

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
"Only a negotiated cease-fire can pave the way to addressing the current humanitarian crisis, the release of all hostages, and a long-term solution to this conflict," said one campaigner.
Almost a million Americans signed petitions from half a dozen civil society organizations demanding that U.S. President Joe Biden and Congress push for a lasting cease-fire in Israel's war on the Gaza Strip.
Amnesty International USA, Avaaz, Demand Progress, Friends Committee on National Legislation (FCNL), MoveOn, and Oxfam America circulated similar petitions in response to the war, which Israel launched after a Hamas-led attack on October 7.
The groups delivered the petition signatures to the White House on Wednesday as the world waited to see if a temporary truce would be extended. The initial four-day pause in fighting—during which Hamas freed some hostages taken last month and Israel released some Palestinian prisoners—was extended by two days on Monday, but as of press time, no new announcement had been made.
U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken arrived in Tel Aviv on Wednesday to meet with Israel's leaders to discuss extending the temporary cease-fire, during which two American Israelis have been released—Liat Atzili and Abigail Idan, who is 4 years old.
"It's inspiring to see the groundswell of support across the United States for an immediate cease-fire to end Israel's reckless military campaign and the total blockade of Gaza."
"The resumption of fighting for Palestinians means that there's going to be no humanitarian aid that will be allowed into the Gaza Strip. It also means there are going to be more casualties and victims alongside mass destruction of civil infrastructure and civilian homes," Al Jazeera's Abu Azzoum reported from Khan Younis. Israeli forces have already killed 15,000 people in Gaza.
MoveOn executive director Rahna Epting said in a statement Wednesday that "civilians are being killed at what is being described a 'historic pace,' the majority women and children. The loss of life is devastating."
"We must end collective punishment, return those taken hostage or wrongfully imprisoned, and let in humanitarian aid," Epting argued. "The current pause is a good step toward what is needed: a permanent cease-fire."
Demand Progress foreign policy adviser Cavan Kharrazian similarly asserted that "there is no military solution to the current conflict, and further violence will continue to erode the safety and security of Palestinians and Israelis. Only a negotiated cease-fire can pave the way to addressing the current humanitarian crisis, the release of all hostages, and a long-term solution to this conflict."
Paul O'Brien, executive director of Amnesty International USA, pointed out that the nearly 1 million people who signed the petitions "represent just a fraction of Americans who support a cease-fire today, as reflected by poll after poll."
"They know that the way the Israeli military and Hamas have been engaging in this conflict is in violation of international law," he continued. "They know that a short pause in the fighting—even as it is welcome—will do nothing to assure that this will change."
Hassan El-Tayyab, FCNL's legislative director for Middle East policy, said that "it's inspiring to see the groundswell of support across the United States for an immediate cease-fire to end Israel's reckless military campaign and the total blockade of Gaza."
"It's critical that Congress and the administration listen to these voices, and the vast majority of U.S. citizens, who want an end to this nightmare before more innocent lives are lost," El-Tayyab added.
Since October 7, the list of members of Congress calling for a Gaza cease-fire has grown to about four dozen—though as The Intercept's Prem Thakker noted Wednesday, "a closer look at some lawmakers' statements raises questions about whether they are truly pushing for an end to the violence."
The United States already gives Israel $3.8 billion in annual military aid—and after the Hamas attack, Biden announced his "unwavering" support for the country and asked Congress for $14.3 billion for its war effort.
Oxfam's petition declares that "President Biden and Congress must help immediately de-escalate this dangerous situation; failing to do so will unwittingly place a U.S. seal of approval on the suffering that is sure to only deepen."
El-Tayyab highlighted that "every major humanitarian organization working in Gaza is pleading with the international community to reach an immediate cease-fire and open up aid access so they can continue their vital work in the Gaza Strip."
Throughout Israel's air and ground assault on Gaza, Israeli forces have waged what some critics have called a "war against hospitals," three-quarters of which have had to shut down. Margaret Harris, a World Health Organization spokesperson, warned Tuesday that "eventually we will see more people dying from disease than from bombardment if we are not able to put back together this health system."
The civil society groups behind the petitions shared the testimony of a practicing nurse volunteering in a Gaza hospital: "We heard nearby explosions. I rushed to assist, only to discover it was my own family. Witnessing their extraction was heartbreaking. Some lost their lives, while others were wounded. They started pulling out dead children from under the rubble in front of me."
"This is the hardest war Gaza has ever experienced. It's the first I witnessed such injuries: amputations, burns, unprecedented in its severity," the nurse added. "Dealing with 60 to 70 people simultaneously in an emergency room designed for 13 or 14 beds poses a challenge. We have no choice but to treat some on the floor."
As Oxfam's Scott Paul put it Wednesday: "We need a permanent cease-fire in order to enable humanitarian organizations to deliver much-needed aid safely and securely. More violence is not going to produce the safety and human rights that Israelis and Palestinians deserve, but it is sure to immeasurably deepen suffering in Gaza."
Digital rights advocates on Thursday welcomed a report that Google and its YouTube video platform are prohibiting the monetization of climate misinformation.
Google advertisers and publishers and YouTube creators will be banned from receiving advertising revenue that contradicts "well-established scientific consensus around the existence and causes of climate change," company officials said in a statement reported by Axios.
"This includes content referring to climate change as a hoax or a scam, claims denying that long-term trends show the global climate is warming, and claims denying that greenhouse gas emissions or human activity contribute to climate change," the statement explained.
"Advertisers simply don't want their ads to appear next to this content. And publishers and creators don't want ads promoting these claims to appear on their pages or videos," the statement added.
Last year, a study by the advocacy group Avaaz concluded that YouTube's recommendation algorithm was "driving millions of people to watch climate misinformation videos" and that the company was incentivizing such content through its monetization program.
"Some of the largest household brands in the world, including Samsung, L'Oreal, Warner Bros, Carrefour, and Danone, as well as two of the largest environmental groups in the world, Greenpeace International and World Wildlife Fund, have advertisements running on these climate misinformation videos," Avaaz said.
Other social media platforms are also rife with climate lies. Last month, Common Dreams reported that the environmental group Friends of the Earth found that Facebook allows 99% of all climate disinformation to go unchecked. A 2020 InfluenceMap study found that in the first six months of last year, at least eight million people in the U.S. saw 51 Facebook ads containing false climate claims.
Google's move to quash climate misinformation profiteers comes one week after YouTube announced it was banning the accounts of several prominent anti-vaccine personalities.
"There is no place for science denial--whether it's climate, Covid, or anything else--on such influential platforms," Vahid Razavi, founder of the digital rights group Ethics in Tech, told Common Dreams. "Deniers can find someplace else to spread their lies."
Five years ago, Matteo Salvini stripped and posed half-naked for a series of "sexy" photos that were auctioned on eBay. At the time, he was a senior official of Italy's separatist Lega Nord party. His bizarre photoshoot took place on the sidelines of a National Front conference in France. Beneficiaries of the auction included part of an Italian anti-abortion network that claims to be "inspired" by the "heritage of Christian culture" and responds to a "conspiracy against life."
Today, Salvini's party has transformed itself into one of the most prominent nationalist movements in Europe (now known only as Lega). Salvini himself has become Italy's interior minister and the country's most recognizable politician, emboldened by stunning results in the recent European Parliament elections, in which his party won a third of Italian votes (about five times more than the 6 percent it received in 2014).
Along with Marine le Pen in France, leader of the National Front (now rebranded as the National Rally party), Hungary's prime minister, Viktor Orban, and others, Salvini is leading a startling resurgence of Europe's far right. Across the continent, the messaging of these right-wing populists is increasingly slick, their party machines are disciplined, and their policies have been carefully crafted to appeal to a wider range of voters.
Back in 2013, Britain's then prime minister, David Cameron, dismissed the anti-EU activists in his own Conservative Party as "swivel-eyed loons." Three years later came the political earthquake of the Brexit referendum result--in which the fringe became the majority. Today, Europe's nationalist movements have undergone a makeover of a comparable speed and magnitude. Last month, they collectively won a record number of seats in the European Parliament.
"It is a sign of a Europe that has changed," proclaimed Salvini at a triumphant press conference in Milan, shortly after the polls closed. Holding up a rosary, kissing a crucifix, and thanking the "Immaculate Heart of Mary," he proclaimed it time to "save" Europe's "Judeo-Christian roots." In Hungary, his ally Orban--self-styled champion of illiberal democracy--hailed "a new era in European politics."
These movements did not emerge overnight, nor will they fade anytime soon. Since mid-2016, together with colleagues at openDemocracy, we have tracked the growth of Europe's nativist movements, from the Brexit campaign, to Orban's increasing stranglehold on the levers of power in Hungary, to cross-border networks seeking to block or roll back women's and LGBTQI rights. Their strategy begins by influencing elections, courts, education, and healthcare systems, as well as policymakers and public opinion, and ends by taking power.
We started this investigative work when we noticed irregularities in the financing of the Leave campaign to take Britain out of the EU. Since then, the picture that has emerged is of a powerful, well-funded global alliance of ultra-conservatives and far-right political actors, many of whom unite around an economically libertarian but socially conservative worldview.
This political vision is explicit about seeking to shift power away from women and LGBTQI people. It aims to promote the "life" of the unborn (while disregarding the risks of unsafe abortions and pregnancies to women's lives); the "family," by which it means a return to traditional gender roles, without any space for LGBTQI people, and putting women back in the home, seen as their "natural" place; and the "freedom" of markets and religious institutions, specifically Christian ones, above all other claims of rights or liberties.
This triad of "life, family, and freedom" was enshrined in the Manhattan Declaration, a manifesto written more than twenty years ago by American activists of the religious right. Signatories including Orthodox, Evangelical, and Catholic leaders pledged to act in unison and determined that "no power on Earth, be it cultural or political, will intimidate us into silence or acquiescence."
Today, that coalition has taken on a decidedly transatlantic hue. Many of Europe's far-right leaders talk openly about defending "Christian Europe." Orban added this message to his party's recent European election manifesto, and Salvini frequently attacks "gender ideology." Vox, the first far-right party to win seats in Spain's parliament since the Franco dictatorship, has vowed to roll back laws against gender-based violence. Poland's Law and Justice party is pushing to outlaw abortion and place restrictive limits on women's access to contraception.
For those Europeans who like to see their continent as the world's most secular and socially liberal, these are disturbing developments. It is no surprise, perhaps, that European countries are capable of producing hard-right nationalist movements, but it is startling how quickly these new parties have grown and forced their way into the electoral mainstream--and it's striking to see how many are adopting overtly religious and socially conservative rhetoric.
Part of the explanation for this surge, however, became clearer for us when we started tracking the international financial flows linked to many of America's most powerful Christian conservative groups. Several of the American activists who signed the Manhattan Declaration have since made numerous trips across the Atlantic, along with a great deal of cash to support their efforts.
$50 million of dark money
A recent openDemocracy investigation found that America's Christian right spent at least $50 million of "dark money" to fund campaigns and advocacy in Europe over the past decade. (By the measures of US political financing, this may not seem like a vast sum, but by European standards it's formidable. The total spend on the 2014 European elections, for example, by all of Ireland's political parties combined was just $3 million.)
These numbers are also likely the tip of the iceberg: our analysis looked at only twelve US Christian right groups, and there were many obstacles to disclosure that limited the information we could extract. Institutions registered as churches, for example, are not required to publish their overseas funding. The largest spender appeared to be the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, which spent more than $20 million in Europe from 2008 to 2014, but filings are not available beyond that period, so the true figure could be far larger.
As well as reviewing thousands of pages of IRS filings from these groups over the last decade, we worked with reporters across Europe to follow the money to its local beneficiaries. One of the groups we looked at, for instance, was Heartbeat International, founded in the early 1970s. Based in Columbus, Ohio, it's seen as a pioneer of the controversial model of "crisis pregnancy centers," which discourage women from accessing legal abortion and contraception. The organization now has a network of "affiliated pregnancy help centers" worldwide and appears to have spent more money in Italy than anywhere else in Europe.
As might be expected, we also found links between these groups and senior members or advisers of the current US administration. None disclose their donors, and there is no legal requirement to do so, but at least two have known ties to famous billionaire funders of conservative causes, including the Koch brothers and the family of Trump's education secretary, Betsy DeVos. One of the religious groups we researched, which pumped $12.4 million into Europe from 2008 to 2017, lists as its chief counsel Jay Sekulow, one of President Trump's personal attorneys.
Another of the US groups we found spending money in Europe is the Acton Institute. Based in Grand Rapids, Michigan, it marries economic liberalism with a conservative Christian social agenda. Its IRS filings disclose that the group has spent at least $1.7 million since 2008 in Europe, where it keeps an office in Rome and has been linked to powerful critics of Pope Francis, including through another controversial think tank, the Dignitatis Humanae Institute, of which former Trump strategist Steve Bannon is a patron.
Dignitatis has recently made international news because of Bannon's plans to use a thirteenth-century monastery outside Rome to train a new generation of Salvinis, Orbans, and Le Pens. "Let's have an academy that brings the best thinkers together and it can actually train... what we call modern gladiators," Bannon said in an April interview with NBC's Richard Engel. His plans were later thwarted when the Institute's lease on the monastery was revoked by the government, citing various contractual violations. This followed protests from local residents who questioned the legality of the lease. Some of the documents submitted in this process showed how the Dignitatis Humanae Institute relied on Acton to support its application, detailing joint activities between the two organizations over a five-year period.
Acton's founder, Robert Sirico, said the Rome office had participated in this process without his knowledge, and that he instructed it to distance itself from Dignitatis and Bannon. But the controversy surrounding Bannon's involvement misses the more significant point about Acton's work. The think tank has an explicit mission to conjoin and support values of free-market capitalism and social conservatism. Unlike the US, in Europe, this blend of often contradictory fundamentalisms is a relatively new phenomenon, but it's an alliance that succeeds in uniting climate-change deniers, anti-abortion activists, and anti-LGBTQI campaigners in attacks against the "liberal" pope, for example. It also explains the rise in anti-welfare state rhetoric we heard at the annual World Congress of Families, an increasingly influential, ultra-conservative summit, held this year in Verona,where one speaker claimed that "the only welfare state that has worked in Italy is the family." This type of rhetoric is gaining traction in places like Italy and Spain, where such systems of benefits and entitlements have long been popular and strong.
The American religious right's support for campaigns against legal abortion, LGBTQI rights, sex education, and other causes in Africa and Latin America has been well documented over the years. Notorious examples such as the "kill the gays" bill in Uganda and draconian anti-abortion laws in Latin America have left a trail of violence, trauma, and repression across both continents. But the scale of the American religious conservatives' push into Europe has not been widely reported or well understood.
"It took the Christian right thirty years to get to where they are now in the White House," said Neil Datta, the secretary of the Brussels-based European Parliamentary Forum on Population and Development, reacting to our research. "We knew a similar effort was happening in Europe, but this should be a wake-up call that this is happening even faster and on a grander scale than many experts could have ever imagined."
Transatlantic coordination
Shortly before the recent European elections, Matteo Salvini took the stage in Verona at the World Congress of Families conference. In his address, he mocked feminists as "interesting for anthropologists to study" and promised to "fight the theory of gender until it changes." The audience included prominent Christian conservative and anti-abortion activists from the United States, members of the Russian government and Orthodox Church, and representatives of various European far-right parties.
To roaring applause, a stream of Italian politicians joined in declaring their support for the "natural family," defined exclusively as a married man and woman, preferably with many children. Following Salvini's lead, they condemned Europe's "crisis of empty cribs" and framed their culture war against the rights of women and LGBTQI people as an economic solution to their country's persistent problems of low growth and high unemployment rates, particularly among young people.
This was the third time openDemocracy had sent reporters to the WCF, after Moldova last year and Budapest in 2017, at which Orban also spoke. But this year was different. What we discovered there was a clearer picture of how American ultra-conservatives and their friends on Europe's far right are working together. We found new evidence of what a group of MEPs has described as "deeply concerning" coordination between some of these movements. Most apparent was the intense focus of this alliance on achieving political power.
One of the more effective speakers was Ignacio Arsuaga, leader of the Madrid-based CitizenGo group. Founded in 2013 after a previous WCF in Spain, CitizenGo was intended to act as a conservative answer to the giant progressive online campaign platforms like Avaaz and Change.org. Arsuaga's organization is best known for its online petitions against same-sex marriage, sex education, and abortion--and for driving buses across cities around the world bearing advertising slogans against LGBTQI rights and "feminazis." From the stage, Arsuaga railed against "the heirs of [Italian Communist leader Antonio] Gramsci, cultural Marxists... radical feminists... LGBT totalitarians." He declared that "this culture war is a global war," and told the assembled participants to pursue both direct paths to power, via "parties and elected officials," and indirect paths--"By controlling their environment... you also control them."
In Verona, we learned that CitizenGo, which has support from both American and Russian ultra-conservatives who sit on its board, was aiming to play a far more ambitious and influential role in the European elections than it had in its previous campaigns. It now sought to act, in the words of one senior Vox official, as a Super-PAC to drive voters toward the far right. Arsuaga told an undercover reporter who posed as a potential donor about the group's plans to run attack ads in Spain against Vox's political opponents in the final weeks before Spain's national elections in April.
He went on to describe how his group is increasingly coordinating with far-right movements across Europe, and told the reporter how he could get around campaign finance laws in his country. In a number of countries in Europe, campaign finance laws cap political spending during campaign periods, limit coordination between different campaign groups, and usually require donor transparency. The new tactics outlined by Arsuaga of pumping potentially unlimited funds from proxy groups into domestic political races is an extremely worrying new development.
The composition of CitizenGo's board illustrates the transnational complexion of the support it can rely on. It includes a close business associate of Konstantin Malofeev, sometimes called "the Orthodox Oligarch," who has been targeted by US and European sanctions for allegedly propping up the pro-Russian breakaway republic in eastern Ukraine. It also includes an Italian politician, Luca Volonte, who is currently on trial in Milan facing corruption charges. An American connection is apparent, too: Brian Brown, head of the National Organization for Marriage and a prominent anti-LGBT activist who also leads the International Organization for Family group that coordinates the WCF, is a board member.
CitizenGo's Arsuaga told our undercover reporter that he gets advice "every couple of months or so" from a "senior expert" in fundraising and technology, who is, he said, "paid by Brian Brown." That expert is Darian Rafie, Brown's partner at another US group named ActRight, which describes itself as a "clearinghouse for conservative action." ActRight recently encouraged people to "thank president Trump for stopping transgender insanity in the military," and asked in a Facebook post, "how much do you think Barack Obama paid Harvard to admit his pot-head daughter?"
Our reporter also spoke directly to Rafie, an experienced American political operative who has worked for the Republican Party and a Tea Party media outlet, and said he was involved in the Trump campaign. He discussed his longstanding relationship with CitizenGo and boasted of his ability to use controversial "geofencing" technology to collect personal data about potential voters gathered in a specific area, such as a campaign rally, via their mobile phones.
Responding to our findings, the former US Democratic Senator Russ Feingold, who worked alongside Senator John McCain in efforts to reform American electoral finance laws, called these developments "frightening." He urged European authorities and regulators to "get ahead of this and not make the same mistakes that were made here in the United States."
The growing role that CitizenGo appears to be playing in giving European far-right parties in-kind support is a new application of methods long used by internationally connected culture warriors who deploy expertise, as well as cash, in their global campaigns. For example, during Ireland's historic abortion referendum last year, openDemocracy reported on how American alt-right activists were targeting Irish voters with social media propaganda. We also revealed how foreign activists could donate to campaigns and continue to buy social media ads online--this in the same week that Mark Zuckerberg made a very public promise to members of the European Parliament that Facebook had banned such foreign ads seeking to interfere in domestic elections.
What's clear in the pattern of connections and support between American ultra-conservatives and European far-right groups is the willingness on both sides to exploit loopholes in regulations and to embrace unscrupulous, even illegal, methods. Last month, openDemocracy worked with a nonprofit watchdog named Unhack Democracy Europe to publish a report pointing to widespread fraud by Viktor Orban's Fidesz party in the 2018 Hungarian elections, including vote-buying, voter intimidation, tampering with postal votes, missing ballots, and election software malfunctions. (The result of that election was to give Orban a parliamentary super-majority, enabling him to further tighten his grip on the judiciary, media, and other organs of power.) The report went on to identify ways in which the European parliamentary elections in Hungary were even more vulnerable to such abuse than national ones. Unhack Democracy is now compiling a follow-up report on what actually happened there in the European elections.
In another development in the run-up to the European-wide vote, openDemocracy received a leaked report authored by the European Parliament's vice-president, a senior Irish MEP, that sought to facilitate greater influence for religious lobbyists in Brussels. This controversial plan was shelved after lawmakers protested, but with a larger bloc of right-wing populist members now in Parliament, the proposal is expected to resurface.
Although Europe's far-right parties fell well short of predictions that they would redraw the map of European political power, underperforming in Germany, Holland, and Denmark, they did make significant gains--especially in Italy, Hungary, and France. "Rather than a victory for democracy," concluded the Dutch scholar Cas Mudde, the European elections showed how populism, and particularly "the populist radical right" has become "mainstreamed and normalized."
At the World Congress of Families conference in Verona, on the eve of those elections, the mood was jubilant. "It's great to be among such a group of far-right radicals," joked the Christian conservative writer and YouTube personality Steve Turley. Proclaiming a "reawakening," from Trump's America to Modi's India, Turley predicted that religious conservatives would soon outnumber "secularists"--simply by outbreeding them. Another American, a Missouri lawyer and Republican activist named Ed Marton, who co-authored a book called "The Conservative Case for Trump," arrived at the podium in a MAGA hat and proclaimed that "Brexit, the Bible, and borders" could "make Europe great again."
But Marton and his colleagues will not have it all their own way. For the first time at the WCF gathering, the crowds protesting outside were far larger than the audience inside. More than 30,000 protesters took over Verona after the Non Una di Meno feminist group, inspired by the trailblazing Argentinian Ni Una Menos ("Not One Less") movement, called a demonstration. People traveled from across Italy and as far away as Belarus, Spain, Croatia, and Britain to take part.
The next day, a smaller group of women staged a silent protest dressed in the iconic red robes and bonnets of Margaret Atwood's "The Handmaid's Tale." These robes have been worn by women protesting the backlash against reproductive rights across the US, as well as in Poland, Australia, Ireland, and Argentina. We met a woman from Croatia who said she planned to join a "walk for freedom" to counter an annual anti-abortion "walk for life" when she got home. "This is just the beginning," she told us.
A controversial Madrid-based campaign group, supported by American and Russian ultra-conservatives, is working across Europe to drive voters towards far-right parties in next month's European Parliament elections and in Spain's national elections this Sunday, openDemocracy can reveal today.
Our findings have caused alarm among lawmakers who fear that Trump-linked conservatives are working with European allies to import a controversial US-style 'Super PAC' model of political campaigning to Europe - opening the door to large amounts of 'dark money' flowing unchecked into elections and referenda.
The Madrid-based campaign group CitizenGo is best known for its online petitions against same-sex marriage, sex education and abortion - and for driving buses across cities with slogans against LGBT rights and "feminazis".
But now openDemocracy can reveal new evidence of "extraordinary coordination" between this group and far-right parties across Europe - from Spain to Italy, Germany and Hungary.
In Spain, CitizenGo is supporting the far-right party Vox that is expected to make big gains this weekend, winning seats in the country's parliament for the first time and potentially forming part of the new government.
Speaking to our undercover reporter posing as a potential donor, CitizenGo's director described plans to run attack ads against Vox's political opponents, and talked about how to get around campaign finance laws.
Meanwhile a senior Vox official compared CitizenGo to a "Super PAC" in the US, referring to the controversial groups that can spend unlimited sums influencing elections in America - and which are known for aggressive, negative campaigning.
openDemocracy can further reveal today how CitizenGo has been supported by an experienced American political fundraiser and tech consultant linked to the Trump campaign, the Republican Party and the Tea Party movement, who boasted of being able to use controversial technology to collect personal data about potential voters.
Former US Democratic Senator Russ Feingold described our findings as "frightening" and called on European leaders to act to protect the democratic process.
"Europe has an opportunity to get ahead of this and not make the same mistakes that were made here in the United States", said Feingold, who worked alongside Republican senator John McCain for reform of electoral finance in the US.
CitizenGo's board also includes a close business associate of the "Orthodox Oligarch" Konstantin Malofeev - who has been targeted by US and European sanctions for allegedly propping up the pro-Russian breakaway republic in eastern Ukraine - and an Italian politician, Luca Volonte, currently on trial in Milan facing corruption charges.
European lawmakers have described openDemocracy's findings as "explosive" and have called for "urgent action" to "maintain the integrity" of upcoming elections.
In a letter to the European Commission's transparency tsar Frans Timmermans, MPs, MEPs and Senators from six European countries said these findings "merit urgent and high level investigation by the European Commission and relevant national authorities".
"We have all seen how democracy can easily be eroded if we remain complacent about the activities of anti-democratic actors... [who oppose] European fundamental rights, European values and liberal democracy", they warned.

The Spanish far-right party Vox has pledged to build walls around Spanish enclaves in North Africa, jail Catalan independence leaders, loosen gun control laws and "make Spain great again". The party also opposes "political correctness", marriage equality for gay people and laws against gender-based violence.
CitizenGo's leader, Ignacio Arsuaga, has publicly supported Vox, as has the group's Spanish language partner organisation, HazteOir - which recently lost the equivalent of charity status after campaigns the government said "denigrate or devalue" LGBT people.
But our research reveals new evidence of the close relationship between CitizenGo, HazteOir and Vox.
"We're never going to ask people to vote for Vox... but the campaign is going to help Vox indirectly"
Describing Vox as "my friends", Arsuaga said they've met with its senior officials to share their campaign plans and described how they 'indirectly' support the party.
Our undercover reporter specifically asked Arsuaga how to get around Spanish campaign finance laws rules - donating more to Vox than the legal limit - and about doing so anonymously, which is against the law.
Arsuaga explained that there are no such limits on donations to groups like CitizenGo, and "if you give privately to a non-profit there is no need to disclose that". He said CitizenGo would not channel money to Vox itself but "you could give to any foundation that doesn't mind to give, to forward the money, to Vox... that would be a good option".
"This is something we haven't made public", Arsuaga continued, "but, in Spain, we're going to launch a campaign before the general elections... where we are going to show bad things that have been said" by the leaders of parties that Vox is running against, for example "in favour of abortion or in favour of LGBT laws" - describing since-released posters and adverts against candidates from other parties.
The Vox official that Arsuaga put our undercover reporter in touch with confirmed that supporting CitizenGo could help the party, "indirectly", describing them as independent but that "we are actually currently totally aligned".
He told our reporter that while there is a limit on the size of individual donations to parties, "there is not a limit on the number of donors, okay, it can be split among several donors... and they only have to register [their first] name, last name and the origin".
"There are other ways of making support", he added, describing "a lack of regulation in terms of the equivalent of Super PACs in the United States, those institutions or organisations that give airtime or advertising in support of causes or candidates or political parties. I understand that that is outside of the limitations of the actual political parties which is very, very regulated".
Super PACs don't officially exist in Europe but he said "there are movements to create those and I think they are unregulated" and "Ignacio's organisation, that's kind of that".

Vox has been hit by several financial scandals, including the late 2018 supreme court condemnation of its then vice-president for "accounting irregularities" in one of his companies, disqualifying him from overseeing other accounts for three years.
It also received EUR800,000 in donations from an extremist Iranian opposition group for its 2014 European elections campaigns - and has been linked to a controversial foundation that glorifies Francisco Franco, Spain's former dictator.
Arsuaga also told our reporter that Vox's General Secretary Javier Ortega Smith, simultaneously the lawyer leading Vox's private prosecution of Catalan independence supporters, "comes, I would say, from the hard right, like Falangists... Franco's movement - but nobody knows, it's a kind of private thing".
Neither Ortega Smith nor the Vox party responded to openDemocracy's requests for comment on Arsuaga's claim.
Responding to openDemocracy's request for comments before publication, Arsuaga said: "It is self-evident that supporting HazteOir.org or CitizenGO means indirectly supporting the parties that defend (in some way) the principles we defend".
It is "public knowledge that we work to influence and put pressure on political parties", he said, saying that this is done "by no means 'behind the scenes'". He also disputed the characterisation of parties that CitizenGo aligns with as "far right".
CitizenGo was set up in 2013 - the same year as Vox - as an ultra-conservative version of the progressive campaign platforms Avaaz.org and MoveOn.org. It has run powerful campaigns globally, including in Kenya where last year it helped get the reproductive health charity Marie Stopes temporarily banned from providing abortion services.
CitizenGo also has some very powerful international backers and partners. As previously mentioned, Alexey Komov, a close associate of the "Orthodox Oligarch" Konstantin Malofeev, and Luca Volonte, the Italian politician currently on trial in Milan facing corruption charges, both serve on the group's board of trustees.
Bank statements from Volonte's Novae Terrae Foundation in Italy, seen by openDemocracy, show that it paid CitizenGo EUR12,000 in 2014 - at the same time as the foundation was receiving money from entities later identified as part of a 'laundromat' pumping illicit cash into Europe from Azerbaijan and Russia. There is no evidence to suggest that the money paid to CitizenGo came from these illicit sources.
Meanwhile, Arsuaga told our undercover reporter that Patrick Slim, son of the Mexican oligarch Carlos Slim, gave his group EUR40,000, which "for him is just a very small amount", Arsuaga noted - although it is close to the maximum individual donation to a political party permitted under Spanish law (and four times election campaign limits).
It was not clear whether this donation was for CitizenGo or HazteOir, neither of which are political parties. At the time of publication, Patrick Slim had not replied to openDemocracy's request for comment.
Another CitizenGo board member is Brian Brown, a prominent US anti-LGBT activist who leads the World Congress of Families (WCF) network that recently met in Italy, with deputy prime minister Matteo Salvini from the far-right Lega party among its speakers.
Arsuaga told our reporter that he met Brown at a WCF meeting in Madrid in 2012 and that CitizenGo gets advice "every couple of months or so" from a "senior expert" in fundraising and technology who is "paid by Brian Brown".
This expert is Darian Rafie, Brown's partner at an American organisation called ActRight, which describes itself online as a "clearinghouse for conservative action".
Previously, CitizenGo has presented itself in the logo on its website as a "member of the ActRight family" and openDemocracy understands that ActRight paid for a CitizenGo staff member in 2013, a claim that Rafie did not deny in emailed comments.
ActRight is currently encouraging people to "thank president Trump for stopping transgender insanity in the military". On Facebook, its recent posts include those supporting Trump; those mocking the appearances of left-wing women; and asking "How much do you think Barack Obama paid Harvard to admit his pot-head daughter?"
ActRight's Rafie is an experienced political consultant in the US who has played key roles in a number of companies that have worked for the Republican National Committee and the Republican party in Ohio and Michigan; received payments from a Super PAC supporting Texas Republican Ted Cruz (as did ActRight in 2015); and worked with the Tea Party group Think Freely Media.
Speaking to our undercover reporter, Rafie said he "did a lot of fundraising politically with Trump", through political action committees (PACs) but also "directly with the campaign... [and] directly with the party", and that he expects one of his companies to be working "in the majority of states" in the 2020 election campaigns.
"There is a lot of stuff to be done with mobile phones and geo-fencing areas", Rafie told our reporter. He explained: "Say there's a rally somewhere, one of these big Trump campaign rallies. What we'll do is we'll draw a Polygon around that event and then we'll register all the phones that were there".
"Then we follow those phones home, then we know who they are, and what they do, and now I know what your Netflix unique ID is, and I've got your Facebook unique ID, so then I can communicate with you through a whole variety of ways".
Rafie said "you can do that in Europe" too, though "it's a little more limited... because the privacy laws are better, for the consumer".
He said: "It's actually really scary, when you peek beneath the covers, and realise that this phone that you're carrying around with you is leaking everywhere all of your information" which can be correlated with personal data "very quickly". In the US, he explained, "all of the data is routinely collated and correlated and available for sale".
"We follow those phones home. Then we know who they are, and what they do, and now I know what your Netflix unique ID is, and I've got your Facebook unique ID, so then I can communicate with you through a whole variety of ways." --Darian Rafie
Over email, Rafie clarified to openDemocracy that this company uses "ad networks" as do "many political campaigns and businesses in the United States... to delineate an area and identify unique device IDs and their associated advertising profiles".
"We should all be frightened by the amount of data routinely collected, collated and sold by ad networks (such as Google and Facebook)", he added.

On stage at the World Congress of Families meeting in Verona, Italy, in late March, CitizenGo's Arsuaga urged European and other international ultra-conservatives to pursue an indirect, "less understood, practised path to power" that he summarised as: "By controlling [politicians'] environment... you also control them".
'By controlling [politicians'] environment... you also control them' --Ignacio Arsuaga, CitizenGo
Speaking to our undercover reporter at this event, Arsuaga revealed that CitizenGo also has "a lot of contact" with the Fidesz and Lega far-right parties in Hungary and Italy, along with "some contact" with the far-right AfD in Germany.
Asked if he discussed his group's campaign strategies with these parties, Arsuaga told our undercover reporter "yeah, yeah... we inform them about what we are going to do".
He also offered to introduce us to Lega party senator Simone Pillon and an AfD official believed to be Maximilian Krah, who was photographed with Salvini at the Verona event.
In Germany, CitizenGo's events have attracted Princess Gloria von Thurn und Taxis - another World Congress of Families speaker, patron of conservative Christian causes and a friend of Steve Bannon - along with the AfD's Benjamin Nolte.
In Italy, CitizenGo was one of the organisers of the WCF event in Verona along with the ProVita anti-abortion campaign that has ties to the neo-fascist party, Forza Nuova.
CitizenGo has also been involved in training Italian activists including via a four-day workshop in 2018 with the Leadership Institute - a US conservative group that counts Vice President Mike Pence among the alumni of its trainings in America.
openDemocracy contacted the Lega, AfD and Fidesz parties but they did not respond to requests for comment on their relationships with CitizenGo.
Lawmakers from across Europe have expressed alarm at openDemocracy's findings about CitizenGo and its international networks.
German MEP Terry Reintke, Greens/EFA spokesperson for gender equality and social policy in the European Parliament, said: "It is shocking how close and deep-running the ties between right-wing, nationalistic populists are - even spanning over the Atlantic. Especially with the European elections ahead, this is extremely worrying".
She added that this "needs to be a loud and clear wake-up call... This is an attack on fundamental rights and freedoms of all of us".
British MEP Molly Scott Cato called for "tough and immediate action... to protect the integrity of the democratic process". CitizenGo is an example, she added, of how "the extreme right often... presents themselves as protectors of life, liberty and family" - while "behind this thin veneer there so often lurks a sinister political agenda".
Scottish National Party MP Alyn Smith reiterated his concern that "these [European] elections will face a concerted effort to manipulate the outcome" and called for "more investigations, particularly in the UK after the activities of the Leave campaigns, so legislators can tackle these in the future".
Petra Bayr, an MP from Austria and Vice-President of the European Parliamentary Forum for Sexual and Reproductive Rights, expressed her concern about European groups "trying to import a controversial US-style 'Super PAC' model of political campaigning to Europe, which can allow large amounts of dark money to flow unregulated into elections and referenda, often in support of extremist parties and financing controversial, negative campaigning".
Commenting on openDemocracy's findings, former Wisconsin Democratic senator Russ Feingold warned of a "downward spiral effect on democracy".
"There is a great irony in this. [Far-right parties] are trying to appeal to ultra nationalist sentiments but they are using tactics that are completely contrary to the sovereignty of those countries. These are international actors, oligarchs and others who are trying to control the political processes of these countries. Even if you are a nationalist, one would think you would be a little bit concerned about that", Feingold said.
Speaking from Washington DC, Adav Noti, a US election lawyer with the Campaign Legal Center, also warned that Super PACs have been "destructive" in the US, with "horrible effects" for American democracy.
"The last eight years since the invention of this Super PAC vehicle have seen a real sharp increase in the extent to which our elections are dominated by a small number of ultra wealthy individuals and corporations", said Noti.
"A federal election in the US is supposed to be decided by 150m voters and yet the policy preferences are being determined by literally 20 people, 20 major donors".
In emailed comments to openDemocracy, CitizenGo's Ignacio Arsuaga said his groups do report donors to Spain's Ministry of Interior and that "according to the current Data Protection legislation, we cannot tell the press who is our donor".
He said "all the donations we have received are legal", and that "the destination of our funds has always been legal and public".
This article was produced by openDemocracy in partnership with the Independent Media Institute.
Thousands of indigenous Brazilians are marching on the country's capital for three days of lobbying and activism to protect the South American country's vast natural resources--which are under heightened threat from President Jair Bolsonaro's pro-exploitation regime.
Up to 5,000 indigenous activists are expected in the city of Brasilia between Wednesday and Friday. As of Wednesday afternoon, at least 2,000 people had shown up and most were encamped in the heart of the city.
"We are defenders of the land, we are defenders of the Amazon, of the forest," Alessandra Munduruku, a representative of the Munduruku tribe from the northern state of Para, told The Guardian. "The white man is our finishing off our planet and we want to defend it."
The Guardian detailed the grievances against the Bolsonaro government that prompted the protest.
Indigenous leaders are incensed by the Bolsonaro government's decision to transfer responsibility for demarcation of indigenous reserves to Brazil's agriculture ministry, which is controlled by members of a powerful farming lobby that has long opposed indigenous land rights. They also object to a decision to hand control of Brazil's cash-strapped indigenous agency Funai to a new ministry of women, family and human rights presided over by a conservative evangelical pastor.
The effort to stem the tide of opening the Amazon rainforest and other tribal lands to development comes as Bolsonaro faces pushback over his environmental policies from across the world.
Earlier this month, as Common Dreams reported, an event to honor the Brazilian leader was moved from the American Museum of Natural History in large part because of Bolsonaro's positions on the Amazon.
The Brazilian activists hope they can add to the pressure.
"We came here for an important cause," said Camila Silveiro, who came to the city from the southern Brazilian state of Parana. "It was very difficult for us, our ancestors, to win these rights and little by little they are decreasing."
The protest has backing from across the world.
A petition at the site Avaaz showed signatures from six continents expressing support and solidarity.
In Austria, Greenpeace activists held a protest outside the Brazilian Embassy in solidarity with the indigenous activists.
Indigenous leaders and allies protested in front of the Brazilian Mission to the U.N. in New York.
"Let's stand with them," said Scottish language activist Adhamh O Broin.
The protests will continue until Friday. Glenn Shepard, an anthropologist at the Emilio Goeldi Museum in Belem, capital of Para, told The Financial Times that the stewardship of the indigenous people of Brazil has thus far stopped deforestation.
"This is their land," said Shepard, "they owe nothing to anybody."
As world leaders continue to negotiate a global game plan for climate action on the final day of the COP24 summit in Katowice, Poland, more than 150 representatives from movements across the globe came together for a sit-in to demand that governments "stand with people, not polluters" and "commit to action in line with the urgency of the crisis."
The purpose of the "corporate-captured U.N. climate talks," as the activists have called them, is to write a rulebook for the 2015 Paris agreement--supported by every nation on Earth except the United States, thanks to President Donald Trump's vow to withdraw from it. The accord aims to limit global warming within this century to 1.5oC above pre-industrial levels.
"Governments must take responsibility and provide real leadership to halt climate breakdown. They are failing completely to do so, and their failures are on full display here at COP24," charges a statement from the sit-in organizers. "Inside these halls, we are calling on the rich polluting countries to stop obstructing progress and to support the just transition we need."
Demanding "climate justice and a world under 1.5oC of warming," and accusing decisions-makers of sticking to "business as usual," the activists on Friday held up massive banners that read, "stand with people, not polluters," "system change, not climate change," and "which side are you on?"
The People's Demands, drafted with input from southern movements and climate justice groups worldwide, are:
Friday also saw U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres--who warned on Wednesday that "it would be suicidal" to conclude COP24 without a bold strategy to limit global warming--return to Poland "to add support for a successful outcome," and youth activists striking in solidarity with 15-year-old Swedish climate advocate Greta Thunberg.
Poland, the global summit's host country, began circulating a draft of the Paris accord's rulebook on Wednesday and, according to BBC News, negotiators are "preparing to work well past the official close of the conference on Friday evening." Activists have expressed concern that in its current form, it won't ensure accountability for efforts to slash greenhouse gas emissions in hopes of curbing global warming.
A key U.N. report released in October--which triggered a diplomatic standoff at the talks between a few oil-exporting nations, including the United States, and the rest of the world--warned that the international community must take immediate and unprecedented action to avert climate catastrophe.
COP24 comes amid worldwide protests demanding dramatic climate action in light of record-breaking levels of carbon emissions, "off the charts" rates of melting ice, and rapidly increasing concerns about extreme weather and species extinction. As one climate scientist concluded in Poland on Thursday, "I've worked on this for 30 years and I've never been as worried as I am today."
Alarmed by rampant destruction in the Amazon rainforest and the long-term impacts on biodiversity, an alliance of indigenous communities pitched the creation of the world's largest protected area, which would reach from the Andes to the Atlantic Ocean, at a United Nations conference in Egypt on Wednesday.
"We have come from the forest and we worry about what is happening," declared Tuntiak Katan, vice president of COICA, the alliance. "This space is the world's last great sanctuary for biodiversity. It is there because we are there. Other places have been destroyed."
COICA, which represents about 500 groups across nine countries and is seeking government-level representation at the U.N. Convention on Biodiversity, aims to safeguard a "sacred corridor of life and culture" about the size of Mexico.
The alliance hopes to implement an "ambitious" post-2020 regional plan to protect biodiversity in the Andes-Amazon-Atlantic or "triple-A" corridor from agribusiness, mining, and the global climate crisis, but they are also concerned about territorial rights, as they don't recognize modern national borders created by colonial settlers.
"Indigenous communities are guardians of life for all humanity, but they are in danger for protecting their forest," Katan said. "We are integrated with nature--it runs through our lives and we need rights to defend it."
While fighting for the right to defend the forest from development and the impacts of global warming, the indigenous groups said they welcome opportunities for collaboration.
Although Colombia had crafted a similar triple-A plan that was set to be unveiled at next month's climate talks, as the Guardian noted, "the election of new rightwing leaders in Colombia and Brazil has thrown into doubt what would have been a major contribution by South American nations to reduce emissions."
Outlining recent shifts in regional politics, the newspaper reported:
Colombia's initial proposal was smaller and focused only on biodiversity and climate. But government enthusiasm has waned since an election in June in which the rightwing populist Ivan Duque took power. Brazil was more sceptical but had previously engaged in ministerial-level talks on the corridor-plan. Its opposition is likely to grow under its new rightwing president, Jair Bolsonaro, who will take power in January.
Last month Bolsonaro indicated he would only stay in the Paris climate agreement if he had guarantees ensuring Brazilian sovereignty over indigenous land and the "triple-A" region.
Bolsonaro's comments about environmental and indigenous issues on the campaign trail "are concerning because they nurture a disturbing tendency in different parts of the world, where almost three-fourths of environmental defenders assassinated in 2017 were indigenous leaders; where opposing agroindustry is the main cause for assassination of our leaders worldwide; and where imposing projects on to communities without their free, prior, and informed consent is at the root of all attacks to indigenous and community leaders," said Juan Carlos Jintiach of COICA.
"Likewise, we see that it is increasingly frequent for indigenous peoples and communities to face costly and difficult processes to legalize their lands, while corporations obtain licenses with ease," Jintiach noted, calling on Bolsonaro to obey all laws and ensure the rights and safety of the people of Brazil.
Despite the changes to the local political climate, Katan vowed the indigenous communities will keep working to play a key role in protecting the forest. "We know the governments will try to go over our heads," he said. "This is nothing new for us. We have faced challenges for hundreds of years."
"Indigenous peoples and local communities are a solution to the devastation of our ecosystems and climate change both in the Amazon as well as in the rest of the world," Katan added in a statement. "But whether policies addressed at mitigating climate change and promoting the restoration of rainforests succeed, depends on the security of having possession of community lands."
This post has been updated with additional comment from Tuntiak Katan and Juan Carlos Jintiach of COICA.
Within days of retired military officer Jair Bolsonaro's victory in Brazil's presidential election, the president-elect's party is already demonstrating how a rapid rise of fascism will target its perceived political enemies and attack fundamental democratic principles in the country.
Less than 24 hours after Sunday's election results were in, State Representative Ana Caroline Campagnolo, who was elected to represent Bolsonaro's Social Liberal party in the legislature earlier this month, called on students to report teachers voicing criticism of his victory or policies.
As the Guardian reports, students who see or hear their teachers expressing outrage over the new president--whose open racism, misogyny, and plans to purge the country of leftists, has inspired millions to demonstrate against him in Brazil and around the world--were encouraged to send Campagnola a WhatsApp message exposing the educators.
"When you have a populist authoritarian, militaristic ruler in that context, he isn't just a laughing stock--as Trump often is--he is actually a very serious challenger to civil rights, and human rights and basic freedoms." --Ivan Briscoe, International Crisis Group
Campagnolo, who was herself a history teacher before entering public office, claimed in a radio interview Tuesday that she had received numerous messages from students so far. Meanwhile, educators denounced her attack on freedom of expression or being what she derisively calls "indoctrinator teachers."
As of this writing on Tuesday, a petition circulating on Avaaz.org, calling on teachers and students to reject Campagnola's efforts, had gathered more than 265,000 signatures.
"We, teachers, understand that Ana Caroline is inciting hatred by asserting untruths, provoking an unhealthy school environment," wrote the educators who started the petition.
Teachers "do not indoctrinate while teaching" but rather "present and promote debates with total respect respecting the free thought of students and the educational community in general."
"In the face of this, we ask that you, a teacher, a student, parents who care for a free and democratic education share and help us denounce the attempt to curtail that teachers are already suffering for a candidate that even without having assumed [office] is using authoritarianism to promote their ideas in a light and undemocratic way!" the petition continued.
Efforts to attack teachers' freedom of speech stoked fears of the new reality Brazilians will be living under after 55 percent of voters supported a man who has been called a "genuine fascist" by Brazil-based journalist Glenn Greenwald. Just before winning his election, Bolsonaro threatened to rid the country of left-wing politicians and their supporters, telling a crowd, "Either they go overseas, or they go to jail."
Campagnolo's campaign to target left-leaning teachers follows moves by government election authorities who, days before the country voted on October 28, seized election-related posters and other materials from university classes and events. The political activities ahead of the election were in violation of election laws, the authorities claimed, even though many of the materials made no mention of specific candidates and focused solely on defeating fascism.
Supreme Court Carmen Lucia ruled late last week that the seizure of political materials from universities was illegal, arguing, "Freedom of thought is not a concession made by the state. It is a fundamental right."
But political observers have expressed fears since Bolsonaro's victory on Sunday night that not only Brazil but other Latin American countries--especially those which, like Brazil, have been ruled by military dictatorships in years past--will experience serious curtailing of rights as the new president takes office.
"This is a guy who said the Brazilian dictatorship didn't kill enough people, that they need to kill another 30,000 people, that the police should be able to kill suspects, that the left will have a choice of going to jail or leaving the country. Will he do these things? I think he will implement as many of these threats as he can get away with," Mark Weisbrot of the Center for Economic and Policy Research told France 24 on Tuesday.
"When you have a populist authoritarian, militaristic ruler in that context, he isn't just a laughing stock--as Trump often is--he is actually a very serious challenger to civil rights, and human rights and basic freedoms," added Ivan Briscoe, Latin America director of the International Crisis Group.
Faced with mounting scientific evidence that bee-poisoning neonicotinoids, or neonics, could cause an "ecological armageddon," European regulators on Friday approved a "groundbreaking" and "historic" ban on the widely-used class of pesticides--an announcement met with immediate applause by campaigners.
"The E.U.'s groundbreaking ban on bee-killing neonicotinoid pesticides is a huge win for pollinators, people, and the planet," responded Tiffany Finck-Haynes, senior food futures campaigner for Friends of the Earth (FOE).
Lori Ann Burd, director of the Center for Biological Diversity's environmental health program, said it's also a win for "science-based regulation of pesticides."
Under the new rules, which build on existing restrictions and are expected to take effect by the end of the year, three main neonics--imidacloprid, clothianidin, and thiamethoxam--will only be allowed in permanent greenhouses "where no contact with bees is expected," according to a statement by the European Union (EU).
Vytenis Andriukaitis, European commissioner for health and food safety, welcomed the move, which follows a February assessment by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) that concluded "most uses of neonicotinoid pesticides represent a risk to wild bees and honeybees."
"Bee health remains of paramount importance for me since it concerns biodiversity, food production, and the environment," Andriukaitis told the Guardian.
The vote was widely praised by the many environmental advocates who have spent years fighting for an outright ban on the use of neonics--a position that has been met with protests from major agricultural groups and lobbyists for pesticide manufacturers.
"Authorizing neonicotinoids during a quarter of a century was a mistake and led to an environmental disaster. Today's vote is historic," declared Martin Dermine of Pesticide Action Network Europe.
"A majority of member states gave a clear signal that our agriculture needs transition," Dermine added. "Using bee-killing pesticides cannot be allowed anymore and only sustainable practices should be used to produce our food."
While celebrating their victory in Europe, critics of neonics also used the news to draw attention to alarming developments at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in the era of President Donald Trump.
"The E.U.'s wisdom highlights the Trump EPA's folly," noted Burd. "Although U.S. beekeepers reported catastrophic losses again this winter, and just this past week the EPA closed a comment period on another suite of damning neonicotinoid risk assessments, rather than banning these dangerous pesticides, the agency is actually considering increasing the use of neonics across another 165 million acres."
Instead, Finck-Haynes said, U.S. regulators and food retailers should "take immediate action and eliminate the use of these toxic pesticides."
Ahed Tamimi, the 17-year-old Palestinian girl who was arrested in January for slapping an Israeli soldier, was sentenced Wednesday to eight months behind bars, enraging activists across the world who have advocated for her release.
"There is no justice under occupation."
--Ahed Tamimi
Tamimi confronted a pair of Israel Defense Forces (IDF) soldiers outside her family home in the occupied West Bank last December just moments after learning a solider had shot her 15-year-old cousin in the face.
Some compared Tamimi's sentence to that of an IDF soldier who was captured on video in 2016 fatally shooting an injured Palestinian man in what was described by one United Nations expert as an "extrajudicial execution."
Speaking with reporters after the sentencing on Wednesday, Ahed Tamimi said, "There is no justice under occupation."
"Ahed Tamimi, a teenage Palestinian girl who slapped a machine gun-toting Israeli soldier that came to her house as part of an occupying army, will spend eight months in Israeli prison for 'assault,'" Yousef Munayyer, executive director of the U.S. Campaign for Palestinian Rights, told Newsweek.
"At the same time, an Israeli court shortened an already short sentence for Elor Azaria, who executed a prone Palestinian in cold blood, so that he will only serve nine months in prison," Munayyer noted. "The perverse Israeli legal system, in all its forms, functions to protect abusers as they trample on those who the state looks down upon."
Several others compared the sentences on social media:
For some, Tamimi has become the latest symbol of the injustice Palestinians face under Israeli occupation. She was denied bail earlier this year, and will receive credit for the time she was detained during the closed-door trial. The sentence resulted from a plea deal her lawyer reached with the Israeli military court. She pled guilty to four charges.
In additon to the jail time, she will pay a $1,400 fine, according to Haaretz, which reported that "the prosecution also reached plea agreements with Nur and Nariman Tamimi, Ahed Tamimi's cousin and mother, both of whom were involved in the videotaped slapping of the soldier."
Sarah Leah Whitson, executive director of the Middle East division of Human Rights Watch, explained that "plea bargains are the norm in Israel's military justice system, which is characterized by prolonged pretrial detention, abuse of kids and sham trials."
"Ahed will be home in a few months," Whitson added, "but Israel is putting this child behind bars for eight months for calling for protests and slapping a soldier, after threatening her with years in jail."
"The fact that a child will be jailed for 8 months for slapping a soldier whose troops just shot her 15 year old cousin in the face is extreme, but in the context of the 99 percent conviction rate in the Israeli military court system and right-wing incitement against Ahed, this compromise by the Israeli military shows they have decided to back down in the face of growing pressure to release Ahed," Fadi Quran, a Palestinian activist and senior campaigner with Avaaz, wrote on Medium.
Whitson and Quran both pointed out that the Israeli military detains hundreds of Palestinian children each year.