SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Will the House Approve Another Year in Afghanistan?
Roiled by the change of military leadership in Afghanistan, the
House will vote today on whether to continue the course in
Afghanistan for another year
If Republicans vote for the $33 billion supplemental appropriation
for the troop surge in Afghanistan, as expected, the measure will pass.
So will the larger military appropriation, which includes approximately
$160 billion for another year in Afghanistan.
Jul 01, 2010
Roiled by the change of military leadership in Afghanistan, the House will vote today on whether to continue the course in Afghanistan for another year
If Republicans vote for the $33 billion supplemental appropriation for the troop surge in Afghanistan, as expected, the measure will pass. So will the larger military appropriation, which includes approximately $160 billion for another year in Afghanistan.
Peace forces in Congress, led by Representative Jim McGovern, will push in the Rules Committee for clean up-or-down votes on both the $33 billion for escalation and an amendment requiring the White House to adopt an exit strategy including a deadline for troop withdrawals. President Obama so far has offered a July 2011 deadline to "begin" withdrawals, a position that has come under fire from Republicans and some in the military.
The language of the McGovern amendment appears to require another Congressional vote if the White House wants to push back the July 2011 deadline. As McGovern and twenty-five House members wrote in a letter to Speaker Nancy Pelosi last week, the recent Rolling Stone article exposed high-level military opposition to the July 2011 deadline.
In a conference call sponsored by Win Without War today, McGovern said his goal was to "maximize the message," hopefully by obtaining a majority of Democratic House members to at least vote for the exit strategy measure whether or not they vote against the supplemental. McGovern argued that the sixty-five House votes for Representative Dennis Kucinich's war powers resolution earlier this year "did not help our cause."
Last year a House majority voted for the exit strategy as a resolution, with 138 votes. As of this week, McGovern had ninety-eight co-sponsors on his measure.
If the vote results show an increased Congressional opposition, the president and his national security team will face a future in which the Afghanistan war is supported primarily by Republicans and opposed by Democrats in Congress as well as Democrats and independents in recent opinion surveys.
McGovern was joined in the conference call by Representative Chellie Pingree of Maine.
Call your Representative through the Capitol Hill switchboard: (202) 224-3121.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Tom Hayden
Tom Hayden (1939-2016) was a state senator and leader of 1960's peace, justice and environmental movements. He taught at Pitzer College in Los Angeles. His books include The Port Huron Statement [new edition], Street Wars and The Zapatista Reader.
Roiled by the change of military leadership in Afghanistan, the House will vote today on whether to continue the course in Afghanistan for another year
If Republicans vote for the $33 billion supplemental appropriation for the troop surge in Afghanistan, as expected, the measure will pass. So will the larger military appropriation, which includes approximately $160 billion for another year in Afghanistan.
Peace forces in Congress, led by Representative Jim McGovern, will push in the Rules Committee for clean up-or-down votes on both the $33 billion for escalation and an amendment requiring the White House to adopt an exit strategy including a deadline for troop withdrawals. President Obama so far has offered a July 2011 deadline to "begin" withdrawals, a position that has come under fire from Republicans and some in the military.
The language of the McGovern amendment appears to require another Congressional vote if the White House wants to push back the July 2011 deadline. As McGovern and twenty-five House members wrote in a letter to Speaker Nancy Pelosi last week, the recent Rolling Stone article exposed high-level military opposition to the July 2011 deadline.
In a conference call sponsored by Win Without War today, McGovern said his goal was to "maximize the message," hopefully by obtaining a majority of Democratic House members to at least vote for the exit strategy measure whether or not they vote against the supplemental. McGovern argued that the sixty-five House votes for Representative Dennis Kucinich's war powers resolution earlier this year "did not help our cause."
Last year a House majority voted for the exit strategy as a resolution, with 138 votes. As of this week, McGovern had ninety-eight co-sponsors on his measure.
If the vote results show an increased Congressional opposition, the president and his national security team will face a future in which the Afghanistan war is supported primarily by Republicans and opposed by Democrats in Congress as well as Democrats and independents in recent opinion surveys.
McGovern was joined in the conference call by Representative Chellie Pingree of Maine.
Call your Representative through the Capitol Hill switchboard: (202) 224-3121.
Tom Hayden
Tom Hayden (1939-2016) was a state senator and leader of 1960's peace, justice and environmental movements. He taught at Pitzer College in Los Angeles. His books include The Port Huron Statement [new edition], Street Wars and The Zapatista Reader.
Roiled by the change of military leadership in Afghanistan, the House will vote today on whether to continue the course in Afghanistan for another year
If Republicans vote for the $33 billion supplemental appropriation for the troop surge in Afghanistan, as expected, the measure will pass. So will the larger military appropriation, which includes approximately $160 billion for another year in Afghanistan.
Peace forces in Congress, led by Representative Jim McGovern, will push in the Rules Committee for clean up-or-down votes on both the $33 billion for escalation and an amendment requiring the White House to adopt an exit strategy including a deadline for troop withdrawals. President Obama so far has offered a July 2011 deadline to "begin" withdrawals, a position that has come under fire from Republicans and some in the military.
The language of the McGovern amendment appears to require another Congressional vote if the White House wants to push back the July 2011 deadline. As McGovern and twenty-five House members wrote in a letter to Speaker Nancy Pelosi last week, the recent Rolling Stone article exposed high-level military opposition to the July 2011 deadline.
In a conference call sponsored by Win Without War today, McGovern said his goal was to "maximize the message," hopefully by obtaining a majority of Democratic House members to at least vote for the exit strategy measure whether or not they vote against the supplemental. McGovern argued that the sixty-five House votes for Representative Dennis Kucinich's war powers resolution earlier this year "did not help our cause."
Last year a House majority voted for the exit strategy as a resolution, with 138 votes. As of this week, McGovern had ninety-eight co-sponsors on his measure.
If the vote results show an increased Congressional opposition, the president and his national security team will face a future in which the Afghanistan war is supported primarily by Republicans and opposed by Democrats in Congress as well as Democrats and independents in recent opinion surveys.
McGovern was joined in the conference call by Representative Chellie Pingree of Maine.
Call your Representative through the Capitol Hill switchboard: (202) 224-3121.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.