Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

Dear Common Dreams Readers:
Corporations and billionaires have their own media. Shouldn't we? When you “follow the money” that funds our independent journalism, it all leads back to this: people like you. Our supporters are what allows us to produce journalism in the public interest that is beholden only to people, our planet, and the common good. Please support our Mid-Year Campaign so that we always have a newsroom for the people that is funded by the people. Thank you for your support. --Jon Queally, managing editor

Join the small group of generous readers who donate, keeping Common Dreams free for millions of people each year. Without your help, we won’t survive.

Sen. Chuck Schumer speaking on gun control on Capitol Hill

US Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York, speaks to activists protesting gun violence and demanding action from lawmakers, on June 8, 2022, in Washington, DC. (Photo: Nicholas Kamm/AFP via Getty Images)

This 'Bipartisan' Gun Deal With Senate Republicans Is Worse Than Nothing

Accepting this do-nothing gun "compromise" just disillusions potential Democratic voters and makes it likely Republicans will retake Congress.

Miles Mogulescu

In the wake of the horrors of Uvalde, it looks like Senate Democrats are about to make a "bipartisan" gun deal with Senate Republicans that will likely accomplish next to nothing except let Republicans off the hook for opposing even minimal gun safety laws.
 
Here's what the deal does not include:

  • Any limit on civilian ownership of AR-15s and other military style assault weapons, not even the compromise Democrats were willing to accept that would raise the age to buy assault weapons from 18 to 21.
  • Any limit on the purchase of high capacity gun magazines which make it possible to shoot dozens of times without reloading.
  • Any legislative limit on the sale of bump stocks which let semi-automatic weapons fire even faster.
  • Any requirement that guns kept at home be stored safely.
  • Any expansion of background checks for gun sales. 

These would be the bare minimum for legislation that would make some difference in reducing mass shootings and gun violence.

If I thought this "bipartisan" compromise could actually prevent any appreciable number of mass shootings, I'd reluctantly support it. But it doesn't.

As Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) who Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell appointed to lead Republicans in the negotiations said when entering the negotiations, "We're not talking about banning a category of weapons across the board [e.g. military-style assault weapons], a ban for certain high-capacity magazines or changing background checks by adding additional disqualifying items." In other words, we won't even talk about anything that would matter.
 
And the Democratic negotiators and President Joe Biden accepted these Republican limitations on what was open for negotiations from the outset.

Here's all the "bipartisan compromise" would do, if enacted: close the "boyfriend loophole" about whether unmarried partners can keep guns if convicted of violence against a dating partner; provide funding for states that create new red flag laws (but keep in mind that many red states refused federal funding for Medicaid expansion); and provide some funds for mental health, although Republicans still oppose new funding; include juvenile records in background checks for 18-21-year-olds who want to buy an AR-15-type weapon.
 
As Monica Munoz Martinez, a MacArthur fellow who hails from Uvalde told the New York Times, "This proposed legislation doesn't restore a sense of safety in Texas. It's hard to celebrate legislation that fails so far short of what families in Uvalde and Buffalo asked for."
 
But congressional Democrats are now hailing this minimalist "compromise" as the most significant gun safety legislation in decades. And they're doing it with their usual bromides for their lack of courage. The No. 2 Senate Democrat, Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois trotted out the usual Democratic excuse for doing too little: "We cannot let the congressional perfect be the enemy of the good."

But he left out the corollary: "The almost useless should be the enemy of the pretty good."
 
For example, although I'm a supporter of Medicare for All, I can buy the argument that while Obamacare is less than perfect, it's "better than nothing." But I just don't buy the argument that this almost useless gun legislation is "good" enough to celebrate.
 
CNN senior political analyst Ron Brownstein writes that "Pew Polling found that significant majorities of Americans support background checks (81 percent), an assault-weapons ban (63 percent), and a ban on high-capacity ammunition magazines (64 percent); a majority also opposes concealed carry of weapons without a permit."
 
Democrats hailing this next-to-meaningless "bipartisan compromise" as "the most significant gun legislation in decades" lets Republicans off the hook in the 2022 election and beyond. Republicans can claim they did something about gun safety, and the mainstream media seems to be buying it, taking away one of the Democrats most potent campaign issues. This is how Democrats repeatedly demoralize their own base while doing little to pick up so-called moderates or independents.
 
The Democrats' biggest weakness going into the midterms is the apathy of its supporters, many of whom are likely not to bother to vote. As Molly Jong-Fast writes in The Atlantic, "If the GOP is hostage to its base, Democrats are on the run from their core voters. Whether its voting rights or debt forgiveness, when it comes to delivering a win for their base, Democrats seem unwilling or unable to deliver."
 
If I thought this "bipartisan" compromise could actually prevent any appreciable number of mass shootings, I'd reluctantly support it. But it doesn't. It just let's Republicans claim they did something. And then they can endlessly yell "Inflation, inflation inflation! Crime, crime, crime! And Biden and the Democrats are all to blame!"
 
To have any chance of keeping its House majority and increasing its Senate majority by two to eliminate the power of Manchin and Sinema to block the Democratic agenda, Democrats have to stand tall and strong. They need to say, "Give us these majorities and we'll pass significant gun safety laws, protect a woman's right to choose anywhere in America, defend democracy and protect voting rights, lower prescription drug prices, protect renters, reduce student debt, and restore tax credits to low-income families."
 
Accepting this do-nothing gun "compromise" just disillusions potential Democratic voters and makes it likely Republicans will retake Congress and block any real progress on gun safety or anything else potential Democratic voters care about.


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Miles Mogulescu

Miles Mogulescu

Miles Mogulescu is an entertainment attorney/business affairs executive, producer, political activist and writer.

"I'm sure this will be all over the corporate media, right?"
That’s what one longtime Common Dreams reader said yesterday after the newsroom reported on new research showing how corporate price gouging surged to a nearly 70-year high in 2021. While major broadcasters, newspapers, and other outlets continue to carry water for their corporate advertisers when they report on issues like inflation, economic inequality, and the climate emergency, our independence empowers us to provide you stories and perspectives that powerful interests don’t want you to have. But this independence is only possible because of support from readers like you. You make the difference. If our support dries up, so will we. Our crucial Mid-Year Campaign is now underway and we are in emergency mode to make sure we raise the necessary funds so that every day we can bring you the stories that corporate, for-profit outlets ignore and neglect. Please, if you can, support Common Dreams today.

 

'We Need Action': Biden, Democrats Urged to Protect Abortion Access in Post-Roe US

"The Supreme Court doesn't get the final say on abortion," Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Tina Smith wrote in a new op-ed.

Kenny Stancil ·


Motorist 'Tried to Murder' Abortion Rights Advocates at Iowa Protest, Witnesses Say

Although one witness said the driver went "out of his way" to hit pro-choice protestors in the street, Cedar Rapids police declined to make an arrest.

Kenny Stancil ·


'A Hate Crime': Oslo Pride Parade Canceled After Deadly Shooting at Gay Bar

A 42-year-old gunman has been charged with terrorism following what Norway's prime minister called a "terrible and deeply shocking attack on innocent people."

Kenny Stancil ·


'We WILL Fight Back': Outrage, Resolve as Protests Erupt Against SCOTUS Abortion Ruling

Demonstrators took to the streets Friday to defiantly denounce the Supreme Court's right-wing supermajority after it rescinded a constitutional right for the first time in U.S. history.

Brett Wilkins ·


80+ US Prosecutors Vow Not to Be Part of Criminalizing Abortion Care

"Criminalizing and prosecuting individuals who seek or provide abortion care makes a mockery of justice," says a joint statement signed by 84 elected attorneys. "Prosecutors should not be part of that."

Kenny Stancil ·

Common Dreams Logo