SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Debating Iraq in 2014: Wrong All Over Again
The crisis in Iraq has brought war back to the US airwaves. But if you were expecting a more robust discussion about US military action this time around, think again. The rule seems to be that if you were wrong in 2003, you're still an expert in 2014.
Take the Sunday chat shows. On ABC's This Week (6/15/14), viewers heard first from former military: ex-fighter pilot Steve Ganyard and retired Gen. Peter Chiarelli.
Jun 16, 2014
The crisis in Iraq has brought war back to the US airwaves. But if you were expecting a more robust discussion about US military action this time around, think again. The rule seems to be that if you were wrong in 2003, you're still an expert in 2014.
Take the Sunday chat shows. On ABC's This Week (6/15/14), viewers heard first from former military: ex-fighter pilot Steve Ganyard and retired Gen. Peter Chiarelli.
Up next was Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), a hawkish lawmaker who called Iraq "the greatest threat, national security threat, since 9/11."
The show's roundtable closed with a brief discussion of Iraq, featuring hard-right war advocates Laura Ingraham and Bill Kristol alongside Democratic strategist Donna Brazile and Rep. Luis Gutierrez, who voted against the Iraq War resolution in 2002. Kristol, one of the most visible media proponents of the Iraq invasion, has never suffered any consequences as a pundit. He told ABC viewers-perhaps even with a straight face-that the current crisis in Iraq is "a disaster unfortunately made possible, or certainly made more likely, by our ridiculous and total withdrawal from Iraq in 2011."
On NBC's Meet the Press (6/15/14), anchor David Gregory told viewers they would hear from "key voices from the House and Senate."
But before that, viewers were treated to failed Republican presidential candidate and Iraq War supporter Mitt Romney. The next guest was a Democrat, West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin, who said: "I'm open to the airstrikes and technical support. Yeah, the airstrikes, technical support, drones, whatever it takes."
The panel discussion on the show featured Paul Wolfowitz, George W. Bush's deputy Pentagon secretary and a key Iraq War architect, along with hawkish Republican Rep. Peter King of New York. They were joined by reporter Dexter Filkins and Washington Post columnist David Ignatius, who wrote in April 2003:
Personally, I don't much care if the US reports about weapons of mass destruction prove to be imaginary. Toppling Hussein's regime was still right.
Iraq briefly came up during the roundtable with former Republican politician Ken Cuccinelli, Republican strategist Steve Schmidt, former Democratic Rep. Harold Ford-who voted for the war-and Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus.
One wouldn't keep trusting a meteorologist who got the weather forecast horribly wrong. Why do news shows treat matters of war any differently?
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)
Peter Hart
Peter Hart is the Domestic Communications Director at the Center for Economic and Policy Research.
The crisis in Iraq has brought war back to the US airwaves. But if you were expecting a more robust discussion about US military action this time around, think again. The rule seems to be that if you were wrong in 2003, you're still an expert in 2014.
Take the Sunday chat shows. On ABC's This Week (6/15/14), viewers heard first from former military: ex-fighter pilot Steve Ganyard and retired Gen. Peter Chiarelli.
Up next was Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), a hawkish lawmaker who called Iraq "the greatest threat, national security threat, since 9/11."
The show's roundtable closed with a brief discussion of Iraq, featuring hard-right war advocates Laura Ingraham and Bill Kristol alongside Democratic strategist Donna Brazile and Rep. Luis Gutierrez, who voted against the Iraq War resolution in 2002. Kristol, one of the most visible media proponents of the Iraq invasion, has never suffered any consequences as a pundit. He told ABC viewers-perhaps even with a straight face-that the current crisis in Iraq is "a disaster unfortunately made possible, or certainly made more likely, by our ridiculous and total withdrawal from Iraq in 2011."
On NBC's Meet the Press (6/15/14), anchor David Gregory told viewers they would hear from "key voices from the House and Senate."
But before that, viewers were treated to failed Republican presidential candidate and Iraq War supporter Mitt Romney. The next guest was a Democrat, West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin, who said: "I'm open to the airstrikes and technical support. Yeah, the airstrikes, technical support, drones, whatever it takes."
The panel discussion on the show featured Paul Wolfowitz, George W. Bush's deputy Pentagon secretary and a key Iraq War architect, along with hawkish Republican Rep. Peter King of New York. They were joined by reporter Dexter Filkins and Washington Post columnist David Ignatius, who wrote in April 2003:
Personally, I don't much care if the US reports about weapons of mass destruction prove to be imaginary. Toppling Hussein's regime was still right.
Iraq briefly came up during the roundtable with former Republican politician Ken Cuccinelli, Republican strategist Steve Schmidt, former Democratic Rep. Harold Ford-who voted for the war-and Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus.
One wouldn't keep trusting a meteorologist who got the weather forecast horribly wrong. Why do news shows treat matters of war any differently?
Peter Hart
Peter Hart is the Domestic Communications Director at the Center for Economic and Policy Research.
The crisis in Iraq has brought war back to the US airwaves. But if you were expecting a more robust discussion about US military action this time around, think again. The rule seems to be that if you were wrong in 2003, you're still an expert in 2014.
Take the Sunday chat shows. On ABC's This Week (6/15/14), viewers heard first from former military: ex-fighter pilot Steve Ganyard and retired Gen. Peter Chiarelli.
Up next was Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), a hawkish lawmaker who called Iraq "the greatest threat, national security threat, since 9/11."
The show's roundtable closed with a brief discussion of Iraq, featuring hard-right war advocates Laura Ingraham and Bill Kristol alongside Democratic strategist Donna Brazile and Rep. Luis Gutierrez, who voted against the Iraq War resolution in 2002. Kristol, one of the most visible media proponents of the Iraq invasion, has never suffered any consequences as a pundit. He told ABC viewers-perhaps even with a straight face-that the current crisis in Iraq is "a disaster unfortunately made possible, or certainly made more likely, by our ridiculous and total withdrawal from Iraq in 2011."
On NBC's Meet the Press (6/15/14), anchor David Gregory told viewers they would hear from "key voices from the House and Senate."
But before that, viewers were treated to failed Republican presidential candidate and Iraq War supporter Mitt Romney. The next guest was a Democrat, West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin, who said: "I'm open to the airstrikes and technical support. Yeah, the airstrikes, technical support, drones, whatever it takes."
The panel discussion on the show featured Paul Wolfowitz, George W. Bush's deputy Pentagon secretary and a key Iraq War architect, along with hawkish Republican Rep. Peter King of New York. They were joined by reporter Dexter Filkins and Washington Post columnist David Ignatius, who wrote in April 2003:
Personally, I don't much care if the US reports about weapons of mass destruction prove to be imaginary. Toppling Hussein's regime was still right.
Iraq briefly came up during the roundtable with former Republican politician Ken Cuccinelli, Republican strategist Steve Schmidt, former Democratic Rep. Harold Ford-who voted for the war-and Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus.
One wouldn't keep trusting a meteorologist who got the weather forecast horribly wrong. Why do news shows treat matters of war any differently?
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.