To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Participants in the Moral March on Wall Street, led by the New York Poor People’s Campaign, rally in New York City on April 11, 2022.
Growing up corporate conditioned by the omnipresent values of aggressive commercialism over civic and democratic values is the lot of people indentured to choiceless lives shaped by merciless corporatism.
A teacher once said to me: “A society pays for what it values.” If so, our society values commercial entertainment, including spectator sports, orders of magnitude more than it values civics defined as the rights and duties exercised by citizens in a democracy.
What if we lived in a society that valued both equally?
1. Possibly the most visible event would be an annual Academy of Civic Heroes Awards viewed by tens of millions of people. The glitter would shine not on the winner’s wardrobes, but on their victories of justice and on their groundbreaking documentaries, books, and features. The acceptance remarks would not be gushing flurries of thank yous, but concise evocations of their hard-earned struggles for, and portrayals of, a just society.
2. The school curriculum in our elementary, secondary, and higher education institutions would provide academic parity for civics and civic skills with courses on business and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).
Regular civic engagement makes a democracy function productively and presciently for its citizenry and its posterity. Markets would be our servants, not our masters.
3. The media would provide significant space and time for citizen activities as they do for sports and the arts and movies. Presently The New York Times has a daily special Arts Section but not a special civic activity section. You know how much space is devoted to sports in the Times. Even NPR and PBS networks are heavy on entertainment and hardly feature any civic leaders or doers, whether to interview (they prefer to interview themselves or academics) or to report local or national civic actions.
4. Celebrities attract audiences and supporters. The media creates entertainment and sports celebrities. Except for a few years in the 1960s and 1970s, the media rarely highlights emerging civic leaders or their proven achievements. Therefore, these priceless advocates have difficulty attracting audiences or supporters.
5. We would celebrate anniversaries, in a broader fashion, beyond those remembering wars or other major acts of violence, natural disasters, or revered presidents. Apart from the holiday in honor of citizen Martin Luther King, Jr., little is formally remembered of the citizen leaders who built the edifices of justice for our country—for instance in the abolition of slavery, voting rights for women, and livelihoods and dignity rights for workers and farmers. Sure, they are sometimes mentioned in textbooks without much context or drama—but how many national civic leaders do you know in America today? They’re not covered on the degraded television or radio evening news.
6. The number of civic lobbyists would far outnumber those pressing for corporate privileges. Instead, companies from the drug, oil and gas, and Silicon Valley businesses swarm over Capitol Hill with their promises of campaign money.
7. Parity would mean that big radio stations like WTOP in Washington, D.C. (news, weather, and sports) could devote time to local civic activities as it does by giving free advertisements to opening businesses or movies. Business and entertainment have their slots by the hour or day while civic conferences and marches (as with “Poor People’s Campaign”) are regularly ignored.
As is routine with these stations, WTOP declined to mention or report the most expansive convention in American history of civic leaders, doers, and thinkers over six days at the Constitution Hall in 2016. None of the 161 stalwart presenters, except Patti Smith, were athletes or entertainers.
8. Just as there is regular data on the number of engineers, scientists, accountants, and others, there would be data on how many full-time citizens there are and how many are graduating with a major in “civil practice” (which does not exist, with very few exceptions).
9. Just as famous athletes’ and other entertainers’ clothing, equipment, and autographs are selling for big money in the collectibles market, societal parity would have similar markets for citizen advocacy memorabilia which could help raise needed funds.
10. Parity of fundraising or investment would mean hundreds of billions of dollars raised to fund tens of thousands of full-time civic groups—local, state and, national—having a seat at the table where important decisions are now being made unilaterally, often in secret, by the few for the many. Civic society monies would pay for democracy’s own media—TV, radio, newspapers, magazines, and social media, owned and used by the people, not beholden to commercial advertisers.
There would be legions of knowledgeable, full-time civic communicators and advocates taking knowledge to action that addresses the many serious perils—some rising to omnicidal levels (see my January 12, 2024, column: “Five Omnicides Facing Our Unprepared World”)—that are now worsening and being ignored by a plutocratic and oligarchic corporate state.
As they do now for Wall Street and Silicon Valley riches, the young would rush to strengthen and lift up the structures of justice—“Justice is the great interest of man on earth,” as Daniel Webster asserted. Regular civic engagement makes a democracy function productively and presciently for its citizenry and its posterity. Markets would be our servants, not our masters.
Alas, growing up corporate conditioned by the omnipresent values of aggressive commercialism over civic and democratic values is the lot of people indentured to choiceless lives shaped by merciless corporatism.
As corporations are increasingly raising our screen-addicted children by harmful direct marketing undermining parental authority and knowledge day after day, more and more people, regardless of their political labels, are realizing that this can no longer be tolerated. The people of good will and the tools of democratic transformation are available or attainable but mostly latent in our existing civic institutions.
My small example-rich paperback—Breaking Through Power: Its Easier Than We Think (City Lights, 2016) will encourage you to champion civic values.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
A teacher once said to me: “A society pays for what it values.” If so, our society values commercial entertainment, including spectator sports, orders of magnitude more than it values civics defined as the rights and duties exercised by citizens in a democracy.
What if we lived in a society that valued both equally?
1. Possibly the most visible event would be an annual Academy of Civic Heroes Awards viewed by tens of millions of people. The glitter would shine not on the winner’s wardrobes, but on their victories of justice and on their groundbreaking documentaries, books, and features. The acceptance remarks would not be gushing flurries of thank yous, but concise evocations of their hard-earned struggles for, and portrayals of, a just society.
2. The school curriculum in our elementary, secondary, and higher education institutions would provide academic parity for civics and civic skills with courses on business and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).
Regular civic engagement makes a democracy function productively and presciently for its citizenry and its posterity. Markets would be our servants, not our masters.
3. The media would provide significant space and time for citizen activities as they do for sports and the arts and movies. Presently The New York Times has a daily special Arts Section but not a special civic activity section. You know how much space is devoted to sports in the Times. Even NPR and PBS networks are heavy on entertainment and hardly feature any civic leaders or doers, whether to interview (they prefer to interview themselves or academics) or to report local or national civic actions.
4. Celebrities attract audiences and supporters. The media creates entertainment and sports celebrities. Except for a few years in the 1960s and 1970s, the media rarely highlights emerging civic leaders or their proven achievements. Therefore, these priceless advocates have difficulty attracting audiences or supporters.
5. We would celebrate anniversaries, in a broader fashion, beyond those remembering wars or other major acts of violence, natural disasters, or revered presidents. Apart from the holiday in honor of citizen Martin Luther King, Jr., little is formally remembered of the citizen leaders who built the edifices of justice for our country—for instance in the abolition of slavery, voting rights for women, and livelihoods and dignity rights for workers and farmers. Sure, they are sometimes mentioned in textbooks without much context or drama—but how many national civic leaders do you know in America today? They’re not covered on the degraded television or radio evening news.
6. The number of civic lobbyists would far outnumber those pressing for corporate privileges. Instead, companies from the drug, oil and gas, and Silicon Valley businesses swarm over Capitol Hill with their promises of campaign money.
7. Parity would mean that big radio stations like WTOP in Washington, D.C. (news, weather, and sports) could devote time to local civic activities as it does by giving free advertisements to opening businesses or movies. Business and entertainment have their slots by the hour or day while civic conferences and marches (as with “Poor People’s Campaign”) are regularly ignored.
As is routine with these stations, WTOP declined to mention or report the most expansive convention in American history of civic leaders, doers, and thinkers over six days at the Constitution Hall in 2016. None of the 161 stalwart presenters, except Patti Smith, were athletes or entertainers.
8. Just as there is regular data on the number of engineers, scientists, accountants, and others, there would be data on how many full-time citizens there are and how many are graduating with a major in “civil practice” (which does not exist, with very few exceptions).
9. Just as famous athletes’ and other entertainers’ clothing, equipment, and autographs are selling for big money in the collectibles market, societal parity would have similar markets for citizen advocacy memorabilia which could help raise needed funds.
10. Parity of fundraising or investment would mean hundreds of billions of dollars raised to fund tens of thousands of full-time civic groups—local, state and, national—having a seat at the table where important decisions are now being made unilaterally, often in secret, by the few for the many. Civic society monies would pay for democracy’s own media—TV, radio, newspapers, magazines, and social media, owned and used by the people, not beholden to commercial advertisers.
There would be legions of knowledgeable, full-time civic communicators and advocates taking knowledge to action that addresses the many serious perils—some rising to omnicidal levels (see my January 12, 2024, column: “Five Omnicides Facing Our Unprepared World”)—that are now worsening and being ignored by a plutocratic and oligarchic corporate state.
As they do now for Wall Street and Silicon Valley riches, the young would rush to strengthen and lift up the structures of justice—“Justice is the great interest of man on earth,” as Daniel Webster asserted. Regular civic engagement makes a democracy function productively and presciently for its citizenry and its posterity. Markets would be our servants, not our masters.
Alas, growing up corporate conditioned by the omnipresent values of aggressive commercialism over civic and democratic values is the lot of people indentured to choiceless lives shaped by merciless corporatism.
As corporations are increasingly raising our screen-addicted children by harmful direct marketing undermining parental authority and knowledge day after day, more and more people, regardless of their political labels, are realizing that this can no longer be tolerated. The people of good will and the tools of democratic transformation are available or attainable but mostly latent in our existing civic institutions.
My small example-rich paperback—Breaking Through Power: Its Easier Than We Think (City Lights, 2016) will encourage you to champion civic values.
A teacher once said to me: “A society pays for what it values.” If so, our society values commercial entertainment, including spectator sports, orders of magnitude more than it values civics defined as the rights and duties exercised by citizens in a democracy.
What if we lived in a society that valued both equally?
1. Possibly the most visible event would be an annual Academy of Civic Heroes Awards viewed by tens of millions of people. The glitter would shine not on the winner’s wardrobes, but on their victories of justice and on their groundbreaking documentaries, books, and features. The acceptance remarks would not be gushing flurries of thank yous, but concise evocations of their hard-earned struggles for, and portrayals of, a just society.
2. The school curriculum in our elementary, secondary, and higher education institutions would provide academic parity for civics and civic skills with courses on business and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).
Regular civic engagement makes a democracy function productively and presciently for its citizenry and its posterity. Markets would be our servants, not our masters.
3. The media would provide significant space and time for citizen activities as they do for sports and the arts and movies. Presently The New York Times has a daily special Arts Section but not a special civic activity section. You know how much space is devoted to sports in the Times. Even NPR and PBS networks are heavy on entertainment and hardly feature any civic leaders or doers, whether to interview (they prefer to interview themselves or academics) or to report local or national civic actions.
4. Celebrities attract audiences and supporters. The media creates entertainment and sports celebrities. Except for a few years in the 1960s and 1970s, the media rarely highlights emerging civic leaders or their proven achievements. Therefore, these priceless advocates have difficulty attracting audiences or supporters.
5. We would celebrate anniversaries, in a broader fashion, beyond those remembering wars or other major acts of violence, natural disasters, or revered presidents. Apart from the holiday in honor of citizen Martin Luther King, Jr., little is formally remembered of the citizen leaders who built the edifices of justice for our country—for instance in the abolition of slavery, voting rights for women, and livelihoods and dignity rights for workers and farmers. Sure, they are sometimes mentioned in textbooks without much context or drama—but how many national civic leaders do you know in America today? They’re not covered on the degraded television or radio evening news.
6. The number of civic lobbyists would far outnumber those pressing for corporate privileges. Instead, companies from the drug, oil and gas, and Silicon Valley businesses swarm over Capitol Hill with their promises of campaign money.
7. Parity would mean that big radio stations like WTOP in Washington, D.C. (news, weather, and sports) could devote time to local civic activities as it does by giving free advertisements to opening businesses or movies. Business and entertainment have their slots by the hour or day while civic conferences and marches (as with “Poor People’s Campaign”) are regularly ignored.
As is routine with these stations, WTOP declined to mention or report the most expansive convention in American history of civic leaders, doers, and thinkers over six days at the Constitution Hall in 2016. None of the 161 stalwart presenters, except Patti Smith, were athletes or entertainers.
8. Just as there is regular data on the number of engineers, scientists, accountants, and others, there would be data on how many full-time citizens there are and how many are graduating with a major in “civil practice” (which does not exist, with very few exceptions).
9. Just as famous athletes’ and other entertainers’ clothing, equipment, and autographs are selling for big money in the collectibles market, societal parity would have similar markets for citizen advocacy memorabilia which could help raise needed funds.
10. Parity of fundraising or investment would mean hundreds of billions of dollars raised to fund tens of thousands of full-time civic groups—local, state and, national—having a seat at the table where important decisions are now being made unilaterally, often in secret, by the few for the many. Civic society monies would pay for democracy’s own media—TV, radio, newspapers, magazines, and social media, owned and used by the people, not beholden to commercial advertisers.
There would be legions of knowledgeable, full-time civic communicators and advocates taking knowledge to action that addresses the many serious perils—some rising to omnicidal levels (see my January 12, 2024, column: “Five Omnicides Facing Our Unprepared World”)—that are now worsening and being ignored by a plutocratic and oligarchic corporate state.
As they do now for Wall Street and Silicon Valley riches, the young would rush to strengthen and lift up the structures of justice—“Justice is the great interest of man on earth,” as Daniel Webster asserted. Regular civic engagement makes a democracy function productively and presciently for its citizenry and its posterity. Markets would be our servants, not our masters.
Alas, growing up corporate conditioned by the omnipresent values of aggressive commercialism over civic and democratic values is the lot of people indentured to choiceless lives shaped by merciless corporatism.
As corporations are increasingly raising our screen-addicted children by harmful direct marketing undermining parental authority and knowledge day after day, more and more people, regardless of their political labels, are realizing that this can no longer be tolerated. The people of good will and the tools of democratic transformation are available or attainable but mostly latent in our existing civic institutions.
My small example-rich paperback—Breaking Through Power: Its Easier Than We Think (City Lights, 2016) will encourage you to champion civic values.