

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Every winter the world's political and business elite retreat to the Swiss mountain resort of Davos to think deep thoughts and sup at five-star eateries. The corporate execs, bankers, and finance ministers who frequent this annual Davos World Economic Forum have of late devoted considerable time to the topic of inequality. Last year's forum, for instance, identified income inequality as 2015's "most significant trend."
But talk can be cheap. In fact, the more the elites at Davos seem to contemplate our global great divide, the more global wealth seems to concentrate in fewer pockets.
Back in 2010, as the global charity Oxfam reminds us in a new report released on the eve of Davos 2016, the world's 388 richest billionaires had a combined fortune that equaled the net worth of the poorest half of the world's population.
But last year just 62 top billionaires had enough net worth to match the wealth of humanity's poorest half. That bottom half totals some 3.6 billion people.
Since 2010, those 3.6 billion folks have together lost just over $1 trillion -- 41 percent -- of their household wealth. The richest 62 of our global billionaire class, meanwhile, have gained $542 billion over that same time span, a 44 percent increase in their personal net worth.
Our global top 1 percent now have more wealth than the rest of the world combined.
These fortunate 62 -- a group small enough to fit in a bus -- certainly do have some good-times company. Our world's wealthiest 1 percenters now average $1.7 million each in wealth, a total over 300 times greater than the average net worth of our world's bottom 90 percent.
The ultimate global inequality bottom line? Our top 1 percent, notes Oxfam, "now have more wealth than the rest of the world combined."
The crowd that's assembling this week in Davos could, with a snap of a few fingers, end this staggeringly stark inequality in a relative matter of minutes. Wealth, after all, isn't concentrating at such a ferocious rate because the rich are "innovating" at some spectacular level. Wealth is concentrating so ferociously in good part because the rich have become incredibly adept at concealing -- from tax collectors -- a huge chunk of their fortunes.
Oxfam's researchers put the amount of wealth that the global rich now have stashed away in offshore tax havens at $7.6 trillion. And those doing the hiding include the hefty share of the movers and shakers at the Davos World Economic Forum.
Oxfam has analyzed the tax machinations of 200 of the world's top corporations, a group that encompasses a fair number of the corporate "strategic partners" at Davos. Nine of ten of these corporate giants turn out to "have a presence in at least one tax haven."
Those corporate CEOs sashaying around Davos, in other words, could with some simple executive orders put a huge dent on a "global system of tax avoidance" that, says Oxfam, "denies poor countries the resources they need to tackle poverty, put children in school, and prevent their citizens dying from easily curable diseases."
Don't hold your breath.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Every winter the world's political and business elite retreat to the Swiss mountain resort of Davos to think deep thoughts and sup at five-star eateries. The corporate execs, bankers, and finance ministers who frequent this annual Davos World Economic Forum have of late devoted considerable time to the topic of inequality. Last year's forum, for instance, identified income inequality as 2015's "most significant trend."
But talk can be cheap. In fact, the more the elites at Davos seem to contemplate our global great divide, the more global wealth seems to concentrate in fewer pockets.
Back in 2010, as the global charity Oxfam reminds us in a new report released on the eve of Davos 2016, the world's 388 richest billionaires had a combined fortune that equaled the net worth of the poorest half of the world's population.
But last year just 62 top billionaires had enough net worth to match the wealth of humanity's poorest half. That bottom half totals some 3.6 billion people.
Since 2010, those 3.6 billion folks have together lost just over $1 trillion -- 41 percent -- of their household wealth. The richest 62 of our global billionaire class, meanwhile, have gained $542 billion over that same time span, a 44 percent increase in their personal net worth.
Our global top 1 percent now have more wealth than the rest of the world combined.
These fortunate 62 -- a group small enough to fit in a bus -- certainly do have some good-times company. Our world's wealthiest 1 percenters now average $1.7 million each in wealth, a total over 300 times greater than the average net worth of our world's bottom 90 percent.
The ultimate global inequality bottom line? Our top 1 percent, notes Oxfam, "now have more wealth than the rest of the world combined."
The crowd that's assembling this week in Davos could, with a snap of a few fingers, end this staggeringly stark inequality in a relative matter of minutes. Wealth, after all, isn't concentrating at such a ferocious rate because the rich are "innovating" at some spectacular level. Wealth is concentrating so ferociously in good part because the rich have become incredibly adept at concealing -- from tax collectors -- a huge chunk of their fortunes.
Oxfam's researchers put the amount of wealth that the global rich now have stashed away in offshore tax havens at $7.6 trillion. And those doing the hiding include the hefty share of the movers and shakers at the Davos World Economic Forum.
Oxfam has analyzed the tax machinations of 200 of the world's top corporations, a group that encompasses a fair number of the corporate "strategic partners" at Davos. Nine of ten of these corporate giants turn out to "have a presence in at least one tax haven."
Those corporate CEOs sashaying around Davos, in other words, could with some simple executive orders put a huge dent on a "global system of tax avoidance" that, says Oxfam, "denies poor countries the resources they need to tackle poverty, put children in school, and prevent their citizens dying from easily curable diseases."
Don't hold your breath.
Every winter the world's political and business elite retreat to the Swiss mountain resort of Davos to think deep thoughts and sup at five-star eateries. The corporate execs, bankers, and finance ministers who frequent this annual Davos World Economic Forum have of late devoted considerable time to the topic of inequality. Last year's forum, for instance, identified income inequality as 2015's "most significant trend."
But talk can be cheap. In fact, the more the elites at Davos seem to contemplate our global great divide, the more global wealth seems to concentrate in fewer pockets.
Back in 2010, as the global charity Oxfam reminds us in a new report released on the eve of Davos 2016, the world's 388 richest billionaires had a combined fortune that equaled the net worth of the poorest half of the world's population.
But last year just 62 top billionaires had enough net worth to match the wealth of humanity's poorest half. That bottom half totals some 3.6 billion people.
Since 2010, those 3.6 billion folks have together lost just over $1 trillion -- 41 percent -- of their household wealth. The richest 62 of our global billionaire class, meanwhile, have gained $542 billion over that same time span, a 44 percent increase in their personal net worth.
Our global top 1 percent now have more wealth than the rest of the world combined.
These fortunate 62 -- a group small enough to fit in a bus -- certainly do have some good-times company. Our world's wealthiest 1 percenters now average $1.7 million each in wealth, a total over 300 times greater than the average net worth of our world's bottom 90 percent.
The ultimate global inequality bottom line? Our top 1 percent, notes Oxfam, "now have more wealth than the rest of the world combined."
The crowd that's assembling this week in Davos could, with a snap of a few fingers, end this staggeringly stark inequality in a relative matter of minutes. Wealth, after all, isn't concentrating at such a ferocious rate because the rich are "innovating" at some spectacular level. Wealth is concentrating so ferociously in good part because the rich have become incredibly adept at concealing -- from tax collectors -- a huge chunk of their fortunes.
Oxfam's researchers put the amount of wealth that the global rich now have stashed away in offshore tax havens at $7.6 trillion. And those doing the hiding include the hefty share of the movers and shakers at the Davos World Economic Forum.
Oxfam has analyzed the tax machinations of 200 of the world's top corporations, a group that encompasses a fair number of the corporate "strategic partners" at Davos. Nine of ten of these corporate giants turn out to "have a presence in at least one tax haven."
Those corporate CEOs sashaying around Davos, in other words, could with some simple executive orders put a huge dent on a "global system of tax avoidance" that, says Oxfam, "denies poor countries the resources they need to tackle poverty, put children in school, and prevent their citizens dying from easily curable diseases."
Don't hold your breath.