipeline to ship crude oil from Alberta to British Columbia.
"Whether it's TransCanada's Energy East filing, or Kinder Morgan's pushing for the Trans-Mountain pipeline at the National Energy Board in Calgary... we know that neither project can be built if this government is going to have a shot at keeping temperature rise below 1.5 degrees Celsius," said Aurore Fauret of climate group 350.org in a statement released on Thursday.
"That's why today we're launching the 'People's Injunction' to stop Prime Minister Trudeau and his government from breaking their first big climate promise and allowing these two pipelines to proceed at the National Energy Board without considering their climate impacts and without listening to community voices--especially First Nations," Fauret continued. "If Canada wants to be taken seriously on the world's stage, then the first step is keeping their climate promises here at home."
Just last month, a coalition of climate groups called on Trudeau to immediately halt and address the country's "costly, broken" pipeline review process--a promise he made on the campaign trail.
In a public pledge, organizers warned that if Trudeau doesn't "honor his word by January 15th, then we, the people, will take action to enforce this 'People's Injunction.'"
In the wake of the Paris climate talks, environmental groups on Thursday called for a "People's Injunction" against corporate proposals for major pipelines across Canada, charging that the resultant boom in tar sands extraction would be incompatible with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's stated commitment to keeping global warming under 1.5 degrees Celsius.
TransCanada announced on Thursday that it "has filed an amendment to its existing application with the National Energy Board" to build the Energy East pipeline that would stretch from eastern to western Canada. The company claims that the proposed changes, at a cost hike of 30 percent, include "route and scope changes that come in direct response to efforts to avoid sensitive environmental areas."
But a coalition of green groups, including Council of Canadians and Ecology Ottawa, declared Thursday that the pipeline must not be built at all.
"Estimates show the upstream production emissions of the pipeline, in Alberta alone, would be as high as 32 million metric tons of [carbon dioxide equivalent] a year, or 7 million new vehicles, while total life-cycle emissions are estimated at a staggering 220 million metric tons per year--more than what's allowable under the new climate pledge," the organizations warned in a joint statement.
"If Canada wants to be taken seriously on the world's stage, then the first step is keeping their climate promises here at home."
--Aurore Fauret, 350.org
"The climate math for building Energy East doesn't add up," said Andrea Harden-Donahue of the Council of Canadians. "Trudeau's Liberal government has agreed with world leaders in Paris to limit warming to 1.5deg Celsius, a target that will require a rapid transition to a fossil free future, definitely not a new massive tar sands pipeline. The action on the ground starts now."
Indigenous communities along the proposed route of Energy East have staged numerous protests and acts of civil disobedience against the pipeline, which would cut through their land and endanger their waterways and public health. "Our Anishinaabe laws and values tell us everything we need to know about Energy East; that is why we say no," Chief Fawn Wapioke of Iskatewizaagegan, Shoal Lake 39 First Nation, declared this summer at an Indigenous march along the proposed route.
Meanwhile, the U.S.-based corporation Kinder Morgan this week filed a written argument to Canadian regulators seeking permission to build the Trans-Mountain Pipeline to ship crude oil from Alberta to British Columbia.
"Whether it's TransCanada's Energy East filing, or Kinder Morgan's pushing for the Trans-Mountain pipeline at the National Energy Board in Calgary... we know that neither project can be built if this government is going to have a shot at keeping temperature rise below 1.5 degrees Celsius," said Aurore Fauret of climate group 350.org in a statement released on Thursday.
"That's why today we're launching the 'People's Injunction' to stop Prime Minister Trudeau and his government from breaking their first big climate promise and allowing these two pipelines to proceed at the National Energy Board without considering their climate impacts and without listening to community voices--especially First Nations," Fauret continued. "If Canada wants to be taken seriously on the world's stage, then the first step is keeping their climate promises here at home."
Just last month, a coalition of climate groups called on Trudeau to immediately halt and address the country's "costly, broken" pipeline review process--a promise he made on the campaign trail.
In a public pledge, organizers warned that if Trudeau doesn't "honor his word by January 15th, then we, the people, will take action to enforce this 'People's Injunction.'"