SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Elizabeth Warren has formed her official presidential exploratory committee, dedicating her campaign to "fighting for America's middle class." (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
And They're Off! Candidates Race to Challenge Trump in 2020
Here’s a prediction: Political leaders who believe people are entitled to health care, food, and housing will see their stock rise in the coming year.
Jan 02, 2019
The cork was barely off the champagne on New Year's Eve 2019 before a crowd of eager candidates began their 2020 presidential election stampede.
Elizabeth Warren has formed her official presidential exploratory committee, dedicating her campaign to "fighting for America's middle class."
Among the most high-profile Trump challengers are Senator Elizabeth Warren, who announced that she had formally launched her presidential exploratory committee in a video to supporters released on December 31.
Mitt Romney waited until January 2, the day before his swearing-in as the new Republican Senator from Utah, to blast Donald Trump in a Washington Post op-ed widely seen as a move to position himself as the voice of anti-Trump Republicans and a potential challenger in the Republican presidential primary.
Another anti-Trumper, Ohio's departing Republican Governor John Kasich, had already declared that he is "very seriously" considering a dark-horse primary challenge against Trump.
On the Democratic side, the field is getting crowded, with more than thirty candidates reportedly considering presidential bids. Among them: Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey, Senator Kamala Harris of California, Senator Bernie Sanders, former Vice President Joe Biden, and departing U.S. Representative Beto O'Rourke, who lost a close Senate race against Ted Cruz in Texas but became a national celebrity.
Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio, and Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota are also considering runs. (More on their developing campaigns to come in future posts.)
From Sanders to Warren to Brown to O'Rourke, it's a notably populist field.
From Sanders to Warren to Brown to O'Rourke, it's a notably populist field.
One exception is Cory Booker, the only candidate so far to have a super PAC launched to support his 2020 presidential campaign. Booker, as mayor of Newark, accepted $100 million from Mark Zuckerberg to "fix" the Newark public schools, and supported a disastrous plan to close schools, hand the district over to charter-school operators, disempower teachers unions and the local school board, all without improving outcomes for children.
As the starting gate opens, Elizabeth Warren has leapt forward to position herself as the progressive champion. In her campaign-launch video, Warren declares: "America's middle-class is under attack. How did we get here? Billionaires and big corporations decided they wanted more of the pie, and they enlisted politicians to cut them a fatter slice. They crippled unions, so no one could stop them, dismantled the financial rules meant to protect us after the Great Depression, and cut their own taxes so they paid less than their secretaries and janitors."
It's a pretty good summary of the economic-populist case that drove grassroots enthusiasm for Bernie Sanders in 2016.
And while some people think Warren missed her moment when she let down the supporters who urged her to join the 2016 field, she has spent her time in the Senate accumulating more credibility as a defender of ordinary citizens against Wall Street predators. This included defending her brainchild, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and grilling titans like Wells Fargo CEO Timothy Sloan, who, she pointed out, got rich screwing low-level employees and consumers.
Warren, like Trump, is a lightning rod. Hated by conservatives and bankers, adored by her base, she has already gotten down in the mud with Trump, who nicknamed her "Pocahontas" and baited her into taking an ill-advised DNA test to prove she had Native American blood, which infuriated her allies and fueled her detractors.
Warren, like Trump, is a lightning rod.
Still, if the U.S. economy goes into a steep decline--a distinct possibility in 2019--Warren's message will seem more relevant than ever.
Certainly, her voice seems more relevant than Mr. 47 percent, Mitt Romney, who, in a leaked video of a 2012 speech to wealthy campaign donors, denounced nearly half of Americans, who, he said, are "dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing . . . ."
Here's a prediction: Political leaders who believe people are entitled to health care, food, and housing will see their stock rise in the coming year.
In his recent Washington Post oped, Romney denounced Trump's character, but praised his policy decisions, including cutting corporate taxes, getting rid of "excessive regulation," and appointing conservative judges.
The battle lines are clear. On with the races.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 The Progressive
Ruth Conniff
Ruth Conniff is Editor-in-chief of the Wisconsin Examiner. She formerly served as Editor-in-chief of The Progressive Magazine, and opened the Progressive's office in Washington, DC, during the Clinton Administration, where she made her debut as a political pundit on CNN's Capital Gang Sunday and Fox News. Se moved to Oaxaca, Mexico, for a year in 2017, where she covered U.S./Mexico relations, the migrant caravan, and Mexico's efforts to grapple with Donald Trump.
amy klobucharcory bookerdemocratic partyelection 2020elizabeth warrenfacebookkamala harrismark zuckerbergshock doctrinetrumpism
The cork was barely off the champagne on New Year's Eve 2019 before a crowd of eager candidates began their 2020 presidential election stampede.
Elizabeth Warren has formed her official presidential exploratory committee, dedicating her campaign to "fighting for America's middle class."
Among the most high-profile Trump challengers are Senator Elizabeth Warren, who announced that she had formally launched her presidential exploratory committee in a video to supporters released on December 31.
Mitt Romney waited until January 2, the day before his swearing-in as the new Republican Senator from Utah, to blast Donald Trump in a Washington Post op-ed widely seen as a move to position himself as the voice of anti-Trump Republicans and a potential challenger in the Republican presidential primary.
Another anti-Trumper, Ohio's departing Republican Governor John Kasich, had already declared that he is "very seriously" considering a dark-horse primary challenge against Trump.
On the Democratic side, the field is getting crowded, with more than thirty candidates reportedly considering presidential bids. Among them: Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey, Senator Kamala Harris of California, Senator Bernie Sanders, former Vice President Joe Biden, and departing U.S. Representative Beto O'Rourke, who lost a close Senate race against Ted Cruz in Texas but became a national celebrity.
Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio, and Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota are also considering runs. (More on their developing campaigns to come in future posts.)
From Sanders to Warren to Brown to O'Rourke, it's a notably populist field.
From Sanders to Warren to Brown to O'Rourke, it's a notably populist field.
One exception is Cory Booker, the only candidate so far to have a super PAC launched to support his 2020 presidential campaign. Booker, as mayor of Newark, accepted $100 million from Mark Zuckerberg to "fix" the Newark public schools, and supported a disastrous plan to close schools, hand the district over to charter-school operators, disempower teachers unions and the local school board, all without improving outcomes for children.
As the starting gate opens, Elizabeth Warren has leapt forward to position herself as the progressive champion. In her campaign-launch video, Warren declares: "America's middle-class is under attack. How did we get here? Billionaires and big corporations decided they wanted more of the pie, and they enlisted politicians to cut them a fatter slice. They crippled unions, so no one could stop them, dismantled the financial rules meant to protect us after the Great Depression, and cut their own taxes so they paid less than their secretaries and janitors."
It's a pretty good summary of the economic-populist case that drove grassroots enthusiasm for Bernie Sanders in 2016.
And while some people think Warren missed her moment when she let down the supporters who urged her to join the 2016 field, she has spent her time in the Senate accumulating more credibility as a defender of ordinary citizens against Wall Street predators. This included defending her brainchild, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and grilling titans like Wells Fargo CEO Timothy Sloan, who, she pointed out, got rich screwing low-level employees and consumers.
Warren, like Trump, is a lightning rod. Hated by conservatives and bankers, adored by her base, she has already gotten down in the mud with Trump, who nicknamed her "Pocahontas" and baited her into taking an ill-advised DNA test to prove she had Native American blood, which infuriated her allies and fueled her detractors.
Warren, like Trump, is a lightning rod.
Still, if the U.S. economy goes into a steep decline--a distinct possibility in 2019--Warren's message will seem more relevant than ever.
Certainly, her voice seems more relevant than Mr. 47 percent, Mitt Romney, who, in a leaked video of a 2012 speech to wealthy campaign donors, denounced nearly half of Americans, who, he said, are "dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing . . . ."
Here's a prediction: Political leaders who believe people are entitled to health care, food, and housing will see their stock rise in the coming year.
In his recent Washington Post oped, Romney denounced Trump's character, but praised his policy decisions, including cutting corporate taxes, getting rid of "excessive regulation," and appointing conservative judges.
The battle lines are clear. On with the races.
Ruth Conniff
Ruth Conniff is Editor-in-chief of the Wisconsin Examiner. She formerly served as Editor-in-chief of The Progressive Magazine, and opened the Progressive's office in Washington, DC, during the Clinton Administration, where she made her debut as a political pundit on CNN's Capital Gang Sunday and Fox News. Se moved to Oaxaca, Mexico, for a year in 2017, where she covered U.S./Mexico relations, the migrant caravan, and Mexico's efforts to grapple with Donald Trump.
The cork was barely off the champagne on New Year's Eve 2019 before a crowd of eager candidates began their 2020 presidential election stampede.
Elizabeth Warren has formed her official presidential exploratory committee, dedicating her campaign to "fighting for America's middle class."
Among the most high-profile Trump challengers are Senator Elizabeth Warren, who announced that she had formally launched her presidential exploratory committee in a video to supporters released on December 31.
Mitt Romney waited until January 2, the day before his swearing-in as the new Republican Senator from Utah, to blast Donald Trump in a Washington Post op-ed widely seen as a move to position himself as the voice of anti-Trump Republicans and a potential challenger in the Republican presidential primary.
Another anti-Trumper, Ohio's departing Republican Governor John Kasich, had already declared that he is "very seriously" considering a dark-horse primary challenge against Trump.
On the Democratic side, the field is getting crowded, with more than thirty candidates reportedly considering presidential bids. Among them: Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey, Senator Kamala Harris of California, Senator Bernie Sanders, former Vice President Joe Biden, and departing U.S. Representative Beto O'Rourke, who lost a close Senate race against Ted Cruz in Texas but became a national celebrity.
Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio, and Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota are also considering runs. (More on their developing campaigns to come in future posts.)
From Sanders to Warren to Brown to O'Rourke, it's a notably populist field.
From Sanders to Warren to Brown to O'Rourke, it's a notably populist field.
One exception is Cory Booker, the only candidate so far to have a super PAC launched to support his 2020 presidential campaign. Booker, as mayor of Newark, accepted $100 million from Mark Zuckerberg to "fix" the Newark public schools, and supported a disastrous plan to close schools, hand the district over to charter-school operators, disempower teachers unions and the local school board, all without improving outcomes for children.
As the starting gate opens, Elizabeth Warren has leapt forward to position herself as the progressive champion. In her campaign-launch video, Warren declares: "America's middle-class is under attack. How did we get here? Billionaires and big corporations decided they wanted more of the pie, and they enlisted politicians to cut them a fatter slice. They crippled unions, so no one could stop them, dismantled the financial rules meant to protect us after the Great Depression, and cut their own taxes so they paid less than their secretaries and janitors."
It's a pretty good summary of the economic-populist case that drove grassroots enthusiasm for Bernie Sanders in 2016.
And while some people think Warren missed her moment when she let down the supporters who urged her to join the 2016 field, she has spent her time in the Senate accumulating more credibility as a defender of ordinary citizens against Wall Street predators. This included defending her brainchild, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and grilling titans like Wells Fargo CEO Timothy Sloan, who, she pointed out, got rich screwing low-level employees and consumers.
Warren, like Trump, is a lightning rod. Hated by conservatives and bankers, adored by her base, she has already gotten down in the mud with Trump, who nicknamed her "Pocahontas" and baited her into taking an ill-advised DNA test to prove she had Native American blood, which infuriated her allies and fueled her detractors.
Warren, like Trump, is a lightning rod.
Still, if the U.S. economy goes into a steep decline--a distinct possibility in 2019--Warren's message will seem more relevant than ever.
Certainly, her voice seems more relevant than Mr. 47 percent, Mitt Romney, who, in a leaked video of a 2012 speech to wealthy campaign donors, denounced nearly half of Americans, who, he said, are "dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing . . . ."
Here's a prediction: Political leaders who believe people are entitled to health care, food, and housing will see their stock rise in the coming year.
In his recent Washington Post oped, Romney denounced Trump's character, but praised his policy decisions, including cutting corporate taxes, getting rid of "excessive regulation," and appointing conservative judges.
The battle lines are clear. On with the races.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.