

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Rob Sargent, Environment America Energy Program Director, 617-747-4317
Today, Environment America celebrated people from across America in a project called Voices for 100% Renewable Energy.
Today, Environment America celebrated people from across America in a project called Voices for 100% Renewable Energy. The project features stories from a wide array of individuals -- from community leaders, to business and nonprofit leaders, to academics, to mayors and other public officials - who believe we can and must quickly transition to powering ourselves with clean, renewable energy.
"Every day, I'm inspired by folks I see across the country working hard to transition our communities, our institutions, and the nation to clean, renewable energy," said Rob Sargent, Energy Program Director with Environment America. "We're hopeful that the people and stories featured in the Voices for 100% Renewable Energy project will motivate and embolden citizens to lean into a swift and steady shift from dirty to clean energy."
Most people in the project focused on the urgent need to reduce the pollution that harms our health and the environment. But, many simply believe that it's common sense and good economics to save energy and to harness unlimited, pollution-free energy sources. Among the people featured in the project were: Anya Schoolmanfrom Solar United Neighbors; Denise Fairchild from the Emerald Cities Collaborative and author of Energy Democracy; Hawaii's Governor, David Ige; Buddy Dyer, Mayor of Orlando, Florida; Colorado Congressman Jared Polis, sponsor of a bill to set a national target of 100 percent clean energy; former NBA and NCAA basketball star, Bill Walton; and Mustafa Santiago Ali from the Hop Hop Caucus.
The people highlighted in the project cite a range of environmental, economic, equity, social and health benefits from the transition to 100 percent renewable energy.
Here's what they had to say:
"The Hawaiian Islands are vulnerable to climate change, and embracing renewable energy is one of our strongest tools to combat it," said Hawaii's Governor David Y. Ige. "We are blessed with abundant renewable energy resources -- solar, wind, ocean, geothermal --that can be the foundation for a robust alternate energy industry. We can also reduce Hawai`i's $6 billion a year dependence on imported oil and instead keep funds here while creating new jobs in the process. I'm proud that Hawai`i is the first, and still the only, state to have a 100 percent renewable energy goal for electricity. Hawai`i was also the first state to enact legislation aligned with the Paris agreement. We are moving forward with our commitments to meet, and even surpass, those targets of lower carbon emissions to combat global warming."
"A decade ago, my 12-year-old son Walter came to me and said, 'Mom, we have to go solar.' He and his friend Diego had just seen 'An Inconvenient Truth' and wanted to take action," said Anya Schoolman, Executive Director of Solar United Neighbors. "At the time, going solar was complicated and expensive. We realized that if we were going to do this, and wanted to really make an impact, we might as well take the whole neighborhood solar. So that's what we did. The boys canvassed up and down the neighborhood and we formed Washington, D.C.'s first solar co-op. That group helped 45 neighbors go solar. Since then, thousands of homeowners have gone solar through a co-op...We will get to 100% renewable energy because going solar gives people a stake in the energy system in a way that fossil fuel sources don't. We have an opportunity to rebuild our energy system. Let's not waste it."
"To remain a global economic leader, we must invest in renewable energy technology and fully embrace a cleaner, carbon-free future," said Congressman Jared Polis. "I am proud to lead federal legislation to move the nation toward 100 percent renewable energy by 2050. In my district, Colorado State University and its students are taking the lead, pledging to commit the university to being powered by 100 percent renewable electricity by 2030, and developing the technology to achieve that goal. By working together to combat climate change through renewable energy, we will protect our health, our national security, our jobs and our planet for the future."
"A just transition to clean energy is a must for all of our communities and is achievable," said Mustafa Ali, Senior Vice President of Climate, Environmental Justice & Community Revitalization with the Hip Hop Caucus. "After 25 years working with thousands of communities across our country who face environmental injustices, I can attest that a transition to clean energy is critical for our kids and a matter of life or death for many families. Our most vulnerable communities, including low-income and communities of color, cannot wait any longer...Instead of continuing to support the fossil fuel industry and policies that continue to put our communities at risk, our leaders need to take action and embrace the clean energy solutions that exist right now and create new economic opportunities for those who have often been forgotten. It makes sense for our leadership in the world, economy, health and moral duty to protect the planet for future generations."
"I am proud to support a vision of transitioning entirely to 100 percent clean and renewable energy in our city," said Mayor Buddy Dyer of Orlando, Florida. "Cities are the front lines where this transformation can happen and by leading an effort like this, we can not only help to improve the health of our residents but also help preserve natural resources, ensure environmental protection, create new jobs in the growing clean energy industry, and drive even more economic growth to our region."
Bill Walton, NBA basketball legend said, "I am proud to stand tall in support of the goal of the campaign for 100 percent renewable energy as soon as possible -- like right now. Renewable energy is the biggest no-brainer in the history of the world. Renewable energy is good economics, good public policy, good social responsibility, and good for you, me and everyone else. Over the course of my lifetime, I have heard far too many times, 'that will never work', or 'we can't do that'. Yet, every time we actually do do it, not only does it work, but it makes things better..."
"As a 40 year community development practitioner, living and working in South Los Angeles, I lived the jobs versus environment dichotomy," said Denise Fairchild, President of Emerald Cities Collaborative. "Our struggles were for jobs, community investments, community ownership and wealth creation. Even our successful fight against Lancer, a municipal incinerator in the mid 1980s, missed defining the intersectional dimensions of our environmental justice work. But today, the 100 percent renewable campaign has the potential to confront -- in an intentional way -- the nexus of our environmental, economic and social justice struggles."
"For years, we've been told that pollution from dirty fuels was the price we had to pay for progress," said Anna Hofmann, clean energy associate with Environment America. "Those days are over. My confidence that we can make the shift to clean renewable energy has been boosted by the conversations I've had with the many people we've profiled in the Voices for 100% Renewable project."
To view Voices for 100% Renewable Energy, go to www.100percentrenewable.org
With Environment America, you protect the places that all of us love and promote core environmental values, such as clean air to breathe, clean water to drink, and clean energy to power our lives. We're a national network of 29 state environmental groups with members and supporters in every state. Together, we focus on timely, targeted action that wins tangible improvements in the quality of our environment and our lives.
(303) 801-0581"We have totally unserious, completely incompetent people taking us into mindless, deadly war," said Democratic US Sen. Chris Murphy.
In an interview with TIME magazine published Thursday, US President Donald Trump responded flippantly to a question on whether Americans should be concerned about the possibility of a retaliatory attack on United States soil amid his illegal and intensifying war on Iran.
"I guess," Trump said when asked about a direct Iranian attack on the US. "We expect some things. Like I said, some people will die. When you go to war, some people will die."
Democratic lawmakers quickly seized on the president's comment as further evidence of his callous lack of regard for the potentially catastrophic consequences of the war he launched.
"This is deranged and dangerous," said US Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).
Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), a retired US Navy officer, wrote on social media that the president "has terrible judgment, and Americans have already died because of it."
"This is officially TRUMP’S WAR," Kelly added.
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) said Trump's remark underscored that "we have totally unserious, completely incompetent people taking us into mindless, deadly war."
The Trump administration has confirmed the deaths of six American soldiers so far. Earlier this week, a top Iranian security official claimed Iran's response to the massive US-Israeli bombing campaign—retaliation that has hit American military bases throughout the Middle East—has killed 500 US soldiers.
More than 1,200 Iranians have been killed by US-Israeli strikes so far, including the more than 160 people—mostly young girls—massacred in an attack on an Iranian elementary school that US investigators believe was carried out by American forces.
"Six of our fellow Americans and over a thousand Iranians lie dead. Their families have been shattered. Billions of our tax dollars have been spent. The Middle East has been plunged into war," Graham Platner, a Democratic candidate for US Senate in Maine and a veteran of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, wrote Thursday. "And for what?"
The Trump administration has refused to provide a clear objective, justification, or timeline for the war, which is costing US taxpayers roughly $1 billion per day. Politico reported earlier this week that US Central Command is "asking the Pentagon to send more military intelligence officers to its headquarters in Tampa, Florida to support operations against Iran for at least 100 days but likely through September."
"The longer this war goes on," Bruce Hoffman of the Council on Foreign Relations wrote Thursday, "the greater the incentive for Iran to apply all forms of asymmetric warfare in hopes of coercing Trump to abandon his war aims. Sleeper agents, lone actors inspired and motivated by Iran, cyberattacks on US infrastructure, and physical attacks on critical infrastructure are all possible."
In response to Trump's comments to TIME, Brian Finucane of the International Crisis Group asked, "Can someone remind me who the heads of the DHS and FBI are at the moment?"
"Surely they will stop any such attack," Finucane wrote sardonically.
UN Human Rights chief Volker Türk warned of violations of "international humanitarian law" by Israel, "in particular when it comes to issues around forced transfer."
As the broader war unleashed in the Middle East this week by the joint attack on Iran by Israel and US forces continued to escalate and intensify on Friday, advocates for children warn that young people caught in the middle of the fighting are paying the highest price for the war of choice launched by US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
More than half a million people have fled their homes in southern Lebanon as Israel unleashed a deadly barrage of bombings overnight and into Friday, adding to a death toll estimated to be more than 130 people this week and following a mass evacuation order by the Israeli government on Thursday amid a wider regional war backed by the US military.
US bombing of Iran also intensified overnight following threats by US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on Thursday that "we have just begun."
From Lebanon to Iran this week, since Trump launched an unprovoked attack on Iran over the weekend, UNICEF estimates that over 190 children have been killed across the Middle East in the escalated fighting. "This includes 181 children in Iran, seven in Lebanon, three in Israel, and one child in Kuwait," said the group.
Israeli forces bombed numerous towns and areas around Beirut on Friday, according to dispatches from the Lebanese National News Agency (NNA), targeting the towns of Al-Majadel, Al-Duwayr, Buday, and others.
The United Nations human rights office warned Friday that Israel's "blanket displacement orders" and bombardment of Beirut and its outlying suburbs was delivering "more misery to civilians" in those areas, including children and their families.
"In all, hundreds of thousands have now been affected by these Israeli displacement orders," said the OHCHR in a statement. "Their breadth makes them very difficult for the population to comply with and therefore brings into question their effectiveness, a requirement under international humanitarian law, and risks amounting to prohibited forced displacement."
UN human rights chief Volker Türk on Friday denounced Israel's large -scale evacuation orders, saying, “These blanket, massive displacement orders we are talking here about hundreds and thousands of people. This raises serious concern under international humanitarian law, and in particular when it comes to issues around forced transfer."
In a Thursday statement, Save the Children called for the warring parties, as well as the six Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) nations—Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates—to deploy every diplomatic tool at their disposal to bring "an end to hostilities" and guarantee "adherence to international humanitarian law to protect the physical, mental, and emotional wellbeing of children across the region."
Save the Children's Latifa Mattar said that children living in these nations across the region "had no say in this conflict and yet, they are paying the price. Children are now living in fear. We are hearing of children too scared to sleep, families sheltering indoors, and schools shuttered at a time when children need routine and safety most."
“We are calling for an immediate cessation of hostilities," added Mattar. "Every hour of continued conflict is another hour a child spends in fear. The international community must act now—deploy every diplomatic tool available to end the conflict, demand compliance with international humanitarian law, and ensure that children are protected. Upholding the laws of war is an obligation, not a choice. There must be a return to good-faith diplomacy before the harm to this generation becomes irreversible."
Al-Jazeera correspondent Zeina Khodr, reporting from Beirut, warned that the humanitarian crisis in the city and surrounding areas is rapidly worsening, with people seeking shelter on nearly every street corner.
"There aren’t enough schools to shelter the hundreds of thousands of people who were forced to flee their homes after Israel’s forced displacement threat for Beirut’s southern suburbs [Thursday],” Khodr reported. “People are telling us: ‘We are not animals; we are human beings, our children are cold.'”
"If a US role were to be confirmed, the strike would rank among the worst cases of civilian casualties in decades of US conflicts in the Middle East."
US investigators reportedly believe that American forces were behind the bombing of an Iranian girls' school that killed more than 160 people—mostly young children—during the initial wave of attacks launched Saturday by President Donald Trump in coordination with the Israeli military.
Citing two unnamed officials, Reuters reported Thursday that US military investigators have found it is "likely" that American forces were responsible for the deadly strike on the school in the southern Iranian town of Minab, though the investigation has not yet been completed. Schools are protected under international law, and targeting them is a war crime.
"Reuters was unable to determine more details about the investigation, including what evidence contributed to the tentative assessment, what type of munition was used, who was responsible, or why the U.S. might have struck the school," the outlet noted. "The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive military matters, did not rule out the possibility that new evidence could emerge that absolves the U.S. of responsibility and points to another responsible party in the incident."
"If a US role were to be confirmed," Reuters added, "the strike would rank among the worst cases of civilian casualties in decades of US conflicts in the Middle East."
HuffPost's Akbar Shahid Ahmed echoed Reuters' reporting, writing that Pentagon officials "told Congress in multiple briefings this week that they believed the US was most likely responsible (though probe ongoing)."
The reporting came on the heels of a New York Times analysis that concluded the US was "most likely to have carried out the strike," given that American forces were simultaneously bombarding an adjacent Iranian naval base. The Times also rejected the claim that an Iranian missile hit the elementary school.
"The strikes were first reported on social media shortly after 11:30 am local time," the Times reported. "An analysis of those posts—as well as bystander photos and videos captured within an hour of the strikes—helps corroborate that the school was hit at the same time as the naval base. One video, pinpointed by geolocation experts, showed several large plumes of smoke billowing from the area of the base and the school."
Beth Van Schaack, a former State Department official who currently teaches at Stanford University’s Center for Human Rights and International Justice, told the Times that "given the US' intelligence capabilities, they should have known that a school was in the vicinity."
Trump administration officials have said very little about the Iranian school strike in their triumphant rhetoric about the war, which Pentagon Secretary Pete Hegseth hailed as the "most lethal, most complex, and most precise aerial operation in history." Hegseth has also openly dismissed what he's called "stupid rules of engagement," rejecting constraints on US forces that are designed to prevent the killing of civilians.
Asked about the school strike during a March 4 press conference, Hegseth responded: "All I know—all I can say is that we're investigating that. We, of course, never target civilian targets, but we're taking a look and investigating that."
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio referred reporters to the Pentagon when asked about the attack, but added that "the United States would not target, deliberately target, a school," in purported contrast to the Iranian government, which Rubio claimed is "deliberately targeting civilians" because "they are a terroristic regime."
Two first responders to the scene of the attack, as well as a parent of one of the killed children, told Middle East Eye earlier this week that the school was hit by two strikes, a possible "double-tap" attack. An Al Jazeera investigation concluded the attack on the school was likely deliberate.
Jeremy Konyndyk, president of Refugees International, called the school attack "a horrific US war crime, up there with My Lai," referring to US soldiers' massacre of Vietnamese civilians in 1968. The US military initially covered up the massacre.
"In a sane world, Hegseth would resign, Congress would hold immediate hearings and establish an investigation, and the US would come clean," Konyndyk wrote on social media. "None of that is likely, so international mechanisms should kick in, including the [International Criminal Court]. And Hegseth should probably talk to a lawyer."
On Thursday, as US and Israeli officials vowed to ramp up their assault on Iran, two boys' schools southwest of Tehran were reportedly bombed.
"The targeting of civilians, educational facilities, and medical institutions constitutes a grave violation of international humanitarian law and human rights law," a group of United Nations experts said earlier this week.