May, 24 2022, 03:46pm EDT
![National Iranian American Council (NIAC)](https://assets.rbl.ms/32012621/origin.jpg)
Senators Ready to Clash on Iran Negotiations in Wednesday Hearing
WASHINGTON
On Wednesday, May 25, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee will host the State Department's leading Iran negotiator, Robert Malley. The hearing comes at an extremely serious moment: Iran is on the brink of becoming a nuclear threshold state; yet the hearing may be profoundly unserious, offering political opponents of the negotiations an opportunity to score political points and further undermine ongoing diplomatic efforts to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran. We encourage editorial boards and journalists to provide serious coverage of the current stakes of the Iran nuclear crisis and cut through the political circus being constructed by organizations and lawmakers dedicated to opposing U.S. diplomacy with Iran.
While some members of the committee may be preparing to score political points or get their "gotcha" moment to brandish their Iran hawk or pro-Israel credentials, in the real world we are on a proliferation precipice: since the Trump Administration's decision to abandon the JCPOA, Iran has gradually ratcheted up its nuclear work and is now on the precipice of becoming a nuclear threshold state. Nonproliferation experts have warned that Iran's nuclear breakout - the time it would take to secure sufficient fissile material for a nuclear weapon, if Iran chose to do so - is now just two weeks and dropping. This means that Iran could soon have an undetectable breakout capability.
Proponents of diplomacy argue that the restoration of the 2015 accord that the Trump administration violated, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, is vital to extending that window and avoiding the worst case scenario of Iran as a threshold nuclear power or a military campaign to set back Iran's program that could invite a host of disastrous consequences. Opponents, however, argue against an agreement but have not offered any viable diplomatic solutions to the issue at hand - namely, what can the U.S. do without an agreement and short of a bombing campaign that would prevent Iran from reaching this nuclear milestone?
Unfortunately, observers looking to this Senate committee hearing hoping for a substantive update or debate are likely to be disappointed as the hearing may shape up to be highly-scripted political theater - as opponents of diplomatic efforts regarding Iran seek to politicize the debate and double down on personal attacks and insinuations against Malley and the Biden Administration. The appearance of the leading U.S. official in the midst of sensitive negotiations is significant, and opponents of the efforts will likely utilize the opportunity to make life even more difficult for U.S. diplomats. One of the two witnesses invited to testify in the second part of the hearing, Foundation for Defense of Democracy's Mark Dubowitz, has himself engaged in personal attacks and trolling against Malley, and was the most prominent advocate for sanctions during the Trump Administration that were designed to impede a Democratic Administration from restoring an Iran nuclear deal.
The leadership of the committee is also not representative of the views of the Senate or the American public. Americans broadly support a restoration of the nuclear agreement. The issue is highly partisan, with all but a handful of Republican legislators opposed in lockstep to the accord and all but a handful of Democrats supportive of efforts to restore the agreement. Yet the Democratic chairman of the Committee, Robert Menendez, is a stalwart Iran hawk who clashed publicly with Obama administration officials, including Antony Blinken, and is playing a similar role under Biden.
Below are key details to keep in mind in advance of this pivotal hearing:
Nonproliferation Benefits:
Under a renewal of the JCPOA, the advancements in Iran's nuclear program would be rolled back. Under these strong nonproliferation benefits, Iran would be unable to procure a nuclear weapon for the foreseeable future. If a deal is finalized, we will see the following immediate nonproliferation benefits:
As of February, Iran had more than 3,000 kilograms of enriched uranium and currently has approximately 42 kg enriched to the 60% U-235 threshold.
- Under the JCPOA, Iran reduces its enriched uranium stockpile to 300 kg or less, a fraction of the amount needed for a single nuclear weapon with further enrichment. This restriction would remain through 2030 even if no new agreement is reached;
- Iran ships out or downblends its 20% and 60% enriched uranium stockpile and limits enrichment to 3.67%, far below weapons grade, through 2030;
Iran is presently enriching with advanced centrifuges at the deeply-buried Fordow facility.
- Iran would halt all uranium enrichment at Fordow and engage in no proliferation-sensitive work at the facility through 2030;
Iran has significantly expanded its work with advanced centrifuges and uranium metal.
- Under the JCPOA, Iran would remove excess advanced centrifuges and place them in monitored storage, ensuring that only IR-1 centrifuges are used to accumulate enriched uranium through at least 2025;
- Iran would halt work on uranium metal through 2030, and ship out any uranium metal it has produced;
IAEA Inspectors have limited access to Iran's enrichment facilities and other nuclear facilities without the implementation of the Additional Protocol.
- Iran will resume compliance with the IAEA Additional Protocol, ensuring Iran's entire nuclear fuel cycle will be closely monitored and the IAEA has enhanced powers to detect any potential covert cheating;
Iran's breakout - the time it would take for Iran to produce sufficient fissile material for a single nuclear weapon - is down to days.
- Iran's breakout time would once again be measured in months instead of days and could approach the 12+ month timeline established by the JCPOA in 2016.
>> Critically, there is no viable diplomatic alternative that could establish a similar level of nonproliferation protections. Bombing Iran's nuclear facilities would not erase Iran's nuclear knowledge and would only incentivize Iran to build back deeper and without international inspectors, ensuring Iran would eventually weaponize.
What's The Final Hurdle?
Enrique Mora, Deputy Secretary General of the European External Action Service, has traveled to Iran twice since March in an effort to resolve what may be the last remaining hurdle in restoring the JCPOA: the Trump administration's unprecedented designation of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) - a major branch of the armed forces in Iran - as a foreign terrorist organization (FTO). Iran is adamant that the unprecedented designation be removed as part of a return to the JCPOA, while the Biden administration appears to have ruled this out and insisted on separate concessions outside of the nuclear file in return.
- Mark Dubowitz, a witness in Panel II, responded to Democratic pledges to return to the JCPOA in April 2019 by urging Trump to implement a "wall of additional sanctions that a [Democratic] successor could not easily dismantle." Among the many suggestions was a call to designate the IRGC as an FTO, suggesting that "international companies would stay out of Iran" as long as it is in place. Trump followed suit days later.
- The designation of the IRGC as an FTO helped to push Iran out of compliance with the JCPOA and triggered a dramatic deterioration in regional security, as many observers foresaw at the time.
- As State Department spokesperson Ned Price stated, "From 2012 to 2018, there were no significant attacks, there were no attacks against U.S. service members, diplomatic facilities in Iraq. That changed in 2018. And between 2019 and 2020, the number of attacks from Iran-backed groups went up 400 percent. This was in the aftermath of the decision to abandon the JCPOA. It was in the aftermath of the decision to apply the FTO designation to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps. It was in the aftermath of the killing of Soleimani, the IRGC chief."
- The IRGC has been one of the world's most sanctioned entities, which has not changed regardless of the status of the JCPOA. Even if the FTO designation is removed in the weeks ahead, the IRGC would remain one of the most sanctioned entities on planet Earth due to multiple overlapping sanctions, and will remain radioactive to outside business.
- While the FTO designation has imposed significant costs on U.S. interests, it is almost completely duplicative of existing U.S. sanctions authorities against the IRGC. As Sec. Blinken stated, "as a practical matter, the designation does not really gain you much because there are a myriad of other sanctions on the IRGC. The primary sanction when it comes to the FTO designation actually is a travel ban and the people affected by that ban when it comes to the IRGC - as you know the IRGC is a large force that has a lot of conscripts in it. They would not be able to travel, the people that are the real bad guys have no intentions of traveling here anyway."
- From Iran's perspective, it has already compromised on some of its preferences, including not demanding compensation for the U.S. withdrawal or guarantees the deal would be implemented by the U.S. beyond 2024. Particularly given the perceived trail from FTO designation to the assassination of IRGC general Qassem Soleimani, it has become exceedingly difficult for Iran to relent on the FTO dispute.
The bottom line: it would be disastrous for the Biden administration to allow a duplicative designation designed to tie Biden's hands to be the difference between rolling back Iran's nuclear program through diplomacy and Iran becoming a nuclear threshold state or the U.S. going to war to stop that outcome.
Failures of Maximum Pressure:
Trump's so-called "maximum pressure" policies failed across the board. Biden administration officials routinely point out as much, though they are less forthcoming about their failure to find a way off the maximum pressure track. Biden has relieved no significant sanctions, and the Iranian economy has been devastated throughout the sixteen months of Biden's time in office. Ordinary Iranians, and not the regime, pay the biggest costs when inflation hovers around 40%, pushing millions into poverty.
When Donald Trump withdrew from the JCPOA, he promised to start "working with our allies to find a real, comprehensive, and lasting solution to the Iranian nuclear threat. This will include efforts to eliminate the threat of Iran's ballistic missile program, to stop its terrorist activities worldwide, and to block its menacing activity across the Middle East."
All of that was a lie.
- Rather than a real, comprehensive and lasting solution to the nuclear threat, Iran went from a full year breakout to days. Some of the knowledge Iran has gained in this time can't be unlearned.
- Iran's missile program became more advanced than ever, with Iran executing a stunning attack on Saudi facilities at Abqaiq and retaliating on U.S. bases in Iraq after the killing of Soleimani.
- Tensions throughout the Middle East soared, with threats increasing against both U.S. troops in Iraq and on oil shipping through the Persian Gulf.
Critically, maximum pressure has impoverished ordinary Iranians and helped worsen the human rights situation in the country.
- Within Iran, withdrawal from the deal gave hardliners an upper hand in wresting control of all levers of government back from moderates.
- Human rights within the country has deteriorated further, with vocal human rights champions being subjected to harsh prison sentences and many organizers focused on providing basic sustenance.
- As human rights defender Narges Mohammadi stated this year prior to the start of a new, unjust prison term for her political activities, "Economic sanctions, because they weren't targeted or based on adequate knowledge of the state, weakened Iranians economically more than they weakened the Iranian regime...In fact, they strengthened the Iranian regime, and hard-line individuals and groups in the country, including the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. This did not benefit democracy in Iran."
What's the alternative to the JCPOA?
Biden has been right to try to restore the JCPOA, though he has lacked the political will that has been necessary to reach the finish line. Regrettably, this means that the likelihood of reaching a no deal scenario has increased dramatically. If this occurs, Biden is likely to be left with two disastrous options: Iran on the threshold of a nuclear weapon or war to try to prevent that outcome from happening.
The architects of maximum pressure have been clear what they think Biden should do. Even when negotiations show promise, there is hardly a month that goes by without major calls to bomb Iran.
- This includes Mark Dubowitz and Mathew Kroenig, who in January published a piece saying that when nuclear negotiations fail, "the president should order military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities to prevent Tehran from building the bomb."
- War hawks consistently downplay the costs of war and play up the potential gains - this was the case in the drumbeat to war against Saddam Hussein's Iraq and is the same for advocates of war with Iran.
- War with Iran would not be the cakewalk many portray. Iran has prepared for such a conflict for years and has numerous capabilities, including missiles and proxies, that could quickly turn a conflict over Iran's nuclear program into a messy regional war.
- If such a war were to come under the Biden administration, with oil markets tight and Russia's invasion of Ukraine still ongoing, it would be a huge disaster, militarily, strategically and economically. A diplomatic solution is still by far the best option for the U.S. and Iran. Biden must see it through.
The National Iranian American Council (NIAC) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization founded in 2002 to give voice to the Iranian-American community. From being the trusted voice on U.S.- Iran relations, to pushing forth legislation that protects individuals of Iranian heritage from systematic discrimination, to celebrating our cultural heritage, NIAC creates a lasting impact in the lives of the members of our community.
(202) 386-6325LATEST NEWS
Kamala Harris Wins March for Our Lives' First-Ever Endorsement
"Kamala Harris has proven herself to be a thoughtful and forceful leader on gun violence, who has time and again listened to young people and fought for our lives."
Jul 24, 2024
March for Our Lives, which was launched six years ago after yet another U.S. mass shooting, announced its first-ever political endorsement on Wednesday, backing Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris' bid for the White House.
"The stakes couldn't be higher," said the group, which was founded in the wake of the February 2018 massacre at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida. "As one of the largest youth-led movements in the nation, we are clear-eyed about the challenge ahead and we believe that Kamala Harris is uniquely suited to meet this moment."
Warning of the threat posed by Republican former President Donald Trump—who just survived an assassination attempt—and his running mate, U.S. Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio), March for Our Lives said that "the country that young people will soon inherit stands at the precipice—on one side, authoritarianism that threatens our fundamental rights, including our right to live freely without fear of gun violence; on the other, a world where we can keep fighting to build the future that young people know we deserve."
"We need an ardent defender of democracy, a gun violence prevention champion, and a leader who will listen to young people, give us a seat at the table, and fight for our future. We believe that Kamala Harris is that candidate, and the right person to stand up for us and fight for the country we deserve," the organization continued, detailing how she has been "a forceful champion for gun safety and for young people" as vice president and a U.S. senator representing California.
"Young people are inheriting an increasingly precarious world," the group added, highlighting youth deaths from gun violence, Israel's war on the Gaza Strip, the escalating climate emergency, and far-right politicians pushing extremist policies. "We have been struggling to feel excited about voting in this election, and are increasingly pessimistic that change is possible. But we know that another Trump presidency is simply not an option that young people can afford—our lives are literally at stake."
Harris began seeking the Democratic nomination for November after President Joe Biden dropped out and endorsed her on Sunday. March for Our Lives said that "we call on her to run a campaign that fights for the policy solutions that young people want, like an assault weapons ban, action on climate change, a vigorous defense of abortion, court reform, and an immediate and lasting cease-fire in Gaza. Young people are savvy voters, who will see through empty promises and cynical horsetrading. We believe that Kamala will step above that and fight for a bold, progressive future—and we will hold her accountable for that."
Since Sunday, Parkland shooting survivor and March for Our Lives co-founder David Hogg has been fiercely supporting Harris, posting on his social media frequent updates about her historic fundraising successes over the past few days.
"Kamala Harris has proven herself to be a thoughtful and forceful leader on gun violence, who has time and again listened to young people and fought for our lives," Hogg said in a statement Wednesday. "Given her strong record on gun safety and prioritizing youth voices during her time in office, I'm proud that Kamala Harris will receive March for Our Lives' first-ever endorsement, and I'm so excited for our work to mobilize young people for her campaign."
Natalie Fall, the group's executive director, toldABC News—which first reported on the endorsement—that "we see a lot of energy around Vice President Harris in this election; there's no denying that. I think everybody's seeing it right now."
"I just think young people in particular didn't really see themselves represented or reflected in the Biden ticket in the way that they wanted. It's not to say that President Biden hasn't had great accomplishments," she explained. "But I think we need someone who can meet this moment and who is up to the challenge of taking Donald Trump to task and really defeating his effort to erode all of our institutions and our democracy."
March for Our Lives members plan to participate in this year's election through creative campaigns, door-knocking, and phone banks, Fall said. In a statement, she added that the group aims to elect not only Harris but also candidates "up and down the ballot" who support its priorities.
"March for Our Lives will work to mobilize young people across the country to support Vice President Harris and other down-ballot candidates, with a particular focus on the states and races where we can make up the margin of victory—in Arizona, New York, Michigan, and Florida," she pledged. "We are ready to double down on this commitment and elect the first woman, first Black woman, and the first person of South Asian descent to become our next president."
The gun violence prevention group's endorsement adds to Harris' mounting pile. Throughout the week, she has also received support from many Democratic governors and members of Congress as well as climate, labor, and reproductive rights groups.
As young people rally behind Harris, she is also seeing support from advocates for older Americans. Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works, wrote in a Wednesday opinion piece for Common Dreams that "Joe Biden has been the best president for seniors in over half a century. Kamala Harris will be even better."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Ben-Gvir Endorses Trump, Says He's More Likely to Back War on Iran
The Israeli security minister, who leads the far-right Jewish Power party, accused the Biden administration of thwarting Israel's victory against Hamas.
Jul 24, 2024
Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir endorsed former U.S. President Donald Trump—the 2024 Republican nominee—for the White House in an interview published Wednesday in which he accused the Biden administration of preventing Israel from winning its war on Gaza.
"I believe that with Trump, Israel will receive the backing to act against Iran," Ben-Gvir, who heads the far-right Otzma Yehudit (Jewish Power) party, toldBloomberg. "With Trump, it will be clearer that enemies must be defeated."
"A cabinet minister is supposed to maintain neutrality," the 48-year-old minister conceded, "but that's impossible to do after [U.S. President Joe] Biden."
"The U.S. has always stood behind Israel in terms of armaments and weapons, yet this time the sense was that we were being reckoned with—that we were trying to be prevented from winning. That happened on Biden's watch and fed Hamas with lots of energy," added Ben-Gvir, who was convicted in 2007 of incitement to racism after he advocated the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.
While Biden, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, and other administration officials have decried Israel's indiscriminate bombing of Gaza and high civilian casualties—at least 140,000 Palestinians killed, injured, or missing, according to local and international agencies—the U.S. has approved billions of dollars in new military aid and more than 100 arms sales to Israel since October.
During his White House tenure, Trump—who boasted that he "fought for Israel like no president ever before"—moved the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem and brokered the Abraham Accords between Israel and Arab nations Bahrain, Morocco, Sudan, and the United Arab Emirates.
Trump has said that Israel should "get the job done" in Gaza, while criticizing the Israel Defense Forces for posting videos showing its obliteration of the embattled Palestinian enclave.
"I don't know why they released wartime shots like that. I guess it makes them look tough. But to me, it doesn't make them look tough," Trump said in April. "They're losing the PR war. They're losing it big. But they've got to finish what they started, and they've got to finish it fast, and we have to get on with life."
While Trump says he wants a deal with Iran to prevent it from developing nuclear weapons, as president he unilaterally withdrew the U.S. from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action—also known as the Iran nuclear deal—and oversaw a "maximum pressure" campaign against Tehran featuring deadly economic sanctions.
On the advice of Iran hawks in his administration including then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Trump also ordered the January 2020 assassination of Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Gen. Qasem Soleimani in Iraq.
Ben-Gvir's interview was published as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was set to address a joint meeting of U.S. Congress Wednesday in Washington, D.C. A growing number of Democratic lawmakers have called for not only a cease-fire in Gaza but also a suspension of U.S. military aid to Israel, whose conduct in the war is on trial for genocide at the International Court of Justice.
Dozens of Democratic lawmakers and Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont have signaled they will skip Netanyahu's speech. Vice President Kamala Harris, who is also the Senate president, said she will not preside over Wednesday's session. Harris, who is the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee in the wake of Biden's withdrawal from the race on Sunday, said she will meet privately with Netanyahu on Thursday.
Echoing calls from groups including CodePink and the Council on American Islamic Relations, Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) said this week that the prime minister should be arrested for war crimes and genocide.
Karim Khan, the International Criminal Court prosecutor, has
applied for arrest warrants for Netanyahu, Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, and three Hamas leaders for alleged war crimes including extermination committed on and after October 7.
Keep ReadingShow Less
US Leads Global Surge in Oil and Gas Expansion, Analysis Finds
"The U.S. has become a petrostate and is still, even under President Biden, permitting new drilling," John Sterman of MIT said. "The developed countries don't show any significant efforts to limit drilling."
Jul 24, 2024
Five wealthy countries including the United States have led a global surge in oil and gas development in 2024, threatening international climate goals, according to an analysis published by The Guardian on Wednesday.
The U.S., United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and Norway together are projected by the end of 2024 to have issued licenses for fossil fuel projects that will emit 11.9 billion metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions over their lifetimes—far more than in any of the previous five years, and roughly equal to a full year of emissions from China, the world's highest emitter—according to industry data analyzed by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) and shared with the newspaper.
The five states are responsible for more than two-thirds of all oil and gas licenses issued globally since 2020, with the U.S. alone accounting for half of the world total. President Joe Biden's administration increased oil and gas licensing by 20% over Trump-era levels, and issued a record 758 new extraction licenses in 2023, according to the analysis.
"The U.S. has become a petrostate and is still, even under President Biden, permitting new drilling," John Sterman, a climate policy expert and professor at Massachusetts Institute of Technology's business school, told The Guardian. "The developed countries don't show any significant efforts to limit drilling."
Sterman pointed to a "fundamental contradiction" between rich countries' international commitments and their ongoing fossil fuel expansion. "We can't keep going on like this," he said.
Revealed: wealthy western countries lead in global oil and gas expansion
Surge by world’s wealthiest countries – such as the US and the UK- threatens to unleash 12bn tonnes of planet-heating emissions.
By @olliemilman & @ninalakhani https://t.co/esY5IuIfi9
— jonathanwatts (@jonathanwatts) July 24, 2024
The industry's grip on U.S. politicians has made significant policy change in Washington difficult. In the past decade, fossil fuel companies have spent $1.25 billion on federal lobbying and more than $650 million on campaign contributions, according to OpenSecrets data.
The Conservative-led U.K. government issued a surge of North Sea licenses in the first half of this year, but lost power to the Labour Party following a general election earlier this month. It's not yet clear if Labour will be able or willing to rescind licenses already issued. Currently the U.K. is set to finish 2024 with 72 licenses for projects that would create 101 million metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions over their lifetimes—a 50-year high, according to the IISD analysis. Norway and Australia are also seeing major upticks this year.
Capital expenditure at the world's largest oil companies is up 60% since 2020, with $302 billion projected to be spent on well development this year, The Guardian reported. The fossil fuel expansion continues even though the reserves in rich countries are generally hard to reach, as more accessible reserves have already been tapped.
The expansion also comes in spite of disturbing climate news—2023 was hottest year on record, June was the 13th consecutive hottest month, and Monday was the hottest day, having broken a record set the previous day—and dire warnings from leading international institutions. No new fossil fuel projects can proceed if the world is to meet the 1.5° Paris agreement target, the International Energy Agency declared in 2021.
In December, at the United Nations COP28 climate summit, the world's nations agreed to transition away from fossil fuels, though the agreement was viewed by climate campaigners as weakly worded and ridden with loopholes.
Delegates from wealthy Western nations often present themselves as change-seekers in international climate negotiations, but the IISD analysis adds to evidence that such nations are in fact a big part of the problem.
"Fossil fuel corporations, and the governments that support them, will never stop unless forced to," Bill McGuire, a climate scientist at University College London, said on social media in response to the analysis. "Neither has any interest in the future of the climate, our world, or their own kids."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular