SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Lexi Alexander directed, among other films, Green Street (2005) and Lifted (2011).
Last May, The New York Times published a 15-page letter from the ACLU to the EEOC and two California state agencies urging them to investigate Hollywood for sex discrimination against women directors.
Just months earlier, NY Times film critic Manohla Dargis wrote that our industry's "refusal to hire more female directors is immoral, maybe illegal, and has helped create and sustain a representational ghetto for women."
Her article came on the heels of a USC study showing that only 1.9% of directors of the top-grossing 100 films of 2013 and 2014 were made by women. That means 98.1% of America's top studio features come from men's perspective.
Two weeks ago, the EEOC stepped up to the plate. Women and Hollywood was the first site to break the news, and on October 2, The Los Angeles Times ran the headline "The Hollywood gender discrimination investigation is on: EEOC contacts women directors."
This news is rocking the industry. Last week, I became the first female director to be interviewed by our nation's highest federal agency, which is charged with enforcing Title VII, America's equal-employment-opportunity law.
According to EEOC.gov, "The EEOC has the authority to investigate charges of discrimination against employers. ... Our role in an investigation is to fairly and accurately assess the allegations in the charge and then make a finding."
If the EEOC finds evidence of systemic discrimination against women directors, it has the authority to file an industry-wide class-action lawsuit for Title VII violations against women directors.
Title VII was fought for and won in 1964. We don't have to fight this battle anymore, but we do have to demand that the U.S. entertainment industry obey this fundamental civil rights law.
Female students make up 50% of graduating classes in film schools (though it is currently unknown which disciplines they pursue). However, once they step onto the professional playing field, statistics show that women directors face worse employment discrimination in Hollywood than in any other industry in America.
Women make up 51% of our population. Yet in 2014, women directed just 14% of TV episodes, and only about 4% of all feature films produced by the six major studios and three mini-majors were directed by women.
And what about women of color? They make up 19% of the U.S. population yet direct just 2% of TV shows and less than 1% of studio feature films. It's time we asked why the DGA-studio diversity agreements are serving minority men, who make up about 18% of the U.S. population and directed about 18% of TV episodes last year -- but failing women utterly.
At the EEOC, I was just the first of many women directors to be interviewed. It is crucial that more women, especially women of color, come forward to speak out. There is power in numbers. The sooner we can break the long silence and isolation of women directors, the sooner we can work toward change.
Women directors can log on to ACLU.org and respond to the "Tell Us Your Story" request, which asks them to describe (anonymously, if preferred) how they may have been excluded from the directing profession.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Last May, The New York Times published a 15-page letter from the ACLU to the EEOC and two California state agencies urging them to investigate Hollywood for sex discrimination against women directors.
Just months earlier, NY Times film critic Manohla Dargis wrote that our industry's "refusal to hire more female directors is immoral, maybe illegal, and has helped create and sustain a representational ghetto for women."
Her article came on the heels of a USC study showing that only 1.9% of directors of the top-grossing 100 films of 2013 and 2014 were made by women. That means 98.1% of America's top studio features come from men's perspective.
Two weeks ago, the EEOC stepped up to the plate. Women and Hollywood was the first site to break the news, and on October 2, The Los Angeles Times ran the headline "The Hollywood gender discrimination investigation is on: EEOC contacts women directors."
This news is rocking the industry. Last week, I became the first female director to be interviewed by our nation's highest federal agency, which is charged with enforcing Title VII, America's equal-employment-opportunity law.
According to EEOC.gov, "The EEOC has the authority to investigate charges of discrimination against employers. ... Our role in an investigation is to fairly and accurately assess the allegations in the charge and then make a finding."
If the EEOC finds evidence of systemic discrimination against women directors, it has the authority to file an industry-wide class-action lawsuit for Title VII violations against women directors.
Title VII was fought for and won in 1964. We don't have to fight this battle anymore, but we do have to demand that the U.S. entertainment industry obey this fundamental civil rights law.
Female students make up 50% of graduating classes in film schools (though it is currently unknown which disciplines they pursue). However, once they step onto the professional playing field, statistics show that women directors face worse employment discrimination in Hollywood than in any other industry in America.
Women make up 51% of our population. Yet in 2014, women directed just 14% of TV episodes, and only about 4% of all feature films produced by the six major studios and three mini-majors were directed by women.
And what about women of color? They make up 19% of the U.S. population yet direct just 2% of TV shows and less than 1% of studio feature films. It's time we asked why the DGA-studio diversity agreements are serving minority men, who make up about 18% of the U.S. population and directed about 18% of TV episodes last year -- but failing women utterly.
At the EEOC, I was just the first of many women directors to be interviewed. It is crucial that more women, especially women of color, come forward to speak out. There is power in numbers. The sooner we can break the long silence and isolation of women directors, the sooner we can work toward change.
Women directors can log on to ACLU.org and respond to the "Tell Us Your Story" request, which asks them to describe (anonymously, if preferred) how they may have been excluded from the directing profession.
Last May, The New York Times published a 15-page letter from the ACLU to the EEOC and two California state agencies urging them to investigate Hollywood for sex discrimination against women directors.
Just months earlier, NY Times film critic Manohla Dargis wrote that our industry's "refusal to hire more female directors is immoral, maybe illegal, and has helped create and sustain a representational ghetto for women."
Her article came on the heels of a USC study showing that only 1.9% of directors of the top-grossing 100 films of 2013 and 2014 were made by women. That means 98.1% of America's top studio features come from men's perspective.
Two weeks ago, the EEOC stepped up to the plate. Women and Hollywood was the first site to break the news, and on October 2, The Los Angeles Times ran the headline "The Hollywood gender discrimination investigation is on: EEOC contacts women directors."
This news is rocking the industry. Last week, I became the first female director to be interviewed by our nation's highest federal agency, which is charged with enforcing Title VII, America's equal-employment-opportunity law.
According to EEOC.gov, "The EEOC has the authority to investigate charges of discrimination against employers. ... Our role in an investigation is to fairly and accurately assess the allegations in the charge and then make a finding."
If the EEOC finds evidence of systemic discrimination against women directors, it has the authority to file an industry-wide class-action lawsuit for Title VII violations against women directors.
Title VII was fought for and won in 1964. We don't have to fight this battle anymore, but we do have to demand that the U.S. entertainment industry obey this fundamental civil rights law.
Female students make up 50% of graduating classes in film schools (though it is currently unknown which disciplines they pursue). However, once they step onto the professional playing field, statistics show that women directors face worse employment discrimination in Hollywood than in any other industry in America.
Women make up 51% of our population. Yet in 2014, women directed just 14% of TV episodes, and only about 4% of all feature films produced by the six major studios and three mini-majors were directed by women.
And what about women of color? They make up 19% of the U.S. population yet direct just 2% of TV shows and less than 1% of studio feature films. It's time we asked why the DGA-studio diversity agreements are serving minority men, who make up about 18% of the U.S. population and directed about 18% of TV episodes last year -- but failing women utterly.
At the EEOC, I was just the first of many women directors to be interviewed. It is crucial that more women, especially women of color, come forward to speak out. There is power in numbers. The sooner we can break the long silence and isolation of women directors, the sooner we can work toward change.
Women directors can log on to ACLU.org and respond to the "Tell Us Your Story" request, which asks them to describe (anonymously, if preferred) how they may have been excluded from the directing profession.