

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Congressional Democrats and Republicans are signing on to a letter
urging President Obama to reconsider his plan to surge tens of
thousands of additional U.S. troops into Afghanistan.
"Mr. President, in reviewing the past history of Afghanistan and the
nations that have failed to conquer it -- Russia spent nine years in
Afghanistan and lost many billions of dollars and more than 15,000
Russian soldiers-- we urge you to reconsider the decision to send an
additional 17,000 troops and to resist pressure to escalate even
further," reads a "Get on the Right Side of History" letter that has
attracted the support of House Democrats Representative Neil
Abercrombie, of Hawaii; John Conyers of Michigan; Bob Filner and Mike
Honda of California; Steve Kagen of Wisconsin; Marcy Kaptur and Dennis
Kucinich of Ohio, and Jim McGovern of Massachusetts.
Also signing the letter are Republicans Roscoe Bartlett, of
Maryland, Howard Coble and Walter Jones Jr. of North Carolina; John
Duncan of Tennessee; Ron Paul of Texas, and Ed Whitfield of Kentucky.
The full letter from the House members reads:
Dear Mr. President:
We have noted with some concern your announcement that an additional
17,000 US troops would be sent to Afghanistan. As the goals of our
seven year military involvement remain troublingly unclear, we urge you
to reconsider such a military escalation.If the intent is to leave behind a stable Afghanistan capable of
governing itself, this military escalation may well be
counterproductive. A recent study by the Carnegie Endowment has
concluded that "the only meaningful way to halt the insurgency's
momentum is to start withdrawing troops. The presence of foreign troops
is the most important element d riving the resurgence of the Taliban."The 2001 authorization to use military force in Afghanistan allowed
military action "to prevent any future acts of international terrorism
against the United States." Continuing to fight a counterinsurgency war
in Afghanistan does not appear to us to be in keeping with these
directives and an escalation may actually harm US security.In a tape released in 2004, Osama bin Laden stated that al Qaedas'
goal was to "bleed.. .America to the point of bankruptcy" in
Afghanistan. He continued, "All that we have to do is to send two
mujahedeen to the furthest point east to raise a piece of cloth on
which is written al Qaeda, in order to make generals race there to
cause America to suffer human, economic and political losses without
their achieving anything of note..."We would do well to pay attention to these threats and to avoid
falling into any such trap through escalation of our military presence
in Afghanistan.We are also concerned that any perceived military success in
Afghanistan might create pressure to increase military activity in
Pakistan. This could very well lead to dangerous destabilization in the
region and would increase hostility toward the United States.Mr. President, in reviewing the past history of Afghanistan and the
nations that have failed to conquer it -- Russia spent nine years in
Afghanistan and lost many billions of dollars and more than 15,000
Russian soldiers-- we urge you to reconsider the decision to send an
additional 17,000 troops and to resist pressure to escalate even
further.
In addition to the House members who have signed on, the letter has
also been endorsed by religious, political and policy advocates from
across the ideological spectrum, including:
Michael D. Ostrolenk, President,
American Conservative Defense AllianceMary Ellen McNish, General Secretary, American Friends Service Committee (AFSC)
Jodie Evans and Medea Benjamin, co-founders, CODEPINK: Women for Peace
Erik Leaver, Foreign Policy In Focus
Joe Volk, Executive Secretary, Friends Committee on National Legislation (FCNL)
Phyllis Bennis, New Internationalism project, Institute for Policy Studies
Robert Naiman, Senior Policy Analyst, Just Foreign Policy
Yifat Susskind, Communications Director, MADRE: Rights, Resources, and Results for Women Worldwide
(Rev.) James Kofski, Associate, Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns
Simone Campbell, SSS, Executive Director, NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby
Dave Robinson, Executive Director, Pax Christi USA: National Catholic Peace Movement
Kevin Martin, Executive Director, Peace Action
John Leinung, Steering Committee, September Eleventh Families for Peaceful Tomorrows
Charlie Clements, President and CEO, Unitarian Universalist Service Committee (UUSC)
Leslie Cagan, National Coordinator, United for Peace and Justice
(UFPJ is a coalition of 1,400 national and local organizations.)Michael Eisenscher, National Coordinator, U.S. Labor Against the War
Kevin Zeese, Executive Director, Voters for Peace
Former Congressman Tom Andrews, Director, Win Without War (WWW is a
coalition of more than 40 national groups, many with religious
affiliations.)Susan Shaer, Executive Director, Women's Action for New Directions
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Congressional Democrats and Republicans are signing on to a letter
urging President Obama to reconsider his plan to surge tens of
thousands of additional U.S. troops into Afghanistan.
"Mr. President, in reviewing the past history of Afghanistan and the
nations that have failed to conquer it -- Russia spent nine years in
Afghanistan and lost many billions of dollars and more than 15,000
Russian soldiers-- we urge you to reconsider the decision to send an
additional 17,000 troops and to resist pressure to escalate even
further," reads a "Get on the Right Side of History" letter that has
attracted the support of House Democrats Representative Neil
Abercrombie, of Hawaii; John Conyers of Michigan; Bob Filner and Mike
Honda of California; Steve Kagen of Wisconsin; Marcy Kaptur and Dennis
Kucinich of Ohio, and Jim McGovern of Massachusetts.
Also signing the letter are Republicans Roscoe Bartlett, of
Maryland, Howard Coble and Walter Jones Jr. of North Carolina; John
Duncan of Tennessee; Ron Paul of Texas, and Ed Whitfield of Kentucky.
The full letter from the House members reads:
Dear Mr. President:
We have noted with some concern your announcement that an additional
17,000 US troops would be sent to Afghanistan. As the goals of our
seven year military involvement remain troublingly unclear, we urge you
to reconsider such a military escalation.If the intent is to leave behind a stable Afghanistan capable of
governing itself, this military escalation may well be
counterproductive. A recent study by the Carnegie Endowment has
concluded that "the only meaningful way to halt the insurgency's
momentum is to start withdrawing troops. The presence of foreign troops
is the most important element d riving the resurgence of the Taliban."The 2001 authorization to use military force in Afghanistan allowed
military action "to prevent any future acts of international terrorism
against the United States." Continuing to fight a counterinsurgency war
in Afghanistan does not appear to us to be in keeping with these
directives and an escalation may actually harm US security.In a tape released in 2004, Osama bin Laden stated that al Qaedas'
goal was to "bleed.. .America to the point of bankruptcy" in
Afghanistan. He continued, "All that we have to do is to send two
mujahedeen to the furthest point east to raise a piece of cloth on
which is written al Qaeda, in order to make generals race there to
cause America to suffer human, economic and political losses without
their achieving anything of note..."We would do well to pay attention to these threats and to avoid
falling into any such trap through escalation of our military presence
in Afghanistan.We are also concerned that any perceived military success in
Afghanistan might create pressure to increase military activity in
Pakistan. This could very well lead to dangerous destabilization in the
region and would increase hostility toward the United States.Mr. President, in reviewing the past history of Afghanistan and the
nations that have failed to conquer it -- Russia spent nine years in
Afghanistan and lost many billions of dollars and more than 15,000
Russian soldiers-- we urge you to reconsider the decision to send an
additional 17,000 troops and to resist pressure to escalate even
further.
In addition to the House members who have signed on, the letter has
also been endorsed by religious, political and policy advocates from
across the ideological spectrum, including:
Michael D. Ostrolenk, President,
American Conservative Defense AllianceMary Ellen McNish, General Secretary, American Friends Service Committee (AFSC)
Jodie Evans and Medea Benjamin, co-founders, CODEPINK: Women for Peace
Erik Leaver, Foreign Policy In Focus
Joe Volk, Executive Secretary, Friends Committee on National Legislation (FCNL)
Phyllis Bennis, New Internationalism project, Institute for Policy Studies
Robert Naiman, Senior Policy Analyst, Just Foreign Policy
Yifat Susskind, Communications Director, MADRE: Rights, Resources, and Results for Women Worldwide
(Rev.) James Kofski, Associate, Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns
Simone Campbell, SSS, Executive Director, NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby
Dave Robinson, Executive Director, Pax Christi USA: National Catholic Peace Movement
Kevin Martin, Executive Director, Peace Action
John Leinung, Steering Committee, September Eleventh Families for Peaceful Tomorrows
Charlie Clements, President and CEO, Unitarian Universalist Service Committee (UUSC)
Leslie Cagan, National Coordinator, United for Peace and Justice
(UFPJ is a coalition of 1,400 national and local organizations.)Michael Eisenscher, National Coordinator, U.S. Labor Against the War
Kevin Zeese, Executive Director, Voters for Peace
Former Congressman Tom Andrews, Director, Win Without War (WWW is a
coalition of more than 40 national groups, many with religious
affiliations.)Susan Shaer, Executive Director, Women's Action for New Directions
Congressional Democrats and Republicans are signing on to a letter
urging President Obama to reconsider his plan to surge tens of
thousands of additional U.S. troops into Afghanistan.
"Mr. President, in reviewing the past history of Afghanistan and the
nations that have failed to conquer it -- Russia spent nine years in
Afghanistan and lost many billions of dollars and more than 15,000
Russian soldiers-- we urge you to reconsider the decision to send an
additional 17,000 troops and to resist pressure to escalate even
further," reads a "Get on the Right Side of History" letter that has
attracted the support of House Democrats Representative Neil
Abercrombie, of Hawaii; John Conyers of Michigan; Bob Filner and Mike
Honda of California; Steve Kagen of Wisconsin; Marcy Kaptur and Dennis
Kucinich of Ohio, and Jim McGovern of Massachusetts.
Also signing the letter are Republicans Roscoe Bartlett, of
Maryland, Howard Coble and Walter Jones Jr. of North Carolina; John
Duncan of Tennessee; Ron Paul of Texas, and Ed Whitfield of Kentucky.
The full letter from the House members reads:
Dear Mr. President:
We have noted with some concern your announcement that an additional
17,000 US troops would be sent to Afghanistan. As the goals of our
seven year military involvement remain troublingly unclear, we urge you
to reconsider such a military escalation.If the intent is to leave behind a stable Afghanistan capable of
governing itself, this military escalation may well be
counterproductive. A recent study by the Carnegie Endowment has
concluded that "the only meaningful way to halt the insurgency's
momentum is to start withdrawing troops. The presence of foreign troops
is the most important element d riving the resurgence of the Taliban."The 2001 authorization to use military force in Afghanistan allowed
military action "to prevent any future acts of international terrorism
against the United States." Continuing to fight a counterinsurgency war
in Afghanistan does not appear to us to be in keeping with these
directives and an escalation may actually harm US security.In a tape released in 2004, Osama bin Laden stated that al Qaedas'
goal was to "bleed.. .America to the point of bankruptcy" in
Afghanistan. He continued, "All that we have to do is to send two
mujahedeen to the furthest point east to raise a piece of cloth on
which is written al Qaeda, in order to make generals race there to
cause America to suffer human, economic and political losses without
their achieving anything of note..."We would do well to pay attention to these threats and to avoid
falling into any such trap through escalation of our military presence
in Afghanistan.We are also concerned that any perceived military success in
Afghanistan might create pressure to increase military activity in
Pakistan. This could very well lead to dangerous destabilization in the
region and would increase hostility toward the United States.Mr. President, in reviewing the past history of Afghanistan and the
nations that have failed to conquer it -- Russia spent nine years in
Afghanistan and lost many billions of dollars and more than 15,000
Russian soldiers-- we urge you to reconsider the decision to send an
additional 17,000 troops and to resist pressure to escalate even
further.
In addition to the House members who have signed on, the letter has
also been endorsed by religious, political and policy advocates from
across the ideological spectrum, including:
Michael D. Ostrolenk, President,
American Conservative Defense AllianceMary Ellen McNish, General Secretary, American Friends Service Committee (AFSC)
Jodie Evans and Medea Benjamin, co-founders, CODEPINK: Women for Peace
Erik Leaver, Foreign Policy In Focus
Joe Volk, Executive Secretary, Friends Committee on National Legislation (FCNL)
Phyllis Bennis, New Internationalism project, Institute for Policy Studies
Robert Naiman, Senior Policy Analyst, Just Foreign Policy
Yifat Susskind, Communications Director, MADRE: Rights, Resources, and Results for Women Worldwide
(Rev.) James Kofski, Associate, Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns
Simone Campbell, SSS, Executive Director, NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby
Dave Robinson, Executive Director, Pax Christi USA: National Catholic Peace Movement
Kevin Martin, Executive Director, Peace Action
John Leinung, Steering Committee, September Eleventh Families for Peaceful Tomorrows
Charlie Clements, President and CEO, Unitarian Universalist Service Committee (UUSC)
Leslie Cagan, National Coordinator, United for Peace and Justice
(UFPJ is a coalition of 1,400 national and local organizations.)Michael Eisenscher, National Coordinator, U.S. Labor Against the War
Kevin Zeese, Executive Director, Voters for Peace
Former Congressman Tom Andrews, Director, Win Without War (WWW is a
coalition of more than 40 national groups, many with religious
affiliations.)Susan Shaer, Executive Director, Women's Action for New Directions