SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
As Court Ruling Clears Way for Keystone XL, Groups Say: It's Now Up to You, Obama, to Stand Up for Climate
'It’s time for President Obama to build on his veto threat and reject Keystone XL outright.'—May Boeve, 350.org
Jan 09, 2015
A ruling by the Nebraska Supreme Court on Friday removes an obstacle for approval of the Keystone XL pipeline--a decision, environmental groups say, that means President Obama can and must exercise his authority to fully reject the pipeline.
Nebraska landowners had challenged the constitutionality of a state law, LB 1161 (pdf), which allowed Gov. Dave Heineman to approve TransCanada's tar sands pipeline route. The victory a lower court dealt the pipeline opponents in February was reversed with Friday's high court decision (pdf). Though four of the seven justices sided with landowners, a fifth was needed by state law when constitutional issues are raised.
White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said Tuesday that Obama would veto legislation that forced the approval of Keystone XL, and said that the Nebraska legal battle was "impeding a final conclusion about this pipeline." He added, "Once that is resolved, that should speed the completion of the evaluation of that project."
Environmental groups charge that the final conclusion should be clear to Obama: the pipeline must be rejected.
"No matter the route, as long as the pipeline is carrying tar sands oil it is a global warming disaster and fails the President's climate test," stated 350.org Executive Director May Boeve.
Echoing Boeve, Steve Kretzmann, Executive Director of Oil Change International, stated: "While the route for Keystone XL may have been approved on a technicality, passing the climate test is a much higher bar. Even the State Department's own report was clear that in the event of low oil prices, Keystone would spur significant upstream production and thus significant additional carbon pollution."
Jane Kleeb of grassroots organization Bold Nebraska said that, despite the court ruling, her group was not about to give up. "When you take a punch, you stand up and keep on fighting. We continue to stand with President Obama in his skepticism of the export pipeline and encourage him to reject Keystone XL now. The only decision that will bring peace of mind to landowners is watching the President use the power of the pen to stop this risky pipeline once and for all," she said.
Hours after the Nebraska court ruling, the House voted 266-153 to approve the pipeline. Twenty-eight Democrats joined Republicans to pass the measure, but it still failed to get enough votes to be veto-proof. A debate on the pipeline heads to the Senate next week.
Ahead of the vote, Boeve called it "a reminder that oily politicians are going to keep pushing Keystone XL as long as the fossil fuel industry is paying the bills and the pipeline is still on the table."
"It's time for President Obama to build on his veto threat and reject Keystone XL outright," she continued.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A ruling by the Nebraska Supreme Court on Friday removes an obstacle for approval of the Keystone XL pipeline--a decision, environmental groups say, that means President Obama can and must exercise his authority to fully reject the pipeline.
Nebraska landowners had challenged the constitutionality of a state law, LB 1161 (pdf), which allowed Gov. Dave Heineman to approve TransCanada's tar sands pipeline route. The victory a lower court dealt the pipeline opponents in February was reversed with Friday's high court decision (pdf). Though four of the seven justices sided with landowners, a fifth was needed by state law when constitutional issues are raised.
White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said Tuesday that Obama would veto legislation that forced the approval of Keystone XL, and said that the Nebraska legal battle was "impeding a final conclusion about this pipeline." He added, "Once that is resolved, that should speed the completion of the evaluation of that project."
Environmental groups charge that the final conclusion should be clear to Obama: the pipeline must be rejected.
"No matter the route, as long as the pipeline is carrying tar sands oil it is a global warming disaster and fails the President's climate test," stated 350.org Executive Director May Boeve.
Echoing Boeve, Steve Kretzmann, Executive Director of Oil Change International, stated: "While the route for Keystone XL may have been approved on a technicality, passing the climate test is a much higher bar. Even the State Department's own report was clear that in the event of low oil prices, Keystone would spur significant upstream production and thus significant additional carbon pollution."
Jane Kleeb of grassroots organization Bold Nebraska said that, despite the court ruling, her group was not about to give up. "When you take a punch, you stand up and keep on fighting. We continue to stand with President Obama in his skepticism of the export pipeline and encourage him to reject Keystone XL now. The only decision that will bring peace of mind to landowners is watching the President use the power of the pen to stop this risky pipeline once and for all," she said.
Hours after the Nebraska court ruling, the House voted 266-153 to approve the pipeline. Twenty-eight Democrats joined Republicans to pass the measure, but it still failed to get enough votes to be veto-proof. A debate on the pipeline heads to the Senate next week.
Ahead of the vote, Boeve called it "a reminder that oily politicians are going to keep pushing Keystone XL as long as the fossil fuel industry is paying the bills and the pipeline is still on the table."
"It's time for President Obama to build on his veto threat and reject Keystone XL outright," she continued.
A ruling by the Nebraska Supreme Court on Friday removes an obstacle for approval of the Keystone XL pipeline--a decision, environmental groups say, that means President Obama can and must exercise his authority to fully reject the pipeline.
Nebraska landowners had challenged the constitutionality of a state law, LB 1161 (pdf), which allowed Gov. Dave Heineman to approve TransCanada's tar sands pipeline route. The victory a lower court dealt the pipeline opponents in February was reversed with Friday's high court decision (pdf). Though four of the seven justices sided with landowners, a fifth was needed by state law when constitutional issues are raised.
White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said Tuesday that Obama would veto legislation that forced the approval of Keystone XL, and said that the Nebraska legal battle was "impeding a final conclusion about this pipeline." He added, "Once that is resolved, that should speed the completion of the evaluation of that project."
Environmental groups charge that the final conclusion should be clear to Obama: the pipeline must be rejected.
"No matter the route, as long as the pipeline is carrying tar sands oil it is a global warming disaster and fails the President's climate test," stated 350.org Executive Director May Boeve.
Echoing Boeve, Steve Kretzmann, Executive Director of Oil Change International, stated: "While the route for Keystone XL may have been approved on a technicality, passing the climate test is a much higher bar. Even the State Department's own report was clear that in the event of low oil prices, Keystone would spur significant upstream production and thus significant additional carbon pollution."
Jane Kleeb of grassroots organization Bold Nebraska said that, despite the court ruling, her group was not about to give up. "When you take a punch, you stand up and keep on fighting. We continue to stand with President Obama in his skepticism of the export pipeline and encourage him to reject Keystone XL now. The only decision that will bring peace of mind to landowners is watching the President use the power of the pen to stop this risky pipeline once and for all," she said.
Hours after the Nebraska court ruling, the House voted 266-153 to approve the pipeline. Twenty-eight Democrats joined Republicans to pass the measure, but it still failed to get enough votes to be veto-proof. A debate on the pipeline heads to the Senate next week.
Ahead of the vote, Boeve called it "a reminder that oily politicians are going to keep pushing Keystone XL as long as the fossil fuel industry is paying the bills and the pipeline is still on the table."
"It's time for President Obama to build on his veto threat and reject Keystone XL outright," she continued.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.