

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Denial of Care, Deadly Forced Evacuations, Destruction of Medical Facilities
Israeli military forces caused deaths and unnecessary suffering of Palestinian patients while occupying hospitals in the Gaza Strip during the current hostilities, amounting to war crimes, Human Rights Watch said today.
Witnesses at three hospitals told Human Rights Watch that Israeli forces denied electricity, water, food, and medicines to patients; shot civilians; mistreated health workers; and deliberately destroyed medical facilities and equipment. Unlawful forced evacuations put patients at grave risk and left desperately needed hospitals nonfunctional.
“Israeli forces repeatedly demonstrated deadly cruelty against Palestinian patients in hospitals that they seized,” said Bill Van Esveld, associate children’s rights director at Human Rights Watch. “The Israeli military’s denial of water and electricity left sick and wounded people to die, while soldiers mistreated and forcibly displaced patients and health workers, and damaged and destroyed hospitals.”
Israeli authorities have not announced any investigations into alleged serious violations of international humanitarian law, including apparent war crimes, by Israeli ground forces while in control of these or other hospitals. Unlawful forced evacuations of hospitals knowingly carried out as part of the Israeli government’s policy of forced displacement of Palestinians in Gaza would amount to crimes against humanity.
Human Rights Watch interviewed nine patients and two healthcare workers present when Israeli forces raided and occupied al-Shifa medical complex in Gaza City in November 2023 and again in March 2024; Kamal Adwan hospital in Beit Lahia in January 2024; and Nasser medical complex in Khan Younis in February 2024. The Gaza Health Ministry reported that 84 patients, and possibly many more, died from lack of care in the three hospitals at these times, excluding people killed by shelling or gunfire.
Israeli forces occupying hospitals severely interfered with the treatment of wounded and sick patients. Medical workers said Israeli forces denied doctors’ pleas to bring medicine and supplies to patients and blocked access to hospitals and ambulances, leading to the deaths of wounded and chronically ill patients, including children on dialysis.
Ansam al-Sharif, who had been hospitalized after losing her leg in an Israeli airstrike and needed crutches to walk, said Israeli soldiers told patients at Nasser hospital to sleep upstairs but to go downstairs from 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. “We stayed there for four days with no food, water, or medicines,” she said. Al-Sharif witnessed the deaths of four older patients during this time.
Israeli forces forcibly evacuated hospitals and put patients, healthcare workers, and displaced people at grave risk. They ordered patients to leave hospitals without assistance, including those on stretchers and in wheelchairs. They only rarely facilitated transfers to other health facilities, which sometimes could not provide care. After Israeli forces evacuated some hospital buildings, they unlawfully burned or destroyed them.
Israeli soldiers committed abuses against patients, healthcare workers, and displaced people at the hospitals. They shot and killed civilians, fired on healthcare workers, and mistreated people in their custody.
Human Rights Watch previously reported on unlawful Israeli attacks on hospitals and ambulances, as well as the arbitrary detention and torture of healthcare workers. By September 2024, only 4 of Gaza’s 36 hospitals had not been damaged or destroyed by Israeli forces, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported, posing a critical threat to the short- and long-term health of the population.
Since the Hamas-led October 7, 2023 attacks on Israel, Israeli authorities have deliberately inflicted damaging and fatal conditions on the Palestinian population in Gaza, including deliberately depriving them of food, water, and other objects necessary for their survival like medicine, amounting to the crime against humanity of extermination and acts of genocide.
Since March 2, 2025, the Israeli government has again blocked all aid entering Gaza, including fuel, in flagrant violation of international humanitarian law. On March 18, the Israeli military launched a new wave of airstrikes and artillery fire across Gaza, killing more than 400 people, the Gaza Health Ministry said.
“The Israeli military’s occupation of Gaza’s hospitals has transformed sites for healing and recovery into centers of death and mistreatment,” Van Esveld said. “Those responsible for these horrific abuses, including senior officials, should be held to account.”
International humanitarian law provides that hospitals and their staff may not be deliberately attacked. Parties to the conflict must at all times respect and protect hospitals and take all feasible precautions to minimize harm to patients, staff, and facilities during the hostilities.
Hospitals remain protected from attack unless they are used to commit acts harmful to the enemy and only after due warning that has gone unheeded. Acts harmful to the enemy would include housing able-bodied combatants, arms and ammunition stores, or a military command post. However, the presence of wounded or sick combatants and their small arms does not make hospitals subject to attack.
A military force may temporarily enter a hospital for reasons of military necessity, including interrogating and detaining wounded or sick combatants, or verifying that a facility is not being used for military purposes. Such an inspection may not interfere with patients’ medical treatment and needs to take into account the potential humanitarian impact. Military personnel must not remain in the facility longer than necessary.
A force that has seized a hospital must actively facilitate the delivery of medical supplies and equipment and not deprive the hospital of other vital resources such as electricity or water.
Occupying a hospital may impede the functioning of the facility and care for the wounded and sick, as well as make the hospital a military objective, endangering patients and staff. Parties are prohibited from interfering in the hospital’s work. Ordering patients and staff to evacuate a hospital may only be done as a last resort. Intentionally destroying facilities or medical equipment is prohibited and, if unlawful or wanton, is a war crime.
While Israeli forces exercised effective control over hospitals, they were also obligated under international human rights law to respect, protect, and fulfill the right to the highest attainable standard of health. The United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) has stated that violating the right to health during armed conflict can include: decimating the healthcare system; directly attacking patients, medical personnel, facilities, and transports; obstructing access to health care; limiting access to health services as a punitive measure; and threatening or restricting access to the underlying determinants of health.
Israel’s general evacuation order for northern Gaza, issued on October 13, 2023, included the al-Shifa medical complex. But as of early November 2023, about 50,000 displaced people were sheltering at al-Shifa, according to the UN human rights office. Photographs and videos from inside the compound, verified by Human Rights Watch, showed scores of tents and hundreds of people in the courtyard, including families, medics tending patients, and emergency workers. Civilians and emergency workers brought hundreds of injured and dead to the hospital day and night.
As a result of Israel cutting all electricity and blocking fuel to Gaza after the October 7 attacks, al-Shifa had run out of fuel for its main generators on October 21. A small generator for the intensive care unit (ICU) ran out of fuel on November 11 and could not be replenished. Dr. Khalid Abu Samra, 30, told Human Rights Watch he was presentwhen staff had to remove a patient from a ventilator because of a lack of electricity. “There was no water or food,” he said.
Israel’s general evacuation order for northern Gaza, issued on October 13, 2023, included the al-Shifa medical complex. But as of early November 2023, about 50,000 displaced people were sheltering at al-Shifa, according to the UN human rights office. Photographs and videos from inside the compound, verified by Human Rights Watch, showed scores of tents and hundreds of people in the courtyard, including families, medics tending patients, and emergency workers. Civilians and emergency workers brought hundreds of injured and dead to the hospital day and night. The Israeli military issued a statement on November 8 that “time is running out” for civilians to evacuate Gaza’s north via one route along Salah al-Din Road. The military said it kept the road “open” for a few hours at a time but there was no reliably safe route to flee the hospital. Five days earlier, an Israeli airstrike had hit an ambulance a few meters from the hospital’s busy entrance, leaving at least 21 people dead or wounded, including 5 children. It was one of several attacks striking ambulances with patients evacuating from al-Shifa.
Data from NASA’s Fire Information for Resource Management System (FIRMS) from between November 6 and 9, based on satellite observation, showed several fires along Omar al-Mukhtar Road, the connecting road from al-Shifa to the Salah al-Din Road main evacuation route. Satellite imagery from November 7 showed Israeli armored vehicles on the connecting road.
Ridana Zukhra, 25, said she left al-Shifa with her children, brother, and cousin when Israeli forces ordered people to evacuate. Despite holding white flags, a tank fired at the group, badly wounding her daughter, Ghazal, 5, whose leg had to be amputated.
By November 12, Israeli forces had surrounded and cut off access to al-Shifa medical complex. About 600 patients were at the hospital at that time, including premature babies and dialysis patients. Hospital administrators said that from November 11 to 17, 40 patients at al-Shifa died, largely due to power cuts, withfurtherdeaths reported from November 17 to 24.
Israeli forces raided and occupied the hospital on November 15. Shahad al-Qutaiti, 23, had been transferred to al-Shifa after a munition hit her apartment building in Gaza City on October 11, killing her husband, mother-in-law, and another relative. Al-Qutaiti was severely wounded and her left leg had to be amputated. She was seven months pregnant and delivered a stillborn baby girl on November 13.
On November 15, al-Qutaiti was recovering from her injuries on the fourth floor of the maternity building, which was “full of patients.” She said Israeli soldiers launched “a sound [flash-bang] grenade and a smoke grenade through the windows to force people to go downstairs.” Her father and brothers carried her in her wheelchair.
The Israeli militaryinterrogated patients and staff and ordered them to leave al-Shifa on November 17. About 150 patients who could not move remained, including comatose patients, double amputees, and premature babies, along with 10 nurses and 7 doctors, said Dr. Abu Samra.
On November 18, Israeli forces ordered the 2,500 displaced people still sheltering at the medical complex to leave, according to the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). The forces facilitated a one-hour UN assessment mission, which reported that hallways were “filled with medical and solid waste.” A military commander gave hospital staff permission to bury patients who had died since November 11, Dr. Abu Samra said. After staff buried about 50 bodies, Israeli forces took another 70 bodies away.
The media and UN agencies reported that from November 11 to 19, five premature babies died at the hospital and 31 were evacuated, all seriously ill. Israeli forces allowed more patients and staff to evacuate on November 22, but 250 remained. The staff asked for 50 ambulances to evacuate, but on November 23, Israeli forces allowed 14 ambulances and 2 minibuses, Dr. Abu Samra said. At least 10 patients on dialysis machines “refused to leave,” he said. “I have no idea what happened to them.” A doctor told the media that a maternity patient died after being evacuated to another hospital that lacked ICU care.
Al-Shifa hospital resumed limited services in January 2024. By mid-March, an estimated 7,000 patients, caregivers, staff, and displaced people were at the medical complex when Israeli forces began shelling intensively nearby. Theyraided the compound “by surprise” on March 18, an Israeli military spokesman said, because “senior Hamas terrorists” were “using the hospital to command attacks.”
While Israeli forces said on March 17 that “there is no obligation for the patients and medical staff to evacuate,” on March 18 they ordered “all those … in al-Shifa hospital” to “immediately evacuate.” CNN reported that witnesses and Palestinian officials had said that when Israeli forces withdrew on April 1, buildings were destroyed and bodies were strewn on hospital grounds. WHO said that at least 21 patients had died and the hospital was largely destroyed.
Dr. Badr B., 28, who asked not to use his real name for his protection, said that electricity at the hospital was cut off at about 2 a.m. on March 18. Israeli forces broadcast a message that no one could leave, he said, and they shot and wounded four healthcare workers near the entrance. A doctor told the BBC that two patients on life support died because of the electricity cut.
Israeli forces seized the complex with “military vehicles, snipers, quadcopters [drones], soldiers, everything,” Dr. B. said. Israeli forces ordered the 72 healthcare workers left at the hospital to transfer about 180 patients from the third and fourth floors of the ICU in the specialized surgeries building to the ground floor and warned they would “start shooting at these floors” within two hours. Dr. B. said that they began “shooting as we were evacuating the last group, three [patients] on crutches and the rest in wheelchairs.” Staff then transferred patients to the hospital’s reception building.
One patient, Abdullah al-Hajj, 33, an employee with the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) whose legs had been traumatically amputated in an Israeli airstrike, said that after nurses carried him from the ICU to the reception building, Israeli forces including tanks fired at the ICU “nonstop.”
Patients were held without food, water, and medicine, with critically wounded patients lying on the floor, WHO reported on March 22. Dr. B said nine patients died in the reception building within a few days, predominantly older people and one patient with Alzheimer’s who had been shot in the head. Another doctor told the media that about 16 patients had died in the reception building.
Al-Hajj said that in the reception building, an Israeli soldier forced a man with a post-operative fractured leg to stand up and strip, despite his pain, and threatened to shoot him. He said that after a soldier ordered another man to go outside, “we heard shots fired, and they brought him back as a dead body.” Soldiers refused requests to bury them, al-Hajj said. Dr. Khaleel Skaik posted on social media that when he returned from being interrogated with his hands tied and arms raised, a soldier shot him, severing his right thumb.
Dr. B. said Israeli soldiers “screened” him, made him kneel in the cold for hours, made him put on white PPE coveralls, and cuffed, blindfolded, and interrogated him. Two soldiers repeatedly told him, “You’re gay,” and he heard a man nearby “screaming in pain as a soldier was kicking him.” Dr. B. said that when he was called for questioning, an officer pulled down his blindfold and “the first thing he did, he slapped me in the face.”
An Israeli commander told news media the army had established a “very systematic control over the separation between the hospital and the terrorists” at al-Shifa, with “announcements, cordons,” and other measures. Israeli forces required staff and patients to wear color-coded bracelets.
Both Dr. Abu Samra and Dr. B. said Israeli forces used them as “human shields,” to open or break open doors and enter and check whether rooms were empty.
Around March 24, Israeli forces ordered healthcare workers to transfer patients to the Amir Nayef oncology building, al-Hajj said. About 20 patients were able to walk, but about 150 could not, he said, yet Israeli forces fired tear gas and smoke grenades into the building. He said that when the reception building was emptied, Israeli tanks shelled it. Smoke is visible billowing from the hospital compound in satellite imagery taken on March 25.
“Three or four patients would die every day” in the Nayef building, al-Hajj said. These included an older married couple. Dr. B. said that 11 patients died during the first two days there, including a woman who went into shock, heart disease patients, older people, and a 14-year-old girl with diabetes, who was alone.
Israeli soldiers “didn’t allow any food, water, [or] aid,” al-Hajj said. His own wounds were infested with worms. Dr. B. said Israeli forces prevented him from bringing supplies to patients from elsewhere in the hospital, and denied permission to WHO missions to visit the hospital.
Dr. B. said that around March 26, Israeli forces set up a “clinic” in the human resources building with water and food, and electricity two days later, but “no painkillers, no antibiotics, no [IV] fluids,” or even diapers. Six healthcare workers and 25 patients were sent initially. By March 31, there were over 100 patients facing “extremely unsanitary conditions, and a lack of water” and food, according to WHO’s director-general. Israeli forces then set the Nayef building on fire, al-Hajj and Dr. B said.
The media reported that Palestinians later exhumedmass graves on hospital grounds, some dug in 2023, that included patients with catheters.
The Israeli military in November 2023 said that Palestinian armed groups had used al-Shifa facilities as a headquarters, publishingphotos of weapons, security camera footage of armed men and two hostages entering the hospital on October 7, and video of a tunnelcomplex below the hospital. The military later said it believed fighters had not used the tunnels, but used the hospital buildings.
In March 2024, the Israeli military released images it said were of hidden weapons, as well as footage of Palestinian fighters inside the hospital that Sky News reported was from fighting outside the compound. The armed wings of Hamas and Islamic Jihad deniedfightinginside the hospital, but stated that they attacked withdrawing Israeli forces outside the hospital on March 31.
Israeli military officials variously stated they killed from “about 40” or “a few dozen” Palestinian fighters, up to “170 ... in or around” the hospital, and detained 600 “terrorists,” including alleged senior Hamas and Islamic Jihad officials. Media reported a witness saying Hamas and Islamic Jihad maintained two offices for their civilian agencies in the hospital, and that scores of non-military employees including police and civil defense workers were present to collect paychecks when the raid began.
None of the patients or medical staff who spoke to Human Rights Watch said that they saw Palestinian fighters inside the hospital compound during Israeli military operations. This is consistent with similar interviews published by the international media.
Israeli forces surrounded Kamal Adwan hospital on December 11 and raided it on December 12, leaving 65 patients, including 18 children, and 3,000 displaced people “trapped … with extreme shortages of water, food and power,” OCHA reported. By December 17, at least eight patients had died, including a 9-year-old child, according to WHO’s director-general. The military ordered the last patients to leave the hospital on December 27.
Ansam al-Sharif, 20, was sheltering at her home in Jabalia refugee camp in northern Gaza on November 19, 2023, when multiple munitions hit her building. Al-Sharif said the attack injured and burned her, causing the amputation of her leg, wounded 10 relatives sheltering with her, and killed 4 people in her building and 39 others in three neighboring buildings. She went to al-Awda hospital, but after a strike there on November 21 killed three doctors and wounded several patients, she was transferred to Kamal Adwan hospital.
CNN and OCHA reported that on December 11, tank fire hit Kamal Adwan’s maternity department, killing two women and injuring others. During Israeli forces’ occupation of the hospital, they screened all males ages 16 and older, arrested scores of healthcare workers, and ordered patients and staff to move to another building, CNN reported.
Gaza’s Health Ministry reported on December 14 that Israeli forces had evacuated 2,500 displaced people and that two emergency room patients had died.
CNN quoted the hospital’s head of pediatric services, who said that on December 15, Israeli military bulldozers dug up and crushed bodies buried on hospital grounds. Satellite imagery from December 15 shows the hospital grounds razed and bulldozer marks visible, destruction and marks not visible in an image from December 14. CNN also reported that two doctors and a doctor’s son were shot and wounded, and that another doctor said soldiers fired at him as he tried to reach a wounded man, who later died.
The Israeli military said it ended operations in the area on December 16. On December 27, Israeli forces again raided Kamal Adwan hospital and burned and severely damaged the laboratory, surgical unit, and various departments, WHO reported. Israeli forces ordered staff to transfer all remaining patients, sending some to the Indonesian Hospital, which was not functional at the time.
The Israeli military said the Kamal Adwan hospital was being used for military purposes, including detaining an Israeli soldier, and that it had found weapons, “technological equipment, and Hamas intelligence documents.” The UN human rights office reported that the military detained hundreds of people while raiding the hospital. The Israeli military released photographs of men without shirts, in a line, carrying guns over their heads, whom it alleged were “terror operatives.” Hospital staff said the weapons had belonged to hospital security guards—permissible under international humanitarian law—and were being handed over to Israeli forces under orders. “There were no armed men at all in the hospital,” al-Sharif said, and while she was in the hospital no fighting occurred inside.
Israeli forces surrounded Nasser hospital in Khan Younis on January 21, 2024, when 850 patients and up to 10,000 displaced people were sheltering there, and raided it on February 15. By the time they withdrew on February 22, the hospital was severely damaged, and medical teams buried 13 patients who had died, some due to lack of electricity and oxygen, the Gaza Health Ministry said.
Medecins Sans Frontieres (Doctors Without Borders or MSF) reported that on January 21, Israeli forces ordered people to leave the hospital, but many soon returned, saying people were being wounded and killed on the street. On January 23, the Israeli military issued displacement orders for areas that included Nasser and two other hospitals, but they denied ambulances access and people could not leave “without risking their lives,” MSF said. On January 26, the Israeli military said that “there is no obligation to evacuate” the hospital but that people could do so.
MSF and BBC reported that there was shooting at the hospital, killing a nurse inside the operating room on February 8 and killing and wounding others. BBC verified videos of shooting and of three bodies in the hospital courtyard.
The Israeli military rejected a request from WHO to visit the hospital on February 10. Duaa D., who asked that her real name not be used for her protection, said her son Mohammed, 20, was a kidney patient in Nasser hospital at the time, where there was no fresh food, clean water, or medicine for Mohammed’s hypertension. Her two younger children, sheltering in a tent in the hospital courtyard, went sleepless with fear. Mohammed said he could barely walk and had lost almost half his body weight due to vomiting and diarrhea, that the water was contaminated, and that he could not digest the canned food due to his chronic illnesses.
On February 13, Duaa saw Jamal Abu al-Ola, 25, who had been sheltering in the hospital, in a white hazmat suit with his hands bound. NBC and other media reported that Israeli forces had detained and beaten him and ordered him to warn the hospital to evacuate, threatening to kill him and others if he did not return. Duaa said al-Ola shared the warning and left the hospital, but soon after was carried back in and “shot, with a fountain of blood pouring.” Witnesses told news media that Israeli forces shot and killed him near the hospital entrance.
Early on February 15, Israeli forces raided the hospital, ordering everyone to leave because they “will demolish the whole building,” Duaa said. Israeli forces used a bulldozer to demolish part of the complex and an artillery shell hit the hospital, Mohammed said. MSF reported that the attack killed one person and wounded eight in the orthopedic ward. The military acknowledged that a “stray shell” had hit the hospital.
Satellite imagery from February 16 shows parts of the hospital complex had been razed, with bulldozer tracks visible.
Duaa said she saw a large number of bodies on the ground behind the renal unit and recalled an “unbearable” smell. “We saw cats and dogs eating bodies,” she said. “Once a dog brought a human hand and gave it to its puppies.”
By February 18, Nasser hospital had ceased to function. On February 19 and 20, ambulances evacuated 53 patients, but 100 patients and 15 doctors remained, along with “the decomposing bodies of eight ICU patients who died for lack of oxygen,” OCHA reported.
The Israeli evacuation orders separated Mohammed from his family. Israeli forces screened him and ordered him to leave the hospital on foot.
SevenIsraelihostages whom Palestinian armed groups released during the November 2023 ceasefire said they had been held in Nasser hospital, in most cases for several days. The Israeli military said before the raid that bodies of Israeli hostages might be in Nasser hospital, though none were recovered. It later said forces searching for hostages’ bodies had exhumed mass graves dug by Palestinians in the hospital. The UN human rights office reported in April 2024 that Palestinians had recovered 283 bodies “buried ... and covered with waste” at Nasser hospital, apparently by Israeli forces, allegedly including bodies with “their hands ... tied and stripped of their clothes.”
International and local healthcare workers who had been in the hospital said they were unaware of any fighters there. Duaa’s husband, Zaid, said that Palestinian armed groups were fighting in Khan Younis at the time “but not in Nasser [hospital]. … [W]e didn’t see resistance [fighters].”
On February 22, the Israeli army withdrew, leaving Nasser hospital severely damaged and non-functioning until limited activities resumed in May 2024.
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
"This is not justice," said the healthcare charity. "Two years of silence, followed by closures that raise more questions than they answer, is unacceptable."
The international healthcare charity Médecins Sans Frontières on Thursday joined the humanitarian group World Central Kitchen in demanding that an "impartial investigative body" examine deadly Israeli attacks on its staffers in Gaza, following the Israeli military's announcement that it was closing the cases without opening a criminal investigation.
MSF, also known in English as Doctors Without Borders, noted that the decision by the Israeli military advocate general (MAG) did "not come as a surprise" and was "the predictable output of a military apparatus investigating itself."
The Israel Defense Forces and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government, said the France-based organization, have proven themselves "unwilling to respond to the extent of violations that may amount to war crimes emerging from Gaza," with Israeli officials continuing to insist that the IDF has been targeting Hamas with its bombardment of Gaza—despite the fact that the death toll of more than 73,000 Palestinians includes at least 22,000 women and 20,000 children and that healthcare facilities, schools, and at least 92% of residential buildings have been destroyed or damaged in attacks.
In addition, said MSF, 15 staff members of the healthcare organization have been killed by Israeli forces since they began bombarding Gaza in retaliation for a Hamas-led attack in October 2023, including two who were killed in multiple attacks on an aid convoy in Gaza City in November 2023 and two who were killed in a strike on an MSF shelter in Khan Younis in February 2024.
"There is no military objective that justifies the wholesale sacrifice of civilians. And there is no internal military review that can substitute for genuine, independent, and impartial accountability."
MSF submitted those cases to the MAG for review, but along with an attack that killed seven World Central Kitchen (WCK) aid workers in April 2024, the military said there was no suspicion of criminal conduct in the assaults on MSF workers.
"This is not justice," said MSF. "Two years of silence, followed by closures that raise more questions than they answer, is unacceptable."
"MSF staff and their family members are dead. Their names are known," the group continued. "Their locations were shared. Their vehicles were identified. We have always maintained that all elements point to a clear responsibility of the Israeli army for the deadly attacks. And yet, those responsible for their deaths have declined to pursue any criminal investigation."
The decision by the MAG makes clear, said the group, that "there is no prospect of accountability within the Israeli legal system for the killing of our staff, just as there has been no accountability for Israel's ongoing genocide against Palestinians."
Following the MAG's announcement on Wednesday, World Central Kitchen issued a statement condemning Israel's "account of the deaths of our seven colleagues on April 1, 2024."
"We fundamentally disagree with their decision about criminal investigations into the IDF airstrikes that killed our team," said WCK. "There has never been any excuse or justification for the attacks, and there is nothing in this account that does so. The decision is inconsistent with the full truth and deeply offensive."
Israeli authorities did not issue a warning to WCK before it attacked the aid organization's convoy, which was traveling through what was supposed to be a deconflicted zone when it was struck.
"At the time of the lethal attacks, the IDF knew that our team in Gaza was unarmed and posing a threat to nobody. It had full visual clarity on our clearly marked humanitarian vehicles during the extended, multiple airstrikes. It knew our team’s movements, identities, and activities in advance," said WCK. "We continue to demand truth and justice for our team and their families. We continue to demand an independent commission to investigate the airstrikes because the IDF cannot credibly investigate its own conduct. And we continue to grieve the loss of our friends."
MSF stressed that Israel's decision to "close" the cases of the attacks "must be understood in their proper context: In Gaza, tens of thousands of Palestinians have been killed. Healthcare facilities have been destroyed. Humanitarian convoys have been struck. Journalists, medical personnel, UN personnel, and aid workers have been killed in numbers unprecedented in any recent conflict."
"MSF reaffirms what we have stated since the beginning of this violence: There is no military objective that justifies the wholesale sacrifice of civilians," said the group. "And there is no internal military review that can substitute for genuine, independent, and impartial accountability."
"To our colleagues we have lost," MSF added, "and to the countless civilians and humanitarian workers who have perished in Gaza: We will not let your deaths be filed away as procedural inevitabilities. You deserved protection. You deserve justice."
"There is one point that should be very clear: It has been run up almost entirely due to Republican tax cuts and their inept management of the economy."
Congressional Republicans have seized upon news that the US national debt reached $40 trillion to bash what they described as "unaffordable socialist policies" and out-of-control spending.
But economists and policy analysts say Republican policy decisions—from massive tax cuts for the rich to disastrous wars of choice in the Middle East—are primarily responsible for the explosion of the national debt over the past quarter-century. President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly promised to eliminate the national debt, has so far overseen an $11.6 trillion debt surge across his two White House terms.
"I have never been a deficit hawk, and I’m not about to change my religious affiliation now," Dean Baker, senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, wrote Thursday. "But whatever we think of debt and deficits, there is one point that should be very clear: It has been run up almost entirely due to Republican tax cuts and their inept management of the economy."
Economist Paul Krugman similarly wrote that while the $40 trillion figure "has no special significance," it underscores "the incredible irresponsibility of the Trump administration, with its unfunded tax cuts that overwhelmingly benefit the wealthy, billions in wasteful military spending—redesigning aircraft carriers because Trump doesn’t like the way they look!—and more."
"As Jared Bernstein and Bobby Kogan have shown, our deficit would be far more manageable if first [George W.] Bush, then Trump, hadn’t rammed through tax cuts that hugely favored high-income Americans," Krugman added.
Kogan, senior director of federal budget policy at the Center for American Progress, estimated in 2023 that tax cuts enacted during the Bush administration and Trump's first term were "responsible for 57% of the increase in the debt ratio since 2001, and more than 90% of the increase in the debt ratio if the one-time costs of bills responding to Covid-19 and the Great Recession are excluded."
You can’t talk about debt without talking about how we got into a bad predicament, and there’s only one correct answer: tax cuts enacted this century
[image or embed]
— Bobby Kogan (@bbkogan.bsky.social) 5:13 PM · Aug 19, 2026
Last summer, Trump signed into law another massive tax cut package that will disproportionately benefit the rich and large corporations—and add trillions of dollars more to the national debt over the next decade.
"From now on, whenever you hear someone fret about how huge, horrible, and out-of-control the national debt is, explain to them that it’s largely because of tax cuts to the wealthy—who are also the major recipients of interest on that debt," former US Labor Secretary Robert Reich wrote on Thursday.
The US national debt reached $40 trillion months earlier than forecasters expected, partially due to lost federal revenue from Trump's court-invalidated tariffs.
"Before his second term is even over, Donald Trump is responsible for more than $10 trillion of this," Rep. Chris Deluzio (D-Pa.) wrote on Thursday. "Just INTEREST on this debt is now sucking up more of our public money than even the military and Medicare. DC Republicans are leaving our kids a colossal mess to clean up."
The vice president of the European Parliament condemned what she described as "a horrific spectacle that turns the death penalty into a show."
Still drawing international censure for his genocidal call to kill dozens of Gazans daily, Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir faced fresh condemnation Thursday after visiting the construction site of a gallows where Palestinians convicted of killing Israelis are set to be hanged to death, with select Israelis gathering as spectators.
Ben-Gvir, leader of the far-right Jewish Power party, posted a video to social media in which he gloats about the construction of gallows, which is being built in an undisclosed location in central Israel.
“I promised to worsen the conditions of terrorists in prisons—we kept it,” Ben-Gvir says in the video. “I promised to pass the Death Penalty for Terrorists law—we did. And now the death row and hanging facility are also starting to take shape.”
The law to which Ben-Gvir referred was passed in March by the Knesset—Israel's parliament—and took effect the following month. The legislation changes the rules governing Israeli military courts in the illegally occupied West Bank so that the death penalty effectively applies only to Palestinians who kill Israelis.
Far-right Knesset members, including Ben-Gvir, wore noose-shaped lapel pins to show their support for the legislation. Ben-Gvir also handed out sweets to Knesset colleagues after the bill passed its first reading.
Ben-Gvir said the execution site would include viewing booths where victims’ families could watch executions, describing this as something customary in various countries and specifically citing the United States as an example.
"Terrorists deserve only one thing—death by hanging," said Ben-Gvir, who in 2007 was convicted by an Israeli court of inciting racism and supporting a terrorist organization, whose leader he has openly honored.
Abdullah al-Zaghari, head of the Palestinian Prisoner Society, urged “effective international action” in response to Ben-Gvir's comments. Al-Zaghari told Anadolu that the minister's visit to the gallows site was part of the “continued determination of the Israeli occupation system” to codify incitement against Palestinians.
Leftist Israeli Knesset lawmaker Ofer Cassif excoriated Ben-Gvir's actions.
"This criminal thug—a sympathizer of murderers of Palestinians, a supporter of terror, and a pathological racist—is also hopelessly infantile," Cassif told The New Arab on Wednesday. "Soon we will oust him from the government, and next, throw him behind bars."
European Parliament Vice President Pina Picierno accused Ben-Gvir of staging "a horrific spectacle that turns the death penalty into a show."
The liberal US pro-Israel group J Street asked on X, "Are we supposed to believe, as some in the Jewish establishment would like us to, that Ben-Gvir’s words somehow tell us nothing about the country he helps govern?"
"He is Israel’s national security minister, and he is now celebrating a facility built to execute Palestinians while Jewish extremists are excluded from the law," the group added. "As the old saying goes: When someone tells you who they are, believe them. When a government gives someone this much power, we have to reckon honestly with the agenda they are pushing."
Ben-Gvir—who is under sanctions and banned from countries including Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Norway, and the United Kingdom for inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank—was still being denounced on Wednesday for advocating the daily mass killing of Palestinians, including civilians, in Gaza amid a nearly three-year war that United Nations experts, human rights groups, a South Africa-led case currently before the International Court of Justice, and many others call a genocide.
Stéphane Dujarric, spokesperson for United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres, said Wednesday—which was World Humanitarian Day—that Ben-Gvir's "remarks are appalling, they're outrageous, they're dehumanizing, they're dangerous, and we condemn them unequivocally."
A spokesperson for German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Wednesday in Berlin that Merz "strongly condemns Minister Ben-Gvir's inhumane statements, which violate international law—they are unacceptable."
"As the occupying power, Israel must treat Palestinians with dignity, protect their property, and ensure public administration and humanitarian aid," the spokesperson added.
French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot called Ben-Gvir's remarks "unbearable and inhumane," adding that "further sanctions could be imposed, and all options are on the table."
In the United States, actor and activist Mark Ruffalo said Thursday on Bluesky that "Ben-Gvir is a bloodthirsty psychopath, war criminal, and one of Israel’s beloved genocidal leaders."
"America and the world should be sanctioning, divesting, and boycotting Israel in every way until this apartheid regime falls," he added.
"No one expects Trump's treasury secretary to know anything about the economy," said one economist.
The American economy lost 23,000 jobs last month, according to federal data, but US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent doesn't see much cause for concern.
During a Thursday interview on CNBC, Bessent was asked about whether the most recent jobs report was a sign of the US labor market "cracking," and he replied that the data at the moment are "quite noisy."
Bessent then asserted that, thanks to Trump's mass deportation policy, "the jobs that we're seeing are going to Americans."
"After the deportations we've seen during President Trump's administration, and the closing of the border... we don't need to produce as many jobs," he said. "And what's really important here is that we are seeing a manufacturing renaissance."
Bessent on the latest bad jobs report: "After the deportations that we've seen and the closing of the border, we don't need to produce as many jobs" pic.twitter.com/kStWCiXAz5
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) August 20, 2026
In fact, there is no manufacturing jobs boom under Trump, as federal data shows the economy has lost an estimated 75,000 manufacturing jobs since the start of his second term.
Dean Baker, senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, noted in a social media post that Bessent's claim about the Trump economy providing bountiful jobs to native-born US workers is also false.
"The employment rate for native-born people is down a percentage point from when Biden was in the White House," Baker wrote, "but no one expects Trump's treasury secretary to know anything about the economy."
Economist Tony Yates observed that Bessent's spin on the jobs report undermined one of the Trump administration's rationales for carrying out mass deportations.
"I love how this contradicts with the argument for the deportations—that migrants were stealing jobs from everyone else," Yates wrote. "Now the claim is that the jobs were created by migrants just as they are now gone with them."
"This is a massive win for Dutch pensioners—not to mention all living creatures on Earth."
Pensioenfonds Recreatie just became the latest Dutch pension fund to ditch US-based BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager and a leading investor in climate-wrecking fossil fuels.
Recreatie, which is for workers in the Netherlands' recreation sector, last Friday named Cardano as the new manager of its €450 million—or $525 million—equity portfolio.
Xander den Uyl, a board member at the pension fund, told the Dutch publication Pensioen Pro that AF Advisors "assessed a long list of asset managers—including BlackRock—based on a dozen criteria," including cost as well as environmental, social, and governance (ESG) policy, and Cardano was the strongest.
HUGE NEWS: Superpolluting firm BlackRock just lost ANOTHER $525 million in Dutch pension funds due to concerns over its funding of coal, oil, and gas. This is a massive win for Dutch pensioners – not to mention all living creatures on Earth. 🧵
— Stop the Money Pipeline (@stopmoneypipeline.bsky.social) August 19, 2026 at 3:01 PM
BlackRock announced in February 2024 that it was transferring its Climate Action 100+ membership to its international arm and last year, just before anti-ESG President Donald Trump returned to power, it left the Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative.
Den Uyl said BlackRock's ESG controversies did not help the asset manager in the review process but "were not decisive," and described the switch to Cardano as "a business decision."
Asked about the development by IPE, a BlackRock spokesperson said: "We respect the fund's decision. We remain proud to manage more than €350 billion on behalf of Dutch clients."
However, as journalists and campaigners have noted this week, Recreatie's decision followed similar moves by other Dutch pension funds. PFZW said last September that it had stopped investing in stock funds managed by BlackRock, and PME in December pulled around €5 billion, or $5.9 billion.
By abandoning "megapolluter" BlackRock, Recreatie "is sending an important message," Fossil Free Netherlands said Tuesday. "Powerful entities that backtrack on climate policy under pressure from Trump will lose European clients. It matters who you partner with as a pension fund—and whose power you strengthen."
"BlackRock is one of the largest investors in fossil fuel companies worldwide and profits from the genocide in Gaza," Fossil Free Netherlands stressed. "BlackRock is one of the largest shareholders in many companies and, as a result, wields enormous influence over both the stock prices of individual companies and the global economy. Moreover, the company consistently prioritizes short-term profits over what matters to us all: a livable climate, fair working conditions, and human rights."
🎉 En wéér breekt een pensioenfonds met mega vervuiler BlackRock.Pensioenfonds Recreatie haalt 450 miljoen euro weg bij de Amerikaanse vermogensreus, onder andere vanwege onvrede met BlackRocks klimaatbeleid.Lees hier meer: fossielvrij.nl/blackrock-vl...
[image or embed]
— Fossielvrij NL (@fossielvrijnl.bsky.social) August 18, 2026 at 8:54 AM
In addition to the decisions by PFZW and PME, Fossil Free Netherlands pointed to European pension funds cutting ties "with the equally unscrupulous and powerful State Street," and an ongoing search for asset managers for New York City's pension funds, the latter of which was also highlighted by US campaigners this week.
New York Communities for Change senior director Jose Gonzalez said in a statement that Recreatie's "exit from BlackRock is the latest in a string of international funds that understand the urgency and long-term fiduciary responsibility resulting from climate change," and comes after NYC Comptroller Mark Levine announced the search, which is considering "ESG factors and limits on carbon."
"In the US context, although heartened by Comptroller Levine's June announcement that the pension systems will bid out contracts for its money managers, it is imperative that the comptroller is serious about meeting its 2040 net zero goals," the campaigner said. "NYC should continue to lead domestically on divestment, and with other pension funds as a universal owner. The proof will be when the comptroller's office moves AUM out of dirty managers like BlackRock and State Street to cleaner ones."
Alec Connon, Stop the Money Pipeline coalition director, also welcomed that "as much of the country swelters under extreme heat and breathes in toxic wildfire smoke, more and more major pension funds are moving money away from the world's dirtiest asset managers."
"As it continues its search for a new asset manager," he added, "New York City and Comptroller Levine have a great chance to continue the funds' climate leadership by divesting from BlackRock and selecting a new asset manager that takes the climate crisis and climate financial risk seriously."
As progressives nationwide seek to prove their politics can beat Republicans, California is still a battleground between the left-wing and centrist factions within the Democratic Party.
A new poll in California may offer a window into the national struggle to define the Democratic Party. In a state that’s often thought of as the capital of blue America, voters are now more likely to say they’re turned off by candidates who align themselves with the Democratic Party.
But that’s not because they’re moving right. The survey, published Wednesday by the Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies, found that voters are “more inclined” to vote for a candidate who identifies as a “progressive” or a “democratic socialist,” compared with those who call themselves “mainstream Democrats.”
Identifying as any sort of Republican, "MAGA" or otherwise, made voters say they were overwhelmingly "less inclined" to give their support.

That California voters lean left of the country at large is hardly shocking news, but the poll does provide yet another striking data point in the broader trend of Democratic voters revolting against the establishment of their own party, which has culminated in a surge of left victories nationwide.
Among self-identified Democratic voters in the state, just 48% said they would be "more inclined" to vote for someone who self-identifies with the mainstream of the party, compared with 58% who said they were inclined to vote for a "democratic socialist" and 60% who said they were inclined to vote for a "progressive."
What precisely these terms mean is not defined by the pollster, and in mainstream discourse, "progressives" like Michigan's Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed and "democratic socialists" like New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani are often spoken of in the same breath, largely because their platforms overlap significantly and both defeated better-funded Democratic opponents with greater institutional backing.
Whatever term is used to describe such candidates, pundits in establishment-friendly media have struggled to make sense of their recent wins.
But Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)—a long-time critic of corporate influence over the US political system who ran for president in 2016 and 2020 and is arguably more responsible than any other single figure for kicking off this shift in the Democratic electorate—wrote in an op-ed for The Guardian on Wednesday that the reason behind it “is not complicated.”
"We now have more income and wealth inequality than at any time in American history. The top 1% now own more wealth than the bottom 93%, and one man, Elon Musk, owns more wealth than the bottom 50% of US households," he wrote. "Not surprisingly, working families are tired of status quo politics and the same old, same old establishment policies that have failed them for years. They want change, real change—and are supporting progressive candidates who are fighting for that change."
That is why, he argues, candidates who have run on campaign finance reform, establishing a single-payer healthcare system, stronger union protections, higher taxes on the rich, and an end to aggressive foreign interventions in countries like Iran and military support for Israel are seeing success.
In November, progressives like El-Sayed, as well as Minnesota Senate candidate Peggy Flanagan, Florida Senate candidate Angie Nixon, Michigan House candidate William Lawrence, Pennsylvania House candidate Bob Brooks, and others, will try to prove that their politics can win in competitive races against Republicans. So will Randy Villegas, who is aiming to unseat Republican Rep. David Valadao in California's 22nd district.
But California's "jungle primary" system, which lets the top two candidates across all parties face off in the general election, will continue for the next several months to be a front in the Democratic Party's internal war.
One closely watched race is in California’s 14th District, near Oakland, where a special election for the seat vacated by the disgraced former Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell has come down to the wire between the progressive state Sen. Aisha Wahab (D-10) and the centrist-leaning transportation official Melissa Hernandez (D).
The two are starkly divided on Israel; while Wahab has called its actions in Gaza" genocide" and called for an end to weapons aid, Hernandez has been noncommittal.
Wahab has also taken stronger stances against corporate abuses and US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and called for significant police reforms, while Hernandez has run on public safety and business-friendly policies.
After steamrolling her opponents in the June primary, with a 25-point lead over Hernandez, Wahab was hit with a $6.3 million spending blitz from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) in the months leading up to this past Tuesday's general election. As of Thursday, the race is too close to call, with Wahab ahead by just over 1,300 votes as 62% of ballots have been counted.
Whoever wins this race will hold the seat for the remainder of Swalwell's term. But the two will face each other again in November with new district lines approved by voters last year as part of a Democratic redistricting effort.
In the 7th district, Sacramento City Council member Mai Vang (D), who was endorsed by the Democratic Socialists of America, unexpectedly finished with more votes in the June primary than 11-term Democratic Rep. Doris Matsui.
The 40-year-old Vang outflanked Matsui, who is more than twice her age, on the left by aggressively championing the abolition of ICE, Medicare for All, and a wealth tax proposal by Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.). The two will face off again one-on-one in November's runoff.
The mayor's race in Los Angeles, between incumbent Karen Bass and democratic socialist City Council member Nithya Raman, will be another test for the left.
Bass, a former member of Congress, has strong institutional support from the Democratic Party, including endorsements from former Vice President Kamala Harris and California Gov. Gavin Newsom.
Raman is challenging her less on ideological grounds and more on the question of competent governance, seeking to overhaul the city's homelessness bureaucracy and construct more affordable housing. She has also pushed back against Bass' call to hire more police officers and advocated instead for investing in more unarmed civilian first responders.
Gaza is suffering from "a shelter crisis which runs far deeper than just physical damage."
It's been 10 months since a ceasefire agreement was reached between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, but in addition to continued attacks on the exclave—in which more than 1,250 Palestinians have been killed since last October—households across Gaza are being endangered on a constant basis by "a shelter crisis which runs far deeper than just physical damage" to residential buildings, as the Norwegian Refugee Council said Thursday.
Ninety-four percent of the population—about 1.98 million people—are in need of shelter-related aid in order to "live safely and with dignity," said the group, "including fuel, energy, and essential household items."
The NRC and the International Organization for Migration lead the Palestine Shelter Cluster, which coordinates humanitarian aid focused on addressing shelter needs in Gaza and the West Bank. The organization's new report, "Exposed on All Sides," describes how funding shortfalls as well as Israel's continued restrictions on shelter materials have left the vast majority of Palestinians in Gaza exposed to "serious health and safety risks."
The Shelter Cluster assessed nearly 2,000 household interviews conducted between June 14-28 in accessible areas in northern Gaza, Gaza City, Deir al-Balah, and Khan Younis.
It categorized the households' severity of needs on a scale of 1-5, with conditions assessed as minimal, stressed, crisis, critical, or catastrophic. More than 4 in 5 households were facing critical or catastrophic conditions, with the families struggling the most described as living in conditions "so poor they were considered a risk to life." Just 12% of households were assessed as being in the least severe categories.
With Israel's bombardment of Gaza damaging or destroying approximately 92% of residential buildings, nearly two-thirds of families interviewed by the Shelter Cluster were living in tents or other makeshift shelters that were meant to be temporary.
"Ten months after the October 2025 ceasefire, most families have lived more than a year in shelters that were never designed for long-term accommodation."
More than half of those households had been living in the same tent for over a year, and more than half of the makeshift housing was in poor or very poor condition. More than 100,000 households are living in shelters with "major deterioration to flooring, walls, and frames," said NRC.
With fuel both unaffordable and difficult to obtain, daily tasks were challenging for the families assessed by the Shelter Cluster. Eighty-four percent of households said their solutions for heating their homes were mostly or entirely ineffective. Nearly 50% of households said they had been burning plastic, tires, garbage, or cardboard in order to prepare food.
"Their use for meal preparation presents serious health risks from toxic smoke and food contamination," reads the report.
Jehan Salim, national coordinator for the Shelter Cluster, emphasized that "a shelter is not adequate simply because it has four walls or a roof."
"Families need to be able to sleep, cook, wash, and keep their children safe inside it," said Salim. "Ten months after the October 2025 ceasefire, most families have lived more than a year in shelters that were never designed for long-term accommodation. The materials needed to repair homes, restore basic services, and provide improved shelters are still not entering Gaza at anything close to the scale required.”
Only 1 in 10 households received shelter materials or basic household assistance in the month prior to the survey, and the Shelter Cluster's partners in Gaza reported "very limited in-country stocks of tents, blankets, or mattresses" in June.
"The entry of shelter materials and equipment also remains constrained by strict and frequently changing entry restrictions. Long advance-notification requirements, repackaging rules, repeated submission processes, and unpredictable approvals can delay or prevent supplies from reaching Gaza, keeping available stocks low and limiting the quality and scale of the response," reads the report.
Israel's "dual-use" restrictions—which claim that everyday items for basic household needs could also be used for violent purposes by Hamas—have contributed to the chronically low supply of "fuel, solar energy equipment, construction and repair materials, heavy machinery, and debris-clearance equipment," said the Shelter Cluster.
"People remain in appalling conditions because Israeli restrictions are preventing even the most basic housing materials from entering Gaza," said Jan Egeland, secretary general of the NRC. "Without a rapid procurement of and access for materials, the coming winter will be catastrophic. Israel must lift its restrictions and allow for predictable entry of shelter materials."
The European Union, United Nations, and World Bank's Gaza Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment (RDNA) report earlier this year found that $26.3 billion was required in the first 18 months following the ceasefire deal to restore essential services, rebuild infrastructure, and support Gaza’s economic recovery. An estimated $71 billion will be needed over the next decade.
In May, the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs reported that its 2026 flash appeal for $4 billion was only 12% funded.
"Funding levels must be increased," said Egeland, "so that Palestinians families can get out of decaying temporary shelters and into something that provides more protection from the elements."
"They are realizing how wildly unpopular Big AI’s agenda is with the American people."
Corporate-friendly Republicans who are typically hostile to regulation are attempting to reshape their image in the lead-up to the November midterms in what critics say is a cynical attempt to capitalize on mounting grassroots backlash against artificial intelligence data centers.
Semafor reported Wednesday that prominent Republicans, having "cheered the AI boom," are now "scrambling to find a new identity as middle-ground pragmatists," even as they receive campaign contributions from companies directly involved in or benefiting from data center construction and maintenance. The National Republican Senatorial Committee recognized in an internal memo that data centers have "become a sleeper issue for the entire election cycle."
Semafor noted that "instead of a moratorium on building new facilities, a growing number of GOP candidates have called for 'guardrails' to protect skeptical communities from unchecked AI growth, as well as the rollback of industry tax breaks."
"These Republicans’ rebrand also involves a bid for the high ground by attacking Democrats with more nuanced positions on data centers," the outlet added.
Semafor points specifically to Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's sudden decision in June to "audit tech companies’ use of the electric grid," as well as his vow to work with state lawmakers to repeal the companies' tax breaks. The Houston Chronicle reported last month that "several of the Republican governor’s most generous financial backers are increasingly investing in the boom that has voters in deep-red rural parts of the state up in arms... including "real estate titan Ed Roski, Jr., who gave $1 million in April, and energy executive Kelcy Warren, who gave $500,000 in June."
Abbott is facing state Rep. Gina Hinojosa (D-49) in November. In an ad debuted earlier this week, Hinojosa's campaign said Abbott "took $20 million in campaign donations from data center executives and companies, and he gave them billions in tax breaks."
New entry into the data center wars: @GinaHinojosaTX going after Greg Abbott.
A woman uses an AI chatbot to ask why her electric bill is going up; it answers, Greg Abbott. pic.twitter.com/NohUKGx53o
— David Weigel (@daveweigel) August 18, 2026
Semafor observed Wednesday that the "Republican shift is underway in Michigan, too," but it is "most intense in Wisconsin," where Republican gubernatorial nominee Tom Tiffany is attempting to posture as tough on data centers despite his voting record in the US House and fundraising history.
Tiffany's campaign has tried to label Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley, Wisconsin's Democratic gubernatorial nominee, as "Data Center David."
"Tiffany’s social media posts that clipped Crowley’s answers to data center questions were reshared and condemned by many progressives who had supported [democratic socialist Francesca] Hong," Semafor reported. "That obscured what are in fact minor policy differences between the candidates: Tiffany wanted community input and for data centers to pay for their electricity, and so did Crowley. Like Texas, Wisconsin has passed bipartisan tax breaks to entice companies to do business there and were losing out on revenue when the profits blew away their projections."
Charlie Blaettler, political director of the Guardrails Alliance—a coalition working to expose the AI industry's growing political influence—said in a statement Wednesday that "the Republican Party is panicking because they sold out to the AI industry—a while ago—and they know it."
"But now they are realizing how wildly unpopular Big AI’s agenda is with the American people," said Blaettler. "The GOP and AI’s unaccountable billionaires are scrambling to backtrack and find a new way to pull the wool over the eyes of the public so they can get what they want: a Congress that will do their bidding and an AI future that benefits them, not the many."
"If I were the mayor of a town or the governor of a state, and I had a chance to get a big plant in, an AI plant, or a data center, I would absolutely want it," said the billionaire president.
President Donald Trump on Wednesday insisted that Americans should welcome artificial intelligence data centers in their communities, despite polls showing widespread opposition to their construction across the US, as well as mounting evidence of their negative impacts on the environment, public health, and Americans' utility bills.
During a White House event with cryptocurrency and technology leaders, Trump was asked what he would say to working-class voters who backed him in the 2024 election but are skeptical about the benefits of AI.
Trump said he saw no reason why there should be opposition to building data centers, which have drawn criticism for producing pollution and forcing major spikes in utility bills thanks to their massive energy needs.
"If I were the mayor of a town or the governor of a state, and I had a chance to get a big plant in, an AI plant, or a data center, I would absolutely want it," Trump explained. "The jobs are enormous and the money paid, the taxes paid, are enormous. And if you don't take it, you're going to be left behind because there are plenty of places that want it."
The president then suggested that the only reason data centers aren't popular is due to lack of effective propaganda from the tech industry.
"Maybe it could use a little public relations help," he said.
Trump: "If I were the mayor of a town or the governor or a state, and I had a chance to get a big data center, I would absolutely want it" pic.twitter.com/9caqZ8L76b
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) August 19, 2026
An internal memo written by the National Republican Senatorial Committee that leaked to Axios on Wednesday warned Silicon Valley that data centers were massively unpopular throughout the country and were putting GOP candidates at risk.
In particular, the memo singled out the US Senate race in Ohio, where former Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown has used incumbent Republican Sen. Jon Husted's support for data centers as a cudgel.
“If voters’ perceptions of data centers are not fixed quickly,” the memo cautioned, “the campaign against them will expand far beyond Ohio.”
The New York Times reported on Thursday that the backlash to data centers has gotten so strong that it has inspired recall campaigns against officials who approved their construction in states including Missouri, Oklahoma, and Michigan.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who has proposed a nationwide moratorium on AI data center construction, told the Times that opposition to Big Tech should be a basic litmus test for any ambitious politician.
"People are standing up and saying, ‘Sorry, we don’t want these data centers in our communities for a number of reasons,'" Sanders said. "If you can’t have the guts to stand up to some large corporation, you should not continue serving in office."
“Fire management," said one researcher, "cannot replace climate mitigation.”
Wildfires raging across Europe this summer have burned through more than 1.4 million acres across France, Spain, Italy, and even countries with typically milder climates, including the United Kingdom and Belgium—and a study published Thursday warned that the continuation of high carbon emissions would nearly triple the amount of burnt land from wildfires by the end of the century.
Climate action that reduces emissions, including a transition away from fossil fuel extraction and toward solar, wind, and other renewable energy sources, would mean about 39% more land would be burned through during fire seasons across the European Union by 2100, according to the research by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK).
But if policymakers fail to take sufficient action, according to the researchers' models, an estimated 192% more land would be burned each year by the end of the century.
The massive increase in wildfire destruction would likely mean major upheaval across Europe; as wildfires tore through Spain and France last month, nearly 270,000 people were forced to evacuate.
Hundreds of people have been killed in European wildfires over the past decade, including at least 14 people in Spain's recent blazes, which grew rapidly amid soaring temperatures, and three firefighters in Greece.
The researchers at PIK compared the projected annual burnt area for 2070-2100 with a model of results for the period between 2000-2030. An increase in hot, dry weather, which scientists have linked to fossil fuel emissions, was the biggest driver of wildfire destruction in the model.
"If fires become really extreme, our ability to contain them might break down, and we do not know yet where this point is."
“Our results indicate there could be widespread increases in burned area even under comparatively low warming of around 1.8°C. But if we emit more, and global temperatures rise by roughly 3.6°C, we see fires become much more prevalent, especially around the Mediterranean and across much of Western and Central Europe, including areas that to date have not experienced many fires,” said Maik Billing, a researcher at PIK and lead author of the study, which was published Thursday in Global Change Biology.
A global temperature rise of 3.6°C would mean fire weather would intensify “virtually all of Europe” by 2100, the scientists said.
Currently, 2.6°C of global heating is expected by the end of the century under climate policies now in place.
The researchers also examined how human action to improve fire management, including training emergency crews and improving equipment and coordination, could mitigate some damage.
"Continued improvements in fire management have the potential to reduce burned area by 92% in a 1.8°C future and 72% at roughly 3.6°C," said PIK. "However, the authors cautioned that the results could be optimistic when it comes to the efficacy of fire management in a much warmer climate."
Thomas Hickler, a scientist at the Senckenberg Society for Nature Research and a co-author of the study, said: “We see fire conditions are increasing, so we need to invest more... Our projections show that this can make a significant difference."
"But if fires become really extreme, our ability to contain them might break down, and we do not know yet where this point is," said Hickler. "The recent record fires in France clearly show that we cannot simply extrapolate from the experiences of the past."
Billing emphasized that regardless of investments in firefighting, "if we go on a path of high emissions... we still see strong increases in burnt area."
“Fire management," said Billing, "cannot replace climate mitigation.”