SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Debating Iraq in 2014: Wrong All Over Again
The crisis in Iraq has brought war back to the US airwaves. But if you were expecting a more robust discussion about US military action this time around, think again. The rule seems to be that if you were wrong in 2003, you're still an expert in 2014.
Take the Sunday chat shows. On ABC's This Week (6/15/14), viewers heard first from former military: ex-fighter pilot Steve Ganyard and retired Gen. Peter Chiarelli.
Jun 16, 2014
The crisis in Iraq has brought war back to the US airwaves. But if you were expecting a more robust discussion about US military action this time around, think again. The rule seems to be that if you were wrong in 2003, you're still an expert in 2014.
Take the Sunday chat shows. On ABC's This Week (6/15/14), viewers heard first from former military: ex-fighter pilot Steve Ganyard and retired Gen. Peter Chiarelli.
Up next was Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), a hawkish lawmaker who called Iraq "the greatest threat, national security threat, since 9/11."
The show's roundtable closed with a brief discussion of Iraq, featuring hard-right war advocates Laura Ingraham and Bill Kristol alongside Democratic strategist Donna Brazile and Rep. Luis Gutierrez, who voted against the Iraq War resolution in 2002. Kristol, one of the most visible media proponents of the Iraq invasion, has never suffered any consequences as a pundit. He told ABC viewers-perhaps even with a straight face-that the current crisis in Iraq is "a disaster unfortunately made possible, or certainly made more likely, by our ridiculous and total withdrawal from Iraq in 2011."
On NBC's Meet the Press (6/15/14), anchor David Gregory told viewers they would hear from "key voices from the House and Senate."
But before that, viewers were treated to failed Republican presidential candidate and Iraq War supporter Mitt Romney. The next guest was a Democrat, West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin, who said: "I'm open to the airstrikes and technical support. Yeah, the airstrikes, technical support, drones, whatever it takes."
The panel discussion on the show featured Paul Wolfowitz, George W. Bush's deputy Pentagon secretary and a key Iraq War architect, along with hawkish Republican Rep. Peter King of New York. They were joined by reporter Dexter Filkins and Washington Post columnist David Ignatius, who wrote in April 2003:
Personally, I don't much care if the US reports about weapons of mass destruction prove to be imaginary. Toppling Hussein's regime was still right.
Iraq briefly came up during the roundtable with former Republican politician Ken Cuccinelli, Republican strategist Steve Schmidt, former Democratic Rep. Harold Ford-who voted for the war-and Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus.
One wouldn't keep trusting a meteorologist who got the weather forecast horribly wrong. Why do news shows treat matters of war any differently?
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)
Peter Hart
Peter Hart is the Domestic Communications Director at the Center for Economic and Policy Research.
The crisis in Iraq has brought war back to the US airwaves. But if you were expecting a more robust discussion about US military action this time around, think again. The rule seems to be that if you were wrong in 2003, you're still an expert in 2014.
Take the Sunday chat shows. On ABC's This Week (6/15/14), viewers heard first from former military: ex-fighter pilot Steve Ganyard and retired Gen. Peter Chiarelli.
Up next was Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), a hawkish lawmaker who called Iraq "the greatest threat, national security threat, since 9/11."
The show's roundtable closed with a brief discussion of Iraq, featuring hard-right war advocates Laura Ingraham and Bill Kristol alongside Democratic strategist Donna Brazile and Rep. Luis Gutierrez, who voted against the Iraq War resolution in 2002. Kristol, one of the most visible media proponents of the Iraq invasion, has never suffered any consequences as a pundit. He told ABC viewers-perhaps even with a straight face-that the current crisis in Iraq is "a disaster unfortunately made possible, or certainly made more likely, by our ridiculous and total withdrawal from Iraq in 2011."
On NBC's Meet the Press (6/15/14), anchor David Gregory told viewers they would hear from "key voices from the House and Senate."
But before that, viewers were treated to failed Republican presidential candidate and Iraq War supporter Mitt Romney. The next guest was a Democrat, West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin, who said: "I'm open to the airstrikes and technical support. Yeah, the airstrikes, technical support, drones, whatever it takes."
The panel discussion on the show featured Paul Wolfowitz, George W. Bush's deputy Pentagon secretary and a key Iraq War architect, along with hawkish Republican Rep. Peter King of New York. They were joined by reporter Dexter Filkins and Washington Post columnist David Ignatius, who wrote in April 2003:
Personally, I don't much care if the US reports about weapons of mass destruction prove to be imaginary. Toppling Hussein's regime was still right.
Iraq briefly came up during the roundtable with former Republican politician Ken Cuccinelli, Republican strategist Steve Schmidt, former Democratic Rep. Harold Ford-who voted for the war-and Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus.
One wouldn't keep trusting a meteorologist who got the weather forecast horribly wrong. Why do news shows treat matters of war any differently?
Peter Hart
Peter Hart is the Domestic Communications Director at the Center for Economic and Policy Research.
The crisis in Iraq has brought war back to the US airwaves. But if you were expecting a more robust discussion about US military action this time around, think again. The rule seems to be that if you were wrong in 2003, you're still an expert in 2014.
Take the Sunday chat shows. On ABC's This Week (6/15/14), viewers heard first from former military: ex-fighter pilot Steve Ganyard and retired Gen. Peter Chiarelli.
Up next was Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), a hawkish lawmaker who called Iraq "the greatest threat, national security threat, since 9/11."
The show's roundtable closed with a brief discussion of Iraq, featuring hard-right war advocates Laura Ingraham and Bill Kristol alongside Democratic strategist Donna Brazile and Rep. Luis Gutierrez, who voted against the Iraq War resolution in 2002. Kristol, one of the most visible media proponents of the Iraq invasion, has never suffered any consequences as a pundit. He told ABC viewers-perhaps even with a straight face-that the current crisis in Iraq is "a disaster unfortunately made possible, or certainly made more likely, by our ridiculous and total withdrawal from Iraq in 2011."
On NBC's Meet the Press (6/15/14), anchor David Gregory told viewers they would hear from "key voices from the House and Senate."
But before that, viewers were treated to failed Republican presidential candidate and Iraq War supporter Mitt Romney. The next guest was a Democrat, West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin, who said: "I'm open to the airstrikes and technical support. Yeah, the airstrikes, technical support, drones, whatever it takes."
The panel discussion on the show featured Paul Wolfowitz, George W. Bush's deputy Pentagon secretary and a key Iraq War architect, along with hawkish Republican Rep. Peter King of New York. They were joined by reporter Dexter Filkins and Washington Post columnist David Ignatius, who wrote in April 2003:
Personally, I don't much care if the US reports about weapons of mass destruction prove to be imaginary. Toppling Hussein's regime was still right.
Iraq briefly came up during the roundtable with former Republican politician Ken Cuccinelli, Republican strategist Steve Schmidt, former Democratic Rep. Harold Ford-who voted for the war-and Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus.
One wouldn't keep trusting a meteorologist who got the weather forecast horribly wrong. Why do news shows treat matters of war any differently?
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.