SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Abortion rights activists hoist their signs outside the US Supreme Court in Washington, DC, on June 24, 2022. (Photoo: Olivier Douliery/AFP via Getty Images)
These Extreme Supremes Have Something Against Bodies
Could tribal governments be the last line of defense for people and the planet? Not according to this Court.
Jul 06, 2022
"Tribal governments can do what states and the federal government cannot." That comment, from Wes Martel of the Greater Yellowstone Coalition gave me comfort last month.
In the days after the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs, okaying the criminalizing of abortion, I wondered if tribes could set up clinics like casinos, and provide abortion services where others could not.
I wasn't the only non-Indigenous woman to have that idea, and we were all quickly set straight by our Indigenous sisters who pointed out that clinics aren't cash cows like casinos, and they're unlikely to spring up on tribal lands for all sorts of reasons, some political and cultural, many economic.
After Dobbs came the court's verdict against the EPA, striking down that agency's ability to limit pollution. The decision scuttles our Environmental Protection Agency's ability to do much of anything to protect the environment, and by extension, any public agency's ability to serve the public without detailed instruction from Congress.
Could tribal governments be the last line of defense for people and the planet?
Before I could even consider that question, I read Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, yet another momentous decision from the extreme Supremes, this one aimed directly at tribal sovereignty.
"Indian country is part of the state, not separate from the state," wrote Justice Brett Kavanaugh, in a majority opinion that overturns the law on reservations across the country.
If Dobbs returns states like Texas to the Jim Crow days of the 1920s and the EPA case unravels how the government has worked since Roosevelt, Castro-Huerta takes tribes back to the Trail of Tears. Not content with rolling back one century, in Castro-Huerta the court takes us back two, to the 1830s and tribal jurisdiction law that's been precedent since Chief Justice John Marshall.
Birth, earth, Indigenous rule, even the "demos" of government itself . . . Kavanaugh and his crew seem to have something against bodies they can't control, be they human or governmental. The woman who accused him of abuse, Christine Blasey Ford, might have some thoughts on that. Anita Hill might, too.
In the meantime, welcome to the new, old world of conquest and colonizers. Shall we cancel the July 4th holiday for next year?
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Laura Flanders
Laura Flanders interviews forward-thinking people about the key questions of our time on The Laura Flanders Show, a nationally syndicated radio and television program also available as a podcast. A contributing writer to The Nation, Flanders is also the author of six books, including "Bushwomen: How They Won the White House for Their Man" (2005). She is the recipient of a 2019 Izzy Award for excellence in independent journalism, the Pat Mitchell Lifetime Achievement Award for advancing women's and girls' visibility in media, and a 2020 Lannan Cultural Freedom Fellowship for her reporting and advocacy for public media. lauraflanders.org
"Tribal governments can do what states and the federal government cannot." That comment, from Wes Martel of the Greater Yellowstone Coalition gave me comfort last month.
In the days after the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs, okaying the criminalizing of abortion, I wondered if tribes could set up clinics like casinos, and provide abortion services where others could not.
I wasn't the only non-Indigenous woman to have that idea, and we were all quickly set straight by our Indigenous sisters who pointed out that clinics aren't cash cows like casinos, and they're unlikely to spring up on tribal lands for all sorts of reasons, some political and cultural, many economic.
After Dobbs came the court's verdict against the EPA, striking down that agency's ability to limit pollution. The decision scuttles our Environmental Protection Agency's ability to do much of anything to protect the environment, and by extension, any public agency's ability to serve the public without detailed instruction from Congress.
Could tribal governments be the last line of defense for people and the planet?
Before I could even consider that question, I read Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, yet another momentous decision from the extreme Supremes, this one aimed directly at tribal sovereignty.
"Indian country is part of the state, not separate from the state," wrote Justice Brett Kavanaugh, in a majority opinion that overturns the law on reservations across the country.
If Dobbs returns states like Texas to the Jim Crow days of the 1920s and the EPA case unravels how the government has worked since Roosevelt, Castro-Huerta takes tribes back to the Trail of Tears. Not content with rolling back one century, in Castro-Huerta the court takes us back two, to the 1830s and tribal jurisdiction law that's been precedent since Chief Justice John Marshall.
Birth, earth, Indigenous rule, even the "demos" of government itself . . . Kavanaugh and his crew seem to have something against bodies they can't control, be they human or governmental. The woman who accused him of abuse, Christine Blasey Ford, might have some thoughts on that. Anita Hill might, too.
In the meantime, welcome to the new, old world of conquest and colonizers. Shall we cancel the July 4th holiday for next year?
Laura Flanders
Laura Flanders interviews forward-thinking people about the key questions of our time on The Laura Flanders Show, a nationally syndicated radio and television program also available as a podcast. A contributing writer to The Nation, Flanders is also the author of six books, including "Bushwomen: How They Won the White House for Their Man" (2005). She is the recipient of a 2019 Izzy Award for excellence in independent journalism, the Pat Mitchell Lifetime Achievement Award for advancing women's and girls' visibility in media, and a 2020 Lannan Cultural Freedom Fellowship for her reporting and advocacy for public media. lauraflanders.org
"Tribal governments can do what states and the federal government cannot." That comment, from Wes Martel of the Greater Yellowstone Coalition gave me comfort last month.
In the days after the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs, okaying the criminalizing of abortion, I wondered if tribes could set up clinics like casinos, and provide abortion services where others could not.
I wasn't the only non-Indigenous woman to have that idea, and we were all quickly set straight by our Indigenous sisters who pointed out that clinics aren't cash cows like casinos, and they're unlikely to spring up on tribal lands for all sorts of reasons, some political and cultural, many economic.
After Dobbs came the court's verdict against the EPA, striking down that agency's ability to limit pollution. The decision scuttles our Environmental Protection Agency's ability to do much of anything to protect the environment, and by extension, any public agency's ability to serve the public without detailed instruction from Congress.
Could tribal governments be the last line of defense for people and the planet?
Before I could even consider that question, I read Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, yet another momentous decision from the extreme Supremes, this one aimed directly at tribal sovereignty.
"Indian country is part of the state, not separate from the state," wrote Justice Brett Kavanaugh, in a majority opinion that overturns the law on reservations across the country.
If Dobbs returns states like Texas to the Jim Crow days of the 1920s and the EPA case unravels how the government has worked since Roosevelt, Castro-Huerta takes tribes back to the Trail of Tears. Not content with rolling back one century, in Castro-Huerta the court takes us back two, to the 1830s and tribal jurisdiction law that's been precedent since Chief Justice John Marshall.
Birth, earth, Indigenous rule, even the "demos" of government itself . . . Kavanaugh and his crew seem to have something against bodies they can't control, be they human or governmental. The woman who accused him of abuse, Christine Blasey Ford, might have some thoughts on that. Anita Hill might, too.
In the meantime, welcome to the new, old world of conquest and colonizers. Shall we cancel the July 4th holiday for next year?
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy