SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Three Reasons Why the FBI Investigation Is a Sham
Senate Republicans are pushing for a vote on Brett Kavanaugh's nomination now that his reopened FBI background check has closed. Unfortunately, political interference by the White House has prevented the FBI from conducting a thorough look into the allegations against Kavanaugh.
WASHINGTON
Senate Republicans are pushing for a vote on Brett Kavanaugh's nomination now that his reopened FBI background check has closed. Unfortunately, political interference by the White House has prevented the FBI from conducting a thorough look into the allegations against Kavanaugh.
If Republicans are hoping that simply going through the motions of reopening Kavanaugh's background check will give political cover to a handful of undecided senators, they are dead wrong. This process has been exposed as a sham. It will NOT satisfy the public's deep concerns about Brett Kavanaugh.
Based on what we know, there are at least three problems with the FBI's background investigation:
1. The investigation did not interview many relevant witnesses who could corroborate the allegations against Kavanaugh.
- The normal FBI background check process dictates that the White House allow the FBI to follow any and all leads. But Trump has provided a narrow witness list of who the FBI is allowed to interview.
- Originally the White House tried to limit the FBI's interviews to just four witnesses. After a public backlash, the FBI was reportedly allowed to widen the circle of witnesses. But there is still no transparency about who was selected for interviews and how. For all we know, the White House may have pre-screened potential witnesses before clearing the FBI to talk to them.
- There is a long list of individuals who have not been interviewed by the FBI.
- Dr. Blasey's Ford's husband, friends, therapist, and polygraph examiner--all of whom could further corroborate her claims;
- Witnesses identified by Deborah Ramirez, a Yale classmate of Kavanaugh's who alleged that he exposed himself to her at a party;
- Kenneth Appold, a suitemate of Kavanaugh's at the time who is "one-hundred-per-cent certain" that he was told that Kavanaugh was the male student who exposed himself to Ramirez;
- Julie Swetnick, the woman who submitted a sworn statement alleging that she saw Kavanaugh at parties where women were sexually assaulted;
- James Roche, Kavanaugh's roommate who said he was "a notably heavy drinker";
- Chad Ludington, Kavanaugh's Yale classmate who was present when Kavanaugh started a bar fight;
- Liz Swisher, who said "it's not credible for him to say that he has had no memory lapses in the nights that he drank to excess;
- And many more.
- For that matter, the FBI has not even talked to Dr. Blasey Ford or Kavanaugh. No investigation could possibly be considered complete without interviewing them.
2. The White House also limited the FBI's ability to determine whether Kavanaugh made false statements under oath.
- One of the major concerns about Kavanaugh's nomination are the apparent lies he told to the Senate, under oath, both in prior confirmation hearings and last week. But by limiting the scope of questions that agents can ask, the White House has impeded the FBI's ability to determine if Kavanaugh lied.
- For instance, the White House has reportedly declared that Kavanaugh's drinking habits -- and whether Kavanaugh testified about them accurately under oath -- will not be within the scope of the FBI's investigation.
- This is not right. The FBI ought to have been allowed to ask witnesses whether Kavanaugh testified truthfully before the Senate Judiciary Committee. They should seek corroboration for his factual claims--from his experiences with alcohol to the references in his yearbook.
- The question is not whether Kavanaugh's yearbook page was vulgar or whether he drank to excess in high school or college. The question is not even necessarily whether he committed perjury in his testimony. The question is whether Kavanaugh can be trusted to be honest and forthcoming. If he casually lies about small things, he can't be trusted about big things.
3. Republicans plan to conceal the FBI's findings from the public.
- Multiple senators have stated that they will base their decision on Kavanaugh on the FBI's findings, yet Senate Republicans have announced they'll shield these findings from the public.
- This is unacceptable given the unique circumstances and high stakes surrounding the Kavanaugh nomination. Republicans have not shied away from making FBI investigative material public in the past, as they did in 2016 in the Hillary Clinton email investigation.
- Republicans have a track record of mischaracterizing FBI background check material that is kept confidential. This week, for instance, Senator Dick Durbin was joined by seven Judiciary Democrats in publicly correcting Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans' claims that past FBI background checks into Kavanaugh revealed no hint of sexual impropriety or alcohol problems. Durbin could not speak further because of the confidentiality of the material, but the incident shows Republicans cannot be trusted to accurately represent the FBI's findings if they are kept hidden from public view.
- Republicans like Chuck Grassley and Susan Collins are already suggesting that the investigation shows "no corroboration" and "appears to be very thorough." If they truly believe the FBI's findings will appear complete, and exonerate Kavanaugh, they should be eager to release them to resolve the doubts about his nomination. If not, the public will be right to ask: What are they hiding?
LATEST NEWS
102 House Democrats, Including Jeffries, Help GOP Send Crypto Bill to Trump's Desk
"Congress surrendered to the onslaught of crypto political spending and legitimized the world's biggest Ponzi scheme," said one GENIUS Act critic. "They also forfeited an opportunity to stop Trump's massive crypto grift."
Jul 17, 2025
More than 100 Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives helped Republicans send what would be the country's first major cryptocurrency law to the desk of President Donald Trump, despite warnings that the legislation would not only further his corruption, but also "expose our financial stability, national security, and consumer protections to greater risk."
All but a dozen voting Republicans and 102 Democrats—including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (N.Y.)—supported the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act, which last month passed the Senate 68-30, with support from 18 Democrats.
If signed by the president, as is expected, the bill would create a regulatory framework for stablecoins, which are pegged to the value of existing assets such as the U.S. dollar. The Trump family's World Liberty Financial has issued the stablecoin USD1.
@housedemocrats.bsky.social Shame on all of you. You have no foresight and no backbone.
[image or embed]
— Jodi Jacobson (@jljacobson.bsky.social) July 17, 2025 at 5:52 PM
Advocacy groups and Democrats critical of the GENIUS Act, and other bills making their way through Congress during "Crypto Week," have highlighted how the legislation would "bolster Trump's business empire while putting American interests at risk."
Leading House Democratic opposition to the GOP's package is Financial Services Committee Ranking Member Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), who warned last week that "these bills would make Congress complicit in Trump's unprecedented crypto scam."
As Politico detailed Thursday:
Waters and other Democrats called for presidential ethics provisions to be added to the bills, pointing to the Trump family's business entanglements in the crypto industry. Trump and his sons have stakes in several crypto ventures, including a company they launched last year that issues a stablecoin and could benefit from the GENIUS bill that is now awaiting the president's signature.
But a growing bloc of the party has joined Republicans in lining up behind the digital asset industry's Washington agenda, a sign of crypto firms' ascendance as a political force. Companies in the crypto sector have poured hundreds of millions of dollars into influence efforts, and a mountain of super [political action committee] money is threatening to target lawmakers who stand in the way of the industry's goals.
After Thursday's vote, Bartlett Naylor, a financial policy advocate for the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, declared that "today, House members piled venality onto perversion onto corruption. In approving this crypto-enabling bill, Congress surrendered to the onslaught of crypto political spending and legitimized the world's biggest Ponzi scheme."
"To add insult to injury," Naylor added, "they also forfeited an opportunity to stop Trump's massive crypto grift, some of the most heinous and flagrant corruption in American presidential history."
RM @repmaxinewaters.bsky.social slams Republicans’ UNSTABLE Act:“The UNSTABLE Act creates the appearance of a federal framework for #stablecoins, but it does not provide the Federal government with the full authority it needs.” | tinyurl.com/5t2skxvnWATCH: www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQWy...
[image or embed]
— U.S. House Committee on Financial Services - Democrats (@ushousefsc.bsky.social) July 17, 2025 at 1:23 PM
In addition to sending the GENIUS Act to Trump, the House advanced two other crypto bills on Thursday: the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act, which would create a regulatory framework for digital asset markets, and the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act, which would prevent the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency (CBDC).
All Republicans present and 78 Democrats backed the CLARITY Act, while just Democratic Reps. Jared Golden (Maine) and Shri Thanedar (Mich.) voted alongside the GOP to pass the CBDC ban. Both of those bills still need Senate approval.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Weaponization of Data': Trump Admin Gives ICE Personal Info of 79 Million Medicaid Recipients
"Trump said he would go after the 'worst of the worst' immigrants, yet now is giving ICE EVERYONE's Medicaid data, even as ICE targets U.S. citizens," said Rep. Pramila Jayapal.
Jul 17, 2025
The Trump administration is handing over the personal data of every Medicaid enrollee to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
According to The Associated Press Thursday, all 79 million people currently receiving the government health insurance benefit will have information shared with ICE by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS):
The database will reveal to ICE officials the names, addresses, birth dates, ethnic and racial information, as well as Social Security numbers for all people enrolled in Medicaid. The state and federally funded program provides healthcare coverage... for the poorest of people, including millions of children.
The "extraordinary" agreement was struck Monday with CMS and not meant to be publicized, according to the AP. The memo states that its intention is to help ICE find the "location of aliens" across the country.
As one unnamed CMS employee told the AP, "They are trying to turn us into immigration agents."
Republicans have often raised the specter of undocumented immigrants claiming benefits in order to justify cutting the government health insurance program.
However, undocumented immigrants are barred from receiving federally funded Medicaid coverage.
The only exception is emergency Medicaid, which covers lifesaving services and which the government requires to be extended to anyone who needs it regardless of status—though this makes up just 1% of overall Medicaid spending.
Some states have also expanded Medicaid to include noncitizens not covered by the federal program. However, that money comes from state budgets rather than the federal one.
Last month, President Donald Trump demanded that CMS hand over the personal data of the millions of Medicaid enrollees in the seven states that allow noncitizens to apply, a move that dozens of states sued to prevent.
At the time, the government justified it as a measure to simply root out fraud and abuse. But under Monday's agreement, the AP says, the Department of Homeland Security "will use the data to identify, for deportation purposes, people who [are] in the country illegally."
However, nearly everyone enrolled in Medicaid is either an American citizen or other legal resident.
Given that the president has made very clear his intent to begin denaturalizing and deporting American citizens, the handing of tens of millions of people's sensitive information to ICE is causing widespread alarm.
"Trump is letting ICE track Americans using their personal and private Medicaid health data. Undocumented immigrants aren't eligible to receive Medicaid, but other people they want to target and track are," said Melanie D'Arrigo, the executive director of the the Campaign for New York Health. "They're not going to stop at immigrants."
"The massive transfer of the personal data of millions of Medicaid recipients should alarm every American," Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) told the AP. "This massive violation of our privacy laws must be halted immediately. It will harm families across the nation and only cause more citizens to forego lifesaving access to healthcare."
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) wrote in a post on X that, "This is about the weaponization of data, full stop. Trump said he would go after the 'worst of the worst' immigrants, yet now is giving ICE EVERYONE's Medicaid data, even as ICE targets U.S. citizens."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Horror Story': Flight Logs Reveal Dozens Disappeared on El Salvador Deportation Trips
"This further demonstrates the callousness and lack of due process involved and is further evidence that the U.S. government is disappearing people," said one immigrant rights advocate.
Jul 17, 2025
"These were disappearances," said one immigrant rights expert of the revelation that dozens of people who have never been acknowledged by the Trump administration were listed on flight manifests for three deportation flights from Texas to El Salvador in March.
404 Media reported Thursday that in May, a hacker targeted the airline that operated the flights, which have been challenged in court by groups including the ACLU and Democracy Forward.
The data retrieved by the hacker showed that in addition to people whose names had been previously included on a list of deported migrants deported to El Salvador's Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT), published by CBS News, more than 40 men and women were listed on flight manifests for planes that the Trump administration sent on March 15
The CBS News story reported on 238 people who had been sent to CECOT without due process, under a $6 million deal with far-right President Nayib Bukele, but the list compiled from the flight manifests puts the total number at at least 281.
The flights landed in El Salvador despite a federal judge blocking them, and now, Michelle Brané of the immigrant rights group Together and Free told 404 Media, "we have this list of people that the U.S. government has not formally acknowledged in any real way and we pretty much have no idea if they are in CECOT or someplace else, or whether they received due process."
"I think this further demonstrates the callousness and lack of due process involved and is further evidence that the U.S. government is disappearing people," said Brané. "For almost all of these people, there's no records whatsoever. No court records, nothing."
It is unclear whether all the people on the flight manifests were actually on the planes, but if "they were indeed on the flights, it is unknown where they currently are," 404 Media reported.
The outlet reported that the family of one of the men who is listed on the flight manifests but whose name has never been reported or acknowledged by the Trump administration, has been protesting his disappearance in his home country of Venezuela.
Keider Alexander Flores Navas' mother, Ana Navas, said in a TikTok video in March that she suddenly stopped hearing from him the day the deportation flights took off—and then saw him in a photo of prisoners at CECOT.
@diariovea 🔵 Ana Navas: Mi hijo no figura en la lista de secuestrados, sé que está en El Salvador por una foto. 🔵 Keider Flores Navas es uno de los venezolanos trasladados a El Salvador. Su madre sabe que está allá por una fotografía en la que lo reconoció. 🔵 Señaló que tiene más de dos semanas y media sin poder hablar con su hijo. #elsalvador #eeuu #venezuela #migrantes #fyp ♬ sonido original - Diario VEA
"He was not on any list. But this photo is from El Salvador," Navas told the Venezuelan outlet Diario VEA.
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, called the news of the flight manifests "a horror story."
404 Media's story "provides the first public confirmation of the identity of some of the people who were disappeared by the Trump administration on March 15," said Reichlin-Melnick.
"Many of the people we sent to CECOT entered the U.S. legally at ports of entry after fully identifying themselves to the government," he added. "But if they did enter illegally, nothing justifies disappearing people to life imprisonment without trial. It's un-American."
The news of the flight manifests comes days after a court filing revealed that Salvadoran officials said the U.S. has jurisdiction over the people being held in CECOT, in response to a United Nations Human Rights Office inquiry about the "involuntary disappearances" of four Venezuelans.
The Trump administration has denied having the power to return CECOT detainees to the United States, as has Bukele.
Lee Gelernt, lead counsel in the ACLU's case regarding the deportation flights, told 404 Media that it is "critical" for the public to know who was on the March 15 flights.
"These individuals were sent to a gulag-type prison without any due process, possibly for the remainder of their lives, yet the government has provided no meaningful information about them, much less the evidence against them," said Gelernt. "Transparency at a time like this is essential."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular