

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Most commentators took the shoe-throwing incident that happened over
the weekend as a bit of grotesque political slapstick. The Iraqi
television reporter who threw his shoes at President Bush apparently
considered himself a martyr, according to a note he passed to a
colleague on the spot. No doubt he anticipated some extremely cruel
reprisal for his symbolic protest. It's up in the air what will happen
to Muntadar al-Zeidi. The fact that he became an instant hero in the
Arab street carries small significance in the West, since that tinder
box doesn't need even a spark to ignite it.
We continually fail, it seems, to view our Middle Eastern disaster
through global eyes. A momentary insult hurled at America -- or at Mr.
Bush personally, if that was the primary intent -- is a minuscule
rebuke for the countless insults the rest of the world has had to bear.
The unilateral invasion of Iraq was an insult to our allies, who had
been naive enough to trust in six decades of cooperation through NATO
and the UN. The distortion and outright lying about Saddam's imminent
threat to the United States was an insult to everyone's intelligence.
The placing of responsibility for 9/11 on Saddam's shoulders was an
insult to the truth.
As he makes the rounds of exit interviews, Mr. Bush continues to throw
shoes at us. His "So what?" attitude toward the disaster he created is
the first shoe, the second is his blind assertion that the war in Iraq
is close to victory. Informed Middle East experts, the very sort he
ignored at the outset of his military adventures, point to a fragile
peace that could be shattered at any moment. The Sunni population of
Baghdad has been ethnically cleansed. Sadr City remains a powder keg.
Half of the country's two million Christians have been wiped out or
forced into exile. Civilian casualties since the invasion, counting the
losses in sectarian attacks, amount to 150,000 at the very least and
could be over 600,000 -- no one knows.
For Mr. Bush to ignore these brutal facts and try to paper them over
with slogans about democracy and victory must have something to do with
the shoes hurled at him. It's heartbreaking to think of the pent-up
rage and sorrow that lie behind the act. Those feelings are far from
being quelled. Should Iraq turn into a Shiite theocracy with
anti-American leanings, a fate that seems to be in the offing, Mr. Bush
will have another thing to say "So what?" about, but at least he'll be
doing it in private.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Most commentators took the shoe-throwing incident that happened over
the weekend as a bit of grotesque political slapstick. The Iraqi
television reporter who threw his shoes at President Bush apparently
considered himself a martyr, according to a note he passed to a
colleague on the spot. No doubt he anticipated some extremely cruel
reprisal for his symbolic protest. It's up in the air what will happen
to Muntadar al-Zeidi. The fact that he became an instant hero in the
Arab street carries small significance in the West, since that tinder
box doesn't need even a spark to ignite it.
We continually fail, it seems, to view our Middle Eastern disaster
through global eyes. A momentary insult hurled at America -- or at Mr.
Bush personally, if that was the primary intent -- is a minuscule
rebuke for the countless insults the rest of the world has had to bear.
The unilateral invasion of Iraq was an insult to our allies, who had
been naive enough to trust in six decades of cooperation through NATO
and the UN. The distortion and outright lying about Saddam's imminent
threat to the United States was an insult to everyone's intelligence.
The placing of responsibility for 9/11 on Saddam's shoulders was an
insult to the truth.
As he makes the rounds of exit interviews, Mr. Bush continues to throw
shoes at us. His "So what?" attitude toward the disaster he created is
the first shoe, the second is his blind assertion that the war in Iraq
is close to victory. Informed Middle East experts, the very sort he
ignored at the outset of his military adventures, point to a fragile
peace that could be shattered at any moment. The Sunni population of
Baghdad has been ethnically cleansed. Sadr City remains a powder keg.
Half of the country's two million Christians have been wiped out or
forced into exile. Civilian casualties since the invasion, counting the
losses in sectarian attacks, amount to 150,000 at the very least and
could be over 600,000 -- no one knows.
For Mr. Bush to ignore these brutal facts and try to paper them over
with slogans about democracy and victory must have something to do with
the shoes hurled at him. It's heartbreaking to think of the pent-up
rage and sorrow that lie behind the act. Those feelings are far from
being quelled. Should Iraq turn into a Shiite theocracy with
anti-American leanings, a fate that seems to be in the offing, Mr. Bush
will have another thing to say "So what?" about, but at least he'll be
doing it in private.
Most commentators took the shoe-throwing incident that happened over
the weekend as a bit of grotesque political slapstick. The Iraqi
television reporter who threw his shoes at President Bush apparently
considered himself a martyr, according to a note he passed to a
colleague on the spot. No doubt he anticipated some extremely cruel
reprisal for his symbolic protest. It's up in the air what will happen
to Muntadar al-Zeidi. The fact that he became an instant hero in the
Arab street carries small significance in the West, since that tinder
box doesn't need even a spark to ignite it.
We continually fail, it seems, to view our Middle Eastern disaster
through global eyes. A momentary insult hurled at America -- or at Mr.
Bush personally, if that was the primary intent -- is a minuscule
rebuke for the countless insults the rest of the world has had to bear.
The unilateral invasion of Iraq was an insult to our allies, who had
been naive enough to trust in six decades of cooperation through NATO
and the UN. The distortion and outright lying about Saddam's imminent
threat to the United States was an insult to everyone's intelligence.
The placing of responsibility for 9/11 on Saddam's shoulders was an
insult to the truth.
As he makes the rounds of exit interviews, Mr. Bush continues to throw
shoes at us. His "So what?" attitude toward the disaster he created is
the first shoe, the second is his blind assertion that the war in Iraq
is close to victory. Informed Middle East experts, the very sort he
ignored at the outset of his military adventures, point to a fragile
peace that could be shattered at any moment. The Sunni population of
Baghdad has been ethnically cleansed. Sadr City remains a powder keg.
Half of the country's two million Christians have been wiped out or
forced into exile. Civilian casualties since the invasion, counting the
losses in sectarian attacks, amount to 150,000 at the very least and
could be over 600,000 -- no one knows.
For Mr. Bush to ignore these brutal facts and try to paper them over
with slogans about democracy and victory must have something to do with
the shoes hurled at him. It's heartbreaking to think of the pent-up
rage and sorrow that lie behind the act. Those feelings are far from
being quelled. Should Iraq turn into a Shiite theocracy with
anti-American leanings, a fate that seems to be in the offing, Mr. Bush
will have another thing to say "So what?" about, but at least he'll be
doing it in private.