SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Flipping on TPP, Hillary Clinton Proves Chameleon-Like on Corporate Trade
"It's becoming increasingly hard for any presidential candidate who expects to be elected to stay aboard this sinking ship."
Oct 07, 2015
Indicating that support for the pro-corporate TransPacific Partnership (TPP) may already be a political third rail in the lead-up to the 2016 election, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton on Wednesday broke with the Obama White House, flipping her position to join Sen. Bernie Sanders and other progressives in saying she does not support the 12-nation "trade" deal.
"As of today, I am not in favor of what I have learned about it," Clinton told PBS News' Judy Woodruff. "I don't believe it's going to meet the high bar I have set. I've been trying to learn as much as I can about the agreement, but I'm worried."
Clinton had previously hedged on the TPP, a deal that she backed as Secretary of State and championed in her book, Hard Choices. Her main rival for the Democratic nomination, Sen. Sanders (I-Vt.)--who has made opposition to the deal a centerpiece of his campaign and worked against its advancement in the Senate--said in June he was "offended by Mrs. Clinton's silence on trade and urged her to share her real views with voters."
Since then, the progressive outcry against the TPP and other corporate-friendly trade deals has only grown louder.
"It's becoming increasingly hard for any presidential candidate who expects to be elected to stay aboard this sinking ship," Evan Greer, campaign director for the advocacy group Fight for the Future, said in a statement responding to Clinton's Wednesday announcement.
What's more, Clinton's statements could serve as "political cover to wavering Congressional Democrats who want to help President Obama but are also feeling grassroots pressure from labor unions and other liberal groups," Timothy B. Lee wrote at Vox.
Whether Clinton's newly minted opposition will stick is another story.
Unlike Sanders' long-standing and consistent opposition to so-called "free trade" deals, NBC political correspondent Mark Murray says Clinton's reverse-course on TPP may not only be a "smart move" for the frontrunner, but also fits a pattern from establishment Democrats.
"In the 2008 Democratic primaries," Murray writes, "both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton railed against NAFTA and free trade accords. But after winning the Democratic nomination, Obama warmed up to free trade--and he's now made this TPP trade accord a chief goal in his final months in the White House."
Accordingly, he continued, "it wouldn't be surprising if Clinton makes a similar move back to the middle if she wins the nomination next year."
Despite what was viewed as cynical political expediency by some, some TPP opponents welcomed Clinton's announcement regardless of her motivations.
"Dear naysayers," tweeted Fight for the Future, "the importance of Clinton coming out against #TPP has nothing to do with whether you like her: it's good news for stopping #TPP."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Indicating that support for the pro-corporate TransPacific Partnership (TPP) may already be a political third rail in the lead-up to the 2016 election, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton on Wednesday broke with the Obama White House, flipping her position to join Sen. Bernie Sanders and other progressives in saying she does not support the 12-nation "trade" deal.
"As of today, I am not in favor of what I have learned about it," Clinton told PBS News' Judy Woodruff. "I don't believe it's going to meet the high bar I have set. I've been trying to learn as much as I can about the agreement, but I'm worried."
Clinton had previously hedged on the TPP, a deal that she backed as Secretary of State and championed in her book, Hard Choices. Her main rival for the Democratic nomination, Sen. Sanders (I-Vt.)--who has made opposition to the deal a centerpiece of his campaign and worked against its advancement in the Senate--said in June he was "offended by Mrs. Clinton's silence on trade and urged her to share her real views with voters."
Since then, the progressive outcry against the TPP and other corporate-friendly trade deals has only grown louder.
"It's becoming increasingly hard for any presidential candidate who expects to be elected to stay aboard this sinking ship," Evan Greer, campaign director for the advocacy group Fight for the Future, said in a statement responding to Clinton's Wednesday announcement.
What's more, Clinton's statements could serve as "political cover to wavering Congressional Democrats who want to help President Obama but are also feeling grassroots pressure from labor unions and other liberal groups," Timothy B. Lee wrote at Vox.
Whether Clinton's newly minted opposition will stick is another story.
Unlike Sanders' long-standing and consistent opposition to so-called "free trade" deals, NBC political correspondent Mark Murray says Clinton's reverse-course on TPP may not only be a "smart move" for the frontrunner, but also fits a pattern from establishment Democrats.
"In the 2008 Democratic primaries," Murray writes, "both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton railed against NAFTA and free trade accords. But after winning the Democratic nomination, Obama warmed up to free trade--and he's now made this TPP trade accord a chief goal in his final months in the White House."
Accordingly, he continued, "it wouldn't be surprising if Clinton makes a similar move back to the middle if she wins the nomination next year."
Despite what was viewed as cynical political expediency by some, some TPP opponents welcomed Clinton's announcement regardless of her motivations.
"Dear naysayers," tweeted Fight for the Future, "the importance of Clinton coming out against #TPP has nothing to do with whether you like her: it's good news for stopping #TPP."
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Indicating that support for the pro-corporate TransPacific Partnership (TPP) may already be a political third rail in the lead-up to the 2016 election, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton on Wednesday broke with the Obama White House, flipping her position to join Sen. Bernie Sanders and other progressives in saying she does not support the 12-nation "trade" deal.
"As of today, I am not in favor of what I have learned about it," Clinton told PBS News' Judy Woodruff. "I don't believe it's going to meet the high bar I have set. I've been trying to learn as much as I can about the agreement, but I'm worried."
Clinton had previously hedged on the TPP, a deal that she backed as Secretary of State and championed in her book, Hard Choices. Her main rival for the Democratic nomination, Sen. Sanders (I-Vt.)--who has made opposition to the deal a centerpiece of his campaign and worked against its advancement in the Senate--said in June he was "offended by Mrs. Clinton's silence on trade and urged her to share her real views with voters."
Since then, the progressive outcry against the TPP and other corporate-friendly trade deals has only grown louder.
"It's becoming increasingly hard for any presidential candidate who expects to be elected to stay aboard this sinking ship," Evan Greer, campaign director for the advocacy group Fight for the Future, said in a statement responding to Clinton's Wednesday announcement.
What's more, Clinton's statements could serve as "political cover to wavering Congressional Democrats who want to help President Obama but are also feeling grassroots pressure from labor unions and other liberal groups," Timothy B. Lee wrote at Vox.
Whether Clinton's newly minted opposition will stick is another story.
Unlike Sanders' long-standing and consistent opposition to so-called "free trade" deals, NBC political correspondent Mark Murray says Clinton's reverse-course on TPP may not only be a "smart move" for the frontrunner, but also fits a pattern from establishment Democrats.
"In the 2008 Democratic primaries," Murray writes, "both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton railed against NAFTA and free trade accords. But after winning the Democratic nomination, Obama warmed up to free trade--and he's now made this TPP trade accord a chief goal in his final months in the White House."
Accordingly, he continued, "it wouldn't be surprising if Clinton makes a similar move back to the middle if she wins the nomination next year."
Despite what was viewed as cynical political expediency by some, some TPP opponents welcomed Clinton's announcement regardless of her motivations.
"Dear naysayers," tweeted Fight for the Future, "the importance of Clinton coming out against #TPP has nothing to do with whether you like her: it's good news for stopping #TPP."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.