SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Attorney General-designate, Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala. is sworn in for his confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. on Tuesday. (Photo: AP)
On Capitol Hill today, the Senate Judiciary Committee is holding confirmation hearings to consider the first of Donald Trump's cabinet nominations, Sen. Jefferson B. Sessions of Alabama. 26 years ago, this same committee denied Sessions a recommendation for the federal bench. "Most of Reagan's judicial appointments have been people with impressive credentials regardless of their ideologies," the editors of the LA Times wrote. "Sessions is a different story."
The Senate refused to confirm Sessions in 1986 because the testimony they heard suggested that he sided with his namesake, Jefferson Davis, over America's commitment to equal protection under the law.
A quarter century later, the Senate must decide if Sessions has changed.
Senator Sessions' record suggests a remarkable consistency in support of policies that contradict and subvert the Reconstruction amendments to the U.S. Constitution
If the photo of Senator Sessions greeting Donald Trump's "thank you" tour in Mobile, Alabama, alongside Southern belles in hoop skirts isn't enough to make clear what past greatness his support of Trump hearkens back to, then the nation should listen to the question of one civil rights veteran from Alabama who asked, in the language of Scripture, "Can a leopard change his spots?"
Senator Sessions' record suggests a remarkable consistency in support of policies that contradict and subvert the Reconstruction amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantee citizenship, equal protection under the law, and the ballot to all Americans.
Indeed. The record is clear. Here are eight reasons why the Senate must reject Sessions.
If Jefferson B. Sessions were confirmed by the Senate in 2017, we would have have an attorney general who, as a senator:
The positions and policies Senator Sessions has supported do not uplift America's shared values of love, justice and mercy.
Like George Wallace before him, Jeff Sessions is a faithful member of the United Methodist Church in Alabama. But he has not in half a century of public life demonstrated any willingness to turn from evil and learn to do good.
The positions and policies Senator Sessions has supported do not uplift America's shared values of love, justice and mercy, despite his trappings of respectability and declarations of faith. He has neither repented of his wrongdoing nor committed to change. So we must reject his nomination and the nomination of any candidate for Attorney General who poses a threat to equal justice and the freedoms we hold dear.
When those who wield the power of the state deprive the people of these freedoms, citizens in general and the U.S. Department of Justice in particular must resist their injustice and hold them accountable. Senator Sessions is clearly unfit for the role of Attorney General.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
On Capitol Hill today, the Senate Judiciary Committee is holding confirmation hearings to consider the first of Donald Trump's cabinet nominations, Sen. Jefferson B. Sessions of Alabama. 26 years ago, this same committee denied Sessions a recommendation for the federal bench. "Most of Reagan's judicial appointments have been people with impressive credentials regardless of their ideologies," the editors of the LA Times wrote. "Sessions is a different story."
The Senate refused to confirm Sessions in 1986 because the testimony they heard suggested that he sided with his namesake, Jefferson Davis, over America's commitment to equal protection under the law.
A quarter century later, the Senate must decide if Sessions has changed.
Senator Sessions' record suggests a remarkable consistency in support of policies that contradict and subvert the Reconstruction amendments to the U.S. Constitution
If the photo of Senator Sessions greeting Donald Trump's "thank you" tour in Mobile, Alabama, alongside Southern belles in hoop skirts isn't enough to make clear what past greatness his support of Trump hearkens back to, then the nation should listen to the question of one civil rights veteran from Alabama who asked, in the language of Scripture, "Can a leopard change his spots?"
Senator Sessions' record suggests a remarkable consistency in support of policies that contradict and subvert the Reconstruction amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantee citizenship, equal protection under the law, and the ballot to all Americans.
Indeed. The record is clear. Here are eight reasons why the Senate must reject Sessions.
If Jefferson B. Sessions were confirmed by the Senate in 2017, we would have have an attorney general who, as a senator:
The positions and policies Senator Sessions has supported do not uplift America's shared values of love, justice and mercy.
Like George Wallace before him, Jeff Sessions is a faithful member of the United Methodist Church in Alabama. But he has not in half a century of public life demonstrated any willingness to turn from evil and learn to do good.
The positions and policies Senator Sessions has supported do not uplift America's shared values of love, justice and mercy, despite his trappings of respectability and declarations of faith. He has neither repented of his wrongdoing nor committed to change. So we must reject his nomination and the nomination of any candidate for Attorney General who poses a threat to equal justice and the freedoms we hold dear.
When those who wield the power of the state deprive the people of these freedoms, citizens in general and the U.S. Department of Justice in particular must resist their injustice and hold them accountable. Senator Sessions is clearly unfit for the role of Attorney General.
On Capitol Hill today, the Senate Judiciary Committee is holding confirmation hearings to consider the first of Donald Trump's cabinet nominations, Sen. Jefferson B. Sessions of Alabama. 26 years ago, this same committee denied Sessions a recommendation for the federal bench. "Most of Reagan's judicial appointments have been people with impressive credentials regardless of their ideologies," the editors of the LA Times wrote. "Sessions is a different story."
The Senate refused to confirm Sessions in 1986 because the testimony they heard suggested that he sided with his namesake, Jefferson Davis, over America's commitment to equal protection under the law.
A quarter century later, the Senate must decide if Sessions has changed.
Senator Sessions' record suggests a remarkable consistency in support of policies that contradict and subvert the Reconstruction amendments to the U.S. Constitution
If the photo of Senator Sessions greeting Donald Trump's "thank you" tour in Mobile, Alabama, alongside Southern belles in hoop skirts isn't enough to make clear what past greatness his support of Trump hearkens back to, then the nation should listen to the question of one civil rights veteran from Alabama who asked, in the language of Scripture, "Can a leopard change his spots?"
Senator Sessions' record suggests a remarkable consistency in support of policies that contradict and subvert the Reconstruction amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantee citizenship, equal protection under the law, and the ballot to all Americans.
Indeed. The record is clear. Here are eight reasons why the Senate must reject Sessions.
If Jefferson B. Sessions were confirmed by the Senate in 2017, we would have have an attorney general who, as a senator:
The positions and policies Senator Sessions has supported do not uplift America's shared values of love, justice and mercy.
Like George Wallace before him, Jeff Sessions is a faithful member of the United Methodist Church in Alabama. But he has not in half a century of public life demonstrated any willingness to turn from evil and learn to do good.
The positions and policies Senator Sessions has supported do not uplift America's shared values of love, justice and mercy, despite his trappings of respectability and declarations of faith. He has neither repented of his wrongdoing nor committed to change. So we must reject his nomination and the nomination of any candidate for Attorney General who poses a threat to equal justice and the freedoms we hold dear.
When those who wield the power of the state deprive the people of these freedoms, citizens in general and the U.S. Department of Justice in particular must resist their injustice and hold them accountable. Senator Sessions is clearly unfit for the role of Attorney General.