May, 03 2017, 11:30am EDT
Fossil Fuel-Funded Report Shows Industry Making Its Last Stand
WASHINGTON
On Monday, the Independent Petroleum Association of America issued a new report arguing that fossil fuel divestment is costly for students, pensioners, and stakeholders.
The report was released days after hundreds of thousands of people mobilized for the Peoples Climate March, and a week before thousands around the world will take part in the Global Divestment Mobilization. This mobilization is taking place across 39 countries, including through five events across New York, and is intensifying the demand for divestment from the fossil fuel companies most responsible for causing climate change. As Donald Trump stacks his cabinet with fossil fuel billionaires including Exxon's own Rex Tillerson and industry puppet Scott Pruitt, communities are demonstrating resistance to the administration's rollbacks on hard-won protections for people and our planet.
In the last few years, multiple reports from financial and legal experts, such as Corporate Knights, the Center for International Environmental Law, Trillium Asset Management, and Mercer, reveal that major university endowments and pension funds, such as those of Harvard University and New York State, have or will incur billions in losses from continued investments in fossil fuels.
Amid a glut of supply, Exxon and many of its industry peers poured billions into the dangerous Alberta tar sands at the expense of the climate and their investors. Now oil majors, such as Exxon and Shell, are shedding fossil fuel assets, incurring billions in losses as the transition away from the carbon-intensive economy gets underway. ExxonMobil, whose executives have spent the last half a century sowing doubt about the company's own climate research, has claimed these divested reserves cannot be considered economical under the Securities and Exchange Commission's accounting rules. Investigations have revealed that Shell also knew about climate change in the early 1990s. The company's CEO recently noted that one of the industry's greatest obstacles today is waning public support. As coal companies declare bankruptcy and fossil fuel companies incur plummeting profits, low-income communities, communities of color, and workers bear the brunt of the industry's failure.
To date, over 700 institutions and more than 58,000 individuals representing over $5.4 trillion in assets have committed to some level of divestment. Just last week, Harvard University announced it is "pausing" its investments in fossil fuels, and the historic Riverside Church in New York announced it is fully divesting. Additional commitments include Amalgamated Bank, the University of California system, the Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund, 25 percent of all UK universities, and institutions across more than 77 countries.
QUOTE SHEET:
Mark Campanale Carbon Tracker Initiative Founder & Executive Director, said:
"There is clear evidence that past behaviour in markets won't be repeated in the future. There is a transition going on and at some point, falling demand for oil will lead to long periods of low oil prices, lowering return on capital, and making the whole sector uneconomic."
Katie McChesney, 350.org US Divestment Campaign Manager, said:
"This report shows the fossil fuel industry attempting to make its last stand, as it pours even further resources into promoting doubt and delay over action on climate change. Divestment doesn't increase risk, it lowers it by insulating an investment portfolio from the volatile and dangerous fossil fuel sector. Just days before the massive Peoples Climate March, Harvard announced it will pause its investments in fossil fuels. If institutions truly support the future they're preparing stakeholders for, they must heed the warnings of the thousands in next week's Global Divestment Mobilization, and cut ties with the coal, oil and gas companies perpetuating climate impacts."
Tom Sanzillo, Director of the Finance Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA.Org), said:
"For the last five years Exxon Mobil the oil industry's leader has lagged the Dow Jones Industrial Average dramatically. In its place other stocks like Apple and Microsoft have driven the returns of institutional investors large and small. The rest of the oil and gas industry have done worse. Professor Bessbinder's paper fails to mention this material fact and that the entire coal industry has collapsed financially and cost investors billions. As a former manager of a large public pension fund I would never hire an academic for investment advice or to advise me in fee negotiations. The Professor's paper lacks an understanding of the divestment question, knowledge of the internal workings of institutional investors and any appreciation of the interaction of market forces and public policy. "F" for missing the obvious, the fossil fuel industries are now less profitable than other stocks and face a negative financial outlook. Climate issues and structurally changing markets make past performance a very poor predictor of future profits."
Denise Patel, DivestInvest Network Coordinator said,
"The IPAA's assessment relies on alternative facts when the reality is that a transition away from fossil fuels is clearly underway. The scholarship on mounting financial risk for oil and gas companies continues to grow. Last week, Moody's cited lower demand for oil and gas over time, changing consumer preferences, and disruptive technological shocks as material risks to oil and gas companies. The report also shows that consequent price volatility and rising pressure on margins and cash flows will lead to stranded assets. The once reliable returns of fossil fuel investments will soon be the riskiest investments in endowment and pension fund portfolios as historical returns are not necessarily indicators of future performance. The implications of holding onto that level of climate risk for university endowments and pension funds are high, and responsible fiduciaries should divest to protect students and pensioners."
350 is building a future that's just, prosperous, equitable and safe from the effects of the climate crisis. We're an international movement of ordinary people working to end the age of fossil fuels and build a world of community-led renewable energy for all.
LATEST NEWS
Amid Spying Fight, House Passes Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," said one advocate.
Apr 17, 2024
While applauding the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan passage of a bill to ensure that "law enforcement and intelligence agencies can't do an end-run around the Constitution by buying information from data brokers" on Wednesday, privacy advocates highlighted that Congress is trying to extend and expand a long-abused government spying program.
The House voted 219-199 for Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (FANFSA), which won support from 96 Democrats and 123 Republicans, including the lead sponsor, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio). Named for the constitutional amendment that protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, H.R. 4639 would close what campaigners call the data broker loophole.
"The privacy violations that flow from law enforcement entities circumventing the Fourth Amendment undermine civil liberties, free expression, and our ability to control what happens to our data," said Free Press Action policy counsel Jenna Ruddock. "These impacts affect everyone who uses digital platforms that extract our personal information any time we open a browser or visit social media and other websites—even when we go to events like demonstrations and other places with our phones revealing our locations."
"We're grateful that the House passed these vital and popular protections," she added. "The bill would prevent flagrant abuses of our privacy by government authorities in league with unscrupulous third-party data brokers. Making this legislation into law with Senate passage too would be a decisive and long-overdue action against government misuse of this clandestine business sector that traffics in our personal data for profit."
Wednesday's vote followed the House sending the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act to the Senate. H.R. 7888 would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows for warrantless spying on noncitizens abroad but also sweeps up Americans' data.
The House notably included an amendment forcing a wide range of individuals and businesses to cooperate with government spying operations but rejected an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the bill, which the Senate could vote on as soon as Thursday.
Noting those decisions on the FISA reauthorization legislation, Ruddock stressed that "today's vote is a victory but follows a recent loss and ongoing threat as that Section 702 bill moves to the Senate this week too."
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," she argued. "That means passing FANFSA and reforming Section 702 authority—and prioritizing everyone's First and Fourth Amendment rights."
Jeramie Scott, senior counsel and director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Project on Surveillance Oversight, also praised the House's FANFSA passage on Wednesday.
"The passage of the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale underscores the extent to which reining in abusive warrantless surveillance is a bipartisan issue," Scott said. "We urge the Senate to take up this measure and close the data broker loophole."
Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at ACLU, similarly said Wednesday that "the bipartisan passage of this bill is a flashing warning sign to the government that if it wants our data, it must get a warrant."
Hamadanchy added that "we hope this vote puts a fire under the Senate to protect their constituents and rein in the government's warrantless surveillance of Americans, once and for all."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a critic of the pending 702 bill and FANFSA's lead sponsor in the upper chamber, called the the House's Wednesday vote "a huge win for privacy" and said that "now it's time for the Senate to follow suit."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Cables Show Biden Pressuring Nations to Oppose Palestine's UN Membership
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," said one former Lebanese diplomat.
Apr 17, 2024
As the United Nations Security Council prepares to vote Thursday on Palestine's bid to become a full U.N. member, the Biden administration—which claims to support Palestinian statehood—is lobbying UNSC nations in an effort to wrangle enough "no" votes so that the United States can avoid resorting to a veto.
Leaked cables obtained by The Intercept show U.S. pressure on Security Council members including Malta—which currently presides over the body—and Ecuador.
While claiming that President Joe Biden backs "Palestinian aspirations for statehood," one of the cables asserts that "it remains the U.S. view that the most expeditious path toward a political horizon for the Palestinian people is in the context of a normalization agreement between Israel and its neighbors."
"We therefore urge you not to support any potential Security Council resolution recommending the admission of 'Palestine' as a U.N. member state, should such a resolution be presented to the Security Council for a decision in the coming days and weeks," the document advises.
The U.S. argument essentially is that the U.N. should not create an independent Palestinian state by fiat—even though that's precisely how the world body voted in 1947 to establish the modern state of Israel.
The renewed push for Palestine's U.N. membership comes as Israel wages a genocidal war on the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian Authority, which hasn't controlled Gaza for nearly two decades, rejected the Biden administration's requests to hold off on seeking full membership.
"We wanted the U.S. to provide a substantive alternative to U.N. recognition. They didn't," one unnamed Palestinian official toldAxios on Wednesday. "We believe full membership in the U.N. for Palestine is way overdue. We have waited more than 12 years since our initial request."
As The Intercept's Ken Klippenstein and Daniel Boguslaw noted:
Since 2011, the U.N. Security Council has rejected the Palestinian Authority's request for full member status. On April 2, the Palestinian Observer Mission to the U.N. requested that the council once again take up consideration of its membership application. According to the first State Department cable, U.N. meetings since the beginning of April suggest that Algeria, China, Guyana, Mozambique, Russia, Slovenia, Sierra Leone, and Malta support granting Palestine full membership to the U.N. It also says that France, Japan, and Korea are undecided, while the United Kingdom will likely abstain from a vote.
Along with the United States, China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom are permanent members of the UNSC, so they also have veto power.
Ahead of Thursday's planned vote, Spain has been doing its own lobbying in Europe to build greater support for Palestinian statehood. At a joint Tuesday press conference with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Slovenian Prime Minister Robert Golob said the question is "when, not if, but when is the best moment to recognize Palestine."
Belgium—which is seeking economic sanctions against Israel in response to its genocidal war on Gaza—is expected to join Spain's push for Palestinian statehood after the country's European Union presidency expires in June.
Currently, 139 of the U.N.'s 193 member states recognize Palestine as an independent state.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who has also claimed to support a so-called "two-state solution"—has alternately boasted about thwarting Palestinian statehood.
Critics pointed to the leaked cables as more proof of U.S. duplicity and double standards on the Israel-Palestine issue.
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," Massoud Maalouf, a former Lebanese ambassador to Canada, Chile, and Poland, said on social media.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Database Exposes 'Illicit Network Undermining Democracy Around the World'
Yanis Varoufakis hailed the effort as "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
Apr 17, 2024
"Coups. Assassinations. Riots. Detentions. Disinformation. We know the tactics that have been deployed to undermine our democracies. But who is behind them?"
Progressive International (PI) asks and answers this and other questions with an extensive new database published Wednesday that connects the dots in what the leftist group calls the "Reactionary International"—a loose global network of right-wing leaders and organizations working to subvert democratic institutions.
PI calls it an "illicit network undermining democracy around the world."
"Today is a mask-off moment for the Reactionary International and the parties, politicians, judges, journalists, foundations, think tanks, tech platforms, NGOs, activists, financiers, and entrepreneurs that comprise it," PI said.
"After a year of preparation, we finally open the doors to our new research consortium, exposing the global network of reactionary forces that corrode our democracies, destroy our planet, and drive us closer to world war," the group added.
"The twin insurrections at the U.S. Capitol in 2021 and BrasÃlia's Three Powers Plaza in 2023 left no doubt about the international coordination of reactionary forces," PI argued. "Yet far too little is known about the entities of this network, their sources of financing, and their institutional allies operating inside our political systems."
Ultimately, PI aims to "support democratic systems to become more resilient to their insidious tactics."
From leaders like Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and former U.S. President Donald Trump—the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee—to evangelical Christian groups influencing laws in African countries criminalizing LGBTQ+ people and tech companies empowering ubiquitous state surveillance, Reactionary International is a who's-who of the world's right-wing forces.
A cursory search of the database's contents shows users can:
- Learn about Israel's NSO, Rayzone, and Team Jorge, and how a team of Tel Aviv tech entrepreneurs fuel unrest in Latin America;
- Meet the Grey Wolves, Turkey's roving death squad with links to President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan and the ethno-nationalists in his governing coalition; and
- Explore the global network of the Falun Gong, its Trump-connected media outlet The Epoch Times, and its traveling dance troupe known as Shen Yun.
Yanis Varoufakis, a PI member and secretary-general of the left-wing Democracy in Europe Movement 2025, called the database "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
PI invites the public to contribute to the database.
"Together, we will not only name, shame, and expose the forces of the far right—but also dismantle their network of complicity," the group said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular