Skip to main content

Why are the billionaires always laughing?

Because they know the corporate media will never call bullshit on their bullshit.

Why are the billionaires laughing?

It’s easy to laugh when the corporate press treats you as a glorious success instead of the epitome of a broken social order. Billionaires laugh because they know the corporate media prefers to fawn over them rather than hold them to account.

Today, we ask you to support our nonprofit, independent journalism because we are not impressed by billionaires flying into space, their corporations despoiling our health and planet, or their vast fortunes safely concealed in tax havens across the globe. We are not laughing.

We are hard at work producing journalism for the common good. With our Fall Campaign underway, please support this mission today. We cannot do it without you.

Support Our Work -- Join the small group of generous readers who donate, keeping Common Dreams free for millions of people each year. Every donation—large or small—helps us bring you the news that matters.

San Franciscans Oppose the War. Why Don't Their Representatives?

Tom Gallagher

Given San Francisco's well deserved reputation as a center of the movement against the war against Iraq, many people outside the city may be surprised to learn that it does not have an antiwar representative in Congress, that is, one who supports withdrawing our troops now – not at some indeterminate time in the future, as Donald Rumsfield assures us we will do.  And given that one of its representatives, Nancy Pelosi, is the House Democratic leader, it's not just the city, but the nation that needs an antiwar representative from San Francisco.

In fact, many San Franciscans are themselves quite surprised, shocked even, when they learn that both of their Congressional representatives, Nancy Pelosi and Tom Lantos, opposed a May 25 budget amendment calling upon the President to "develop a plan for the withdrawal of U.S. military forces from Iraq."  After all, last November, 63% of the city's voters approved Proposition N, which called on the Federal government to "bring the troops safely home now." 

And since Pelosi is the House Democratic leader, there might have been a few Congressional Democrats surprised as well – or at least disappointed, since a 122-79 majority of her own party supported the amendment.  On the war, it seems, Pelosi is leading from the rear – her national antiwar image notwithstanding.  Oh, she does berate the Bush Administration for its conduct of the war, certainly.  Her statement on the May 5 $82 billion supplemental appropriation referred  to "repeated failures in judgment that first put our troops in harm's way."  But when 58 Democrats voted against the increased war funding, their ranks did not include her – or Lantos.  Critic of the war?  Yes.  Opponent of the war?  Not so far.

Certainly she's deft enough.  Challenging the President to put what he thinks he's doing in Iraq into words with her resolution demanding that he provide a "plan for success" was a clever enough maneuver, even if  was voted down on procedural grounds along nearly absolute party lines.  Likewise, few war opponents found fault with her raising Republican hackles by her describing the war as "a grotesque mistake" – although it should be clear by now that while the Administration's war plans were grotesque, they were no mistake.  

But all of Pelosi's polished maneuvering and rhetoric is no substitute for making substantive votes against the war.  Pelosi essentially assures the antiwar movement that she feels our pain and then votes the President what he wants.  This sort of winking – "you know we're really with you but we can't say it"–  strategy has already failed the Democrats in the John Kerry campaign, and the once massive antiwar movement has yet to recover from it.   

The May 25 Iraq withdrawal plan that Pelosi and Lantos helped defeat was offered by Democratic Congresswoman Lynn Woolsey of Petaluma, California and was a toned-down version of a resolution (H.Con.Res. 35), sponsored by Woolsey and 34 others, declaring it "the sense of Congress that the President should develop and implement a plan to begin the immediate withdrawal of United States Armed Forces from Iraq," while not shirking the obligations to that country which Bush's duplicitous and disastrous war policies have brought us.

Cities can't make foreign policy, we know.  But their voters can demand that their representatives do so.  San Francisco's did that last Fall, and since all polls show opposition to the war only increasing since then, the urgency of our representatives' supporting "the immediate withdrawal" called for in the Woolsey resolution is all the greater.  The San Francisco Board of Supervisors thought so on June 28, when they passed a resolution, with only one dissenting vote,  "urging Representatives Nancy Pelosi and Tom Lantos to add their names to the list of Representatives sponsoring H.Con.Res.35."

By the simple act of signing the Woolsey resolution, Nancy Pelosi and Tom Lantos can belatedly, but clearly, give San Francisco the antiwar representation it deserves – and has already asked for.  And in the act, Nancy Pelosi might also provide her party and the country the antiwar leadership we need in the fight to end this war based on lies that has killed 1,800 Americans, untold numbers of Iraqis, and costs $1 billion a week. 

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Tom Gallagher

Tom Gallagher

Tom Gallagher is a former Massachusetts State Representative and the author of 'The Primary Route: How the 99% Take On the Military Industrial Complex.' He lives in San Francisco.

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.

New Whistleblower Sparks Calls to 'Crack Down on Facebook and All Big Tech Companies'

Hours after another ex-employee filed a formal complaint, reporting broke on internal documents that show the tech giant's failure to address concerns about content related to the 2020 U.S. election.

Jessica Corbett ·

'Catastrophic and Irreparable Harm' to Wolves Averted as Wisconsin Judge Cancels Hunt

"We are heartened by this rare instance of reason and democracy prevailing in state wolf policy," said one conservation expert.

Brett Wilkins ·

'Texans Deserved Better Than This': Supreme Court Leaves Abortion Ban in Place

The nation's high court set a date to hear a pair of legal challenges to the "horrific" restrictions.

Jessica Corbett ·

'Like It Never Happened': Federal Judge Tosses Trump Attack on Clean Water Rule

Denying a Biden administration request to temporarily retain the rule, the judge reestablished "the careful balance of state and federal power to protect clean water that Congress intended when it wrote the Clean Water Act."

Brett Wilkins ·

Self-Proclaimed Pro-Climate Corporations Have Been Giving Thousands to Manchin and Sinema

"As if it wasn't enough that wealthy polluters have bankrolled Sen. Manchin during his fight against common-sense climate solutions—now companies that claim to value protecting the environment have opened their pocketbooks as well."

Kenny Stancil ·

Support our work.

We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported.

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values.
Direct to your inbox.

Subscribe to our Newsletter.

Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit | Privacy Policy
Common Dreams Logo