SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The President Should Make Walmart Part of the Minimum Wage Debate
"No family should work full time and live in poverty."
May 09, 2014
"No family should work full time and live in poverty."
That's been President Obama's rallying cry on the stump, persuasively arguing for an increase in the federal (and state) minimum wage. Yet on Friday, President Obama plans to visit a Walmart in Mountain View to celebrate their efforts to become more energy efficient. That's a mistake. Walmart, the country's largest private employer, pays (at the highest estimate) 825,000 workers less than $25,000 a year, the line at which a family with two children working full-time falls into poverty.
And that is a choice the company is making. Walmart could give all of those workers a raise now. Last year, Demos found that for what it spent buying back its own stock Walmart could pay all of its workers over $25,000 a year. Walmart spent $7.6 billion on stock repurchases in 2013, which do nothing to boost the company's productivity or profits. The Walton heirs alone, already some of the wealthiest people in the country, made $2.6 billion from that round of share buybacks. Buybacks aren't of long-term use to the company, even for its shareholders. On the other hand, a raise across the retail sector would boost growth, and create over 100,000 new jobs.
Earlier this week, Pam Ramos, a Walmart worker in Mountain View, wrote a must-read piece for Salon on the implications. Key quote:
"I want the president to help us and tell Walmart to pay us enough to cover the bills and take care of our families. That doesn't seem like too much to ask from such a profitable company, a company that sets the standard for jobs in this country. And I hope it's not too much to ask from a president who believes that income inequality is the defining challenge of our time."
It isn't too much to ask. The country has a clear vested interest in lifting those families out of poverty and boosting the economy as a result. The president should echo the language he's used to lift up high-road employers like Costco and (more recently) the Gap, and encourage Walmart to pay its low-wage workforce more, like he did during the State of the Union:
"Profitable companies like Costco see higher wages as a smart way to boost productivity and to reduce turnover," the president said. "But there are a lot of Americans who don't work somewhere like Costco, and they're working for wages that don't go as far as they once did."
A lot of those workers who aren't working for decent wages are working for Walmart. The president is talking the talk on the minimum wage and it's having an impact. He should hold the country's largest employer to the same standard.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Demos
"No family should work full time and live in poverty."
That's been President Obama's rallying cry on the stump, persuasively arguing for an increase in the federal (and state) minimum wage. Yet on Friday, President Obama plans to visit a Walmart in Mountain View to celebrate their efforts to become more energy efficient. That's a mistake. Walmart, the country's largest private employer, pays (at the highest estimate) 825,000 workers less than $25,000 a year, the line at which a family with two children working full-time falls into poverty.
And that is a choice the company is making. Walmart could give all of those workers a raise now. Last year, Demos found that for what it spent buying back its own stock Walmart could pay all of its workers over $25,000 a year. Walmart spent $7.6 billion on stock repurchases in 2013, which do nothing to boost the company's productivity or profits. The Walton heirs alone, already some of the wealthiest people in the country, made $2.6 billion from that round of share buybacks. Buybacks aren't of long-term use to the company, even for its shareholders. On the other hand, a raise across the retail sector would boost growth, and create over 100,000 new jobs.
Earlier this week, Pam Ramos, a Walmart worker in Mountain View, wrote a must-read piece for Salon on the implications. Key quote:
"I want the president to help us and tell Walmart to pay us enough to cover the bills and take care of our families. That doesn't seem like too much to ask from such a profitable company, a company that sets the standard for jobs in this country. And I hope it's not too much to ask from a president who believes that income inequality is the defining challenge of our time."
It isn't too much to ask. The country has a clear vested interest in lifting those families out of poverty and boosting the economy as a result. The president should echo the language he's used to lift up high-road employers like Costco and (more recently) the Gap, and encourage Walmart to pay its low-wage workforce more, like he did during the State of the Union:
"Profitable companies like Costco see higher wages as a smart way to boost productivity and to reduce turnover," the president said. "But there are a lot of Americans who don't work somewhere like Costco, and they're working for wages that don't go as far as they once did."
A lot of those workers who aren't working for decent wages are working for Walmart. The president is talking the talk on the minimum wage and it's having an impact. He should hold the country's largest employer to the same standard.
"No family should work full time and live in poverty."
That's been President Obama's rallying cry on the stump, persuasively arguing for an increase in the federal (and state) minimum wage. Yet on Friday, President Obama plans to visit a Walmart in Mountain View to celebrate their efforts to become more energy efficient. That's a mistake. Walmart, the country's largest private employer, pays (at the highest estimate) 825,000 workers less than $25,000 a year, the line at which a family with two children working full-time falls into poverty.
And that is a choice the company is making. Walmart could give all of those workers a raise now. Last year, Demos found that for what it spent buying back its own stock Walmart could pay all of its workers over $25,000 a year. Walmart spent $7.6 billion on stock repurchases in 2013, which do nothing to boost the company's productivity or profits. The Walton heirs alone, already some of the wealthiest people in the country, made $2.6 billion from that round of share buybacks. Buybacks aren't of long-term use to the company, even for its shareholders. On the other hand, a raise across the retail sector would boost growth, and create over 100,000 new jobs.
Earlier this week, Pam Ramos, a Walmart worker in Mountain View, wrote a must-read piece for Salon on the implications. Key quote:
"I want the president to help us and tell Walmart to pay us enough to cover the bills and take care of our families. That doesn't seem like too much to ask from such a profitable company, a company that sets the standard for jobs in this country. And I hope it's not too much to ask from a president who believes that income inequality is the defining challenge of our time."
It isn't too much to ask. The country has a clear vested interest in lifting those families out of poverty and boosting the economy as a result. The president should echo the language he's used to lift up high-road employers like Costco and (more recently) the Gap, and encourage Walmart to pay its low-wage workforce more, like he did during the State of the Union:
"Profitable companies like Costco see higher wages as a smart way to boost productivity and to reduce turnover," the president said. "But there are a lot of Americans who don't work somewhere like Costco, and they're working for wages that don't go as far as they once did."
A lot of those workers who aren't working for decent wages are working for Walmart. The president is talking the talk on the minimum wage and it's having an impact. He should hold the country's largest employer to the same standard.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.