SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Americans lack a national health care system, the country's pockmarked with healthcare deserts, and millions of what Truman called "normally self-supporting" people are just one layoff or one virulent virus away from disaster--as we're now seeing. (Photo: Fatemeh Bahrami/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)
Covid-19: Our Health Crisis Is Born of Bigotry
Instead of erasing our weak parts, we’ve raced them, blaming vulnerability on the vulnerable and hoping the bridges wouldn’t break where we are.
Mar 28, 2020
"A bridge is no stronger than its weakest part." Former slave turned educator Anna Julia Cooper uttered those very contemporary-sounding words back in 1892. The US didn't heed them then; we haven't heeded them yet. The big question, brought home to us one more time by the Covid-19 crisis, is why not? What does American society so love about having weak parts that we refuse--year after year and epidemic after epidemic--to shore up?
Most Western European nations took steps to strengthen the weakest parts of their health systems some time between 1918 and the so-called Spanish flu and AIDS.
"Illness is neither an indulgence for which people have to pay, nor an offense for which they should be penalized, but a misfortune, the cost of which should be shared by the community," said Aneurin Bevan, the former coal miner turned health minister who reformed the UK's healthcare system. Resisting opposition from politicians and the British equivalent of the AMA, the National Health Service Act was passed in 1946, nationalizing more than 2,500 hospitals. It's those hospitals Britons are cheering on now.
President Truman was proposing exactly the same sort of thing at the same time. But, in Washington, the AMA attacked his bill as socialism and accused the Truman administration of following the Moscow party line. Twenty years had to pass before President Lyndon Baines Johnson signed Medicare and Medicaid into law, and forty five more before President Obama's Affordable Care Act.
And still, here we are. Americans lack a national health care system, the country's pockmarked with healthcare deserts, and millions of what Truman called "normally self-supporting" people are just one layoff or one virulent virus away from disaster--as we're now seeing.
Private greed, then, masked anti-socialism, and an interest in keeping workers on an economic brink is one part of the answer of why we've thus far ignored Anna Julia Cooper.
Another part is surely racism and sexism and disdain for the poor. As Mab Segrest's new book Administrations of Lunacy recounts in her history of a 19th century Georgia mental hospital, even faced with definitive research that patient life expectancy could be doubled by adding nutrients to their diets, white doctors chose to stick to their belief that black patients and women and the poor and destitute were simply physically and spiritually weaker (than affluent whites). Accepting a public health approach would have been costly to administrators' bottom line and their pro-segregation views, says Segrest.
In other words, instead of erasing our weak parts we've raced them, blaming vulnerability on the vulnerable and hoping the bridges wouldn't break where we are. But as Cooper also said, "If one link of the chain is broken, the chain is broken." Covid-19 is tugging on that chain. This time, will we learn?
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Laura Flanders
Laura Flanders interviews forward-thinking people about the key questions of our time on The Laura Flanders Show, a nationally syndicated radio and television program also available as a podcast. A contributing writer to The Nation, Flanders is also the author of six books, including "Bushwomen: How They Won the White House for Their Man" (2005). She is the recipient of a 2019 Izzy Award for excellence in independent journalism, the Pat Mitchell Lifetime Achievement Award for advancing women's and girls' visibility in media, and a 2020 Lannan Cultural Freedom Fellowship for her reporting and advocacy for public media. lauraflanders.org
"A bridge is no stronger than its weakest part." Former slave turned educator Anna Julia Cooper uttered those very contemporary-sounding words back in 1892. The US didn't heed them then; we haven't heeded them yet. The big question, brought home to us one more time by the Covid-19 crisis, is why not? What does American society so love about having weak parts that we refuse--year after year and epidemic after epidemic--to shore up?
Most Western European nations took steps to strengthen the weakest parts of their health systems some time between 1918 and the so-called Spanish flu and AIDS.
"Illness is neither an indulgence for which people have to pay, nor an offense for which they should be penalized, but a misfortune, the cost of which should be shared by the community," said Aneurin Bevan, the former coal miner turned health minister who reformed the UK's healthcare system. Resisting opposition from politicians and the British equivalent of the AMA, the National Health Service Act was passed in 1946, nationalizing more than 2,500 hospitals. It's those hospitals Britons are cheering on now.
President Truman was proposing exactly the same sort of thing at the same time. But, in Washington, the AMA attacked his bill as socialism and accused the Truman administration of following the Moscow party line. Twenty years had to pass before President Lyndon Baines Johnson signed Medicare and Medicaid into law, and forty five more before President Obama's Affordable Care Act.
And still, here we are. Americans lack a national health care system, the country's pockmarked with healthcare deserts, and millions of what Truman called "normally self-supporting" people are just one layoff or one virulent virus away from disaster--as we're now seeing.
Private greed, then, masked anti-socialism, and an interest in keeping workers on an economic brink is one part of the answer of why we've thus far ignored Anna Julia Cooper.
Another part is surely racism and sexism and disdain for the poor. As Mab Segrest's new book Administrations of Lunacy recounts in her history of a 19th century Georgia mental hospital, even faced with definitive research that patient life expectancy could be doubled by adding nutrients to their diets, white doctors chose to stick to their belief that black patients and women and the poor and destitute were simply physically and spiritually weaker (than affluent whites). Accepting a public health approach would have been costly to administrators' bottom line and their pro-segregation views, says Segrest.
In other words, instead of erasing our weak parts we've raced them, blaming vulnerability on the vulnerable and hoping the bridges wouldn't break where we are. But as Cooper also said, "If one link of the chain is broken, the chain is broken." Covid-19 is tugging on that chain. This time, will we learn?
Laura Flanders
Laura Flanders interviews forward-thinking people about the key questions of our time on The Laura Flanders Show, a nationally syndicated radio and television program also available as a podcast. A contributing writer to The Nation, Flanders is also the author of six books, including "Bushwomen: How They Won the White House for Their Man" (2005). She is the recipient of a 2019 Izzy Award for excellence in independent journalism, the Pat Mitchell Lifetime Achievement Award for advancing women's and girls' visibility in media, and a 2020 Lannan Cultural Freedom Fellowship for her reporting and advocacy for public media. lauraflanders.org
"A bridge is no stronger than its weakest part." Former slave turned educator Anna Julia Cooper uttered those very contemporary-sounding words back in 1892. The US didn't heed them then; we haven't heeded them yet. The big question, brought home to us one more time by the Covid-19 crisis, is why not? What does American society so love about having weak parts that we refuse--year after year and epidemic after epidemic--to shore up?
Most Western European nations took steps to strengthen the weakest parts of their health systems some time between 1918 and the so-called Spanish flu and AIDS.
"Illness is neither an indulgence for which people have to pay, nor an offense for which they should be penalized, but a misfortune, the cost of which should be shared by the community," said Aneurin Bevan, the former coal miner turned health minister who reformed the UK's healthcare system. Resisting opposition from politicians and the British equivalent of the AMA, the National Health Service Act was passed in 1946, nationalizing more than 2,500 hospitals. It's those hospitals Britons are cheering on now.
President Truman was proposing exactly the same sort of thing at the same time. But, in Washington, the AMA attacked his bill as socialism and accused the Truman administration of following the Moscow party line. Twenty years had to pass before President Lyndon Baines Johnson signed Medicare and Medicaid into law, and forty five more before President Obama's Affordable Care Act.
And still, here we are. Americans lack a national health care system, the country's pockmarked with healthcare deserts, and millions of what Truman called "normally self-supporting" people are just one layoff or one virulent virus away from disaster--as we're now seeing.
Private greed, then, masked anti-socialism, and an interest in keeping workers on an economic brink is one part of the answer of why we've thus far ignored Anna Julia Cooper.
Another part is surely racism and sexism and disdain for the poor. As Mab Segrest's new book Administrations of Lunacy recounts in her history of a 19th century Georgia mental hospital, even faced with definitive research that patient life expectancy could be doubled by adding nutrients to their diets, white doctors chose to stick to their belief that black patients and women and the poor and destitute were simply physically and spiritually weaker (than affluent whites). Accepting a public health approach would have been costly to administrators' bottom line and their pro-segregation views, says Segrest.
In other words, instead of erasing our weak parts we've raced them, blaming vulnerability on the vulnerable and hoping the bridges wouldn't break where we are. But as Cooper also said, "If one link of the chain is broken, the chain is broken." Covid-19 is tugging on that chain. This time, will we learn?
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.