SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
'Failed' EU Refugee Summit Results in Aid Pledge -- and Little Else
'What was needed was a bold, ambitious new approach. But what we got was the continuation of a failed strategy.'
Sep 24, 2015
As the continent faces what one humanitarian organization has dubbed "a social, economic, and political crisis of immense proportions," European heads of government agreed Thursday to pledge at least EUR1.1 billion to help refugees, but failed to come up with a comprehensive strategy to stem a growing disaster.
The Guardian reports: "The emergency Brussels summit decided little but to throw money at aid agencies and transit countries hosting millions of Syrian refugees and to step up the identification and finger-printing of refugees in Italy and Greece by November."
In a parallel decision earlier in the week, European governments forced through a deal to impose refugee quotas, sharing 120,000 people between them in a controversial decision that several states bitterly opposed.
"Seldom had EU leaders met so divided," wrote Guardian journalist Ian Traynor. "And seldom have the stakes been higher in the need to forge common positions to cope with the crisis and to limit the damage from months of blame games. The main aim was to cool tempers and try to strike a consensus on what to do. The results were inconclusive and the same issues will dominate yet another summit in three weeks."
Of this week's outcomes, the UN refugee agency offered a measured response, hailing the aid pledge while saying it was "disappointed that, notwithstanding relocation, no further measures have been proposed to create more legal pathways for refugees to reach safety in Europe." This would include enhanced resettlement and humanitarian admission, family reunification, private sponsorship, and humanitarian and student visas.
"It is an important step toward stabilizing the crisis," said UN High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres on Thursday, "but much more needs to be done."
"What was needed was a bold, ambitious new approach," added John Dalhuisen, Amnesty International's Europe director. "But what we got was the continuation of a failed strategy."
Dalhuisen continued:
The proposed EUR1 billion for refugee hosting countries is positive but beyond this, the commitments disappoint. EU leaders should have been agreeing on how to ensure safe and legal routes for refugees into Europe and fixing Europe's failing asylum system.
Instead, the focus of the proposals on keeping refugees out ignores the realities of a global refugee crisis and states' obligations to provide protection to those unable to find it elsewhere.
The relocation figures agreed on Tuesday won't significantly relieve the pressure on frontline states and without much more concrete and immediate assistance to these countries, the chaotic and tragic scenes we have witnessed in recent weeks will only continue and likely worsen.
On Twitter, British journalist Daniel Trilling contributed to the chorus, outlining what critics had hoped to see come out of the summit:
In a statement on Wednesday, the humanitarian group Caritas Europe charged that "[y]ears of austerity measures focused on dismantling welfare states across Europe have led Member States to a level of incapacity to absorb and respond to the relatively low amount of people who are arriving to Europe."
"We think that the current obstacle is the lack of political will to review the ongoing economic paradigm and to change tack on austerity," the statement read. "Without austerity, European Member States would probably respond differently to this crisis."
Observers have also cautioned that European leaders' failure to agree on common policies could have harmful consequences that span borders and governments.
Earlier this week, journalist Yiannis Baboulias warned at the Guardian: "The lack of a coherent strategy and astonishing deficit of leadership we are witnessing from EU politicians on how to deal with the refugee crisis across the continent is playing right [into] the hands of the far-right."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
As the continent faces what one humanitarian organization has dubbed "a social, economic, and political crisis of immense proportions," European heads of government agreed Thursday to pledge at least EUR1.1 billion to help refugees, but failed to come up with a comprehensive strategy to stem a growing disaster.
The Guardian reports: "The emergency Brussels summit decided little but to throw money at aid agencies and transit countries hosting millions of Syrian refugees and to step up the identification and finger-printing of refugees in Italy and Greece by November."
In a parallel decision earlier in the week, European governments forced through a deal to impose refugee quotas, sharing 120,000 people between them in a controversial decision that several states bitterly opposed.
"Seldom had EU leaders met so divided," wrote Guardian journalist Ian Traynor. "And seldom have the stakes been higher in the need to forge common positions to cope with the crisis and to limit the damage from months of blame games. The main aim was to cool tempers and try to strike a consensus on what to do. The results were inconclusive and the same issues will dominate yet another summit in three weeks."
Of this week's outcomes, the UN refugee agency offered a measured response, hailing the aid pledge while saying it was "disappointed that, notwithstanding relocation, no further measures have been proposed to create more legal pathways for refugees to reach safety in Europe." This would include enhanced resettlement and humanitarian admission, family reunification, private sponsorship, and humanitarian and student visas.
"It is an important step toward stabilizing the crisis," said UN High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres on Thursday, "but much more needs to be done."
"What was needed was a bold, ambitious new approach," added John Dalhuisen, Amnesty International's Europe director. "But what we got was the continuation of a failed strategy."
Dalhuisen continued:
The proposed EUR1 billion for refugee hosting countries is positive but beyond this, the commitments disappoint. EU leaders should have been agreeing on how to ensure safe and legal routes for refugees into Europe and fixing Europe's failing asylum system.
Instead, the focus of the proposals on keeping refugees out ignores the realities of a global refugee crisis and states' obligations to provide protection to those unable to find it elsewhere.
The relocation figures agreed on Tuesday won't significantly relieve the pressure on frontline states and without much more concrete and immediate assistance to these countries, the chaotic and tragic scenes we have witnessed in recent weeks will only continue and likely worsen.
On Twitter, British journalist Daniel Trilling contributed to the chorus, outlining what critics had hoped to see come out of the summit:
In a statement on Wednesday, the humanitarian group Caritas Europe charged that "[y]ears of austerity measures focused on dismantling welfare states across Europe have led Member States to a level of incapacity to absorb and respond to the relatively low amount of people who are arriving to Europe."
"We think that the current obstacle is the lack of political will to review the ongoing economic paradigm and to change tack on austerity," the statement read. "Without austerity, European Member States would probably respond differently to this crisis."
Observers have also cautioned that European leaders' failure to agree on common policies could have harmful consequences that span borders and governments.
Earlier this week, journalist Yiannis Baboulias warned at the Guardian: "The lack of a coherent strategy and astonishing deficit of leadership we are witnessing from EU politicians on how to deal with the refugee crisis across the continent is playing right [into] the hands of the far-right."
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
As the continent faces what one humanitarian organization has dubbed "a social, economic, and political crisis of immense proportions," European heads of government agreed Thursday to pledge at least EUR1.1 billion to help refugees, but failed to come up with a comprehensive strategy to stem a growing disaster.
The Guardian reports: "The emergency Brussels summit decided little but to throw money at aid agencies and transit countries hosting millions of Syrian refugees and to step up the identification and finger-printing of refugees in Italy and Greece by November."
In a parallel decision earlier in the week, European governments forced through a deal to impose refugee quotas, sharing 120,000 people between them in a controversial decision that several states bitterly opposed.
"Seldom had EU leaders met so divided," wrote Guardian journalist Ian Traynor. "And seldom have the stakes been higher in the need to forge common positions to cope with the crisis and to limit the damage from months of blame games. The main aim was to cool tempers and try to strike a consensus on what to do. The results were inconclusive and the same issues will dominate yet another summit in three weeks."
Of this week's outcomes, the UN refugee agency offered a measured response, hailing the aid pledge while saying it was "disappointed that, notwithstanding relocation, no further measures have been proposed to create more legal pathways for refugees to reach safety in Europe." This would include enhanced resettlement and humanitarian admission, family reunification, private sponsorship, and humanitarian and student visas.
"It is an important step toward stabilizing the crisis," said UN High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres on Thursday, "but much more needs to be done."
"What was needed was a bold, ambitious new approach," added John Dalhuisen, Amnesty International's Europe director. "But what we got was the continuation of a failed strategy."
Dalhuisen continued:
The proposed EUR1 billion for refugee hosting countries is positive but beyond this, the commitments disappoint. EU leaders should have been agreeing on how to ensure safe and legal routes for refugees into Europe and fixing Europe's failing asylum system.
Instead, the focus of the proposals on keeping refugees out ignores the realities of a global refugee crisis and states' obligations to provide protection to those unable to find it elsewhere.
The relocation figures agreed on Tuesday won't significantly relieve the pressure on frontline states and without much more concrete and immediate assistance to these countries, the chaotic and tragic scenes we have witnessed in recent weeks will only continue and likely worsen.
On Twitter, British journalist Daniel Trilling contributed to the chorus, outlining what critics had hoped to see come out of the summit:
In a statement on Wednesday, the humanitarian group Caritas Europe charged that "[y]ears of austerity measures focused on dismantling welfare states across Europe have led Member States to a level of incapacity to absorb and respond to the relatively low amount of people who are arriving to Europe."
"We think that the current obstacle is the lack of political will to review the ongoing economic paradigm and to change tack on austerity," the statement read. "Without austerity, European Member States would probably respond differently to this crisis."
Observers have also cautioned that European leaders' failure to agree on common policies could have harmful consequences that span borders and governments.
Earlier this week, journalist Yiannis Baboulias warned at the Guardian: "The lack of a coherent strategy and astonishing deficit of leadership we are witnessing from EU politicians on how to deal with the refugee crisis across the continent is playing right [into] the hands of the far-right."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.