December, 27 2021, 10:17am EDT
Coalition Led by AFL-CIO Demands FIFA Commit to Human and Labor Rights Standards Ahead of 2026 World Cup
Leading labor and human rights groups launch campaign with letter outlining demands for soccer federation as it selects U.S. cities to host 2026 games.
WASHINGTON
Today, the AFL-CIO launched a new campaign in partnership with other leading labor and human rights organizations to push FIFA to prioritize labor and human rights during the city selection process for the 2026 World Cup, which will be hosted by cities across the United States, Canada and Mexico. The coalition of groups released an open letter to FIFA on Monday demanding the governing body commit to a series of minimum labor and human rights standards and agree to negotiate with national human rights stakeholders prior to December 31, which is the deadline FIFA has set for prospective host cities to finalize and publicize their human rights plans.
Given the lack of substantive progress on these issues in meetings with FIFA officials, the coalition has taken this public step to make its demands known and intends to continue to hold FIFA accountable for its failure to prioritize labor and human rights in the lead up to the 2026 World Cup.
"Despite FIFA's dismal track record on human and workers' rights, we have approached them and their bidding cities in good faith, calling on them to ensure worker health and safety protections, provide fair wages and give workers a voice," said AFL-CIO President Liz Shuler. "However, FIFA has made no clear commitments on how it will meet its obligation to protect workers and communities in the planning and execution of the 2026 World Cup."
While the 2026 World Cup is almost five years away, host city human rights commitments are being framed and finalized now. FIFA has required that the bid committees for each of the 17 prospective host cities submit a human rights plan, and while some have taken steps to engage labor and human rights stakeholders and integrate feedback, many others have neglected or outright refused to do so. This inconsistency and inadequate consideration of stakeholders is the result of FIFA's failure to set clear standards and expectations around labor and human rights. Moreover, although the human rights plans will presumably be a factor in FIFA's host city selection process, the governing body has refused to disclose how much they really matter.
The selection process has been opaque from the outside, with limited input and consultation from key stakeholders. As the AFL-CIO states in their letter, given where things stand, "[...] FIFA essentially stands to profit from low wages, unsafe working conditions, racial discrimination in hiring and promotion, gentrification, and other forms of skewed development."
"Soccer fans across the United States, Canada and Mexico are excited for the World Cup to come to North America in 2026, but in order for the tournament to be a success FIFA needs to demonstrate a greater commitment to human and workers' rights than is currently," said Independent Supporters Council President Bailey Brown. "As fans of the beautiful game, we recognize the checkered history of neglect, mistreatment and exploitation of the workers and local communities who help make the World Cup possible. That's why we are calling on FIFA to do the right thing and take immediate steps to ensure all stakeholders in the 2026 World Cup are treated with the dignity and respect they deserve."
Demands of FIFA have been consistent over the course of AFL-CIO's correspondence. The letter calls for FIFA to commit "to be bound by a detailed set of minimum standards," including:
- Fair living wages
- Strong workplace health and safety protections
- Targeted local hiring
- Limitations on temporary work
- Strong investigation and enforcement mechanisms
- Responsible contractor bid requirements
- Ongoing meaningful stakeholder engagement
- Requirements to reduce labor conflict
- Agreements to give workers a voice
Signers of the open letter represent a diverse coalition, including national and international labor and human rights groups, North American soccer fan associations, legal experts and immigrant and urban policy advocates. Please find the full list of signers below:
- Cathy Feingold, Director of International Affairs, AFL-CIO
- Kenneth Roth, Executive Director, Human Rights Watch
- Rachel Micah-Jones, Executive Director, Centro de los derechos del migrante
- Erica Smiley, Executive Director, National Jobs with Justice
- Lauren Jacobs, Executive Director, PowerSwitch Action
- Robert Stumberg (Professor of Law) and Jennifer Li (Staff Attorney), Harrison Institute for Public Law, Georgetown Law School
- Bailey Brown (President) and Andrew Picard (Vice President), Independent Supporters Council
- Jennifer Rosenbaum, Executive Director, Global Labor Justice-International Labor Rights Forum
Concerns about FIFA's approach to labor and human rights issues a the 2026 World Cup are in part based on the track record of human and labor rights abuses alleged at past World Cup events, including but not limited to the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, the 2018 World Cup in Russia, the 2014 World Cup in Brazil and the 2010 World Cup in South Africa. Given this history, it is incumbent upon FIFA to establish new standards that demonstrate its intention to correct course and put greater emphasis on human and labor rights at the 2026 World Cup.
"FIFA has been forced to engage with the global labor movement and major human rights groups in the wake of public outrage related to its operations around the world," said Tim Noonan, Director of Campaigns and Communication at the International Trade Union Confederation. "We required FIFA to confront and remedy child labor in the production of its soccer balls in India and Pakistan, and mass displacement of populations in the construction of World Cup facilities in Brazil. Most recently, FIFA had to negotiate and commit to protections for migrant workers facing dangerous and abusive conditions while constructing the stadiums for Qatar 2022."
For members of the new AFL-CIO led coalition, it is imperative that the 2026 World Cup not come at the expense of labor and human rights, and that local communities actually benefit from the tournament. Tuesday's open letter marks the first step in a campaign committed to ensuring the 2026 World Cup is the most human rights and worker-friendly tournament FIFA has ever organized.
The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) works tirelessly to improve the lives of working people. We are the democratic, voluntary federation of 56 national and international labor unions that represent 12.5 million working men and women.
LATEST NEWS
'Killing Is Normalized': IDF Soldier Speaks Out About Orders to Shoot Civilians in Gaza
The commands are: everyone that comes inside needs to die," the soldier said. "If they're inside, they're dangerous, you need to kill them. No matter who it is."
Jul 07, 2025
Another Israel Defense Forces soldier has spoken out publicly against the IDF's brutalization of civilians in Gaza.
In an interview with the British Sky News Monday, a reservist who has served three tours of duty in Gaza spoke candidly about orders he and other soldiers received to shoot any person arbitrarily who entered defined "no-go zones," regardless of whether they posed a threat.
The soldier gave his testimony anonymously for fear of being labeled a "traitor." However, he identified himself as a reservist from the 252nd Division who was stationed at the Netzarim Corridor, a road which divides North and South Gaza.
The area has been one of the most critical strategic points for Israel's occupation of Gaza, allowing control over the flow of aid and people.
The soldiers, stationed on the edge of a civilian neighborhood in the homes of displaced Palestinians, were ordered by their commanders to kill anyone who passed an "imaginary line" that marked the beginning of the military stronghold, the soldier said.
"We have a territory that we are in, and the commands are: everyone that comes inside needs to die," the soldier said. "If they're inside, they're dangerous, you need to kill them. No matter who it is."
"It was like pretty much everyone that comes into the territory, and it might be like a teenager riding his bicycle," he said.
The soldier said that the prevailing attitude among the troops was that all Palestinians were "terrorists," and that this attitude was reinforced by commanders.
"They say if someone comes here, it means that he knows he shouldn't be there, and if he still comes, it means he's a terrorist," he said. "This is what they tell you. But I don't really think it's true. It's just poor people, civilians, that don't really have too many choices."
He said that when soldiers in the corridor kill civilians, a lot of them "think that they did something good."
That sense of impunity, he said, comes from the higher-ups.
"Some commanders can really decide to do war crimes and bad things and don't face the consequences of that," he said.
"You can't be in this scenario for so long and not normalize it," he said. "Killing is normalized, and you don't see the problem."
This anonymous soldier is the latest of many who have decided to speak out against atrocities their military has committed.
His testimony comes on the heels of a harrowing Haaretz expose, in which several other Israeli soldiers described being ordered to shoot Palestinian aid-seekers, turning the U.S.-Israeli administered Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) sites into "killing fields." Others provided The Associated Press with video of soldiers bombarding civilians in an aid site with pepper spray and stun grenades.
Others have spoken out against the attacks on civilians near the Israeli stronghold at Netzarim.
In April, a report by the Israeli veterans group Breaking the Silence detailed many more accounts of brutality over the first year-and-a-half of the war. It included accounts of Israeli soldiers razing agricultural land, bulldozing entire city blocks, and designating "large swathes of the land" that "were turned into massive kill zones."
"All of them were wiped off the face of the Earth. Annihilation, expropriation, and expulsion are immoral and must never be normalized or legitimized," the report said.
The soldier who spoke to Sky News said his deployment left a similar stain on his conscience.
"I kind of feel like I took part in something bad, and I need to counter it with something good that I do, by speaking out, because I am very troubled about what I took and still am taking part of, as a soldier and citizen in this country," he said. "I think the war is... a very bad thing that is happening to us, and to the Palestinians, and I think it needs to be over."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Oxfam Says Russian Use of Chemical Weapons in Ukraine Would Be 'Egregious Violation of International law'
"The increasing erosion of the rule of law is deeply concerning," said an Oxfam campaigns manager.
Jul 07, 2025
Anti-poverty organization Oxfam on Monday expressed grave concern over reports that Russia has been increasingly deploying chemical weapons in Ukraine.
The Associated Press reported late last week that two Dutch intelligence agencies are claiming that Russia has been ramping up its use of chemical weapons in its war against Ukraine. Among the chemical weapons allegedly being deployed by Russia are chloropicrin, a banned poison gas that was used by European powers during World War I, and CS gas, which is typically used as a riot control agent.
Sarah Redd, Oxfam's advocacy and campaigns manager in Ukraine, called reports of banned chemical weapons use deeply troubling and called for a full investigation into the matter.
"Oxfam is appalled at the recent intensification of violence against civilians in Ukraine, especially the reports of Russia's use of chemical weapons, which would be an egregious violation of international law," she said. "The increasing erosion of the rule of law is deeply concerning. Such laws were put in place to prevent humanity from sliding back into a darker chapter of history. Oxfam calls for an immediate and independent international investigation into these allegations and to hold those responsible to account."
Russia is a signatory of the Chemical Weapons Convention, a treaty first drafted and enacted in the 1990s that bars the use of both chloropicrin and CS gas in war. This makes Russia subject to potential investigations carried out by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, although such an investigation can only take place if requested by member states.
Ukraine has claimed that Russia has carried out more than 9,000 chemical weapons attacks ever since it launched its invasion of the country more than three years ago. During the 2024 election campaign, President Donald Trump claimed that he could bring an end to the Ukraine-Russia war within a single day although so far fighting between the two nations has only intensified.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Indefensible': Trump Budget Law Subsidizes Private Jet Owners While Taking Healthcare From Millions
A provision of the budget law that President Donald Trump signed last week will leave taxpayers to "pick up the tab for the private jet industry and billionaire high flyers."
Jul 07, 2025
The Republican budget measure that U.S. President Donald Trump signed into law late last week contains a provision that analysts say will allow private jet owners to write off the full cost of their aircraft in the first year of purchase, a boon to the ultra-rich that comes as millions of people are set to lose healthcare under the same legislation.
FlyUSA, a private aviation provider, gushed in a blog post that with final passage of the unpopular budget reconciliation package, "business jet ownership has never looked more fiscally attractive or more fun to explain to your accountant."
The law, crafted by congressional Republicans and approved with only GOP support, permanently restores a major corporate tax break known as 100% bonus depreciation, which allows businesses to deduct the costs of certain assets in the first year of purchase rather than writing them off over time.
Forbes noted that the bonus depreciation policy "applies to a slew of qualified, physical business expenses which depreciate over time, such as machinery and company cars, but the policy is often associated with big-ticket luxury items, such as private aircraft, and its institution last decade led to a boom in jet sales."
"Trump and congressional Republicans have certainly delivered for the billionaire class."
Chuck Collins, director of the Program on Inequality at the Institute for Policy Studies, called bonus depreciation "a massive tax break for billionaires and centi-millionaires that use the most polluting form of transportation on the planet."
"A corporation purchasing a $50 million private jet could potentially deduct the entire $50 million from their taxes in the year of the purchase, rather than spreading the deduction over many years," Collins wrote. "This amounts to a massive taxpayer subsidy, as ordinary taxpayers pick up the tab for the private jet industry and billionaire high flyers."
"Subsidizing more private jets on a warming planet is reckless and indefensible," he added.
The National Business Aviation Association, a lobbying group for the private aviation industry, celebrated passage of the Republican legislation, specifically welcoming the bonus depreciation policy as "effective for incentivizing aircraft purchase." (The Institute for Taxation and Economic Policy argues that "depreciation tax breaks have never been shown to encourage more capital investment.")
Meanwhile, communities across the United States are bracing for the law's deep cuts to Medicaid and federal nutrition assistance, which are expected to impose damaging strains on state budgets and strip food benefits and health coverage from millions of low-income Americans.
"Trump and congressional Republicans have certainly delivered for the billionaire class," said Robert Weissman, co-president of Public Citizen. "This is certainly one of the cruelest bills in American history, backtracking on the country's painfully slow history of expanding healthcare coverage and, equally remarkably, taking food away from the hungry."
"That's a lot of needless suffering just to make the richest Americans richer," he added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular