Hillary Clinton's Dangerous Defense of Afghan Women
Last week,
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
pledged that the United States will not abandon Afghan women and girls
today as Afghan President Hamid Karzai is visiting the United States.According to the Associated Press,
Clinton told three senior women Afghan officials who were traveling
with Karzai that "We will not abandon you, we will stand with you
always." Clinton also said it is "essential that women's rights and
women's opportunities are not sacrificed or trampled on in the
reconciliation process." Her statements indicate that the US will not
support reconciliation with Taliban militants unless they "respect
women's rights," renounce the Taliban, and abide by the country's laws,
reported the Canadian Press.
Forgive my cynicism but we abandoned Afghan women many years ago,
and greatly exacerbated their plight when we cynically used them as a
justification to destroy their country and our continued military
presence is only making things worse. This latest statement from
Clinton reads like yet another ploy to use the lives of Afghan women as
an excuse-this time for not talking to the Taliban. While I am in no
way saying that we should condone the Taliban's misogyny, our military
presence is not the key to addressing that issue. In fact it is likely
making matters worse.
Women's lives have always been part of the battleground over which opposing forces fight. However, as Laura Carlsen points out, it has gotten much worse in recent years:
* At the turn of the 20th century, 5% of war casualties were civilians
* In World War I, 15% were civilians
* In World War II, the figure leapt to a 65% civilian death toll, as whole cities were bombed
* By the mid-nineties, 75% of war deaths were civilians
* Today, 90% of the human war toll are civilians-the majority women and childrenForget the complaints of "collateral damage". As military leaders
brag that modern technology has produced the most accurate weapons in
history, during war strikes in places like Iraq or Afghanistan, women
and children die.They are not the collateral damage-they are the targets.
As this blog pointed out recently, despite assurances that this is not the case, there
is anecdotal evidence that the U.S. military is still using training
chants that encourage the killing of innocent women and children.
I went down to the market where all the women shop
I pulled out my machete and I begin to chop
I went down to the park where all the children play
I pulled out my machine gun and I begin to spray.
What was that about not sacrificing or trampling on women's human rights?
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Last week,
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
pledged that the United States will not abandon Afghan women and girls
today as Afghan President Hamid Karzai is visiting the United States.According to the Associated Press,
Clinton told three senior women Afghan officials who were traveling
with Karzai that "We will not abandon you, we will stand with you
always." Clinton also said it is "essential that women's rights and
women's opportunities are not sacrificed or trampled on in the
reconciliation process." Her statements indicate that the US will not
support reconciliation with Taliban militants unless they "respect
women's rights," renounce the Taliban, and abide by the country's laws,
reported the Canadian Press.
Forgive my cynicism but we abandoned Afghan women many years ago,
and greatly exacerbated their plight when we cynically used them as a
justification to destroy their country and our continued military
presence is only making things worse. This latest statement from
Clinton reads like yet another ploy to use the lives of Afghan women as
an excuse-this time for not talking to the Taliban. While I am in no
way saying that we should condone the Taliban's misogyny, our military
presence is not the key to addressing that issue. In fact it is likely
making matters worse.
Women's lives have always been part of the battleground over which opposing forces fight. However, as Laura Carlsen points out, it has gotten much worse in recent years:
* At the turn of the 20th century, 5% of war casualties were civilians
* In World War I, 15% were civilians
* In World War II, the figure leapt to a 65% civilian death toll, as whole cities were bombed
* By the mid-nineties, 75% of war deaths were civilians
* Today, 90% of the human war toll are civilians-the majority women and childrenForget the complaints of "collateral damage". As military leaders
brag that modern technology has produced the most accurate weapons in
history, during war strikes in places like Iraq or Afghanistan, women
and children die.They are not the collateral damage-they are the targets.
As this blog pointed out recently, despite assurances that this is not the case, there
is anecdotal evidence that the U.S. military is still using training
chants that encourage the killing of innocent women and children.
I went down to the market where all the women shop
I pulled out my machete and I begin to chop
I went down to the park where all the children play
I pulled out my machine gun and I begin to spray.
What was that about not sacrificing or trampling on women's human rights?
Last week,
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
pledged that the United States will not abandon Afghan women and girls
today as Afghan President Hamid Karzai is visiting the United States.According to the Associated Press,
Clinton told three senior women Afghan officials who were traveling
with Karzai that "We will not abandon you, we will stand with you
always." Clinton also said it is "essential that women's rights and
women's opportunities are not sacrificed or trampled on in the
reconciliation process." Her statements indicate that the US will not
support reconciliation with Taliban militants unless they "respect
women's rights," renounce the Taliban, and abide by the country's laws,
reported the Canadian Press.
Forgive my cynicism but we abandoned Afghan women many years ago,
and greatly exacerbated their plight when we cynically used them as a
justification to destroy their country and our continued military
presence is only making things worse. This latest statement from
Clinton reads like yet another ploy to use the lives of Afghan women as
an excuse-this time for not talking to the Taliban. While I am in no
way saying that we should condone the Taliban's misogyny, our military
presence is not the key to addressing that issue. In fact it is likely
making matters worse.
Women's lives have always been part of the battleground over which opposing forces fight. However, as Laura Carlsen points out, it has gotten much worse in recent years:
* At the turn of the 20th century, 5% of war casualties were civilians
* In World War I, 15% were civilians
* In World War II, the figure leapt to a 65% civilian death toll, as whole cities were bombed
* By the mid-nineties, 75% of war deaths were civilians
* Today, 90% of the human war toll are civilians-the majority women and childrenForget the complaints of "collateral damage". As military leaders
brag that modern technology has produced the most accurate weapons in
history, during war strikes in places like Iraq or Afghanistan, women
and children die.They are not the collateral damage-they are the targets.
As this blog pointed out recently, despite assurances that this is not the case, there
is anecdotal evidence that the U.S. military is still using training
chants that encourage the killing of innocent women and children.
I went down to the market where all the women shop
I pulled out my machete and I begin to chop
I went down to the park where all the children play
I pulled out my machine gun and I begin to spray.
What was that about not sacrificing or trampling on women's human rights?