May, 09 2014, 02:01pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Dave Murphy, Food Democracy Now!, 917-968-7369
Katherine Paul, Organic Consumers Association, 207-653-3090
Divest Monsanto Now! Campaign Calls on Investors to Sell Monsanto Stock to End Monsanto's War on Mandatory GMO Labeling in U.S.
Clear Lake, Iowa
Yesterday Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin signed the first no strings attached law requiring mandatory labeling of genetically engineered (genetically modified organism or GMO) food in the nation. This morning, the biotech industry and giant food manufacturers have indicated that they will sue the state of Vermont to stop the bill from being implemented.
In response, today Food Democracy Now! is launching a National Day of Action with a broad coalition of organic farm and consumer groups to divest Monsanto's stock from investment portfolios in the largest institutional holder mutual funds, Fidelity, Vanguard and State Street and individual retirement funds in an effort to stop Monsanto and the Grocery Manufacturers Association efforts to kill mandatory GMO labeling in the U.S..
According to the Divest Monsanto Now! coalition, at a time when socially responsible investing is gaining in popularity, Monsanto (NYSE: MON) should be added to the list of unethical and socially irresponsible corporations shunned by mutual funds and other investments. Despite its negative reputation, Monsanto has been the darling of Wall Street, but today activists across the U.S. are hoping to change that.
"In the past 2 years alone Monsanto has contributed more than $13 million to kill GMO labeling in California and Washington State, yesterday Vermont showed what happens when elected officials stand up for the will of the people over corporate special interests," said Dave Murphy, Founder and Executive Director of Food Democracy Now!.
"News of Monsanto and giant food companies pending lawsuit is a sign of how out of touch corporations are with the America public. If you support GMO labeling, eat organic food or care about the future of our democracy, it's time to remove Monsanto from any investment portfolio you own. For decades Monsanto's executives lied about the harm of its toxic chemicals like Agent Orange and PCBs. Now Monsanto own patents on life and genetically engineered the food that we eat, but refuses to play by the rules of openness and transparency in the market place. We must use larger market forces to stop them." Murphy added.
As the largest biotech seed and chemical company in the world, during its 100-year history Monsanto has been responsible for producing the most toxic and environmentally destructive substances on the planet. As the manufacturer of Agent Orange, DDT, PCBs and dioxin, Monsanto's toxic legacy of harm to the environment and human health is appalling and inexcusable.
"For a long time companies like Monsanto have gotten a free pass when it comes to how they make profits at the expense of public health. Divest Monsanto Now! is targeting the movers and shakers on Wall Street to not just own stock, but also own their responsibility to public health affected by the companies they own," claimed Adam Eidinger, a Monsanto Shareholder who brought a GMO labeling resolution before shareholders in January of this year.
For decades Monsanto's executives lied about the harm of its toxic chemicals, intimidated scientists critical of their products to put profits over human health and public safety. Now is the time to broaden socially responsible investing to confront the significant harms caused by Monsanto.
"After 20 years of bullying consumers and small farmers, buying out politicians, scientists, and the mass media, Monsanto is being challenged by a global resistance movement determined to label and ban GMOs, to boycott Monsanto's seeds and herbicides, and now most recently to divest - to move their money out of any mutual fund or financial institution that holds stock in this reckless and criminal corporation", said Ronnie Cummins, Director of Organic Consumers Association and a leader in the national movement to label GMOs.
In barely a month after launching the Divest Monsanto Now! campaign, Food Democracy Now! has heard from thousands of members who have made the call to their financial advisors requesting that they move their investments to a fund that does not profit from Monsanto's toxic legacy.
Food Democracy Now! member Romola H. of East Long Island, New York, was shocked when she found Monsanto stock in her Fidelity Investment mutual funds, but even more surprised by Fidelity's response.
"They checked and found out I have some Monsanto stock and [Fidelity] told me they would have to change my whole portfolio", said Romola. "I said, 'well please do it...do you know about Monsanto?' She said 'yes', but that she didn't think I could. She did see the information on what is happening with take the Monsanto stock plunge. So at least Fidelity knows about it. She then called back and said she spoke to her higher up and they would take their time and in one month get back to me to see about getting rid of Monsanto for me."
Even now, as activists across the country protest in front of Fidelity offices, more Fidelity mutual fund holders are making appointments to cash our of their Monsanto stock and into more socially responsible funds.
Currently, Monsanto is valued at $60 billion in the marketplace and with 525 million shares of Monsanto stock outstanding, the three largest mutual fund shareholders, Vanguard, Fidelity and State Street own nearly 16% of Monsanto stock collectively, make them the largest public owners of Monsanto stock. Already 64 other countries around the world already label genetically engineered foods, but for the past 22 years Monsanto has led the charge to keep Americans in the dark about the food they are eating and feeding their families.
LEARN MORE ABOUT NATIONAL DAY OF ACTION HERE:
https://fooddemocracynow.org/blog/2014/may/3/monsanto_stock_plunge_natio...
LEARN MORE ABOUT DIVEST MONSANTO NOW! CAMPAIGN:
https://fooddemocracynow.org/blog/2014/apr/9/take_the_Monsanto_stock_plu...
SIGN THE PETITION HERE:
https://action.fooddemocracynow.org/sign/take_the_Monsanto_stock_plunge/
The Organic Consumers Association (OCA) is an online and grassroots 501(c)3 nonprofit public interest organization, and the only organization in the U.S. focused exclusively on promoting the views and interests of the nation's estimated 50 million consumers of organically and socially responsibly produced food and other products. OCA educates and advocates on behalf of organic consumers, engages consumers in marketplace pressure campaigns, and works to advance sound food and farming policy through grassroots lobbying. We address crucial issues around food safety, industrial agriculture, genetic engineering, children's health, corporate accountability, Fair Trade, environmental sustainability, including pesticide use, and other food- and agriculture-related topics.
LATEST NEWS
Congressional Progressives Unveil 'Bold' Agenda for Second Biden Term
The Congressional Progressive Caucus says its legislative blueprint for 2025 and beyond aims to "deliver equality, justice, and economic security for working people."
Apr 18, 2024
The Congressional Progressive Caucus on Thursday published a "comprehensive domestic policy legislative agenda" for U.S. President Joe Biden's possible second White House term that seeks to "deliver equality, justice, and economic security for working people."
The CPC's Progressive Proposition Agenda is a seven-point plan aimed at lowering the cost of living, boosting wages and worker power, advancing justice, combating climate change and protecting the environment, strengthening democracy, breaking the corporate stranglehold on the economy, and bolstering public education.
"Progressives are proud to have been part of the most significant Democratic legislative accomplishments of this century. We have made real progress for everyday Americans—but there's much more work to be done," Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) said in a statement.
"That's why the Progressive Caucus has identified these popular, populist, and possible solutions," she added. "Democrats in Congress can meet the urgent needs people are facing; rewrite the rules to ensure majorities of this country are no longer barred from the American promise of equality, justice, and economic opportunity; and motivate people with a vision of progressive governance under Democratic majorities in the House and Senate and a Democratic White House."
Progressive lawmakers have already introduced bills for many items on the agenda, including a Green New Deal for Public Schools, expanding the Supreme Court, comprehensive voting rights protection, and legalizing marijuana.
The CPC agenda is backed by a wide range of labor, climate, environmental, civil rights, consumer, faith-based, and other organizations.
"The Congressional Progressive Caucus is leading the way for Congress to address the major issues affecting working families, from reducing healthcare and housing costs to strengthening workers' rights to join unions, earn living wages and benefits, and have safe workplaces," Service Employees International Union president Mary Kay Henry said in a statement.
"SEIU is proud to partner with the CPC to move these priorities forward and build a more equitable economy in which corporations are held accountable for their actions," she added.
Mary Small, chief strategy officer at Indivisible, said: "House progressives were the engine at the heart of our legislative accomplishments in 2021 and 2022. They've continued that momentum to be true governing partners to the Biden administration as those laws and programs are implemented."
"That's why Indivisible is so supportive of the CPC's Proposition Agenda, a bold vision for progressive governance in 2025 and beyond. From reproductive rights to saving our democracy to economic security for all, the CPC is driving forward exactly the sort of legislative goals we want to see in our next governing moment."
That moment is far from guaranteed, with not only the White House hanging in the balance as Biden will all but certainly face former Republican President Donald Trump in November's election but also the Senate Democratic Caucus clinging to a single-seat advantage over the GOP. Republicans currently hold the House of Representatives by a five-seat margin.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'McCarthyism Is Alive and Well': Google Fires 28 for Protesting Israel Contract
"These mass, illegal firings will not stop us," said organizers. "Make no mistake, we will continue organizing until the company drops Project Nimbus and stops powering this genocide."
Apr 18, 2024
The peace coalition No Tech for Apartheid accused Google of a "flagrant act of retaliation" late Wednesday night as the Silicon Valley giant announced it had fired 28 workers over protests against its cloud services contract with the Israeli government.
The firings came after Google organizers held two 10-hour sit-ins at the company's offices in Sunnyvale, California and New York City, demanding the termination of Project Nimbus, a $1.2 billion contract under which Google and Amazon provide cloud infrastructure and data services for Israel—without any oversight regarding whether the Israel Defense Forces uses the services in its occupation of Palestinian territories and bombardment of Gaza.
Workers have denounced Project Nimbus since it was announced in 2021, but Israel's killing of at least 33,970 Palestinians in Gaza since October and its intentional starvation of civilians led employees to escalate their protests.
No Tech for Apartheid said in a statement that Google officials called the police to both offices to arrest nine protesters—dubbed the Nimbus Nine—on Tuesday morning, before utilizing "a dragnet of in-office surveillance" to fire nearly two dozen other employees on Wednesday.
"They punished all of the workers they could associate with this action in wholesale firings," said the coalition, which includes Jewish Voice for Peace and MPower Change, a Muslim-led anti-war group.
Google accused the workers of "bullying," "harassment," defacing property, and physically impeding other employees—allegations No Tech for Apartheid rejected as it noted organizers "have yet to hear from a single executive about" their concerns over Google's collaboration with Israel.
"This excuse to avoid confronting us and our concerns directly, and attempt to justify its illegal, retaliatory firings, is a lie," said the workers. "Even the workers who were participating in a peaceful sit-in and refusing to leave did not damage property or threaten other workers. Instead they received an overwhelmingly positive response and shows of support."
The organizers staged the sit-ins on the heels of reporting in Time magazine about new negotiations between Google and the Israeli government regarding further potential tech contracts.
Kate J. Sim, a child safety policy adviser at Google who said she was among those fired this week, said the terminations show "how terrified [executives] are of worker power."
Google employees have a history of harnessing worker power to change policies at the company. In 2018, Google terminated a deal with the U.S. Defense Department to develop drone and artificial intelligence (AI) technology through a contract called Project Maven. The decision followed the resignations of several employees and the condemnation of thousands of workers.
Calling Google CEO Sundar Pichai and Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian "genocide profiteers," No Tech for Apartheid said Wednesday that they will not stop demonstrating against Project Nimbus until they get a similar result.
"The truth is clear: Google is terrified of us," said the group. "They are terrified of workers coming together and calling for accountability and transparency from our bosses... The corporation is trying to downplay and discredit our power.
"These mass, illegal firings will not stop us," No Tech for Apartheid added. "On the contrary, they only serve as further fuel for the growth of this movement. Make no mistake, we will continue organizing until the company drops Project Nimbus and stops powering this genocide."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Amid Spying Fight, House Passes Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," said one advocate.
Apr 17, 2024
While applauding the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan passage of a bill to ensure that "law enforcement and intelligence agencies can't do an end-run around the Constitution by buying information from data brokers" on Wednesday, privacy advocates highlighted that Congress is trying to extend and expand a long-abused government spying program.
The House voted 219-199 for Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (FANFSA), which won support from 96 Democrats and 123 Republicans, including the lead sponsor, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio). Named for the constitutional amendment that protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, H.R. 4639 would close what campaigners call the data broker loophole.
"The privacy violations that flow from law enforcement entities circumventing the Fourth Amendment undermine civil liberties, free expression, and our ability to control what happens to our data," said Free Press Action policy counsel Jenna Ruddock. "These impacts affect everyone who uses digital platforms that extract our personal information any time we open a browser or visit social media and other websites—even when we go to events like demonstrations and other places with our phones revealing our locations."
"We're grateful that the House passed these vital and popular protections," she added. "The bill would prevent flagrant abuses of our privacy by government authorities in league with unscrupulous third-party data brokers. Making this legislation into law with Senate passage too would be a decisive and long-overdue action against government misuse of this clandestine business sector that traffics in our personal data for profit."
Wednesday's vote followed the House sending the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act to the Senate. H.R. 7888 would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows for warrantless spying on noncitizens abroad but also sweeps up Americans' data.
The House notably included an amendment forcing a wide range of individuals and businesses to cooperate with government spying operations but rejected an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the bill, which the Senate could vote on as soon as Thursday.
Noting those decisions on the FISA reauthorization legislation, Ruddock stressed that "today's vote is a victory but follows a recent loss and ongoing threat as that Section 702 bill moves to the Senate this week too."
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," she argued. "That means passing FANFSA and reforming Section 702 authority—and prioritizing everyone's First and Fourth Amendment rights."
Jeramie Scott, senior counsel and director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Project on Surveillance Oversight, also praised the House's FANFSA passage on Wednesday.
"The passage of the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale underscores the extent to which reining in abusive warrantless surveillance is a bipartisan issue," Scott said. "We urge the Senate to take up this measure and close the data broker loophole."
Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at ACLU, similarly said Wednesday that "the bipartisan passage of this bill is a flashing warning sign to the government that if it wants our data, it must get a warrant."
Hamadanchy added that "we hope this vote puts a fire under the Senate to protect their constituents and rein in the government's warrantless surveillance of Americans, once and for all."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a critic of the pending 702 bill and FANFSA's lead sponsor in the upper chamber, called the the House's Wednesday vote "a huge win for privacy" and said that "now it's time for the Senate to follow suit."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular