December, 13 2017, 04:00pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
A.G. Schneiderman Releases New Details On Investigation Into Fake Net Neutrality Comments
New Analysis Shows as Many as 2 Million Comments Stole Real Americans' Identities; To Date, Over 5,000 People Have Filed Reports with the AG's Office at ag.ny.gov/FakeComments
FCC is Scheduled to Vote on Net Neutrality Tomorrow, Based on Corrupted Public Comment Process
In New Letter, A.G. Schneiderman Urges Postponement of Vote, Tells FCC: "Moving forward with this vote would make a mockery of the notice and comment process... and reward those who perpetrated this fraud"
WASHINGTON
New Analysis Shows as Many as 2 Million Comments Stole Real Americans' Identities; To Date, Over 5,000 People Have Filed Reports with the AG's Office at ag.ny.gov/FakeComments
FCC is Scheduled to Vote on Net Neutrality Tomorrow, Based on Corrupted Public Comment Process
In New Letter, A.G. Schneiderman Urges Postponement of Vote, Tells FCC: "Moving forward with this vote would make a mockery of the notice and comment process... and reward those who perpetrated this fraud"
Today, New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman released new details of his office's investigation into fake comments submitted during the net neutrality comment process, with a new analysis showing that two million of the comments stole real Americans' identities.
"Millions of fake comments have corrupted the FCC public process - including two million that stole the identities of real people, a crime under New York law," said Attorney General Schneiderman. "Yet the FCC is moving full steam ahead with a vote based on this corrupted process, while refusing to cooperate with an investigation. As we've told the FCC: moving forward with this vote would make a mockery of our public comment process and reward those who perpetrated this fraud to advance their own hidden agenda. The FCC must postpone this vote and work with us to get to the bottom of what happened."
To date, over 5,000 people have filed reports with the Attorney General's office regarding identities used to submit fake comments to the Federal Communications Commission on the repeal of net neutrality, on which the FCC is scheduled to vote tomorrow, December 14, 2017. People can check whether their identity was misused and report it to the Attorney General's office at ag.ny.gov/FakeComments. Examples of the over 5,000 reports already submitted to the Attorney General's office can be found below.
Attorney General Schneiderman's latest analysis shows that as many as two million comments misused the identities of real Americans, including over 100,000 comments per state from New York, Florida, Texas, and California. A map can be found below, highlighting the number of fake comments submitted using stolen identities by state.
Despite widespread evidence that the public comment process was corrupted, the FCC's General Counsel has said that the agency will not cooperate with the Attorney General's investigation into the impersonation of New Yorkers, and that it will move forward with tomorrow's scheduled vote.
In a new letter to the FCC, Attorney General Schneiderman directly rebuts the excuses for refusing to cooperate with an investigation of illegal conduct that could constitute, among other violations, criminal impersonation under New York law.
"Moving forward with this vote would make a mockery of the notice and comment process mandated by the Administrative Procedure Act and reward those who perpetrated this fraud in service of their own hidden agenda," Attorney General Schneiderman wrote. "None of the assertions in your letter justify the FCC's refusal to share evidence of who committed these illegal acts."
Examples of Reports to Attorney General's Office via ag.ny.gov/FakeComments -
"This person is my aunt. She never filed this. She is an elderly woman; someone is using her identification." - Bronx, NY
"This is a 13 year old child - she did not post this comment, nor did anyone else in her household." - Rochester, NY
"This comment was made on July 11th, 2017. This is a fake comment... I am her son, and can confirm it was not her. [She] died of cancer on June 8th, 2017." - Albany, NY
"I am a service member in the United States Navy. I was... on a flight from Bahrain to Boston at the time the comments were submitted." - Florida
"This is my elderly mother's information. I have verified with her that she did not submit this information." - Ft. Meyers, FL
"My LATE husband's name was fraudulently used after a valiant battle with cancer. This unlawful act adds to my pain that someone would violate his good name." - Los Angeles, CA
"My 96 year old World War Two veteran father...was offended by 'the theft of [his] good name and honor.' Someone used his name and address without his consent." - Thousand Oaks, CA
"As a disabled Veteran and who owned his own computer repair shop and is involved in the IT community...I find this egregious." - Old Saybrook, CT
"This fake comment is purportedly from my father. The problem is...the comment was posted more than a year AFTER HIS DEATH!!! Good luck in prosecuting whoever desecrated the memory of a Navy reservist and Seabee." - Stratford, CT
"Please do find who did this and establish all violations possible and prosecute." - Des Moines, IA
"This comment was made under my mom's name. She passed away several years ago from cancer. This is sickening." - Chicago, IL
"This is a fake filing. This isn't the county that I served on active duty in the Marine Corps for nearly 5 years." - Elkhart, IN
"This is a case of someone using the identity of a 13 years old minor. This is such a disgrace to the public trust." - Lowell, IN
"I am 72 years old. I don't understand how this happened but I am angry about it. People should be held accountable." - Morristown, NJ
"I am filing this complaint on behalf of my mother, an elderly woman. This is definitely a false submission to the FCC." - Red Bank, NJ
"I'm sick to my stomach knowing that somebody stole my identity and used it to push a viewpoint that I do not hold. This solidifies my stance that in no way can the FCC use the public comments as a means to justify the vote they will hold here shortly." - Columbus, OH
"Please do something about this. This is crazy!" - Fremont, OH
"This is so outrageous. I am furious. Please investigate and prosecute." - Chambersburg, PA
"I wasn't sure which form to complete on my State Attorney's website (Kansas), so I am completing your form as well as contacting him. I was horrified to see that my name was used in a comment that is opposite of my belief!" - McPherson, KS
"My father is 92 years old, was in a rehabilitation facility with a recently broken femur and I promise you, he does not know anything about net neutrality. This is definitely a fake post." - Burnsville, MN
"This was someone commenting as my deceased father." - Minneapolis, MN
"I am submitting this on behalf of my grandpa who is 90 years old. He absolutely did NOT write this comment." - St. Louis, MO
"This is terrifying. Who knows what else has been said falsely under my name?" - St. Joseph, MO
"These are the kinds of actions that make the population lose faith in the system. How many deceased people 'commented' on this? Sickening." - Cameron, NC
"This comment listed the name and address of my father, who died 10 years ago. This is really disgraceful that his name and address has been used in this way." - Meadville, PA
"The comment I found is attributed to be from my mother, who died in 2009." - Fort Mill, SC
"I find it extremely sick and disrespectful to be using my deceased dad to try to make an unpopular decision look the opposite." - Tennessee
"My step-uncle died two months before this comment was made. I am. Absolutely. Livid." - Knoxville, TN
"It cannot stand that the American's people information is abused in such a clear and blatant way to be used to justify unspeakable evils." - Bay City, TX
"I hope as the Attorney General of this great state you and other states attorney generals do something about this. I do not appreciate having my name and information used without my consent." - San Antonio, TX
"The mass misrepresentation of the people makes me sick. Please ensure my voice is not misrepresented, I am against and will continue to be against the repealing of net neutrality." - Leesburg, VA
"I am a veteran and I should not have my name wrongfully [used]." - Hi Hat, KY
"I am filing this on behalf of my father who had two fake comments posted. He resides in VA and I have contacted our Attorney general as well." - Virginia Beach, VA
"I am from West Virginia, but maybe you can use this information to expand the scope of the investigation. Our attorney general has not set up a form as easy to use as this one. Thank you for your service." - West Virginia
LATEST NEWS
Netanyahu Shows Map of 'New Middle East'—Without Palestine—to UN General Assembly
"Netanyahu made clear with his little map today what normalization really seeks: eliminating Palestine... from the region and legitimizing greater Israel, all with the blessing of Arab regimes," one critic said.
Sep 22, 2023
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu angered Palestinians and their defenders Friday after presenting a map of "The New Middle East" without Palestine during his speech to the United Nations General Assembly in New York.
Speaking to a largely empty chamber, Netanyahu—whose far-right government is widely considered the most extreme in Israeli history—showed a series of maps, including one that did not show the West Bank, East Jerusalem, or Gaza. These Palestinian territories have been illegally occupied by Israel since 1967, with the exception of Gaza—from which Israeli forces withdrew in 2005, while maintaining an economic stranglehold over the densely populated coastal strip.
Middle East Eyereported Netanyahu also held up a map of "Israel in 1948"—the year the modern Jewish state was established, largely through the ethnic cleansing of more than 750,000 Arabs—that erroneously included the Palestinian territories as part of Israel.
Palestinian Ambassador to Germany Laith Arafeh said on social media that there is "no greater insult to every foundational principle of the United Nations than seeing Netanyahu display before the UNGA a 'map of Israel' that straddles the entire land from the river to the sea, negating Palestine and its people, then attempting to spin the audience with rhetoric about 'peace' in the region, all the while entrenching the longest ongoing belligerent occupation in today's world."
As Middle East Eye noted:
The inclusion of Palestinian lands (and sometimes land belonging to Syria and Lebanon) in Israeli maps is common among believers of the concept of Eretz Yisrael—Greater Israel—a key part of ultra-nationalist Zionism that claims all of these lands belong to a Zionist state.
Earlier this year, Netanyahu's finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich, spoke from a podium adorned with a map that also included Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria as part of Greater Israel. In the same event, he said there was "no such thing as Palestinians."
The use of such maps by Israeli officials comes at a time when Netanyahu's ultra-nationalist government has taken steps that experts say amount to the "de jure annexation" of the occupied West Bank.
Netanyahu used the maps in an attempt to illustrate the increasing number of Arab countries normalizing relations with Israel under the Abraham Accords brokered by the administration of former U.S. President Donald Trump.
"There's no question the Abraham Accords heralded the dawn of a new age of peace," the Israeli prime minister said. "But I believe that we are at the cusp of an even more dramatic breakthrough, an historic peace between Israel and Saudi Arabia. Peace between Israel and Saudi Arabia will truly create a new Middle East."
Critics have countered that peace between apartheid Israel and Arab dictatorships has come at the cost of advancing Palestinian rights. In the case of Morocco, the United States recognized the North African nation's illegal annexation and brutal occupation of Western Sahara in exchange for normalization with Israel.
Netanyahu's props on Friday reminded numerous observers of the time during his 2012 General Assembly speech when he used a cartoon drawing of a bomb to illustrate Iran's progress on advancing a nuclear weapons program that both U.S. and Israeli intelligence agencies said did not exist.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Brazilian Supreme Court Delivers 'Historic Victory' to Indigenous Peoples
The court ruled against the Big Ag-backed "time limit trick," which would have only recognized Indigenous land claims if the group could prove they were living in a given territory on October 5, 1988.
Sep 22, 2023
In a major victory for Indigenous rights, Brazil's Supreme Federal Court rejected an argument Thursday that could have forced hundreds of thousands from their ancestral lands.
The so-called "time limit trick," backed by the nation's powerful agricultural interests, would have only recognized Indigenous land claims if the group could prove they were living in a given territory on October 5, 1988, the day the current Brazilian constitution was signed, as Survival International explained. The proposed rule ignored the fact that Brazil's military dictatorship displaced many Indigenous groups before it finally ended in 1985, The Guardianpointed out.
"I'm shaking," Jéssica Nghe Mum Priprá of the Xokleng-Laklano Indigenous group toldThe Associated Press while celebrating the news. "It took a while, but we did it. It's a very beautiful and strong feeling. Our ancestors are present—no doubt about it."
"The Supreme Court has shown that it cares about our lives and that it's against genocide."
The particular case the nation's highest court heard Thursday involved a land dispute in the state of Santa Catarina, Reuters reported. The Xokleng people were driven from much of their traditional lands in the state during the 1950s, when Brazil sold the land to tobacco farmers, the outlet explained in 2021. Santa Catarina then used the 1988 time limit to push more members of the Xokleng group out of a national park, prompting the current dispute.
"Before they killed us with guns, now they kill us with the stroke of a pen," former chief João Paté told Reuters in 2021.
However, the court on Thursday ruled 9-2 in favor of the Xokleng.
"Areas occupied by Indigenous people and areas that are linked to the ancestry and tradition of Indigenous peoples have constitutional protection, even if they are not demarcated," Justice Luiz Fux said.
The only two dissenting judges were appointed by right-wing former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, who supported extractive industries at the expense of Indigenous rights.
The court also said that the decision had "general repercussion" status, meaning it would apply to other rulings involving Indigenous land claims.
"This is a momentous, historic victory for Brazil's Indigenous peoples, and a massive defeat for the agribusiness lobby," Survival International research and advocacy director Fiona Watson said in a statement, adding that a broad application of the time limit trick would have threatened many Indigenous groups in the country, among them the uncontacted Kawahiva.
"It was all part of a devastating assault on Brazil's Indigenous peoples and the Amazon rainforest, so this rejection of it is hugely important, not only for Indigenous peoples, but for the global fight against climate change too," she said.
Indigenous peoples gathered in Brasilia celebrated the news with dancing and weeping, The Guardian reported, as did those following the case from their homes in the Amazon region.
"We're crying with joy," Aty Guasu, an organization representing the Guarani group, said in a statement translated by Survival International. "Today we're going to sing the song of life and dance the dance of joy. The Supreme Court has shown that it cares about our lives and that it's against genocide. It has listened to the cry of the Indigenous peoples of Brazil."
National Indigenous rights group APIB also welcomed the decision, but said that there were other pending threats to Indigenous rights.
"We have indeed emerged victorious from the time frame thesis, but there is still much to be done," the group's executive coordinator Dinamam Tuxá said in a statement.
Tuxá pointed to a bill currently in the Senate that would only allow new reservations in land occupied by Indigenous groups as of 1988, as Reuters described it. While the court decision may make this provision harder to pass, the bill would also ease the way for mining, farming, dams, and transportation projects in Indigenous territory, AP explained.
"We remain mobilized," Tuxá said. "We continue to fight because we need to ensure and protect the rights of Indigenous peoples."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Democratic Senators Sound Alarm Over Koch-Backed Plot to 'Eviscerate' Regulatory State
"For years, regulated interests have funded a full-scale campaign to delegitimize and dismantle federal regulations."
Sep 22, 2023
Hours before ProPublicarevealed new details about U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas' relationship with the Koch network, a group of Democratic senators filed a brief on Thursday warning that Koch-backed entities are closely involved in an upcoming case that could further gut the federal government's regulatory power—and enhance the strength of the conservative-dominated high court.
The case in question is Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which stems from a New Jersey-based fishing company's challenge to a law requiring certain fishing boats to carry federal compliance monitors to enforce regulations.
Loper Bright Enterprises specifically objected to an interpretation of federal law by the National Marine Fisheries Service, which said the Magnuson-Stevens Act allows the agency to require industry to pay the costs of the monitors.
The dispute over an obscure federal statute has since exploded into a matter of great interest to industry groups and environmentalists, with the latter warning that if the Supreme Court sides with the plaintiffs, it will be much more difficult for federal agencies to implement climate regulations.
Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) echoed that concern and spotlighted the attention the case has attracted from right-wing and corporate-funded groups.
"This case is the product of a decades-long effort by pro-corporate interests to eviscerate the federal government's regulatory apparatus, to the detriment of the American people," the lawmakers wrote, noting that a number of groups connected to the Koch network and other powerful right-wing organizations have submitted briefs in support of the plaintiffs in Loper v. Raimondo.
"For example, amici The Buckeye Institute, Cato Institute, Competitive Enterprise Institute, Landmark Legal Foundation, Mountain States Legal Foundation, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, New Civil Liberties Alliance, and Pacific Legal Foundation have all received hundreds of thousands, and sometimes millions, of dollars from Donors Trust and Donors Capital Fund—two donor-advised funds that allow ultra-wealthy interests to direct funding anonymously."
"The Buckeye Institute, Cato Institute, Competitive Enterprise Institute, New Civil Liberties Alliance, and Pacific Legal Foundation
have also received substantial funding from the Koch family foundations—another top-ten funder for the climate change counter-movement," the senators added.
"The court should proceed cautiously before contributing to their sought-for degradation of our American regulatory system."
At the center of Loper v. Raimondo is the so-called Chevron doctrine, a decades-old administrative law principle that says courts should defer to a federal agency's "reasonable" interpretation of a statute when the law's language is ambiguous.
The plaintiffs in the case and their corporate-backed supporters have called on the Supreme Court to either weaken the Chevron doctrine or overrule it entirely.
In its amicus brief in the case, the Cato Institute—which was co-founded by billionaire oil tycoon Charles Koch—declares that the Chevron doctrine is "unconstitutional and ahistorical" and has "wreaked havoc in the lower courts upon people and businesses."
The Democratic senators counter in their brief that the Chevron doctrine has been critical in "allowing Congress to rely on agency capacity and subject-matter expertise to help carry out Congress' broad policy objectives."
"Administrative regulations reined in dangerous industry activities," the senators added, "and our society became safer and more prosperous."
A ruling that effectively casts the principle aside, the lawmakers argued, "would not just conflict with Congress' well-established policymaking desires; it would erode the separation of powers by shifting policymaking power from Congress and the executive to the unaccountable judiciary."
The brief was submitted a day before ProPublicareported that Thomas, one of the justices poised to rule on Loper v. Raimondo, has attended at least two donor events for the Koch network during his time on the Supreme Court.
ProPublica noted that Thomas used to support the Chevron doctrine but has changed his position in recent years amid a growing corporate onslaught against the regulatory principle.
The Democratic senators stressed in their brief that "the assault in this case on the regulatory system is not an isolated effort."
"For years, regulated interests have funded a full-scale campaign to delegitimize and dismantle federal regulations,” the lawmakers wrote. "The court should proceed cautiously before contributing to their sought-for degradation of our American regulatory system."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular
Independent, nonprofit journalism needs your help.
Please Pitch In
Today!
Today!