

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Patrick Sullivan, (415) 517-9364, psullivan@biologicaldiversity.org
Kieran Suckling, executive director of the Center for Biological Diversity, released the following statement ahead of President Obama's State of the Union address tonight.
Kieran Suckling, executive director of the Center for Biological Diversity, released the following statement ahead of President Obama's State of the Union address tonight.
"Following 2014's record-breaking heat, President Obama faces some of the most consequential choices any president has ever made in the fight against global warming. His own scientists warn that carbon and methane pollution are already threatening human well-being and disrupting Earth's precious web of life. To help preserve a livable climate, the president has to aim higher than he ever has before, directly confronting the dirty fossil fuels driving our planet into crisis.
"As we head toward the Paris climate summit, President Obama needs to throw his full weight behind a bold new plan to cut global carbon emissions to zero by 2050. Here at home, the president has already pledged to veto a bill that would force approval of the disastrous Keystone XL pipeline. But he also needs to reject dangerous Arctic drilling and act against the frenzy of fracking, coal mining and oil production on America's beautiful public lands and in our communities.
"The president must also strengthen his administration's climate policies. We need much more ambitious cuts to power plant pollution and methane emissions from oil and gas production and an end to new fossil fuel leasing on public lands.
"The global climate crisis won't be solved by rhetoric and grand speeches but by hard work and the courage to do what's right. As the Obama presidency enters its final chapter, he faces a pivotal choice: Finally take the ambitious action needed to stem climate disruption or continue a series of baby steps that will ultimately fail to avert disaster."
Here are the five actions the Center for Biological Diversity urges President Obama to take in 2015 to curb carbon pollution and fight global warming:
1. Back the "zero emissions by 2050" plan at the Paris Climate Summit this year: After last week's announcement that 2014 was the hottest year in Earth's recorded history, the president should order U.S. negotiators to back an international push at the United Nations climate talks to end all fossil fuel use by 2050. This bold proposal to eliminate carbon pollution by mid-century is backed by dozens of governments around the world. The U.S. must also support efforts to provide ample support to help developing countries leapfrog into clean energy economies.
2. Reject the Keystone XL pipeline and other dangerous energy projects: President Obama must follow through on a pledge to veto a bill in Congress aimed at ramming through this climate-disrupting pipeline, which would transport up to 35 million gallons of oil a day from Canada's tar sands to the Gulf of Mexico. Extracting and refining tar sands oil produces two times more greenhouse gases per barrel than conventional oil, and scientists say Keystone would be a disaster for the climate. Beyond Keystone, the Obama administration must curb other tar sands energy projects, reject new efforts to drill for oil in the Arctic, and begin a rapid, large-scale transition to more renewable forms of energy.
3. Strengthen Power Plant Pollution Rules: The Environmental Protection Agency must greatly strengthen recently unveiled rules aimed at cutting planet-warming pollution from power plants. Careful examination reveals that the EPA plan, in combination with all other current climate initiatives, would still leave total U.S. emissions about 5 percent above 1990 levels by 2030. But recent scientific analysis shows that developed countries, including the United States, must reduce emissions far more -- 35 percent to 65 percent below 1990 levels by 2030.
4. Cut more methane pollution from oil and gas production: The Obama administration should greatly strengthen a recent proposal to regulate methane pollution from the oil and gas industry, the nation's largest industrial source of this dangerously potent greenhouse gas. The rules must be widened to apply to existing equipment, which accounts for 90 percent of methane leaks. The steps the administration currently proposes would not apply to existing equipment and would continue to allow millions of metric tons of this dangerous gas -- which traps 87 times more heat than carbon dioxide over a 20-year period -- to escape into the atmosphere.
5. Ban new fossil fuel leasing of public lands and oceans: The president should use his legal authority to ban new fossil fuel leasing on public lands and oceans. The federal government currently leases millions of acres of public lands and oceans for oil, gas, fracking, coal and other fossil fuel development. That leasing is estimated to have caused some 20 percent of all U.S. greenhouse gas emissions in 2013. By prohibiting new fossil fuel leasing, the president can take significant amounts of potential greenhouse gas emissions off the table, while providing critical leadership.
At the Center for Biological Diversity, we believe that the welfare of human beings is deeply linked to nature — to the existence in our world of a vast diversity of wild animals and plants. Because diversity has intrinsic value, and because its loss impoverishes society, we work to secure a future for all species, great and small, hovering on the brink of extinction. We do so through science, law and creative media, with a focus on protecting the lands, waters and climate that species need to survive.
(520) 623-5252"Trump has turned Venezuela into an effective US colony," said one critic.
Some critics of the Trump administration are reacting with horror to revelations that US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has been serving as the de facto ruler of Venezuela.
According to a Saturday report in The New York Times, Rubio for the last several months has been acting informally as the "viceroy" of Venezuela ever since its recognized president, Nicolás Maduro, was abducted by the American military in January and brought to the US to face charges related to "narco-terrorism."
The Times' sources revealed that Rubio "effectively controls Venezuela’s finances, the distribution of its natural resources, and its government" and "is deeply involved in the country’s day-to-day operations," while maintaining regular contact with acting Venezuelan President Delcy Rodríguez.
Under current arrangements, the US Treasury Department takes in revenue from Venezuela's exports, including its petroleum, and then disperses the money back to the country through its private banks with strict conditions set by Rubio over what it can be spent on.
In explaining the system, the Times likened it to "parents handing out allowances to children," adding that it gives Rubio "immense leverage over... Rodríguez, who depends on the money to pay workers and prop up the national currency."
Elizabeth Saunders, professor of political science at Columbia University, described Rubio's power over Venezuela as "insane," as well as "derelict, unconscionable, and impeachable."
"The secretary of state's time is scarce, valuable, and not outsourcable," Saunders emphasized.
Orlando J. Pérez, professor of Political Science at the University of North Texas at Dallas, said the Times report made a mockery of Rubio's professed claims to want to bring democracy back to Venezuela.
"It appears Rubio has transformed from democracy promotion warrior," Pérez commented, "to transactional realpolitik operative!"
Kenneth Roth, former executive director at Human Rights Watch, wrote that US control over Venezuela appeared similar to the kind of imperial power wielded by European nations in the 19th Century.
"Trump has turned Venezuela into an effective US colony," said Roth, "with Marco Rubio as the viceroy and Washington controlling the country’s oil revenue and dictating major foreign and domestic policies. Democracy has been relegated to the distant future."
Bradley Simpson, historian at the University of Connecticut, also saw the current US arrangement with Venezuela as a return to overt imperialism.
"We are literally back in the Dollar Diplomacy days of the 1910s," Simpson wrote, "when the United States invaded countries and took over their financial systems and ran them as effective colonies. Flagrantly illegal, enormously corrupt. Where is the organization of American states or UN in denouncing this?"
"These hoodlums come in with machine guns—M4, an American-made machine gun—and they detain us. They block off the road."
Rep. Ro Khanna this week was detained by a group of Israeli settlers whom he described as "hoodlums... with machine guns" while making a visit to a Palestinian village in the occupied West Bank.
In an interview with Reuters published on Saturday, Khanna (D-Calif.) said he and his tour group were surrounded by armed settlers as they were traveling through the West Bank on Wednesday.
"We were at a village that Israeli settlers had destroyed, they had destroyed the school, they had destroyed that village, and we were just looking at it," said Khanna. "And these hoodlums come in with machine guns—M4, an American-made machine gun—and they detain us. They block off the road."
The California Democrat said that the settlers called in members of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to help them deal with him and his group.
"The IDF is on their side," Khanna remarked, "not on the side of the Americans."
Cameron Kasky, an aide to Khanna, told Reuters that the group was held for over an hour before officials whom he believed to be police intervened and secured their release.
The IDF told Reuters that both military troops and police officers dispersed the settlers who had set up a roadblock near the small Palestinian village of Khirbet Zanuta.
Khanna wasn't the only American to have a run-in with Israeli settlers this week, as CNN reported that four settlers attacked groups of journalists, including CNN reporters and crew, who were traveling through an area north of the Palestinian city of Ramallah on Saturday.
As the journalists were driving, four settlers blocked off the road with their cars and began attacking the reporters' vehicles with wooden clubs and metal rods.
"The settlers then began to jump on the vehicle behind CNN's—carrying another group of journalists—and smashed the windshield of that vehicle," the network reported. "Another group of settlers tried to block a separate exit route before chasing the journalists towards the town of Sinjil."
Israeli police arrived on the scene and arrested four settlers who were allegedly responsible for the attacks, CNN reported.
"The Israel Police and the IDF view any manifestation of violence or causing damage to property very seriously," the Israeli officers said after the arrests, "especially when it concerns media personnel performing their work."
Israeli settlers for years have carried out violent attacks on Palestinians living in the West Bank, and witnesses have regularly described IDF soldiers at the scene either standing by as the attacks occur or even actively helping the attackers.
In an interview with CNN on Tuesday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that claims about settler violence have been "blown up beyond belief," describing attacks as being carried out by a small number of "juvenile delinquents."
"This brazen act should be seen as nothing more than an attempt to prevent the public from knowing what is happening in their country by intimidating journalists from doing their jobs."
The Trump administration on Friday escalated its war with the press by subpoenaing several reporters at The New York Times days after the paper published a story on Wednesday that detailed security concerns about the luxury jet the Qatari government gave to President Donald Trump.
According to the Times, the subpoenas are attempting to force reporters to testify before a federal grand jury in Manhattan on Wednesday next week, a move that the paper describes as an "extraordinary escalation in President Trump’s efforts to threaten and intimidate independent news organizations."
The issued subpoenas do not specifically name the Times' reporting on the Qatari jet as the reason for the grand jury probe, although they were given to all four journalists—Tyler Pager, Julian Barnes, Eric Schmitt, and Eric Lipton—who reported the story.
Additionally, the Times noted, a senior official at the FBI had asked the paper to hold off publishing its story on the jet before it came out on Wednesday, citing unspecified national security concerns about its content.
David McCraw, the top attorney representing the Times' newsroom, denounced the subpoenas as an attack on the freedom of the press.
"The appearance of federal law enforcement agents on the doorstep of news reporters should shock the conscience of any American who believes in the Constitution and the press freedom it protects," said McGraw. “This brazen act should be seen as nothing more than an attempt to prevent the public from knowing what is happening in their country by intimidating journalists from doing their jobs."
It is highly uncommon for government investigators to subpoena journalists when they are probing national security leaks, as such actions are generally seen as having a chilling effect on reporters’ ability to gather information.
Rick Stengel, former under secretary of state for President Barack Obama, said that the Times' reporting on the Qatari jet, whose security upgrades are being financed with US tax dollars, is completely within the scope of constitutional protections for press freedom.
"The reporting that the Times journalists have been subpoenaed for is exactly the kind of journalism the First Amendment is designed to protect: matters involving national security and taxpayer dollars," wrote Stengel in a Saturday social media post. "Reporting that embarrasses a president is protected speech."
Fox News chief national security correspondent Jennifer Griffin also denounced the Trump administration for trying to drag reporters into a grand jury investigation.
"This action by the US government to subpoena reporters for reporting legitimate news on security concerns about Air Force One should alarm every American," Griffin wrote.
Seth Stern, chief of advocacy for the Freedom of the Press Foundation, accused the Trump administration of abusing government power not to defend national security, but to protect the president from personal humiliation.
"We've long said that when the government claims it needs to investigate journalists to protect national security, it really means its own reputational security," said Stern. "This is as clear an example as you can get. The administration's embarrassment that it reportedly charged taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars to retrofit a flying bribe that still isn't secure enough for hostile times does not supersede the need for a free and independent press."
This is the second time in recent weeks that the Trump administration has tried to subpoena reporters to compel their testimony in grand jury investigations.
In June, the US Department of Justice issued subpoenas for national security reporters at The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal related to national security leaks.
Subpoenas against both news organizations were withdrawn after they issued legal challenges in sealed filings.