We have no sign that the luck of that top 0.01 percent will be turning anytime soon. (Photo: Philipp/cc/flickr)
Sep 05, 2018
How can we tell when a democracy, or rule by the people, evolves into a plutocracy, the reign of the rich? Easy. We have a democracy when a political system can and does make a good-faith effort to address the problems average people face.
In a plutocracy, on the other hand, the political system pays no more than lip service to average people's problems and works diligently instead at protecting -- and growing -- the wealth of the already wealthy.
By this simple standard, we Americans today unquestionably live in a plutocracy. Our latest slam-dunk evidence: the record of the decade since the Wall Street financial crash ushered in the Great Recession.
Almost exactly ten years ago, in late summer 2008, the tremors that had been roiling the U.S. economy ever since the housing bubble popped the year before turned into an economic earthquake. The giant Lehman Brothers investment bank fell into one yawning fissure. The giant insurer AIG stumbled toward another.
" Citigroup appeared poised to go down next, with General Motors and Chrysler to follow," remembers the New Yorker's George Packer. "Everything solid in the American economy turned out to be built on sand."
No American born after the 1929 crash had ever since anything like this. In quick order, about 9 million workers lost their jobs. About the same number of families lost their homes.
What happened next? Plutocracy happened next. The American political system came rushing to the rescue of the same elites whose frauds and financial manipulations had greased the skids for the crisis.
The nation's wealthiest 10 percent, as NYU economist Edward Wolff has detailed, holds 84 percent of the nation's stock value, up from 81 percent in 2007.
Last week, a triumphant Wall Street celebrated that rescue, on the day the stock market reached a historic milestone: 3,453 days of bull market, arguably, the New York Times noted, the longest bull market in American financial history. Since March 2009, the share values of publicly traded companies in the United States have increased over 320 percent, creating, in the process, more than $18 trillion in new wealth.
The bulk of that new wealth -- the overwhelming bulk -- has settled in the pockets of America's affluent. The nation's wealthiest 10 percent, as NYU economist Edward Wolff has detailed, holds 84 percent of the nation's stock value, up from 81 percent in 2007.
And what about the vast majority of Americans who own either no stock at all or precious little? As of 2016, the most recent year with full data available, the overall wealth of the median -- most typical -- American household is sitting 34 percent below that household's net worth just before the Great Recession began.
Average Americans are hurting on the income side, too. The 2008 crash and its aftermath, researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco have computed, are going to end up costing the average American $70,000 in lifetime income.
So what do all these numbers mean for the decade since the financial crash?
"This is the decade," says the German economist Moritz Schularick, "in which wealth inequality has increased the most in U.S. history."
"This is the decade," says the German economist Moritz Schularick, "in which wealth inequality has increased the most in U.S. history."
The nation's richest 0.01 percent, as the economists Annette Alstadsaeter, Niels Johannesen, and Gabriel Zucman have documented, now hold 9.9 percent of the nation's total wealth -- and 11.2 percent once we take into account the assets America's wealthiest have stashed in offshore tax havens.
We have no sign that the luck of that top 0.01 percent will be turning anytime soon. The enormous tax break for Corporate America enacted last December has 2018 corporate second-quarter profits up nearly 25 percent over 2017 levels.
And that surge comes above and beyond three decades of already rising corporate profits. Between 1984 and 2014, calculates London School of Business analyst Simcha Barkai, the share of the nation's output going to corporate profit more than tripled. In 2014, that increase shoved $1.35 trillion extra into the pockets of shareholders and business owners, the equivalent of $17,000 for every worker in America's corporate sector.
All these numbers, some might say, signal that our economic and political system isn't working. But the system is working -- for the rich. From a plutocracy, we shouldn't expect anything else.
Still, we can end here on a cheery note. Americans a century ago faced a plutocracy just like ours today. They beat their plutocracy back. We can do the same.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
Sam Pizzigati
Sam Pizzigati, veteran labor journalist and Institute for Policy Studies associate fellow, edits Inequality.org. His recent books include: The Case for a Maximum Wage (2018) and The Rich Don't Always Win: The Forgotten Triumph over Plutocracy that Created the American Middle Class, 1900-1970 (2012).
How can we tell when a democracy, or rule by the people, evolves into a plutocracy, the reign of the rich? Easy. We have a democracy when a political system can and does make a good-faith effort to address the problems average people face.
In a plutocracy, on the other hand, the political system pays no more than lip service to average people's problems and works diligently instead at protecting -- and growing -- the wealth of the already wealthy.
By this simple standard, we Americans today unquestionably live in a plutocracy. Our latest slam-dunk evidence: the record of the decade since the Wall Street financial crash ushered in the Great Recession.
Almost exactly ten years ago, in late summer 2008, the tremors that had been roiling the U.S. economy ever since the housing bubble popped the year before turned into an economic earthquake. The giant Lehman Brothers investment bank fell into one yawning fissure. The giant insurer AIG stumbled toward another.
" Citigroup appeared poised to go down next, with General Motors and Chrysler to follow," remembers the New Yorker's George Packer. "Everything solid in the American economy turned out to be built on sand."
No American born after the 1929 crash had ever since anything like this. In quick order, about 9 million workers lost their jobs. About the same number of families lost their homes.
What happened next? Plutocracy happened next. The American political system came rushing to the rescue of the same elites whose frauds and financial manipulations had greased the skids for the crisis.
The nation's wealthiest 10 percent, as NYU economist Edward Wolff has detailed, holds 84 percent of the nation's stock value, up from 81 percent in 2007.
Last week, a triumphant Wall Street celebrated that rescue, on the day the stock market reached a historic milestone: 3,453 days of bull market, arguably, the New York Times noted, the longest bull market in American financial history. Since March 2009, the share values of publicly traded companies in the United States have increased over 320 percent, creating, in the process, more than $18 trillion in new wealth.
The bulk of that new wealth -- the overwhelming bulk -- has settled in the pockets of America's affluent. The nation's wealthiest 10 percent, as NYU economist Edward Wolff has detailed, holds 84 percent of the nation's stock value, up from 81 percent in 2007.
And what about the vast majority of Americans who own either no stock at all or precious little? As of 2016, the most recent year with full data available, the overall wealth of the median -- most typical -- American household is sitting 34 percent below that household's net worth just before the Great Recession began.
Average Americans are hurting on the income side, too. The 2008 crash and its aftermath, researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco have computed, are going to end up costing the average American $70,000 in lifetime income.
So what do all these numbers mean for the decade since the financial crash?
"This is the decade," says the German economist Moritz Schularick, "in which wealth inequality has increased the most in U.S. history."
"This is the decade," says the German economist Moritz Schularick, "in which wealth inequality has increased the most in U.S. history."
The nation's richest 0.01 percent, as the economists Annette Alstadsaeter, Niels Johannesen, and Gabriel Zucman have documented, now hold 9.9 percent of the nation's total wealth -- and 11.2 percent once we take into account the assets America's wealthiest have stashed in offshore tax havens.
We have no sign that the luck of that top 0.01 percent will be turning anytime soon. The enormous tax break for Corporate America enacted last December has 2018 corporate second-quarter profits up nearly 25 percent over 2017 levels.
And that surge comes above and beyond three decades of already rising corporate profits. Between 1984 and 2014, calculates London School of Business analyst Simcha Barkai, the share of the nation's output going to corporate profit more than tripled. In 2014, that increase shoved $1.35 trillion extra into the pockets of shareholders and business owners, the equivalent of $17,000 for every worker in America's corporate sector.
All these numbers, some might say, signal that our economic and political system isn't working. But the system is working -- for the rich. From a plutocracy, we shouldn't expect anything else.
Still, we can end here on a cheery note. Americans a century ago faced a plutocracy just like ours today. They beat their plutocracy back. We can do the same.
Sam Pizzigati
Sam Pizzigati, veteran labor journalist and Institute for Policy Studies associate fellow, edits Inequality.org. His recent books include: The Case for a Maximum Wage (2018) and The Rich Don't Always Win: The Forgotten Triumph over Plutocracy that Created the American Middle Class, 1900-1970 (2012).
How can we tell when a democracy, or rule by the people, evolves into a plutocracy, the reign of the rich? Easy. We have a democracy when a political system can and does make a good-faith effort to address the problems average people face.
In a plutocracy, on the other hand, the political system pays no more than lip service to average people's problems and works diligently instead at protecting -- and growing -- the wealth of the already wealthy.
By this simple standard, we Americans today unquestionably live in a plutocracy. Our latest slam-dunk evidence: the record of the decade since the Wall Street financial crash ushered in the Great Recession.
Almost exactly ten years ago, in late summer 2008, the tremors that had been roiling the U.S. economy ever since the housing bubble popped the year before turned into an economic earthquake. The giant Lehman Brothers investment bank fell into one yawning fissure. The giant insurer AIG stumbled toward another.
" Citigroup appeared poised to go down next, with General Motors and Chrysler to follow," remembers the New Yorker's George Packer. "Everything solid in the American economy turned out to be built on sand."
No American born after the 1929 crash had ever since anything like this. In quick order, about 9 million workers lost their jobs. About the same number of families lost their homes.
What happened next? Plutocracy happened next. The American political system came rushing to the rescue of the same elites whose frauds and financial manipulations had greased the skids for the crisis.
The nation's wealthiest 10 percent, as NYU economist Edward Wolff has detailed, holds 84 percent of the nation's stock value, up from 81 percent in 2007.
Last week, a triumphant Wall Street celebrated that rescue, on the day the stock market reached a historic milestone: 3,453 days of bull market, arguably, the New York Times noted, the longest bull market in American financial history. Since March 2009, the share values of publicly traded companies in the United States have increased over 320 percent, creating, in the process, more than $18 trillion in new wealth.
The bulk of that new wealth -- the overwhelming bulk -- has settled in the pockets of America's affluent. The nation's wealthiest 10 percent, as NYU economist Edward Wolff has detailed, holds 84 percent of the nation's stock value, up from 81 percent in 2007.
And what about the vast majority of Americans who own either no stock at all or precious little? As of 2016, the most recent year with full data available, the overall wealth of the median -- most typical -- American household is sitting 34 percent below that household's net worth just before the Great Recession began.
Average Americans are hurting on the income side, too. The 2008 crash and its aftermath, researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco have computed, are going to end up costing the average American $70,000 in lifetime income.
So what do all these numbers mean for the decade since the financial crash?
"This is the decade," says the German economist Moritz Schularick, "in which wealth inequality has increased the most in U.S. history."
"This is the decade," says the German economist Moritz Schularick, "in which wealth inequality has increased the most in U.S. history."
The nation's richest 0.01 percent, as the economists Annette Alstadsaeter, Niels Johannesen, and Gabriel Zucman have documented, now hold 9.9 percent of the nation's total wealth -- and 11.2 percent once we take into account the assets America's wealthiest have stashed in offshore tax havens.
We have no sign that the luck of that top 0.01 percent will be turning anytime soon. The enormous tax break for Corporate America enacted last December has 2018 corporate second-quarter profits up nearly 25 percent over 2017 levels.
And that surge comes above and beyond three decades of already rising corporate profits. Between 1984 and 2014, calculates London School of Business analyst Simcha Barkai, the share of the nation's output going to corporate profit more than tripled. In 2014, that increase shoved $1.35 trillion extra into the pockets of shareholders and business owners, the equivalent of $17,000 for every worker in America's corporate sector.
All these numbers, some might say, signal that our economic and political system isn't working. But the system is working -- for the rich. From a plutocracy, we shouldn't expect anything else.
Still, we can end here on a cheery note. Americans a century ago faced a plutocracy just like ours today. They beat their plutocracy back. We can do the same.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.