SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Historic EPA Game Changer: Will Jackson Veto or Regulate the Plunder of Appalachia?
Oct 19, 2009
Big News: In a historic move, Lisa Jackson's EPA threw down the
gauntlet on mountaintop removal mining last Friday--after they had just
compromised on another massively destructive mountaintop removal
operation.
Is this the beginning of the end of the plunder of Appalachia--or is the EPA moving sideways to regulate what its own science has called an irreversible violation of the Clean Water Act?
Within the backdrop of the EPA's extraordinary announcement, the coalfield uprising is moving on several fronts this week.
Today, besieged coalfield residents in the Coal River Valley are delivering an urgent letter
to West Virginia Gov. Joe Manchin to stop an impending mountaintop
removal operation near a dangerous coal slurry impoundment in their
communities that will destroy jobs and their homeland, and an
internationally acclaimed wind farm. Updates of the action at the
governor's mansion will be posted at Climate Ground Zero. Meanwhile, the Alliance for Appalachia and and other coalfield groups are also continuing to collect statements against the Army Corps' NWP 21 permit process and their chaotic hearings last week.
Charleston Gazette/Coal Tattoo journalist Ken Ward broke the news
on Friday: The EPA has announced its historic intentions to "issue a
public notice of a proposed determination to restrict or prohibit the
discharge of dredged and/or fill material at the Spruce No. 1 Mine
project site consistent with our authority under Section 404 (c) of the
Clean Water Act and regulations 40 C.F.R. Part 231."
In a line: For the first time in decades, the EPA is moving to
invoke its veto power to stop a St. Louis, Mo-owned Arch Coal
mountaintop removal mining operation from unacceptable adverse impacts
on the environment and water quality. The EPA has concluded that the
Army Corps of Engineers' plan to adjust the permit would still result
in the destruction of seven miles of streams.
So, why did the EPA accept a compromise at the St. Louis, MO-owned
Patriot Coal's massive Hobet mountaintop removal mine, which would reportedly still allow half of the affected streams to be destroyed?
In truth, Lisa Jackson and the EPA have recognized
that thousands of miles of streams have been sullied and jammed with
mining waste from mountaintop removal mining in Appalachia over the
past three decades--and the impacts are "immense and irreversible, and
there are no scientifically credible plans for mitigating these
impacts," according to Dr. Margaret Palmer's US Senate hearing
testimony last June. West Virginia state environmental biologist Doug
Wood has noted:
"We now have clear evidence that in some streams that drain mountaintop
coal quarry valley fills, the entire order Ephemeroptera (mayflies) has
been extirpated, not just certain genera of this order...The loss of an
order of insects from a stream is taxonomically equivalent to the loss
of all primates (including humans) from a given area. The loss of two
insect orders is taxonomically equivalent to killing all primates and
all rodents through toxic chemicals."
Spruce No. 1 Mine in Logan County, West Virginia is not only the
largest mountaintop removal site in West Virginia--it has been the
quintessential battleground for science and law-based mining policies over 10 years.
So, is this the beginning of the end of the plunder of Appalachia...or just more of regulating an abomination?
A searing new collection of photos and essays--Plundering Appalachia--asks this question in one of the most gripping and informed books in years.
Examining the cradle to the grave impacts of mountaintop removal
mining, and coal in general, Plundering Appalachia shows the
indisputable destruction of reckless mining on the local communities,
the mountains and valleys, the watersheds, and the nation at large.
Here's a video clip from the book:
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Jeff Biggers
Jeff Biggers is the author of In Sardinia: An Unexpected Journey in Italy, and other works of history.
Big News: In a historic move, Lisa Jackson's EPA threw down the
gauntlet on mountaintop removal mining last Friday--after they had just
compromised on another massively destructive mountaintop removal
operation.
Is this the beginning of the end of the plunder of Appalachia--or is the EPA moving sideways to regulate what its own science has called an irreversible violation of the Clean Water Act?
Within the backdrop of the EPA's extraordinary announcement, the coalfield uprising is moving on several fronts this week.
Today, besieged coalfield residents in the Coal River Valley are delivering an urgent letter
to West Virginia Gov. Joe Manchin to stop an impending mountaintop
removal operation near a dangerous coal slurry impoundment in their
communities that will destroy jobs and their homeland, and an
internationally acclaimed wind farm. Updates of the action at the
governor's mansion will be posted at Climate Ground Zero. Meanwhile, the Alliance for Appalachia and and other coalfield groups are also continuing to collect statements against the Army Corps' NWP 21 permit process and their chaotic hearings last week.
Charleston Gazette/Coal Tattoo journalist Ken Ward broke the news
on Friday: The EPA has announced its historic intentions to "issue a
public notice of a proposed determination to restrict or prohibit the
discharge of dredged and/or fill material at the Spruce No. 1 Mine
project site consistent with our authority under Section 404 (c) of the
Clean Water Act and regulations 40 C.F.R. Part 231."
In a line: For the first time in decades, the EPA is moving to
invoke its veto power to stop a St. Louis, Mo-owned Arch Coal
mountaintop removal mining operation from unacceptable adverse impacts
on the environment and water quality. The EPA has concluded that the
Army Corps of Engineers' plan to adjust the permit would still result
in the destruction of seven miles of streams.
So, why did the EPA accept a compromise at the St. Louis, MO-owned
Patriot Coal's massive Hobet mountaintop removal mine, which would reportedly still allow half of the affected streams to be destroyed?
In truth, Lisa Jackson and the EPA have recognized
that thousands of miles of streams have been sullied and jammed with
mining waste from mountaintop removal mining in Appalachia over the
past three decades--and the impacts are "immense and irreversible, and
there are no scientifically credible plans for mitigating these
impacts," according to Dr. Margaret Palmer's US Senate hearing
testimony last June. West Virginia state environmental biologist Doug
Wood has noted:
"We now have clear evidence that in some streams that drain mountaintop
coal quarry valley fills, the entire order Ephemeroptera (mayflies) has
been extirpated, not just certain genera of this order...The loss of an
order of insects from a stream is taxonomically equivalent to the loss
of all primates (including humans) from a given area. The loss of two
insect orders is taxonomically equivalent to killing all primates and
all rodents through toxic chemicals."
Spruce No. 1 Mine in Logan County, West Virginia is not only the
largest mountaintop removal site in West Virginia--it has been the
quintessential battleground for science and law-based mining policies over 10 years.
So, is this the beginning of the end of the plunder of Appalachia...or just more of regulating an abomination?
A searing new collection of photos and essays--Plundering Appalachia--asks this question in one of the most gripping and informed books in years.
Examining the cradle to the grave impacts of mountaintop removal
mining, and coal in general, Plundering Appalachia shows the
indisputable destruction of reckless mining on the local communities,
the mountains and valleys, the watersheds, and the nation at large.
Here's a video clip from the book:
Jeff Biggers
Jeff Biggers is the author of In Sardinia: An Unexpected Journey in Italy, and other works of history.
Big News: In a historic move, Lisa Jackson's EPA threw down the
gauntlet on mountaintop removal mining last Friday--after they had just
compromised on another massively destructive mountaintop removal
operation.
Is this the beginning of the end of the plunder of Appalachia--or is the EPA moving sideways to regulate what its own science has called an irreversible violation of the Clean Water Act?
Within the backdrop of the EPA's extraordinary announcement, the coalfield uprising is moving on several fronts this week.
Today, besieged coalfield residents in the Coal River Valley are delivering an urgent letter
to West Virginia Gov. Joe Manchin to stop an impending mountaintop
removal operation near a dangerous coal slurry impoundment in their
communities that will destroy jobs and their homeland, and an
internationally acclaimed wind farm. Updates of the action at the
governor's mansion will be posted at Climate Ground Zero. Meanwhile, the Alliance for Appalachia and and other coalfield groups are also continuing to collect statements against the Army Corps' NWP 21 permit process and their chaotic hearings last week.
Charleston Gazette/Coal Tattoo journalist Ken Ward broke the news
on Friday: The EPA has announced its historic intentions to "issue a
public notice of a proposed determination to restrict or prohibit the
discharge of dredged and/or fill material at the Spruce No. 1 Mine
project site consistent with our authority under Section 404 (c) of the
Clean Water Act and regulations 40 C.F.R. Part 231."
In a line: For the first time in decades, the EPA is moving to
invoke its veto power to stop a St. Louis, Mo-owned Arch Coal
mountaintop removal mining operation from unacceptable adverse impacts
on the environment and water quality. The EPA has concluded that the
Army Corps of Engineers' plan to adjust the permit would still result
in the destruction of seven miles of streams.
So, why did the EPA accept a compromise at the St. Louis, MO-owned
Patriot Coal's massive Hobet mountaintop removal mine, which would reportedly still allow half of the affected streams to be destroyed?
In truth, Lisa Jackson and the EPA have recognized
that thousands of miles of streams have been sullied and jammed with
mining waste from mountaintop removal mining in Appalachia over the
past three decades--and the impacts are "immense and irreversible, and
there are no scientifically credible plans for mitigating these
impacts," according to Dr. Margaret Palmer's US Senate hearing
testimony last June. West Virginia state environmental biologist Doug
Wood has noted:
"We now have clear evidence that in some streams that drain mountaintop
coal quarry valley fills, the entire order Ephemeroptera (mayflies) has
been extirpated, not just certain genera of this order...The loss of an
order of insects from a stream is taxonomically equivalent to the loss
of all primates (including humans) from a given area. The loss of two
insect orders is taxonomically equivalent to killing all primates and
all rodents through toxic chemicals."
Spruce No. 1 Mine in Logan County, West Virginia is not only the
largest mountaintop removal site in West Virginia--it has been the
quintessential battleground for science and law-based mining policies over 10 years.
So, is this the beginning of the end of the plunder of Appalachia...or just more of regulating an abomination?
A searing new collection of photos and essays--Plundering Appalachia--asks this question in one of the most gripping and informed books in years.
Examining the cradle to the grave impacts of mountaintop removal
mining, and coal in general, Plundering Appalachia shows the
indisputable destruction of reckless mining on the local communities,
the mountains and valleys, the watersheds, and the nation at large.
Here's a video clip from the book:
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.