SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Congressional Democrats and Republicans are signing on to a letter
urging President Obama to reconsider his plan to surge tens of
thousands of additional U.S. troops into Afghanistan.
"Mr. President, in reviewing the past history of Afghanistan and the
nations that have failed to conquer it -- Russia spent nine years in
Afghanistan and lost many billions of dollars and more than 15,000
Russian soldiers-- we urge you to reconsider the decision to send an
additional 17,000 troops and to resist pressure to escalate even
further," reads a "Get on the Right Side of History" letter that has
attracted the support of House Democrats Representative Neil
Abercrombie, of Hawaii; John Conyers of Michigan; Bob Filner and Mike
Honda of California; Steve Kagen of Wisconsin; Marcy Kaptur and Dennis
Kucinich of Ohio, and Jim McGovern of Massachusetts.
Also signing the letter are Republicans Roscoe Bartlett, of
Maryland, Howard Coble and Walter Jones Jr. of North Carolina; John
Duncan of Tennessee; Ron Paul of Texas, and Ed Whitfield of Kentucky.
The full letter from the House members reads:
Dear Mr. President:
We have noted with some concern your announcement that an additional
17,000 US troops would be sent to Afghanistan. As the goals of our
seven year military involvement remain troublingly unclear, we urge you
to reconsider such a military escalation.If the intent is to leave behind a stable Afghanistan capable of
governing itself, this military escalation may well be
counterproductive. A recent study by the Carnegie Endowment has
concluded that "the only meaningful way to halt the insurgency's
momentum is to start withdrawing troops. The presence of foreign troops
is the most important element d riving the resurgence of the Taliban."The 2001 authorization to use military force in Afghanistan allowed
military action "to prevent any future acts of international terrorism
against the United States." Continuing to fight a counterinsurgency war
in Afghanistan does not appear to us to be in keeping with these
directives and an escalation may actually harm US security.In a tape released in 2004, Osama bin Laden stated that al Qaedas'
goal was to "bleed.. .America to the point of bankruptcy" in
Afghanistan. He continued, "All that we have to do is to send two
mujahedeen to the furthest point east to raise a piece of cloth on
which is written al Qaeda, in order to make generals race there to
cause America to suffer human, economic and political losses without
their achieving anything of note..."We would do well to pay attention to these threats and to avoid
falling into any such trap through escalation of our military presence
in Afghanistan.We are also concerned that any perceived military success in
Afghanistan might create pressure to increase military activity in
Pakistan. This could very well lead to dangerous destabilization in the
region and would increase hostility toward the United States.Mr. President, in reviewing the past history of Afghanistan and the
nations that have failed to conquer it -- Russia spent nine years in
Afghanistan and lost many billions of dollars and more than 15,000
Russian soldiers-- we urge you to reconsider the decision to send an
additional 17,000 troops and to resist pressure to escalate even
further.
In addition to the House members who have signed on, the letter has
also been endorsed by religious, political and policy advocates from
across the ideological spectrum, including:
Michael D. Ostrolenk, President,
American Conservative Defense AllianceMary Ellen McNish, General Secretary, American Friends Service Committee (AFSC)
Jodie Evans and Medea Benjamin, co-founders, CODEPINK: Women for Peace
Erik Leaver, Foreign Policy In Focus
Joe Volk, Executive Secretary, Friends Committee on National Legislation (FCNL)
Tom Hayden
Phyllis Bennis, New Internationalism project, Institute for Policy Studies
Robert Naiman, Senior Policy Analyst, Just Foreign Policy
Yifat Susskind, Communications Director, MADRE: Rights, Resources, and Results for Women Worldwide
(Rev.) James Kofski, Associate, Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns
Simone Campbell, SSS, Executive Director, NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby
Dave Robinson, Executive Director, Pax Christi USA: National Catholic Peace Movement
Kevin Martin, Executive Director, Peace Action
John Leinung, Steering Committee, September Eleventh Families for Peaceful Tomorrows
Charlie Clements, President and CEO, Unitarian Universalist Service Committee (UUSC)
Leslie Cagan, National Coordinator, United for Peace and Justice
(UFPJ is a coalition of 1,400 national and local organizations.)Michael Eisenscher, National Coordinator, U.S. Labor Against the War
Kevin Zeese, Executive Director, Voters for Peace
Former Congressman Tom Andrews, Director, Win Without War (WWW is a
coalition of more than 40 national groups, many with religious
affiliations.)Susan Shaer, Executive Director, Women's Action for New Directions
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Congressional Democrats and Republicans are signing on to a letter
urging President Obama to reconsider his plan to surge tens of
thousands of additional U.S. troops into Afghanistan.
"Mr. President, in reviewing the past history of Afghanistan and the
nations that have failed to conquer it -- Russia spent nine years in
Afghanistan and lost many billions of dollars and more than 15,000
Russian soldiers-- we urge you to reconsider the decision to send an
additional 17,000 troops and to resist pressure to escalate even
further," reads a "Get on the Right Side of History" letter that has
attracted the support of House Democrats Representative Neil
Abercrombie, of Hawaii; John Conyers of Michigan; Bob Filner and Mike
Honda of California; Steve Kagen of Wisconsin; Marcy Kaptur and Dennis
Kucinich of Ohio, and Jim McGovern of Massachusetts.
Also signing the letter are Republicans Roscoe Bartlett, of
Maryland, Howard Coble and Walter Jones Jr. of North Carolina; John
Duncan of Tennessee; Ron Paul of Texas, and Ed Whitfield of Kentucky.
The full letter from the House members reads:
Dear Mr. President:
We have noted with some concern your announcement that an additional
17,000 US troops would be sent to Afghanistan. As the goals of our
seven year military involvement remain troublingly unclear, we urge you
to reconsider such a military escalation.If the intent is to leave behind a stable Afghanistan capable of
governing itself, this military escalation may well be
counterproductive. A recent study by the Carnegie Endowment has
concluded that "the only meaningful way to halt the insurgency's
momentum is to start withdrawing troops. The presence of foreign troops
is the most important element d riving the resurgence of the Taliban."The 2001 authorization to use military force in Afghanistan allowed
military action "to prevent any future acts of international terrorism
against the United States." Continuing to fight a counterinsurgency war
in Afghanistan does not appear to us to be in keeping with these
directives and an escalation may actually harm US security.In a tape released in 2004, Osama bin Laden stated that al Qaedas'
goal was to "bleed.. .America to the point of bankruptcy" in
Afghanistan. He continued, "All that we have to do is to send two
mujahedeen to the furthest point east to raise a piece of cloth on
which is written al Qaeda, in order to make generals race there to
cause America to suffer human, economic and political losses without
their achieving anything of note..."We would do well to pay attention to these threats and to avoid
falling into any such trap through escalation of our military presence
in Afghanistan.We are also concerned that any perceived military success in
Afghanistan might create pressure to increase military activity in
Pakistan. This could very well lead to dangerous destabilization in the
region and would increase hostility toward the United States.Mr. President, in reviewing the past history of Afghanistan and the
nations that have failed to conquer it -- Russia spent nine years in
Afghanistan and lost many billions of dollars and more than 15,000
Russian soldiers-- we urge you to reconsider the decision to send an
additional 17,000 troops and to resist pressure to escalate even
further.
In addition to the House members who have signed on, the letter has
also been endorsed by religious, political and policy advocates from
across the ideological spectrum, including:
Michael D. Ostrolenk, President,
American Conservative Defense AllianceMary Ellen McNish, General Secretary, American Friends Service Committee (AFSC)
Jodie Evans and Medea Benjamin, co-founders, CODEPINK: Women for Peace
Erik Leaver, Foreign Policy In Focus
Joe Volk, Executive Secretary, Friends Committee on National Legislation (FCNL)
Tom Hayden
Phyllis Bennis, New Internationalism project, Institute for Policy Studies
Robert Naiman, Senior Policy Analyst, Just Foreign Policy
Yifat Susskind, Communications Director, MADRE: Rights, Resources, and Results for Women Worldwide
(Rev.) James Kofski, Associate, Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns
Simone Campbell, SSS, Executive Director, NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby
Dave Robinson, Executive Director, Pax Christi USA: National Catholic Peace Movement
Kevin Martin, Executive Director, Peace Action
John Leinung, Steering Committee, September Eleventh Families for Peaceful Tomorrows
Charlie Clements, President and CEO, Unitarian Universalist Service Committee (UUSC)
Leslie Cagan, National Coordinator, United for Peace and Justice
(UFPJ is a coalition of 1,400 national and local organizations.)Michael Eisenscher, National Coordinator, U.S. Labor Against the War
Kevin Zeese, Executive Director, Voters for Peace
Former Congressman Tom Andrews, Director, Win Without War (WWW is a
coalition of more than 40 national groups, many with religious
affiliations.)Susan Shaer, Executive Director, Women's Action for New Directions
Congressional Democrats and Republicans are signing on to a letter
urging President Obama to reconsider his plan to surge tens of
thousands of additional U.S. troops into Afghanistan.
"Mr. President, in reviewing the past history of Afghanistan and the
nations that have failed to conquer it -- Russia spent nine years in
Afghanistan and lost many billions of dollars and more than 15,000
Russian soldiers-- we urge you to reconsider the decision to send an
additional 17,000 troops and to resist pressure to escalate even
further," reads a "Get on the Right Side of History" letter that has
attracted the support of House Democrats Representative Neil
Abercrombie, of Hawaii; John Conyers of Michigan; Bob Filner and Mike
Honda of California; Steve Kagen of Wisconsin; Marcy Kaptur and Dennis
Kucinich of Ohio, and Jim McGovern of Massachusetts.
Also signing the letter are Republicans Roscoe Bartlett, of
Maryland, Howard Coble and Walter Jones Jr. of North Carolina; John
Duncan of Tennessee; Ron Paul of Texas, and Ed Whitfield of Kentucky.
The full letter from the House members reads:
Dear Mr. President:
We have noted with some concern your announcement that an additional
17,000 US troops would be sent to Afghanistan. As the goals of our
seven year military involvement remain troublingly unclear, we urge you
to reconsider such a military escalation.If the intent is to leave behind a stable Afghanistan capable of
governing itself, this military escalation may well be
counterproductive. A recent study by the Carnegie Endowment has
concluded that "the only meaningful way to halt the insurgency's
momentum is to start withdrawing troops. The presence of foreign troops
is the most important element d riving the resurgence of the Taliban."The 2001 authorization to use military force in Afghanistan allowed
military action "to prevent any future acts of international terrorism
against the United States." Continuing to fight a counterinsurgency war
in Afghanistan does not appear to us to be in keeping with these
directives and an escalation may actually harm US security.In a tape released in 2004, Osama bin Laden stated that al Qaedas'
goal was to "bleed.. .America to the point of bankruptcy" in
Afghanistan. He continued, "All that we have to do is to send two
mujahedeen to the furthest point east to raise a piece of cloth on
which is written al Qaeda, in order to make generals race there to
cause America to suffer human, economic and political losses without
their achieving anything of note..."We would do well to pay attention to these threats and to avoid
falling into any such trap through escalation of our military presence
in Afghanistan.We are also concerned that any perceived military success in
Afghanistan might create pressure to increase military activity in
Pakistan. This could very well lead to dangerous destabilization in the
region and would increase hostility toward the United States.Mr. President, in reviewing the past history of Afghanistan and the
nations that have failed to conquer it -- Russia spent nine years in
Afghanistan and lost many billions of dollars and more than 15,000
Russian soldiers-- we urge you to reconsider the decision to send an
additional 17,000 troops and to resist pressure to escalate even
further.
In addition to the House members who have signed on, the letter has
also been endorsed by religious, political and policy advocates from
across the ideological spectrum, including:
Michael D. Ostrolenk, President,
American Conservative Defense AllianceMary Ellen McNish, General Secretary, American Friends Service Committee (AFSC)
Jodie Evans and Medea Benjamin, co-founders, CODEPINK: Women for Peace
Erik Leaver, Foreign Policy In Focus
Joe Volk, Executive Secretary, Friends Committee on National Legislation (FCNL)
Tom Hayden
Phyllis Bennis, New Internationalism project, Institute for Policy Studies
Robert Naiman, Senior Policy Analyst, Just Foreign Policy
Yifat Susskind, Communications Director, MADRE: Rights, Resources, and Results for Women Worldwide
(Rev.) James Kofski, Associate, Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns
Simone Campbell, SSS, Executive Director, NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby
Dave Robinson, Executive Director, Pax Christi USA: National Catholic Peace Movement
Kevin Martin, Executive Director, Peace Action
John Leinung, Steering Committee, September Eleventh Families for Peaceful Tomorrows
Charlie Clements, President and CEO, Unitarian Universalist Service Committee (UUSC)
Leslie Cagan, National Coordinator, United for Peace and Justice
(UFPJ is a coalition of 1,400 national and local organizations.)Michael Eisenscher, National Coordinator, U.S. Labor Against the War
Kevin Zeese, Executive Director, Voters for Peace
Former Congressman Tom Andrews, Director, Win Without War (WWW is a
coalition of more than 40 national groups, many with religious
affiliations.)Susan Shaer, Executive Director, Women's Action for New Directions