

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

This Monday, 350.org and allies held a series of actions inside the COP26 venue highlighting the fact that voices critical to the UN negotiations have been effectively shut out of the space or have had to face many challenges to come to Glasgow and attend the climate talks. Campaigners held a banner saying 'Nothing about us without us', whilst playing recorded messages from those who haven't been able to come to Glasgow and hearing from speakers from Bangladesh, Brazil, Malaysia, Philippines, India, Cameroon, and Sri Lanka.
"The climate crisis has affected a lot of people, especially in poor countries. Here in the Philippines we now experience massive floods, landslides, heavy rains, extremely hot weather and water scarcity. My family and I suffer when strong typhoons hit us at this time of the year, and our homes and communities get flooded." Princess Panotes, from John Dewey School for Children, Philippines
"I don't want these false solutions, I want real solutions, and for developed countries to get to real zero as soon as possible. This COP must demonstrate concrete actions to match the scale of this crisis, including phasing out all support for coal, oil and gas, increasing climate finance, and delivering a just transition for workers and communities." Theiva Lingam, Regional Facilitator for Friends of the Earth Asia Pacific region, from Malaysia
"My name is Jonathan Feijo, and I speak from Brazil. I am one more of the young blacks from the global South who is not physically at COP because of the pandemic and also because of the environmental racism that places us on the margins of the climate debate. Still, I want you to hear my message. We, the communities on the front lines and those most impacted by climate change, demand that world leaders and financial institutions spare no effort to keep the earth's temperature below 1.5 degrees, and above all, to put people first." Jonathan Feijo, young activist from Eco Pelo Clima, Fridays For Future Brazil
"To every individual in position of power, to bring about a positive change, the climate crisis is all around us. We have seen massive floods, storms, droughts, everywhere. Farmers in my area are facing its effects leading to a food crisis. We have all the solutions in front of us. All we need is immediate inclusive action right now." Frayashti Shekhawat from We the Young, India
"There is a great danger that the voices of the most vulnerable to the impacts of the climate crisis and those who most need to be at the table at the COP will be excluded this year because of the pandemic and the brutal vaccine inequity that pervades our world. We, as frontline communities that are hardest hit by the climate crisis, demand that world leaders and financial institutions move at the scale and the speed necessary for all of us to stay below 1.5 degrees. To all the leaders gathered in Glasgow, I ask you to put people to the front at the climate talks." Yeb Sano, Executive Director Greenpeace Southeast Asia, from the Philippines
"The UK is hosting the most exclusionary COP ever. We are facing a global pandemic made worse by the UK and other northern countries who are refusing the vaccine patent waivers which are needed by many of our countries to produce life-saving vaccines, so that people's lives can be saved from this pandemic. Besides that, the constantly changing quarantine rules and visa requirements mean that many global South voices cannot be there in Glasgow with many of you. The COP is an exclusive place at the best of times, but this year's particular situation and arrangements made by the UK government mean that people who normally can be there to hold those in power accountable this time could also not be there. We need to be challenging and disrupting the power relations to be able to stop this climate crisis." Dipti Bhatnagar, Friends of the Earth Mozambique
"Sri Lanka is one the most affected countries by climate change. Throughout the year we face severe climate impacts including floods, droughts and landslides. In past years I have been part of the Friends of the Earth International delegation representing the South. Like many other southern people, this year I am going to miss COP26 because I'm not sure about the safety during the talks. The pandemic is still ongoing and the cases are rising in Glasgow and across the UK. Only about 60% of the population in Sri Lanka is vaccinated. The UK government failed to honor a pledge to offer COVID vaccine to all delegates. I want to tell the UK government and the UNFCCC that they cannot ignore the voices of the South and make agreements with the North when many in southern communities are the most affected and vulnerable." Hemantha Withanage, from Sri Lanka, Chairperson of Friends of the Earth International
Images of the action can be found HERE
350 is building a future that's just, prosperous, equitable and safe from the effects of the climate crisis. We're an international movement of ordinary people working to end the age of fossil fuels and build a world of community-led renewable energy for all.
The vote came after an emotional debate in which some Republican lawmakers detailed threats and harassment they'd received for opposing the president's redistricting scheme.
President Donald Trump's push to get Indiana Republicans to redraw their congressional map ahead of the 2026 midterm elections went down in overwhelming defeat in the Indiana state Senate on Thursday.
As reported by Punchbowl News' Jake Sherman, the proposal to support a mid-decade gerrymander in Indiana was rejected by a vote of 19 in favor to 31 opposed, with 21 Republican state senators crossing the aisle to vote with all 10 Democrats to torpedo the measure, which would have changed the projected balance of Indiana's current congressional makeup from seven Republicans and two Democrats to a 9-0 map in favor of the GOP.
The Senate vote came after the state House's approval of the bill and an emotional debate in which some Indiana Republicans opposed to the president's plan detailed violent threats they'd received from his supporters.
According to a report published in the Atlantic on Thursday, Republican Indiana state Sen. Greg Walker (41) this week detailed having heavily armed police come to his home as the result of a false emergency call, a practice commonly known as swatting.
Walker said that he refused to be intimated by such tactics, and added that "I fear for all states if we allow threats and intimidation to become the norm."
Indiana's rejection of the effort is a major blow to Trump’s unprecedented mid-decade redistricting crusade, which began in Texas and subsequently spread to Missouri and North Carolina.
Christina Harvey, executive director for Stand Up America, said that the Indiana state Senate's rejection of the Trump plan was an "important victory for democracy."
"For weeks, Indiana residents have been pleading with their state leaders to stop mid-decade redistricting and the Senate listened," Harvey said. “Despite threats to themselves and their families, a majority of Indiana senators were steadfast in rejecting this gerrymandered map."
John Bisognano, president of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, praised the Republicans who rejected the president's scheme despite enduring threats and harassment.
"Threats of violence are never acceptable, and no lawmakers should face violent threats for simply standing up for their constituents," Bisognano said. "Republicans in other states who are facing a similar choice—whether to listen to their constituents or follow orders from Washington—should follow Indiana’s lead in rejecting this charade and finally put an end to the national gerrymandering crisis."
The lawmakers accused the Social Security Administration of "a slash-first, think-later approach," for which "beneficiaries will pay the price."
Leading Senate Democrats and Independent US Sen. Bernie Sanders this week pressed the Trump administration for answers following reports that the Social Security Administration is planning to dramatically reduce visits to its field offices.
"We write with concerns regarding recent reports that the Social Security Administration is reorganizing its field office operations, and has established a goal of cutting the number of field office visits in half—amounting to 15 million fewer visits annually," Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), and Sanders (I-Vt.) wrote in a letter to SSA Administrator Frank Bisignano.
"Given that beneficiaries are already waiting months for field office appointments, and the agency has not shared with Congress or the public on how it plans to achieve this goal, we are concerned that these efforts are in fact part of a plan to 'quietly kill field offices,' implementing a backdoor cut in benefits by making it harder for Americans to access the Social Security customer services they need," the senators said.
"The Trump administration has relentlessly attacked Social Security."
Earlier this month, Nextgov/FCW revealed that the Social Security Administration said in internal documents that it wants “no more than 15 million total” in-person visits to its field offices in fiscal year 2026—or about half the current number of such visits. An anonymous SSA staffer told the outlet that senior agency officials are aiming for “fewer people in the front door" and for "all work that doesn’t require direct customer interactions to be centralized.”
As Warren's office noted Thursday:
The Trump administration has relentlessly attacked Social Security. Under Commissioner Bisignano, the administration has implemented policy changes that make it harder for Americans to get their benefits, including by implementing burdensome in-person and bug-prone identification processes that force millions more beneficiaries to visit field offices each year—at the same time they are slashing SSA’s workforce by around 7,000 and closing regional offices.
Instead of staffing up to meet these needs, SSA’s field office capacity has significantly declined. Beneficiaries are being forced to wait hours to get help—only to be told they will need to call to schedule an appointment.
"We are concerned that your plan is to force beneficiaries onto SSA’s bug-prone website or push them into customer service phone tree 'doom-loops'—which will almost certainly result in delayed or missed benefits for some individuals," the letter adds. "Once again, you seem to have adopted a slash-first, think-later approach to 'modernizing' SSA, and beneficiaries will pay the price."
The senators are asking Bisignano if the reports of proposed SSA office visit reductions are accurate, and if so, how and when the plan will be implemented, how the agency will "provide services to beneficiaries that would otherwise go to field offices," and how the reductions will affect already lengthy wait times and service online users and callers to the agency's 1-800 number.
The lawmakers' letter comes as Republican senators on Thursday voted down a proposed three-year extension of Affordable Care Act subsidies, a move that is expected to result, on average, in a doubling of health insurance premiums for around 22 million people. Critics said the vote underscores the need for single-payer healthcare legislation like the Medicare for All Act reintroduced by Sanders and Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.) earlier this year.
The trade deficit has grown and the US has lost manufacturing jobs during the first nine months of Trump's second term.
A new analysis from the Economic Policy Institute claims that the signature trade deal from President Donald Trump's first term has actually "created more problems than it fixed."
The report, published Thursday, notes that the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), signed into law by Trump in 2020, has completely failed to fulfill Trump's stated goal of lowering the US trade deficit with Canada and Mexico, which has grown from a combined $125 billion in 2020 to $263 billion in 2025.
This increased trade deficit was particularly notable when it comes to the auto industry, says the report, written by EPI senior economist Adam S. Hersh.
"In the critical automotive industry that Trump said he wanted to reshore, imports of motor vehicles and parts from Mexico nearly doubled following USMCA, rising to $274 billion in 2024, up from $196 billion in 2019," the report explains. "Light-duty vehicles imports from Mexico rose 36% while imports of medium- and heavy-duty vehicles increased a whopping 256%."
The report also finds that the trade deal "left a gaping loophole for Chinese manufacturers to exploit duty-free access to North American markets without reciprocal market access for US manufacturers," the result of which was "Chinese firms expanded their direct investment footprint in Mexico by as much as 288% through 2023."
The bottom line, says the report, is "Trump’s USMCA created more problems than it fixed," and that "today the pressure on manufacturing jobs and deterioration in the trade balance with Mexico are worse than before USMCA."
However, the report also says that the US, Canada, and Mexico have an opportunity to significantly improve on USMCA given that the deal is up for review next year.
Among other things, the report recommends closing the loopholes that have allowed Chinese manufacturers to rapidly expand their footprint in Mexico; expanding the the Rapid Response Labor Mechanism that "has helped improve wages and working conditions in a number of specific workplaces"; and slashing intellectual property rights provisions that "currently allow companies to preempt local laws addressing negative externalities from digital service provision."
The EPI report came on the same day that American Economic Liberties Project's Rethink Trade program released an analysis showing that Trump so far has failed to live up to his pledge to reduce the US trade deficit and revive domestic manufacturing.
In all, Rethink Trade found that the US trade deficit increased more during the first nine months of 2025 than it did during the first nine months of 2024. Additionally, the group found that the US has actually lost 49,000 manufacturing jobs since the start of Trump's second term.
Lori Wallach, director of the Rethink Trade program, said that "the nine-month data show outcomes that are the opposite of President Trump’s promises to cut the trade deficit and create more American manufacturing jobs."
She noted that Trump's trade deals so far "seem to prioritize the demands of Big Tech, Big Oil, Big Pharma, and other usual beneficiaries of decades of failed US trade policy instead of fixing the root causes of our huge trade deficit to help American manufacturing workers and firms as he promised."