Women Take On Hollywood
Last May, The New York Times published a 15-page letter from the ACLU to the EEOC and two California state agencies urging them to investigate Hollywood for sex discrimination against women directors.
Just months earlier, NY Times film critic Manohla Dargis wrote that our industry's "refusal to hire more female directors is immoral, maybe illegal, and has helped create and sustain a representational ghetto for women."
Her article came on the heels of a USC study showing that only 1.9% of directors of the top-grossing 100 films of 2013 and 2014 were made by women. That means 98.1% of America's top studio features come from men's perspective.
Two weeks ago, the EEOC stepped up to the plate. Women and Hollywood was the first site to break the news, and on October 2, The Los Angeles Times ran the headline "The Hollywood gender discrimination investigation is on: EEOC contacts women directors."
This news is rocking the industry. Last week, I became the first female director to be interviewed by our nation's highest federal agency, which is charged with enforcing Title VII, America's equal-employment-opportunity law.
According to EEOC.gov, "The EEOC has the authority to investigate charges of discrimination against employers. ... Our role in an investigation is to fairly and accurately assess the allegations in the charge and then make a finding."
If the EEOC finds evidence of systemic discrimination against women directors, it has the authority to file an industry-wide class-action lawsuit for Title VII violations against women directors.
Title VII was fought for and won in 1964. We don't have to fight this battle anymore, but we do have to demand that the U.S. entertainment industry obey this fundamental civil rights law.
Female students make up 50% of graduating classes in film schools (though it is currently unknown which disciplines they pursue). However, once they step onto the professional playing field, statistics show that women directors face worse employment discrimination in Hollywood than in any other industry in America.
Women make up 51% of our population. Yet in 2014, women directed just 14% of TV episodes, and only about 4% of all feature films produced by the six major studios and three mini-majors were directed by women.
And what about women of color? They make up 19% of the U.S. population yet direct just 2% of TV shows and less than 1% of studio feature films. It's time we asked why the DGA-studio diversity agreements are serving minority men, who make up about 18% of the U.S. population and directed about 18% of TV episodes last year -- but failing women utterly.
At the EEOC, I was just the first of many women directors to be interviewed. It is crucial that more women, especially women of color, come forward to speak out. There is power in numbers. The sooner we can break the long silence and isolation of women directors, the sooner we can work toward change.
Women directors can log on to ACLU.org and respond to the "Tell Us Your Story" request, which asks them to describe (anonymously, if preferred) how they may have been excluded from the directing profession.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Last May, The New York Times published a 15-page letter from the ACLU to the EEOC and two California state agencies urging them to investigate Hollywood for sex discrimination against women directors.
Just months earlier, NY Times film critic Manohla Dargis wrote that our industry's "refusal to hire more female directors is immoral, maybe illegal, and has helped create and sustain a representational ghetto for women."
Her article came on the heels of a USC study showing that only 1.9% of directors of the top-grossing 100 films of 2013 and 2014 were made by women. That means 98.1% of America's top studio features come from men's perspective.
Two weeks ago, the EEOC stepped up to the plate. Women and Hollywood was the first site to break the news, and on October 2, The Los Angeles Times ran the headline "The Hollywood gender discrimination investigation is on: EEOC contacts women directors."
This news is rocking the industry. Last week, I became the first female director to be interviewed by our nation's highest federal agency, which is charged with enforcing Title VII, America's equal-employment-opportunity law.
According to EEOC.gov, "The EEOC has the authority to investigate charges of discrimination against employers. ... Our role in an investigation is to fairly and accurately assess the allegations in the charge and then make a finding."
If the EEOC finds evidence of systemic discrimination against women directors, it has the authority to file an industry-wide class-action lawsuit for Title VII violations against women directors.
Title VII was fought for and won in 1964. We don't have to fight this battle anymore, but we do have to demand that the U.S. entertainment industry obey this fundamental civil rights law.
Female students make up 50% of graduating classes in film schools (though it is currently unknown which disciplines they pursue). However, once they step onto the professional playing field, statistics show that women directors face worse employment discrimination in Hollywood than in any other industry in America.
Women make up 51% of our population. Yet in 2014, women directed just 14% of TV episodes, and only about 4% of all feature films produced by the six major studios and three mini-majors were directed by women.
And what about women of color? They make up 19% of the U.S. population yet direct just 2% of TV shows and less than 1% of studio feature films. It's time we asked why the DGA-studio diversity agreements are serving minority men, who make up about 18% of the U.S. population and directed about 18% of TV episodes last year -- but failing women utterly.
At the EEOC, I was just the first of many women directors to be interviewed. It is crucial that more women, especially women of color, come forward to speak out. There is power in numbers. The sooner we can break the long silence and isolation of women directors, the sooner we can work toward change.
Women directors can log on to ACLU.org and respond to the "Tell Us Your Story" request, which asks them to describe (anonymously, if preferred) how they may have been excluded from the directing profession.
Last May, The New York Times published a 15-page letter from the ACLU to the EEOC and two California state agencies urging them to investigate Hollywood for sex discrimination against women directors.
Just months earlier, NY Times film critic Manohla Dargis wrote that our industry's "refusal to hire more female directors is immoral, maybe illegal, and has helped create and sustain a representational ghetto for women."
Her article came on the heels of a USC study showing that only 1.9% of directors of the top-grossing 100 films of 2013 and 2014 were made by women. That means 98.1% of America's top studio features come from men's perspective.
Two weeks ago, the EEOC stepped up to the plate. Women and Hollywood was the first site to break the news, and on October 2, The Los Angeles Times ran the headline "The Hollywood gender discrimination investigation is on: EEOC contacts women directors."
This news is rocking the industry. Last week, I became the first female director to be interviewed by our nation's highest federal agency, which is charged with enforcing Title VII, America's equal-employment-opportunity law.
According to EEOC.gov, "The EEOC has the authority to investigate charges of discrimination against employers. ... Our role in an investigation is to fairly and accurately assess the allegations in the charge and then make a finding."
If the EEOC finds evidence of systemic discrimination against women directors, it has the authority to file an industry-wide class-action lawsuit for Title VII violations against women directors.
Title VII was fought for and won in 1964. We don't have to fight this battle anymore, but we do have to demand that the U.S. entertainment industry obey this fundamental civil rights law.
Female students make up 50% of graduating classes in film schools (though it is currently unknown which disciplines they pursue). However, once they step onto the professional playing field, statistics show that women directors face worse employment discrimination in Hollywood than in any other industry in America.
Women make up 51% of our population. Yet in 2014, women directed just 14% of TV episodes, and only about 4% of all feature films produced by the six major studios and three mini-majors were directed by women.
And what about women of color? They make up 19% of the U.S. population yet direct just 2% of TV shows and less than 1% of studio feature films. It's time we asked why the DGA-studio diversity agreements are serving minority men, who make up about 18% of the U.S. population and directed about 18% of TV episodes last year -- but failing women utterly.
At the EEOC, I was just the first of many women directors to be interviewed. It is crucial that more women, especially women of color, come forward to speak out. There is power in numbers. The sooner we can break the long silence and isolation of women directors, the sooner we can work toward change.
Women directors can log on to ACLU.org and respond to the "Tell Us Your Story" request, which asks them to describe (anonymously, if preferred) how they may have been excluded from the directing profession.