SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Byline Inequality Matters
Aug 19, 2015
Anna Quindlen relayed an eye-opening and hair-raising experience to her readers in 1990.
"A newspaper editor said to me not long ago, with no hint of self-consciousness, 'I'd love to run your column, but we already run Ellen Goodman,'" the New York Times columnist wrote. "Not only was there a quota; there was a quota of one."
A quarter of a century later, many newspapers still have far to go. On a recent slow news day, white men wrote every bylined commentary in the Washington Post's op-ed pages.
Even the most well-meaning white men can't speak for the rest of us.
Granted, the Post regularly features the analysis of Eugene Robinson, an African-American man, and Fareed Zakaria, an immigrant born in India. It also runs Kathleen Parker and other white women. Several of the paper's Metro and Business section columnists are people of color, including at least two black women.
But that pale and male lineup that caught my eye was no blip.
While the Post distributes columns written by Esther Cepeda and Ruben Navarrette, it doesn't publish work by either of them or other people of Latin American descent on its own pages. Given that the 54 million Latinos living in the United States compose our largest minority, can't Washington's dominant news source find room for the opinions expressed by a single person from this community?
Detailed research on byline balance is clear if infrequent. A 2012 Op-Ed Project study found that male opinion-page writers still outnumber female writers four-to-one.
This leaves most op-ed sections more testosterone-laced than the subset of Donald Trump's Twitter followers who cheer when he disses Megyn Kelly.
In addition to this quantity problem, there are quality concerns. The Op-Ed Project found that a disproportionate share of women's commentaries address "pink" things like gender, food, and family versus economics, politics, national security, and other hard-news topics.
The mainstream media is even more muffled when it comes to amplifying voices from communities of color. The last time the media watchdog group Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR) did the bean-counting, whites wrote up to 94 percent of the opinion pieces in the three most prominent newspapers.
And like The Washington Post, The New York Times still doesn't publish a single Latino columnist.
How does OtherWords, the editorial service I run, measure up?
Some background: William A. Collins founded Minuteman Media in 1998 as a bulwark against the growing dominance of conservatives in the nation's opinion pages. When this avuncular former Norwalk, Connecticut mayor handed me the reins of his editorial service six years ago, most of the folks writing the commentaries we distributed were pale and male.
By 2012, women were writing a quarter of the pieces that this editorial service, by then renamed, got published in newspapers. That was better but not good enough. Today, partly because of my column, women pen half of our work.
Achieving gender equality makes our scrappy outfit stand out. However, people of color wrote only 5 percent of our commentaries in the first half of this year, which aligns with the media's lack of diversity.
Working within the confines of a shoestring budget, OtherWords brings under-exposed yet bold voices to the kitchen tables of the good people from Union, South Carolina, to Gardena, California -- and hundreds of towns in between. Now that we're less male, can we get less pale? We can and we must.
Because byline inequality matters.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This column was distributed by OtherWords.
Emily Schwartz Greco
Emily Schwartz Greco is the Philanthropy + Nonprofits Editor for The Conversation. Previously, Emily was the managing editor of the OtherWords editorial service. She covered Latin America for the Bloomberg and Dow Jones news services.
centers for disease control (cdc)conservativesdonald trumpfairgender equalityinequalitylgbtqmedianew york timeswashington postwomen
Anna Quindlen relayed an eye-opening and hair-raising experience to her readers in 1990.
"A newspaper editor said to me not long ago, with no hint of self-consciousness, 'I'd love to run your column, but we already run Ellen Goodman,'" the New York Times columnist wrote. "Not only was there a quota; there was a quota of one."
A quarter of a century later, many newspapers still have far to go. On a recent slow news day, white men wrote every bylined commentary in the Washington Post's op-ed pages.
Even the most well-meaning white men can't speak for the rest of us.
Granted, the Post regularly features the analysis of Eugene Robinson, an African-American man, and Fareed Zakaria, an immigrant born in India. It also runs Kathleen Parker and other white women. Several of the paper's Metro and Business section columnists are people of color, including at least two black women.
But that pale and male lineup that caught my eye was no blip.
While the Post distributes columns written by Esther Cepeda and Ruben Navarrette, it doesn't publish work by either of them or other people of Latin American descent on its own pages. Given that the 54 million Latinos living in the United States compose our largest minority, can't Washington's dominant news source find room for the opinions expressed by a single person from this community?
Detailed research on byline balance is clear if infrequent. A 2012 Op-Ed Project study found that male opinion-page writers still outnumber female writers four-to-one.
This leaves most op-ed sections more testosterone-laced than the subset of Donald Trump's Twitter followers who cheer when he disses Megyn Kelly.
In addition to this quantity problem, there are quality concerns. The Op-Ed Project found that a disproportionate share of women's commentaries address "pink" things like gender, food, and family versus economics, politics, national security, and other hard-news topics.
The mainstream media is even more muffled when it comes to amplifying voices from communities of color. The last time the media watchdog group Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR) did the bean-counting, whites wrote up to 94 percent of the opinion pieces in the three most prominent newspapers.
And like The Washington Post, The New York Times still doesn't publish a single Latino columnist.
How does OtherWords, the editorial service I run, measure up?
Some background: William A. Collins founded Minuteman Media in 1998 as a bulwark against the growing dominance of conservatives in the nation's opinion pages. When this avuncular former Norwalk, Connecticut mayor handed me the reins of his editorial service six years ago, most of the folks writing the commentaries we distributed were pale and male.
By 2012, women were writing a quarter of the pieces that this editorial service, by then renamed, got published in newspapers. That was better but not good enough. Today, partly because of my column, women pen half of our work.
Achieving gender equality makes our scrappy outfit stand out. However, people of color wrote only 5 percent of our commentaries in the first half of this year, which aligns with the media's lack of diversity.
Working within the confines of a shoestring budget, OtherWords brings under-exposed yet bold voices to the kitchen tables of the good people from Union, South Carolina, to Gardena, California -- and hundreds of towns in between. Now that we're less male, can we get less pale? We can and we must.
Because byline inequality matters.
Emily Schwartz Greco
Emily Schwartz Greco is the Philanthropy + Nonprofits Editor for The Conversation. Previously, Emily was the managing editor of the OtherWords editorial service. She covered Latin America for the Bloomberg and Dow Jones news services.
Anna Quindlen relayed an eye-opening and hair-raising experience to her readers in 1990.
"A newspaper editor said to me not long ago, with no hint of self-consciousness, 'I'd love to run your column, but we already run Ellen Goodman,'" the New York Times columnist wrote. "Not only was there a quota; there was a quota of one."
A quarter of a century later, many newspapers still have far to go. On a recent slow news day, white men wrote every bylined commentary in the Washington Post's op-ed pages.
Even the most well-meaning white men can't speak for the rest of us.
Granted, the Post regularly features the analysis of Eugene Robinson, an African-American man, and Fareed Zakaria, an immigrant born in India. It also runs Kathleen Parker and other white women. Several of the paper's Metro and Business section columnists are people of color, including at least two black women.
But that pale and male lineup that caught my eye was no blip.
While the Post distributes columns written by Esther Cepeda and Ruben Navarrette, it doesn't publish work by either of them or other people of Latin American descent on its own pages. Given that the 54 million Latinos living in the United States compose our largest minority, can't Washington's dominant news source find room for the opinions expressed by a single person from this community?
Detailed research on byline balance is clear if infrequent. A 2012 Op-Ed Project study found that male opinion-page writers still outnumber female writers four-to-one.
This leaves most op-ed sections more testosterone-laced than the subset of Donald Trump's Twitter followers who cheer when he disses Megyn Kelly.
In addition to this quantity problem, there are quality concerns. The Op-Ed Project found that a disproportionate share of women's commentaries address "pink" things like gender, food, and family versus economics, politics, national security, and other hard-news topics.
The mainstream media is even more muffled when it comes to amplifying voices from communities of color. The last time the media watchdog group Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR) did the bean-counting, whites wrote up to 94 percent of the opinion pieces in the three most prominent newspapers.
And like The Washington Post, The New York Times still doesn't publish a single Latino columnist.
How does OtherWords, the editorial service I run, measure up?
Some background: William A. Collins founded Minuteman Media in 1998 as a bulwark against the growing dominance of conservatives in the nation's opinion pages. When this avuncular former Norwalk, Connecticut mayor handed me the reins of his editorial service six years ago, most of the folks writing the commentaries we distributed were pale and male.
By 2012, women were writing a quarter of the pieces that this editorial service, by then renamed, got published in newspapers. That was better but not good enough. Today, partly because of my column, women pen half of our work.
Achieving gender equality makes our scrappy outfit stand out. However, people of color wrote only 5 percent of our commentaries in the first half of this year, which aligns with the media's lack of diversity.
Working within the confines of a shoestring budget, OtherWords brings under-exposed yet bold voices to the kitchen tables of the good people from Union, South Carolina, to Gardena, California -- and hundreds of towns in between. Now that we're less male, can we get less pale? We can and we must.
Because byline inequality matters.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.