Scott Pruitt Has Misled Congress on Climate Multiple Times
On Thursday morning, Donald Trump's EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt told CNBC that he does not believe carbon dioxide is a "primary contributor" to global warming.
On Thursday morning, Donald Trump's EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt told CNBC that he does not believe carbon dioxide is a "primary contributor" to global warming.
"I think that measuring with precision human activity on the climate is something very challenging to do and there's tremendous disagreement about the degree of impact, so no, I would not agree that it's a primary contributor to the global warming that we see," he told CNBC's "Squawk Box."
Fundamentally, of course, this statement contradicts the overwhelming scientific consensus that man is driving the climate crisis by burning fossil fuels and adding excess CO2 and other greenhouse gasses to the atmosphere. According to NASA, "Humans have increased atmospheric CO2 concentration by more than a third since the Industrial Revolution began. This is the most important long-lived 'forcing' of climate change."
The view Pruitt articulated also directly contradicts statements which he made very clearly to the Senate in at least three instances.
That Pruitt misled congress is clear. In formal written testimony (Page 122) as part of "Questions for the Record", Pruitt certified that "I also believe the Administrator has an important role when it comes to the regulation of carbon dioxide, which I will fulfill consistent with Massachusetts v. EPA and the agency's Endangerment Finding on Greenhouse Gases respective of the applicable statutory framework established by Congress."
Separately, in an exchange with Senator Bernie Sanders, Pruitt said "Senator, I believe that the [EPA] administrator has a very important role to perform in regulating CO2."
By offering and affirming that the EPA Administrator has an important role in regulating carbon dioxide in light of the EPA's Endangerment Finding, Pruitt clearly acknowledged the role CO2 plays in global warming.
But his deception goes even deeper. During separate questioning in committee Pruitt also explicitly acknowledged "That the endangerment finding is there and needs to be enforced and respected." When pressed by Senator Markey on whether he would review or alter the finding if confirmed, Pruitt said "There is nothing that I know that would cause a review at this point."
Pruitt clearly made the case to the Senate at the time that he had no reason to reverse the finding that CO2 poses a danger by causing climate change, whereas now he says publicly that it does not pose a danger, actively denying the role of CO2 as a dangerous climate pollutant. Pruitt's dissembling was so thorough that back in January NPR wrote a headline saying "Pruitt Denounces Regulations and Distances Himself From Climate Change Deniers at Hearing to Lead EPA"
It's clear from all of this that Scott Pruitt misled Congress and the American people about his intentions and beliefs as regards a core agency responsibility of regulating CO2 emissions.
For these reasons, Senators should demand that Pruitt be removed from his position -- that way he can be a fossil fuel lobbyist on his own time and not the government's dime.
The arsonist is now in charge of the fire department, and Pruitt wants to let the climate crisis burn out of control. The EPA administrator is supposed to protect families and communities from environmental crises, but all Pruitt is willing to do is spewing corporate polluter talking points.
Pruitt is clearly unfit and uniquely unsuited to do the job he has been entrusted to do.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
On Thursday morning, Donald Trump's EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt told CNBC that he does not believe carbon dioxide is a "primary contributor" to global warming.
"I think that measuring with precision human activity on the climate is something very challenging to do and there's tremendous disagreement about the degree of impact, so no, I would not agree that it's a primary contributor to the global warming that we see," he told CNBC's "Squawk Box."
Fundamentally, of course, this statement contradicts the overwhelming scientific consensus that man is driving the climate crisis by burning fossil fuels and adding excess CO2 and other greenhouse gasses to the atmosphere. According to NASA, "Humans have increased atmospheric CO2 concentration by more than a third since the Industrial Revolution began. This is the most important long-lived 'forcing' of climate change."
The view Pruitt articulated also directly contradicts statements which he made very clearly to the Senate in at least three instances.
That Pruitt misled congress is clear. In formal written testimony (Page 122) as part of "Questions for the Record", Pruitt certified that "I also believe the Administrator has an important role when it comes to the regulation of carbon dioxide, which I will fulfill consistent with Massachusetts v. EPA and the agency's Endangerment Finding on Greenhouse Gases respective of the applicable statutory framework established by Congress."
Separately, in an exchange with Senator Bernie Sanders, Pruitt said "Senator, I believe that the [EPA] administrator has a very important role to perform in regulating CO2."
By offering and affirming that the EPA Administrator has an important role in regulating carbon dioxide in light of the EPA's Endangerment Finding, Pruitt clearly acknowledged the role CO2 plays in global warming.
But his deception goes even deeper. During separate questioning in committee Pruitt also explicitly acknowledged "That the endangerment finding is there and needs to be enforced and respected." When pressed by Senator Markey on whether he would review or alter the finding if confirmed, Pruitt said "There is nothing that I know that would cause a review at this point."
Pruitt clearly made the case to the Senate at the time that he had no reason to reverse the finding that CO2 poses a danger by causing climate change, whereas now he says publicly that it does not pose a danger, actively denying the role of CO2 as a dangerous climate pollutant. Pruitt's dissembling was so thorough that back in January NPR wrote a headline saying "Pruitt Denounces Regulations and Distances Himself From Climate Change Deniers at Hearing to Lead EPA"
It's clear from all of this that Scott Pruitt misled Congress and the American people about his intentions and beliefs as regards a core agency responsibility of regulating CO2 emissions.
For these reasons, Senators should demand that Pruitt be removed from his position -- that way he can be a fossil fuel lobbyist on his own time and not the government's dime.
The arsonist is now in charge of the fire department, and Pruitt wants to let the climate crisis burn out of control. The EPA administrator is supposed to protect families and communities from environmental crises, but all Pruitt is willing to do is spewing corporate polluter talking points.
Pruitt is clearly unfit and uniquely unsuited to do the job he has been entrusted to do.
On Thursday morning, Donald Trump's EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt told CNBC that he does not believe carbon dioxide is a "primary contributor" to global warming.
"I think that measuring with precision human activity on the climate is something very challenging to do and there's tremendous disagreement about the degree of impact, so no, I would not agree that it's a primary contributor to the global warming that we see," he told CNBC's "Squawk Box."
Fundamentally, of course, this statement contradicts the overwhelming scientific consensus that man is driving the climate crisis by burning fossil fuels and adding excess CO2 and other greenhouse gasses to the atmosphere. According to NASA, "Humans have increased atmospheric CO2 concentration by more than a third since the Industrial Revolution began. This is the most important long-lived 'forcing' of climate change."
The view Pruitt articulated also directly contradicts statements which he made very clearly to the Senate in at least three instances.
That Pruitt misled congress is clear. In formal written testimony (Page 122) as part of "Questions for the Record", Pruitt certified that "I also believe the Administrator has an important role when it comes to the regulation of carbon dioxide, which I will fulfill consistent with Massachusetts v. EPA and the agency's Endangerment Finding on Greenhouse Gases respective of the applicable statutory framework established by Congress."
Separately, in an exchange with Senator Bernie Sanders, Pruitt said "Senator, I believe that the [EPA] administrator has a very important role to perform in regulating CO2."
By offering and affirming that the EPA Administrator has an important role in regulating carbon dioxide in light of the EPA's Endangerment Finding, Pruitt clearly acknowledged the role CO2 plays in global warming.
But his deception goes even deeper. During separate questioning in committee Pruitt also explicitly acknowledged "That the endangerment finding is there and needs to be enforced and respected." When pressed by Senator Markey on whether he would review or alter the finding if confirmed, Pruitt said "There is nothing that I know that would cause a review at this point."
Pruitt clearly made the case to the Senate at the time that he had no reason to reverse the finding that CO2 poses a danger by causing climate change, whereas now he says publicly that it does not pose a danger, actively denying the role of CO2 as a dangerous climate pollutant. Pruitt's dissembling was so thorough that back in January NPR wrote a headline saying "Pruitt Denounces Regulations and Distances Himself From Climate Change Deniers at Hearing to Lead EPA"
It's clear from all of this that Scott Pruitt misled Congress and the American people about his intentions and beliefs as regards a core agency responsibility of regulating CO2 emissions.
For these reasons, Senators should demand that Pruitt be removed from his position -- that way he can be a fossil fuel lobbyist on his own time and not the government's dime.
The arsonist is now in charge of the fire department, and Pruitt wants to let the climate crisis burn out of control. The EPA administrator is supposed to protect families and communities from environmental crises, but all Pruitt is willing to do is spewing corporate polluter talking points.
Pruitt is clearly unfit and uniquely unsuited to do the job he has been entrusted to do.