SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"Don't be surprised when extended U.S. military presence in eastern Syria starts to resemble occupation and a new anti-American insurgency flares up. Call it ISIS 2.0." (Photo: Kurdishstruggle/flickr/cc)
America's Syria Trap
Pay attention, folks. It’s about to get a lot worse in the Middle East. Again.
Jan 25, 2018
Remember when a ground invasion of a sovereign country--perpetrated by a NATO ally--would constitute a big story?
Before Donald Trump, "Russiagate" and the mainstream media's apparent obligation to cover every presidential tweet, Turkish planes bombing--and tanks rumbling through--Syria might've been real news. These days hardly anyone has the energy to care. No, Washington pols have been too busy misappropriating the poor, underpaid military to bolster their own narrative around the three-day government shutdown. Neither side comes up for air long enough to ask real questions about the mission and status of all those American soldiers and Marines still deployed in Syria--not all that far from the Turkish military incursion.
Hate to say I told you so, but I saw the Turkish invasion coming, all but predicted it, in fact. Heck, anyone paying just a little attention could have. Thing is, most Americans--for all their thanks-for-your-service platitudes--couldn't give a hoot about foreign policy. There's no draft, no new taxes, they've got no "skin in the game." Well, as the monumental catastrophe that is the Syrian civil war escalates with the latest Turkish invasion, someone ought to remind Americans that they've still got a few thousand troops on the ground there.
The whole situation is a mess, and once again it appears the U.S. military is caught in the middle of the maelstrom. Here's a one-minute review: Syrian President Bashar Assad, assisted by his Iranian and Russian allies, has all but crushed the rebels west of the Euphrates River. The U.S. and its Saudi Arabian allies are none too happy about that, but they are basically powerless to do anything about it. Islamic State--at least in a conventional sense--has been routed by U.S.-allied Kurdish militias east of the Euphrates. These days, a tense stasis between U.S. and Russian-backed forces exists along the river, just waiting for some spark to kick off a truly catastrophic conflict. Enter the Turks--frenemies and NATO allies to boot--who hate American-sponsored Kurdish militias in Syria's north. Turkey makes no distinction between the Syrian People's Protection Units, or YPG (our Kurds), and the insurgent Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) on the other side of the border. The Turks insist they're both "terrorists"--a convenient label even if it has been so stretched as to elude any real meaning.
So here we are, the American military, staring down the Russians and Assad while holding a weak hand. Nonetheless, senior administration officials and top generals pronounce their intention to indefinitely stay in Syria to "counter Iran" and deny Islamic State's return.
Haven't we been here before? I distinctly remember being told my troops had to remain in Iraq and Afghanistan or the "terrorists" would find that mythical "safe haven" in Baghdad or Kandahar. That approach may not be accurate, but it sure is a proven formula for perpetual war. Don't be surprised when extended U.S. military presence in eastern Syria starts to resemble occupation and a new anti-American insurgency flares up. Call it ISIS 2.0.
The crazy part is, right now, that might be the least of our problems. Turkish planes, troops and armed proxies are rolling toward the town of Manbij, where U.S. troops allegedly are embedded with the YPG. Whether it's in Manbij or elsewhere, what happens when a Turkish F-16 fighter--designed in America--drops a bomb that kills a U.S. Green Beret in Syria? War with a NATO ally? The closing of strategic U.S. bases in Turkey? An embarrassing climb-down to defuse regional tensions? None of those options sound too appealing, and de-escalation doesn't strike me as President Trump's game.
Should Turkey's bombing and ground incursion catalyze or exacerbate Syria's broader ethno-sectarian nightmare, well, that'd suit Islamic State just fine. Count on those remarkably resilient and eminently malleable jihadis to exploit the ensuing chaos to reconstitute in Syria's Sunni heartland. Islamic State may never again field conventional legions, but a slow-burning and no less horrific insurgency appears conceivable. ISIS and other Islamists have a knack for thriving in war-ravaged locales. Need proof? Check out Yemen, where another U.S.-backed war has only empowered the local al-Qaida franchise. This is counterproductivity. The new American way.
The point is as simple as it is alarming. Once again, Washington has trapped itself in a byzantine Mideast quagmire largely of its own making. Worse still, it's unclear if the administration's "adults in the room" have anything resembling a coherent exit strategy from Syria. Who's asking the tough questions? Is anyone piloting this ship? I, for one, am not so sure.
Pay attention, folks. It's about to get a lot worse in the Middle East. Again. But hey, Americans do love sequels.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 TruthDig
Danny Sjursen
Danny Sjursen is a retired US Army officer, senior fellow at the Center for International Policy (CIP), and director of the Eisenhower Media Network (EMN). His work has appeared in the NY Times, LA Times, Common Dreams, Mother Jones, and TomDispatch. He served combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan and later taught history at West Point. He is the author of a memoir and critical analysis of the Iraq War, "Ghostriders of Baghdad: Soldiers, Civilians, and the Myth of the Surge" (2015) and "Patriotic Dissent: America in the Age of Endless War" (2020). Along with fellow vet Chris "Henri" Henriksen, he co-hosts the podcast "Fortress on a Hill." Follow him on Twitter @SkepticalVet and on his website.
Remember when a ground invasion of a sovereign country--perpetrated by a NATO ally--would constitute a big story?
Before Donald Trump, "Russiagate" and the mainstream media's apparent obligation to cover every presidential tweet, Turkish planes bombing--and tanks rumbling through--Syria might've been real news. These days hardly anyone has the energy to care. No, Washington pols have been too busy misappropriating the poor, underpaid military to bolster their own narrative around the three-day government shutdown. Neither side comes up for air long enough to ask real questions about the mission and status of all those American soldiers and Marines still deployed in Syria--not all that far from the Turkish military incursion.
Hate to say I told you so, but I saw the Turkish invasion coming, all but predicted it, in fact. Heck, anyone paying just a little attention could have. Thing is, most Americans--for all their thanks-for-your-service platitudes--couldn't give a hoot about foreign policy. There's no draft, no new taxes, they've got no "skin in the game." Well, as the monumental catastrophe that is the Syrian civil war escalates with the latest Turkish invasion, someone ought to remind Americans that they've still got a few thousand troops on the ground there.
The whole situation is a mess, and once again it appears the U.S. military is caught in the middle of the maelstrom. Here's a one-minute review: Syrian President Bashar Assad, assisted by his Iranian and Russian allies, has all but crushed the rebels west of the Euphrates River. The U.S. and its Saudi Arabian allies are none too happy about that, but they are basically powerless to do anything about it. Islamic State--at least in a conventional sense--has been routed by U.S.-allied Kurdish militias east of the Euphrates. These days, a tense stasis between U.S. and Russian-backed forces exists along the river, just waiting for some spark to kick off a truly catastrophic conflict. Enter the Turks--frenemies and NATO allies to boot--who hate American-sponsored Kurdish militias in Syria's north. Turkey makes no distinction between the Syrian People's Protection Units, or YPG (our Kurds), and the insurgent Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) on the other side of the border. The Turks insist they're both "terrorists"--a convenient label even if it has been so stretched as to elude any real meaning.
So here we are, the American military, staring down the Russians and Assad while holding a weak hand. Nonetheless, senior administration officials and top generals pronounce their intention to indefinitely stay in Syria to "counter Iran" and deny Islamic State's return.
Haven't we been here before? I distinctly remember being told my troops had to remain in Iraq and Afghanistan or the "terrorists" would find that mythical "safe haven" in Baghdad or Kandahar. That approach may not be accurate, but it sure is a proven formula for perpetual war. Don't be surprised when extended U.S. military presence in eastern Syria starts to resemble occupation and a new anti-American insurgency flares up. Call it ISIS 2.0.
The crazy part is, right now, that might be the least of our problems. Turkish planes, troops and armed proxies are rolling toward the town of Manbij, where U.S. troops allegedly are embedded with the YPG. Whether it's in Manbij or elsewhere, what happens when a Turkish F-16 fighter--designed in America--drops a bomb that kills a U.S. Green Beret in Syria? War with a NATO ally? The closing of strategic U.S. bases in Turkey? An embarrassing climb-down to defuse regional tensions? None of those options sound too appealing, and de-escalation doesn't strike me as President Trump's game.
Should Turkey's bombing and ground incursion catalyze or exacerbate Syria's broader ethno-sectarian nightmare, well, that'd suit Islamic State just fine. Count on those remarkably resilient and eminently malleable jihadis to exploit the ensuing chaos to reconstitute in Syria's Sunni heartland. Islamic State may never again field conventional legions, but a slow-burning and no less horrific insurgency appears conceivable. ISIS and other Islamists have a knack for thriving in war-ravaged locales. Need proof? Check out Yemen, where another U.S.-backed war has only empowered the local al-Qaida franchise. This is counterproductivity. The new American way.
The point is as simple as it is alarming. Once again, Washington has trapped itself in a byzantine Mideast quagmire largely of its own making. Worse still, it's unclear if the administration's "adults in the room" have anything resembling a coherent exit strategy from Syria. Who's asking the tough questions? Is anyone piloting this ship? I, for one, am not so sure.
Pay attention, folks. It's about to get a lot worse in the Middle East. Again. But hey, Americans do love sequels.
Danny Sjursen
Danny Sjursen is a retired US Army officer, senior fellow at the Center for International Policy (CIP), and director of the Eisenhower Media Network (EMN). His work has appeared in the NY Times, LA Times, Common Dreams, Mother Jones, and TomDispatch. He served combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan and later taught history at West Point. He is the author of a memoir and critical analysis of the Iraq War, "Ghostriders of Baghdad: Soldiers, Civilians, and the Myth of the Surge" (2015) and "Patriotic Dissent: America in the Age of Endless War" (2020). Along with fellow vet Chris "Henri" Henriksen, he co-hosts the podcast "Fortress on a Hill." Follow him on Twitter @SkepticalVet and on his website.
Remember when a ground invasion of a sovereign country--perpetrated by a NATO ally--would constitute a big story?
Before Donald Trump, "Russiagate" and the mainstream media's apparent obligation to cover every presidential tweet, Turkish planes bombing--and tanks rumbling through--Syria might've been real news. These days hardly anyone has the energy to care. No, Washington pols have been too busy misappropriating the poor, underpaid military to bolster their own narrative around the three-day government shutdown. Neither side comes up for air long enough to ask real questions about the mission and status of all those American soldiers and Marines still deployed in Syria--not all that far from the Turkish military incursion.
Hate to say I told you so, but I saw the Turkish invasion coming, all but predicted it, in fact. Heck, anyone paying just a little attention could have. Thing is, most Americans--for all their thanks-for-your-service platitudes--couldn't give a hoot about foreign policy. There's no draft, no new taxes, they've got no "skin in the game." Well, as the monumental catastrophe that is the Syrian civil war escalates with the latest Turkish invasion, someone ought to remind Americans that they've still got a few thousand troops on the ground there.
The whole situation is a mess, and once again it appears the U.S. military is caught in the middle of the maelstrom. Here's a one-minute review: Syrian President Bashar Assad, assisted by his Iranian and Russian allies, has all but crushed the rebels west of the Euphrates River. The U.S. and its Saudi Arabian allies are none too happy about that, but they are basically powerless to do anything about it. Islamic State--at least in a conventional sense--has been routed by U.S.-allied Kurdish militias east of the Euphrates. These days, a tense stasis between U.S. and Russian-backed forces exists along the river, just waiting for some spark to kick off a truly catastrophic conflict. Enter the Turks--frenemies and NATO allies to boot--who hate American-sponsored Kurdish militias in Syria's north. Turkey makes no distinction between the Syrian People's Protection Units, or YPG (our Kurds), and the insurgent Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) on the other side of the border. The Turks insist they're both "terrorists"--a convenient label even if it has been so stretched as to elude any real meaning.
So here we are, the American military, staring down the Russians and Assad while holding a weak hand. Nonetheless, senior administration officials and top generals pronounce their intention to indefinitely stay in Syria to "counter Iran" and deny Islamic State's return.
Haven't we been here before? I distinctly remember being told my troops had to remain in Iraq and Afghanistan or the "terrorists" would find that mythical "safe haven" in Baghdad or Kandahar. That approach may not be accurate, but it sure is a proven formula for perpetual war. Don't be surprised when extended U.S. military presence in eastern Syria starts to resemble occupation and a new anti-American insurgency flares up. Call it ISIS 2.0.
The crazy part is, right now, that might be the least of our problems. Turkish planes, troops and armed proxies are rolling toward the town of Manbij, where U.S. troops allegedly are embedded with the YPG. Whether it's in Manbij or elsewhere, what happens when a Turkish F-16 fighter--designed in America--drops a bomb that kills a U.S. Green Beret in Syria? War with a NATO ally? The closing of strategic U.S. bases in Turkey? An embarrassing climb-down to defuse regional tensions? None of those options sound too appealing, and de-escalation doesn't strike me as President Trump's game.
Should Turkey's bombing and ground incursion catalyze or exacerbate Syria's broader ethno-sectarian nightmare, well, that'd suit Islamic State just fine. Count on those remarkably resilient and eminently malleable jihadis to exploit the ensuing chaos to reconstitute in Syria's Sunni heartland. Islamic State may never again field conventional legions, but a slow-burning and no less horrific insurgency appears conceivable. ISIS and other Islamists have a knack for thriving in war-ravaged locales. Need proof? Check out Yemen, where another U.S.-backed war has only empowered the local al-Qaida franchise. This is counterproductivity. The new American way.
The point is as simple as it is alarming. Once again, Washington has trapped itself in a byzantine Mideast quagmire largely of its own making. Worse still, it's unclear if the administration's "adults in the room" have anything resembling a coherent exit strategy from Syria. Who's asking the tough questions? Is anyone piloting this ship? I, for one, am not so sure.
Pay attention, folks. It's about to get a lot worse in the Middle East. Again. But hey, Americans do love sequels.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.