February, 15 2018, 10:45am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Stephen Kent, skent@kentcom.com 914-589-5988, Jennie Wetter, jwetter@populationinstitute.org 202-544-3300 ext 108
The Divided States of Reproductive Health and Rights
After a Year of Trump Policies, Population Institute’s Report Card on Reproductive Health/Rights for 2017 Lowers Overall U.S. Grade to a “D-”
WASHINGTON
On the heels of the Trump administration's proposed 2019 budget, which seeks to slash support for reproductive health programs, the Population Institute today released its sixth annual report card on reproductive health and rights in the U.S. The results were alarming, showing declining overall reproductive health and rights and growing disparities between states after the first year of Trump policies. For 2017, the overall U.S. grade fell from a "D" to a "D-." 18 states got a failing grade.
These findings reflect sharp differences in the way states handle family planning and reproductive health programs, as well as stepped up attacks on those programs by the Trump administration. "The Trump administration and its allies in Congress have escalated the assault on reproductive health and rights,"said Robert Walker, president of the Population Institute. "At the state level, we are seeing a deep and growing divide between states that seek to protect reproductive health and rights and those that do not. States with good grades are gradually improving, while states with poor grades are showing little or no improvement.
The National Grade
The national grade this year fell from a "D" to a "D-", reflecting escalating attacks on reproductive health and rights at the federal level.
The Trump budget proposal unveiled this week signals worse attacks to come. It would eliminate the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program, invest in ineffective abstinence-only education programs, and block patients from seeing their preferred health care provider, Planned Parenthood.
Over the past year some Trump administration attacks on reproductive health and rights were blocked, at least temporarily, including a proposed 20-week abortion ban and attempted defunding of Planned Parenthood. But other attacks were carried out.
The Administration diluted the Affordable Care Act's "contraceptive mandate" by issuing a regulation that enables employers and insurers to delete coverage of contraceptives in their insurance policies, for any religious or moral reason, without even notifying the government. Last year, with Trump administration backing, Congress blocked implementation of an Obama-era regulation prohibiting states, under Title X, from defunding Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers. This year, the Trump administration is seeking to help states terminate Planned Parenthood as a healthcare provider for Medicaid beneficiaries.
Reproductive rights also suffered a judicial setback in 2017 with the confirmation of President Trump's nomination of Neil Gorsuch to the U.S. Supreme Court and the nomination and confirmation of several district and appellate court justices to the federal bench.
State Grades
First, the good news: Twenty-two states received a B- or higher in 2017. Eleven states (California, Washington D.C., Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington) received an "A" in 2017, up from five the year before. The improved showing was largely attributable to state declines in the rate of teenage pregnancy.
But the bad news highlights growing national disparity: 27 states received a "D" or lower. 18 of those states received a failing grade ("F"), including Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Wisconsin.
To view individual state report cards, go to: https://www.populationinstitute.org/resources/reports/reportcard/
Understanding the Results
"A woman's reproductive health and rights should not depend on what state or county she lives in, but increasingly, it does," said Walker. "This report card shows the disparities are large and growing, as access to abortion services is getting curtailed in many states." In 26 states today more than 50 percent of the women live in a county without an abortion provider. "The proposed Trump budget would only exacerbate this divide," he said.
"There is some good news in the midst of all this," said Walker. "America's unintended pregnancy rate is the lowest it has been in 30 years and we have reached an historic low in the teen pregnancy rate. But that progress cannot be taken for granted, as the Trump administration made clear with their recent budget. If birth control opponents are ultimately successful in defunding Title X family planning clinics and evidence-based sex education programs, we should expect an increase in both teen and unintended pregnancies."
"The United States is in danger of becoming, in effect, the Divided States of Reproductive Health and Rights," said Walker. "We cannot let that happen. All those who are concerned about the state of reproductive health in America should be making their voices heard."
Methodology
Using eleven criteria, the Institute's report card ranked each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia:
- Thirty percent of the grade is based on measures of effectiveness. This includes the latest available data on the teenage pregnancy rate (15%) and the rate of unintended pregnancies (15%).
- Twenty-five percent of the grade is based upon prevention. This includes mandated comprehensive sex education in the schools (15%), access to emergency contraception (5%), and minors' access to contraceptive services (5%).
- Twenty-five percent of the grade is based upon affordability. This includes if states are expanding Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act (15%), Medicaid eligibility rules for family planning (5%), and restrictions of insurance coverage of abortion (5%).
- The final 20 percent of the grade is based upon clinic access. This includes abortion restrictions (10%), TRAP Laws (5%), and percent of women living in a county without an abortion provider (5%).
Based upon their scores, each state received a "core" grade (A, B, C, D or F), but some states received an additional "plus" or a "minus" for factors not reflected in the core grade.
LATEST NEWS
'Cuba's Next,' Says Lindsey Graham as Illegal Trump-Israel War on Iran Kills Hundreds
"Trump 2.0 seems to be about regime change," said one observer.
Mar 02, 2026
As American and Israeli bombs kill hundreds of Iranians—reportedly including at least 180 students and others at a girl's school in Minab—Sen. Lindsey Graham said Sunday that President Donald Trump is "on a roll" and that Cuba is the next nation in the US regime change crosshairs.
In an interview on Fox News, Graham (R-SC) said prematurely that "Trump finished the job" that former President Ronald Reagan "failed to do," namely, destroy Iran's Islamist government after the overthrow of a brutal US-backed monarchy in 1979. "I am a big admirer of Ronald Reagan but I'm here to tell you that Donald Trump, in my opinion, is the gold standard for Republicans, maybe any president, when it comes to foreign policy."
"Maduro—everybody talked about him, well, Donald Trump's got him in jail," Graham said of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, who was abducted along with his wife two months by invading US forces.
"Cuba's next. They're gonna fall," Graham said of the revolutionary government in Havana that's outlasted a dozen American presidents, despite decades of US-led assassination attempts, sabotage, and subversion. "This communist dictatorship in Cuba, their days are numbered."
Lindsey Graham: Cuba is next. They are going to fall. Their days are numbered. pic.twitter.com/XZd1PyIqDP
— Acyn (@Acyn) March 2, 2026
The remarks by Graham—who previously berated Trump as a "jackass," "nut job," and "loser" unfit to be commander-in-chief—come amid reporting that Trump is feeling buoyed by what he views as successful attacks on Iran and Venezuela.
"The president is feeling like, 'I'm on a roll,' like, 'This is working,'" one unnamed Trump administration official told the Atlantic's Vivian Salama over the weekend.
This, from a president who said he deplored regime change and vowed "no new wars" while running for reelection.
A day before launching the US-Israeli war of choice against Iran, Trump floated what he described as a "friendly takeover" of Cuba, prompting vehement condemnation from Havana. Cuba is already suffering under decades of US sanctions that have devastated the socialist nation's economy and the well-being of its people.
In January, Trump issued an executive order baselessly declaring that Cuba poses "an unusual and extraordinary threat" to US national security and tightening the blockade to further starve the island of fuel.
Trump 2.0 seems to be about regime change. Is Cuba next? Listen onApple: interc.pt/40A4gef Spotify: interc.pt/4aKpVqd Elsewhere: interc.pt/4l53fod@mjbusta.bsky.social @andrespertierra.bsky.social @akelalacy.bsky.social
[image or embed]
— The Intercept (@theintercept.com) March 1, 2026 at 8:56 AM
Graham has backed every single US war since he was elected to Congress in 1994 and has openly advocated regime change in Cuba for more than a decade. He has also been accused of incitement to genocide for urging Israel to "level" Gaza—whose border crossings Israel has closed again, citing the attack on Iran.
Graham's support for regime change in Iran has been condemned across the political spectrum, from progressive Democrats including Rep. Ro Khanna of California to far-right figures like the late activist Charlie Kirk—who lambasted the senator's hawkish stance as "pathologically insane" shortly before his assassination last year.
If the US does strike Cuba, it would be the 11th country attacked during Trump’s two terms in the White House. The president—who has said he feels snubbed for the Nobel Peace Prize—has bombed Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Nigeria, Pakistan, Somalia, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen, as well as dozens of boats allegedly transporting drugs in international waters in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Don't Support Bootlickers': ChatGPT Subscribers Vow Mass Cancellations After Pentagon Deal
"We can push OpenAI over the edge," said one group encouraging a boycott of the AI giant.
Mar 02, 2026
Calls to boycott OpenAI have been growing over the last several days after the artificial intelligence giant reached a deal with the US Department of Defense to use its ChatGPT chatbot across its classified network.
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman on Friday said that the deal reached with the Pentagon would have "prohibitions on domestic mass surveillance" and maintain "human responsibility for the use of force, including for autonomous weapon systems."
The DOD had previously gotten into a dispute with AI firm Anthropic, which refused to modify its Claude chatbot to allow for its use for domestic spying or to make final decisions on whether to take a human life.
President Donald Trump announced on Friday that he'd ordered the US military to stop using Anthropic's technology, describing the firm as "A RADICAL LEFT, WOKE COMPANY" in a Truth Social post.
Shortly after Trump's post, Altman announced that OpenAI had reached a deal with the Pentagon. This led many critics to suspect that, whatever Altman's denials, the DOD would be allowed to use ChatGPT in ways that it had been forbidden to utilize Claude.
Adam Cochrane, who runs activist venture capital firm Cinneamhain Ventures, said immediately after Altman's announcement that he was canceling his ChatGPT subscription on the grounds that "I don’t support bootlickers."
Dr. Simon Goddek, a biotech scientist, also revealed that he was canceling his ChatGPT subscription and encouraged others to do the same.
"Companies understand one language: MONEY," he wrote. "If they support wars of aggression, they can’t profit from me. I’m out. What’s stopping you?"
AI consultant Mark Gadala-Maria accused Altman of being two-faced with his DOD deal, noting that the OpenAI CEO had expressed solidarity with Anthropic in the face of the Trump administration's attacks.
"Just a few hours ago he was on TV saying he stood by Anthropic," wrote Gadala-Maria. "Then he undercuts them and takes the same contract that Anthropic just lost. How can anyone trust this guy?"
An OpenAI boycott group called "QuitGPT" went online shortly after Altman's announcement, and the organization claims that it has gotten more than 1.5 million people to cancel their ChatGPT subscriptions or stop using it all together.
QuitGPT also outlined why its boycott of OpenAI could be potentially effective given the highly competitive nature of the current consumer AI market.
"ChatGPT is the biggest chatbot in the world, but that advantage is fragile," QuitGPT explained. "ChatGPT has been losing market share. Their creator, OpenAI, is losing three times more than they earn. ChatGPT users skew young and progressive, and many don't know about alternatives. We can push OpenAI over the edge."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Israel Exploits Attack on Iran to Reinstate Gaza 'Starvation Policy'
"All the NGOs in Gaza need more food, medicine, medical equipment, fuel, tents, personal care every day. We cannot wait," said chef José Andrés, founder of World Central Kitchen.
Mar 02, 2026
After Israeli and US forces launched an illegal war aimed at forcing regime change in Iran this past weekend, Israel also announced "the closure of the crossings into the Gaza Strip," which it has bombed and starved for nearly 29 months, killing at least tens of thousands of Palestinians.
Israel's Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT)—which oversees civilian policy in Gaza and the West Bank—announced on social media Saturday that "several necessary security adjustments have been implemented" because of the operation against Iran, including the closure of Gaza crossings "until further notice."
COGAT also claimed that "the closure of the crossings will have no impact on the humanitarian situation" in Gaza, adding that "the substantial quantities of food that have entered since the beginning of the ceasefire amount to four times the nutritional needs of the population," so "the existing stock is expected to suffice for an extended period."
However, reports from human rights groups, journalists, and the United Nations have highlighted how Israel's restrictions have continued to impede evacuations of the sick and severely wounded, and nongovernmental groups' deliveries of humanitarian aid, despite the October ceasefire deal. Palestinians in Gaza also remain at risk of Israeli forces' airstrikes, gunfire, and shelling.
"A new chokehold on Gaza," Philippe Lazzarini, commissioner-general of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, said Monday. "Once again, Israel is renewing its ban on supplies entering Gaza. After more than two years of unspeakable suffering and a spreading man-made famine, people still lack the most basic supplies, despite increases in aid since the ceasefire. UNRWA personnel in Gaza keep providing healthcare, learning, and clean water—but we must be allowed to do much more and certainly not less."
Even before Israel closed the borders on Saturday, the US-Israel attack on Iran led to Palestinians in Gaza "buying whatever food supplies and goods they could manage," Al Jazeera reported Monday. "People everywhere rushed to the market to buy sugar, flour, cooking oil, and yeast. Shelves began to empty, and the price of essential goods increased."
Things got even worse after COGAT's announcement. Asmaa Abu Al-Khair, a 38-year-old mother of eight, told Al Jazeera at a Gaza City market on Sunday that "I feel great anxiety. Everyone is talking about it—about Iran's strike and the closure of the crossings—and I cannot afford to buy what I need, while at the same time, I am afraid of famine returning. I have young children."
Many displaced families living in nearby tents also "do not have the money to buy supplies, nor the space to store them inside the tents," she said. "We endured so much hardship during the war, and it barely ended with the announcement of a ceasefire. So why close the crossing now? What do we have to do with what is happening? Is what we witnessed not enough? Why play with people’s nerves?"
Since Saturday, critics around the world have also warned about the impacts of Israel shutting off the Palestinian exclave indefinitely, again. Arab Center Washington DC fellow Assal Rad declared on social media that "under the cover of its illegal war on Iran, Israel is continuing genocide in Gaza."
Mass shooting survivor and former congressional candidate Cameron Kasky similarly said that "the siege on Gaza returns in its fullest force. Illegal wars to advance Israel's goals are being used for expanding the genocide plans."
Israel faces a South Africa-led genocide case at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) over the US-backed war on Gaza that it launched after Hamas' October 7, 2023 attack. The International Criminal Court (ICC) has also issued related arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.
Chef José Andrés said on social media Sunday that World Central Kitchen—which he founded—is cooking 1 million hot meals every day, and if Gaza's borders stay closed, the group "will run out of food this week."
"We need food deliveries every single day to feed hungry families who are not part of this war," he said. "All the NGOs in Gaza need more food, medicine, medical equipment, fuel, tents, personal care every day. We cannot wait... let the humanitarian trucks go through today!"
Responding to Andrés, US Congressman Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) said that "Israel must reopen access to aid groups. If not, Netanyahu must be arrested immediately. He continues war crimes."
The Hague Group—a coalition of countries that came together last year, led by Colombia and South Africa, with the goal of upholding the ICC and ICJ rulings on Israel and Palestine—responded to COGAT by scheduling an emergency meeting that at least 30 nations are set to attend in the Dutch city for which the organization is named.
The focus of Wednesday's meeting "is simple," Varsha Gandikota-Nellutla, the group's executive secretary, said in a Monday statement. "How do we give international law teeth? Several states have begun enforcing their legal obligations, turning rhetoric into concrete action through The Hague Group's measures: cutting arms flows, closing ports, and pursuing accountability."
Ronald Lamola, South Africa's minister of international relations and cooperation, said that "the application of international law can no longer be selective: punitive for some and totally disregarded by others. The Hague Group exists to translate obligations that arise out of international law into coordinated state action. We invite governments of conscience—those prepared to uphold law in deed as well as word—to join us."
Francesca Albanese, the UN special rapporteur focused on the occupied Palestinian territories and a target of Trump administration sanctions, said that "I am honored to attend the upcoming emergency meeting of the The Hague Group."
"Time has come for decolonized multilateralism, grounded in universal rights and obligations, applied with integrity and free from double standards," Albanese added. "May European and Arab states join this necessary effort."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


