SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
At many big stores, workers are short-handed and face difficult working conditions—even when their companies are highly profitable.
I’ve always felt that working in customer-facing jobs is my calling. I’m passionate about making people feel comfortable when they enter a business, be it a retail store or a restaurant.
But it was hard to keep that passion when I worked at Dollar General. Like workers at many other big retailers, we were so short-staffed and poorly trained that it was next to impossible to give good customer service.
My interview and first day on the job went well. Managers, co-workers, and customers all seemed pretty happy. The second day was a complete 180. All of a sudden I was thrown into my duties with zero training. They even scheduled me to close out the store that day without instructions.
Dollar General has also been taking profits that could go toward worker pay or fixing up their stores and spending them instead on stock buybacks.
Quickly I had shifts where I was the only worker for hours at a time, dealing with long lines of impatient customers, tons of merchandise to stock, and frustrated vendors subject to long wait times.
I frequently had to get overstock items from unstable top shelves and constantly worried I’d fall. The back door also wouldn’t close correctly—and even though I brought it up to management several times, it remained an easy way for anyone to sneak in.
I didn’t know it then, but Dollar General has repeatedly faced huge penalties for workplace safety violations.
Once I was called out to help with a truck delivery of refrigerated and frozen products. I went to grab a tote bag full and had to do a triple take because it was full of black mold. Another afternoon, I picked up a bag of potting soil to stock and realized it was covered with dead insects, which got all over the floor and other products.
When I had problems like these with merchandise, I was expected to contact the warehouse myself. But that was hard to do, given how understaffed we were.
Dollar General isn’t the only tough place for retail employees. At many big stores, workers are short-handed and face difficult working conditions—even when their companies are highly profitable.
Where is all the money going? Well, I can tell you not much went to me.
I made $14.75 an hour for part-time hours, even though I often wound up working full-time. After the first few weeks, my schedule became so unpredictable that I sometimes worked only a few hours a week. Eventually it just wasn’t worth all the hard work and stress, so I quit.
By contrast, Dollar General CEO Todd Vasos made nearly $10 million last year—521 times as much as a typical worker at his company, the Institute for Policy Studies reported recently.
Dollar General has also been taking profits that could go toward worker pay or fixing up their stores and spending them instead on stock buybacks. That’s when a company repurchases its own shares to inflate the value of its stock and make CEOs even richer. Between 2019 and 2023, the company spent $9 billion on this financial scam.
I also learned from the Institute’s report that 88% of Dollar General workers who are eligible to participate in the company 401(k) plan don’t have one dime in their accounts. Low-wage workers like me just don’t earn enough to be able to save for our retirement.
I saw up close how a business that’s focused on exploiting employees to make those at the top even richer isn’t just bad for workers like me, but for customers as well. And anyone who’s worked for one of these low-wage companies can tell you Dollar General is hardly unique.
If we want a strong economy, we need to do more to make sure all workers can make a decent living and feel safe and respected in their workplace.
The union federation's new analysis provides a "snapshot of the extreme economic inequity that will only worsen under Donald Trump's Project 2025 Agenda."
The largest federation of labor unions in the U.S. published a report Thursday warning that the country is facing a crisis of "CEO payflation" as executive compensation at leading companies surges, a trend fueled by former President Donald Trump's regressive tax cuts and record stock buybacks.
The AFL-CIO's annual report on executive pay shows that the CEO-to-median-worker-pay ratio at S&P 500 companies was 268 to 1 last year, meaning that "it would take more than five career lifetimes for workers to earn what CEOs receive in just one year."
"On average, the median employee of an S&P 500 company would have had to start working in 1762 (prior to the American Revolution) to earn what the average CEO received in 2023," says the report, which points to a number of specific companies as the poster children of out-of-control executive compensation.
From 2021 to 2023, ExxonMobil CEO Darren Woods' total compensation rose from $23.6 million to $36.9 million as the company reaped massive windfall profits from energy market chaos sparked by Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Starbucks CEO Laxman Narasimhan saw his compensation jump 66%—from $8.8 million in 2022 to $14.6 million in 2023—as the company aggressively fought unionization efforts.
Overall, CEO pay at leading U.S. corporations rose 6% in 2023 compared to the previous year as companies continued to pass costs onto consumers—even as business expenses declined. Last year, the AFL-CIO's new report notes, "commodity prices that companies pay fell by 3% while consumer prices rose 3%, boosting corporate profits and CEO pay."
Over the past decade, the average S&P 500 CEO has seen a pay increase of roughly $4.2 million.
The executive compensation surge has been fueled in part by stock buybacks, which the AFL-CIO describes as "a financial
engineering practice that increases earnings per share that is used in many CEOs' incentive pay plans." Stock-based awards made up about 70% of total executive compensation in 2023, a separate study found.
Top U.S. companies bought back $795.1 billion worth of their shares last year, the AFL-CIO noted Thursday. One estimate from Goldman Sachs indicates share repurchases by S&P 500 companies could surpass $1 trillion next year for the first time in U.S. history.
In May, Apple—whose CEO received $63.2 million in total compensation last year—announced a $110 billion stock buyback authorization, the largest share repurchase program by a single company in the nation's history, beating its own record set in 2018.
"We are deeply concerned about pro-corporate policies that would drive up costs, put people out of work, endanger people's lives, and make it harder for working people to get ahead."
The massive tax cuts for corporations and the rich that the Republican-controlled Congress passed in 2017 and former President Donald Trump signed into law have also contributed to rising executive pay, the AFL-CIO said in its new report.
The law, which sparked a massive stock buyback spree, "permanently reduced the top corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%," reads the new report. "Economists estimate that 51% of the income gains from the corporate tax cuts went to firm owners, 10% went to the top five highest-paid senior executives, 38% went to the top 10%, and 0% of the wage gains went to the bottom 90% of workers."
The AFL-CIO, which has been tracking executive pay since 1997, said its new findings present a mere "snapshot of the extreme economic inequity that will only worsen under Donald Trump's Project 2025 Agenda."
"This level of inequality is not sustainable," Fred Redmond, the AFL-CIO's secretary-treasurer, said during a press call on Thursday. "Working people are sick and tired of politicians like Donald Trump pushing massive tax breaks for CEOs."
Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, has proposed extending elements of his tax law that are set to expire at the end of next year while slashing the corporate tax rate even further.
The Trump campaign and Project 2025—a far-right agenda crafted by at least 140 former Trump administration officials—have both called for a reduction in corporate taxes, even as profits surge to all-time highs.
Last month, the AFL-CIO launched an online tool aimed at educating U.S. voters on "how a second Trump term would decimate workers' ability to organize; gut health and safety protections; attack civil, labor, and consumer rights; eviscerate retirement security; and undermine our ability to hold the wealthy and corporations accountable."
"We are deeply concerned about pro-corporate policies that would drive up costs, put people out of work, endanger people's lives, and make it harder for working people to get ahead," said the labor organization, which has endorsed Democratic nominee Kamala Harris. "For unions, this agenda would make it tougher for members to win gains in our next contracts and stack the deck in favor of CEOs."
Companies in line to receive CHIPS Act subsidies spent a combined $41 billion on share repurchases between 2019 and 2023, a new report shows.
An analysis published Thursday estimates that semiconductor firms positioned to receive billions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies thanks to a 2022 U.S. law have spent big on investor-enriching stock buybacks in recent years, a finding that amplified calls for meaningful restrictions on companies benefiting from public money.
The new report released by the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) shows that between 2019 and 2023, the first 11 corporations to reach preliminary CHIPS and Science Act agreements with the U.S. Department of Commerce collectively poured more than $41 billion into stock buybacks—a sum that would have been enough to finance a $27,541 raise for 300,000 employees annually for five years.
Intel, the company set to receive more CHIPS Act money than any other semiconductor firm, spent the most on buybacks: a staggering $30.2 billion between 2019 and 2023.
"We found no evidence that any of the companies with preliminary agreements have publicly committed to suspend their existing share repurchase plans—or to refrain from authorizing new plans—during the grant period," reads the report. "In fact, when members of Congress asked BAE Systems executives if the firm would commit to pausing stock buybacks or to not engage in future ones while receiving a taxpayer-funded CHIPS grant, they declined to answer."
The Biden White House, which worked hard to get the CHIPS Act across the finish line in 2022, has insisted that the law contains "strong guardrails" to prevent the misuse of taxpayer money, including on share repurchases.
But Sarah Anderson of IPS and Natalia Renta of the Americans for Financial Reform Education Fund, the co-authors of the new report, noted Thursday that the statute only prohibits CHIPS Act subsidy recipients from spending the taxpayer money directly on buybacks.
"Since money is fungible, this is not a strong guardrail," the pair argued.
"Congress passed the CHIPS and Science Act and President Biden signed it into law to bolster semiconductor manufacturing in the U.S.—not to waste public dollars on stock buybacks."
Critics of stock buybacks and sky-high executive compensation warned prior to the CHIPS Act's passage that the measure would amount to large-scale corporate welfare unless lawmakers placed serious constraints on how companies could spend the money.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) tried unsuccessfully to attach an amendment to the measure that would have barred subsidy recipients from buying back their own stock, outsourcing jobs, or attempting to sabotage unionization efforts.
A little over a month after President Joe Biden signed the CHIPS Act into law, a group of Democratic legislators warned U.S. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo that while the statute "specifically prohibits the use of CHIPS funds for stock buybacks and dividend payments, these restrictions do not explicitly prohibit award recipients from using CHIPS funds to free up their own funds, which they can then use for those purposes."
The new IPS report notes that four semiconductor firms that have reached CHIPS Act agreements with the Biden administration have "board-approved share repurchase plans that would allow an additional $14.3 billion in buyback spending," with Intel accounting for more than half of that total.
The analysis also found that annual CEO compensation between 2019 and 2023 averaged close to $14 million at firms in line for CHIPS Act funding, while median pay at the companies was $73,046.
"Congress passed the CHIPS and Science Act and President Biden signed it into law to bolster semiconductor manufacturing in the U.S.—not to waste public dollars on stock buybacks that make rich executives richer and exacerbate economic and racial inequality," said Renta, senior policy counsel for corporate governance and power at the Americans for Financial Reform Education Fund.
"Commerce Secretary Raimondo must finalize CHIPS contracts with strong stock buyback restrictions to make sure public money serves the public good, as intended, not narrow, private interests," Renta added.