

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Just one month after New York's landmark fracking ban was announced, amid ongoing celebrations and calls for other states to follow suit, Republican lawmakers are already scheming on how best to override the decision.
The Poughkeepsie Journal reported Sunday that at least one Republican congressman is considering ways to make it easier for landowners to sue the state.
Fracking advocate and U.S. Rep. Chris Collins (R-NY), who was recently named to the House Energy and Commerce Committee, told the Journal that he has "engaged in a series of discussions on the next steps needed to help restore the individual property rights of New Yorkers."
Landowners already have a recourse, known as a "takings claim," through which they can argue that they have "no reasonable use for their property as a result of the government's action" and that the government is obliged to compensate for their losses. At issue is whether the fracking ban would apply in this context.
Tom West, an attorney who has represented oil and gas companies in fracking cases, told the Journal that lawmakers are "potentially" considering legislation that would make it easier for landowners to bring such a claim and, further, make their case in federal court, as opposed to state court--where a takings claim would face stronger opposition.
Though such action may not challenge the fracking ban outright, West notes, "if you have the prospect of having to pay out hundreds of millions--or billions--of dollars to landowners as a result of your regulatory action, you might rethink your strategy."
The attack is not unexpected. When announcing the ban, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo said that decision would likely face "tons" of lawsuits.
Supporters of the fracking ban are planning a rally in Albany this Wednesday to celebrate what they say is an "incredible victory for science, public health, the environment, and our movement." Over one hundred local and national organizations are sponsoring the event.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Just one month after New York's landmark fracking ban was announced, amid ongoing celebrations and calls for other states to follow suit, Republican lawmakers are already scheming on how best to override the decision.
The Poughkeepsie Journal reported Sunday that at least one Republican congressman is considering ways to make it easier for landowners to sue the state.
Fracking advocate and U.S. Rep. Chris Collins (R-NY), who was recently named to the House Energy and Commerce Committee, told the Journal that he has "engaged in a series of discussions on the next steps needed to help restore the individual property rights of New Yorkers."
Landowners already have a recourse, known as a "takings claim," through which they can argue that they have "no reasonable use for their property as a result of the government's action" and that the government is obliged to compensate for their losses. At issue is whether the fracking ban would apply in this context.
Tom West, an attorney who has represented oil and gas companies in fracking cases, told the Journal that lawmakers are "potentially" considering legislation that would make it easier for landowners to bring such a claim and, further, make their case in federal court, as opposed to state court--where a takings claim would face stronger opposition.
Though such action may not challenge the fracking ban outright, West notes, "if you have the prospect of having to pay out hundreds of millions--or billions--of dollars to landowners as a result of your regulatory action, you might rethink your strategy."
The attack is not unexpected. When announcing the ban, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo said that decision would likely face "tons" of lawsuits.
Supporters of the fracking ban are planning a rally in Albany this Wednesday to celebrate what they say is an "incredible victory for science, public health, the environment, and our movement." Over one hundred local and national organizations are sponsoring the event.
Just one month after New York's landmark fracking ban was announced, amid ongoing celebrations and calls for other states to follow suit, Republican lawmakers are already scheming on how best to override the decision.
The Poughkeepsie Journal reported Sunday that at least one Republican congressman is considering ways to make it easier for landowners to sue the state.
Fracking advocate and U.S. Rep. Chris Collins (R-NY), who was recently named to the House Energy and Commerce Committee, told the Journal that he has "engaged in a series of discussions on the next steps needed to help restore the individual property rights of New Yorkers."
Landowners already have a recourse, known as a "takings claim," through which they can argue that they have "no reasonable use for their property as a result of the government's action" and that the government is obliged to compensate for their losses. At issue is whether the fracking ban would apply in this context.
Tom West, an attorney who has represented oil and gas companies in fracking cases, told the Journal that lawmakers are "potentially" considering legislation that would make it easier for landowners to bring such a claim and, further, make their case in federal court, as opposed to state court--where a takings claim would face stronger opposition.
Though such action may not challenge the fracking ban outright, West notes, "if you have the prospect of having to pay out hundreds of millions--or billions--of dollars to landowners as a result of your regulatory action, you might rethink your strategy."
The attack is not unexpected. When announcing the ban, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo said that decision would likely face "tons" of lawsuits.
Supporters of the fracking ban are planning a rally in Albany this Wednesday to celebrate what they say is an "incredible victory for science, public health, the environment, and our movement." Over one hundred local and national organizations are sponsoring the event.