Bailing Out a Boat Full of Holes

Published on
by
Inter Press Service

Bailing Out a Boat Full of Holes

by
Adrianne Appel

An ACORN (The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) member holds a sign, Tuesday, Sept. 23, 2008, as the political action group stages a protest in front of the Federal Reserve Bank Building in Doral, Fla. Many economists continue to sound warnings that the bailout was misguided and that the U.S. government needs to take more action. (AP Photo/J. Pat Carter)

BOSTON - The U.S. Treasury's
bonanza from Congress to hand out 700 billion dollars to Wall Street is
not what the country needs to right its shaky economy, many independent
experts say.

"Despite the bailout, it's clear the economy is
going into a deep recession," Robert E. Scott, senior international
economist at the Economic Policy Institute, told IPS.

U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke warned Tuesday that
the U.S. economy is headed downward, hours after The Fed unveiled a
programme to buy short-term debt in an effort to stimulate lending
among businesses.

The Fed's action followed a drop in the Dow Jones industrial average on
Monday to below 10,000 for the first time since 2004, and reports of
plunging markets around the world, with markets in Brazil and Russia
especially hard hit. Developing nations are bracing for harder times to
come.

Banks around the world invested in the same troubled U.S.
mortgage products that are deemed largely responsible for the downturn
in the U.S. economy.

In Europe, European Union finance ministers on Tuesday urged
European nations to coordinate their economic stimulus efforts but did
not propose an EU bailout. Ireland and Germany went it alone, and drew
up their own stimulus plans.

"This bailout of the financial sector is not doing enough to help the real economy," Scott said.

On Oct. 3, the U.S. Congress approved 700 billion dollars for
U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to spend as he sees fit, mostly
on Wall Street firms reeling from their bad mortgage deals.

After initial failure in the U.S. House, Paulson, who crafted
the controversial bailout plan, eventually convinced the U.S. Congress
to approve it. U.S. citizens from coast to coast expressed opposition
to the plan, and swamped lawmakers with phone calls.

In the end, Congress, nervous about the economy and cowed by
swarms of lobbyists from the nation's banks businesses and financial
institutions, ignored their constituents and passed the plan. The final
House vote was 263 to 171.

About 150 billion dollars in extra spending was added to the
bill to woo more lawmakers to vote for it, mostly in the form of tax
breaks and programmes for lawmakers' home districts.

According to reports from lawmakers, many citizens had
expressed concern about the size of the bailout, the fact that it is
directed at Wall Street firms, and that Paulson, a former CEO of
Goldman Sachs, a company with a financial stake in the bailout, would
oversee the programme.

On Monday, Paulson announced that he had picked Neel Kashkari
to run the bailout programme. Kashkari is a 35-year-old assistant
treasury secretary and former Goldman Sachs colleague, with about six
years of total work experience since graduating from the Wharton School
of Economics.

Lead lawmakers said last week that taxpayers needn't worry
about mishandling of the funds, which will be doled out in
350-billion-dollar chunks, with some oversight by Congress and
agencies.

"The bright light of accountability will protect the taxpayers. We are
addressing the real pain experienced by Mr. and Mrs. Jones on Main
Street," Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said just moments before the
final vote.

Lawmakers also vowed tougher regulation of the financial and
banking industry to prevent future abuses similar to those in the
mortgage and trading industry, widely believed responsible for the
current global and U.S. economic crisis.

"It would be a betrayal if we were to stop here. We have to
perform serious reform, comparable to the New Deal, with a new set of
regulations for all of the financial industry," said Barney Frank, the
chairman of the powerful House Financial Services Committee.

Rep. Dennis Kucinich warned that the plan is a mistake, as he cast his vote against it.

"This bill represents an utter failure of the democratic
process," Kucinich said. "It represents the triumph of special interest
over the triumph of the public interest," he said.

"We could have recognised the power of government to prime the
pump of the economy to get money flowing through out society by
creating jobs, health care and major investments in green energy," he
said.

Many economists continue to sound warnings that the bailout
was misguided and that the U.S. government needs to take more action.

Timothy Canova, professor of international economic law at
Chapman University School of Law, said nationwide there are 10,000
foreclosures a week. More can be expected without additional help from
the government.

"The bailout is directed at the top of the pyramid, it doesn't
do much to help the foreclosure waves at the bottom. It keeps pulling
down the financial structure," he warned.

The nation needs a moratorium on further foreclosures and new bankruptcy rules that will protect homeowners," Canova said.

"This is an imperfect solution," Scott added. "Most effective
would be to inject capital into commercial banks, as they did during
the Great Depression."

Overall, the government needs to invest up to 900 billion
dollars to stimulate the economy. If it spent the money on shoring up
the country's crumbling infrastructure and schools, that would create
jobs. States, like Massachusetts and California that are reeling from
the economic slowdown, need help from the federal government, too, he
said.

"We also must help homeowners, and help them refinance their
mortgages," Scott said. The government could create something similar
to the homeowner's loan corporation that saved many homes from
foreclosure during the depression. The programme would allow homeowners
to obtain low-interest loans.

"This would keep people in their homes and cut down on foreclosures," he said.

That would be good news to Emily Rosenbaum, executive director
of Coalition for a Better Acre, a non-profit that aims to improve
neighbourhoods in Lowell and Lawrence, Massachusetts, poorer
communities that are often the first stop for new immigrants.

The organisation aids people facing foreclosure, presently running at 40-50 per month for the region.

"The number of foreclosures jumped last year three-fold. In
2006, there were 93 foreclosures, and in 2007, there were 293. This
year we don't know the numbers yet but we are expecting another
doubling," she said.

Foreclosures can send a neighbourhood into a "downward spiral", she added.

"Having boarded-up houses on a street, and vacated buildings
attracts crime and vagrancy," Rosenbaum said. "We don't know what the
effect of the actions in Washington will be. For some time, this has
been a challenging environment."

 

Share This Article

More in: