January, 25 2011, 03:00pm EDT
The State of the Union: What to Watch For
President Obama will deliver the State of the Union address to
Congress on Tuesday, January 25. The speech will provide important
indications about the President's priorities for the next year, and
should signal to environmentalists the extent to which he plans to stand
up to corporate polluter lobbyists and support a pro-environment agenda.
Here's Friends of the Earth's view of what the President should say about energy and the environment, and what he shouldn't say.
WASHINGTON
President Obama will deliver the State of the Union address to
Congress on Tuesday, January 25. The speech will provide important
indications about the President's priorities for the next year, and
should signal to environmentalists the extent to which he plans to stand
up to corporate polluter lobbyists and support a pro-environment agenda.
Here's Friends of the Earth's view of what the President should say about energy and the environment, and what he shouldn't say.
What President Obama SHOULD DO in his speech:
1) Commit to protecting the Clean Air Act and vetoing any rollbacks
The Clean Air Act is a landmark law that has cut air pollution, reduced
asthma and lung disease, and saved lives. In 2007, the Supreme Court
confirmed that the Clean Air Act's protections apply to the pollution
that is causing climate change, and as a result the Environmental
Protection Agency has begun implementing the Clean Air Act with modest
measures to reduce climate pollution. Unfortunately, corporate special
interests that would rather be able to pollute freely, with no
constraints, are now backing legislative attempts to roll back the Clean
Air Act's protections. Such rollbacks would be disastrous. President
Obama should make it clear he will use all of the tools at his disposal
to stop them.
2) Rededicate himself to cutting fossil fuel subsidies
Fossil fuels are inherently dirty, but unfortunately, while fossil fuel
industries like Big Oil and King Coal have multibillion dollar profits,
Congress continues to award them massive subsidies. President Obama has
pledged to end fossil fuel subsidies, but so far, Congress has been
unwilling to make necessary cuts. Given that many of the newly elected
members of Congress promised during their campaigns to cut deficit
spending, they should be amenable to eliminating these subsidies, as
doing so would reduce the deficit. Friends of the Earth and allies have
identified $200 billion in environmentally harmful spending that can be
cut from the budget in our Green Scissors report (https://www.greenscissors.com/). President Obama should pledge to spend political capital to eliminate these subsidies.
3) Speak out about the serious threats posed by climate change -- and real solutions
Last year was the hottest year ever recorded, and climate-related
extreme weather events harmed people around the world. Scientists agree
that the impacts of climate change will become much more severe if we do
not rapidly reduce pollution. Unfortunately, right-wing,
polluter-backed misinformation campaigns have confused much of the
public about the state of the science. President Obama should use the
bully pulpit of the presidency to call Americans' attention to this
challenge and the fact that while time is running out, solutions are
still attainable.
4) Explain that government regulation is often a good thing
Effective regulations are essential to the strength of our economy and
the well being of the public. However, corporate special interests
seeking to enrich themselves have tried to make "regulation" a dirty
word. This isn't an abstract debate. We've seen in the past what happens
without sufficient regulation: kids die when they eat contaminated
food, rivers catch on fire, giant oil spills take human life and destroy
ecosystems, corporations discriminate against and mistreat their
employees, and financial institutions engage in behavior so risky that
it crashes the economy. The truth is that in order for markets and
society to function, we need regulations. President Obama should make
this point.
5) Call for a transportation bill that reduces vehicle miles travelled
Americans are boxed in by a built environment that requires cars for
all manner of trips, resulting in worsening health, lost productivity
and leisure time, and unnecessary greenhouse gas emissions. Our
outdated federal transportation policy has resulted in yearly increases
in what the Center for Clean Air Policy has dubbed "empty miles," miles
driven by cars that serve as a drag on household budgets and the wider
American economy. The upcoming debate about the federal surface
transportation bill is the perfect opportunity to reduce miles traveled
by personal vehicles and to reconfigure the built environment by
bringing origins and destinations closer together. President Obama
should urge Congress to promote healthier bodies, healthier pocketbooks,
and a healthier planet by reducing vehicle miles travelled. He should
call for investments in rail, public transit, walkable and bikeable
communities and other smart transportation options.
6) Defend federal agencies from congressional assault
Members of the 112th Congress have threatened to drive
federal agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency and the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to a grinding halt with
weekly or even daily hearings questioning their authority to regulate
everything from greenhouse gases to oil spills to genetically engineered
fish. President Obama should strongly defend these agencies, and their
policies and regulations -- both existing and proposed, from any attack
on their authority and ability to protect our environment and public
health from harm.
What President Obama SHOULD AVOID:
1) Calling dirty things clean -- like the so-called 'Clean Electricity Standard'
In last year's State of the Union address, President Obama shocked
environmentalists by calling dirty energy sources such as offshore
drilling, nuclear reactors, biofuels and coal "clean." This year, there
is a danger that he will endorse what is misleadingly called a "Clean
Electricity Standard" -- an energy production mandate that would include
many or all of these dirty energy sources. (See the letter Friends of the Earth and allies sent to Obama urging him to avoid endorsing a dirty Clean Electricity Standard.
[pdf]) A far better approach would be to call for a "Renewable
Electricity Standard" that requires the U.S. to ramp up energy use from
truly clean sources, such as wind, solar and geothermal. We want
President Obama to talk about clean energy, but only if he uses the term
accurately.
2) Pretending half measures are real solutions to climate change
The enormity of the climate crisis requires radical changes to the ways
we produce and consume energy. We can make these changes while making
our society more livable and prosperous, but we can't fool ourselves
into thinking that small changes at the margins will be adequate to
solve the problem. We welcome any steps that President Obama takes to
reduce emissions, but he should frame limited emissions reductions as
first steps in the right direction, rather than actions that will
accomplish all that is needed.
3) Promoting new free trade agreements that will harm workers and the environment
President Obama promised during his campaign to step back from his
predecessors' policy of promoting trade agreements that were great for
wealthy multinational corporations but that harmed workers and the
environment. Unfortunately, the Obama administration recently announced
it supports a NAFTA-style trade agreement with South Korea. President
Obama should adhere to his campaign pledge and stop promoting bad trade
deals. He should not push for the passage of any bad trade agreements in
his speech.
4) Offering to turn the White House over to corporate lobbyists
President Obama won office thanks in large part to his message of
change, particularly his pledge that he would change the way Washington
works and limit the influence of corporate lobbyists. But his recent
selections of William Daley (seen as a close friend of business
interests) as his new chief of staff and GE CEO Jeffrey Immelt as the
head of his council on jobs and economic competitiveness may indicate
that the President is backing away from his commitment to stand up to
corporate special interests. President Obama should make clear in his
speech that he will use the presidency to fight for policies that are in
the public interest -- to stand up for the common good -- and that he
will not give special access to or begin caving more to the demands of
corporate special interests. The government is already far too
subservient to giant corporations; the President must not announce that
he plans to grant them even more influence.
Friends of the Earth fights for a more healthy and just world. Together we speak truth to power and expose those who endanger the health of people and the planet for corporate profit. We organize to build long-term political power and campaign to change the rules of our economic and political systems that create injustice and destroy nature.
(202) 783-7400LATEST NEWS
Modi Government Crackdown on Dissent Hits 'Crisis Point' Before Indian Elections
"The growing crackdown clearly shows the authorities' blatant disregard for human rights and rule of law," said one Amnesty International campaigner.
Mar 22, 2024
As India's right-wing government cracks down on opposition ahead of next month's general elections, Amnesty International on Friday urged authorities to "stop weaponizing the criminal justice system to intimidate and harass" political candidates, activists, and others.
Protests broke out in the capital New Delhi and other Indian cities after police on Thursday arrested Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, an opposition leader from the Aam Aadmi Party, over corruption allegations AAP members say are politically motivated. Two other AAP leaders were previously arrested in connection with the same case, which involves the alleged favoring of certain alcohol vendors and illegal campaign financing.
Authorities also froze the bank accounts of another leading opposition party, the Indian National Congress, over a tax dispute that dates back to 2018. Party leader Sonia Gandhi accused Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) party of perpetrating "a systematic effort to cripple the party financially."
“They want to know we are corrupt like them, which is not the case.” – AAP chief spokesperson Priyanka Kakkar on the BJP’s crackdown on opposition politicians.
AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal was arrested just today on charges of corruption.
The India Report: https://t.co/rxPr6zKnWx pic.twitter.com/P3eSbxVTVm
— Al Jazeera English (@AJEnglish) March 21, 2024
Gandhi, Kejriwal and others have repeatedly accused of Modi's government of misusing federal agencies and resources to repress opposition figures as elections loom. The BJP denies the allegations.
"The Bharatiya Janata Party-led Indian government's crackdown on peaceful dissent and opposition has now reached a crisis point," Amnesty International India board chair Aakar Patel said in a statement.
"The authorities have repeatedly exploited and weaponized various financial and terrorism laws to systematically crack down on human rights defenders, activists, critics, nonprofit organizations, journalists, students, academics, and political opposition," Patel added. "The arrest of Arvind Kejriwal and the freezing of Indian National Congress' bank accounts a few weeks before India holds its general elections show the authorities' blatant failure to uphold the country's international human rights obligations."
Patel continued:
What we are witnessing is a brutal crackdown on human rights including through the misuse of central investigative and financial agencies, attacks on peaceful protests, arbitrary arrests, use and export of invasive spyware for unlawful surveillance, [and] systematic discrimination against religious minorities to feed into their majoritarian Hindutva politics and targeted suspension of opposition leaders from the Parliament who dare to hold the authorities to account.
"The growing crackdown clearly shows the authorities' blatant disregard for human rights and rule of law," Patel added. "Authorities must respect, protect, promote, and fulfill the human rights of everyone in the country including human rights defenders, activists, and opposition candidates before, during, and after the general elections which are due to begin in April 2024. Authorities must also ensure access to justice and effective remedies for victims of human rights violations."
On Thursday, the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission held a hearing on the situation in India.
The commission noted that in recent years, as Modi and the BJP have consolidated power, "concerns about human rights abuses in India have grown" over "a wide range of significant rights issues, including restrictions on religious and press freedoms, violence or threats of violence targeting members of national/racial/ethnic and religious minorities, harassment of and restrictions on civil society and human rights organizations, corruption, and lack of accountability."
Keep ReadingShow Less
House GOP 'Imploding' as Gallagher Resigns and Greene Moves to Oust Speaker
"House Republicans had a bad day," said one reporter, listing challenges and changes to leadership as a government shutdown looms.
Mar 22, 2024
The U.S. House of Representatives started a two-week recess on Friday, but not before a series of events that provoked fresh declarations of what has become a familiar phrase over the past few years: "Republicans in disarray."
Before leaving Capitol Hill, House members passed a spending package intended to prevent a partial government shutdown that could still occur unless the Senate acts. Fewer than two dozen Democrats and over 100 Republicans opposed the bill. Democratic opposition was largely related to Israel's war on the Gaza Strip.
Meanwhile, far-right Republicans like Texas Congressman Chip Roy have made comments like, "Everyone that I know and trust about the border, about overall spending, see it as a complete and total failure and a capitulation by Republicans. And leadership worked the deal, so it's on leadership."
Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) not only opposed the package but also filed a motion to vacate, hoping to remove House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.)—which would only require a simple majority if it came up for a vote.
The \u201cRepublican-controlled\u201d House just passed a $1.2 trillion spending bill that doesn\u2019t secure our border, but funds full term abortion and trans ideology on our youth.\n\nI filed a Motion to Vacate because the House needs a Speaker who\u2019s able to win for Republicans and our\u2026— (@)
House Republicans elected Johnson to the leadership role in late October, after ousting former Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.)—who then opted to leave office at the end of last year—and rejecting three other candidates for the post: Reps. Tom Emmer (D-Minn.), Steve Scalise (R-La.), and Jim Jordan (R-Ohio).
Noting that Greene filed a regular motion rather than a privileged one, meaning it could be referred to a committee, "where it would likely languish," NBC Newsreported Friday:
Greene told reporters that her motion to vacate was "more of a warning than a pink slip," saying she does not want to "throw the House into chaos," like the three and a half weeks that the chamber was without a speaker when McCarthy, her close ally, was ousted.
"I'm not saying that it won't happen in two weeks or it won't happen in a month or who knows when. But I am saying the clock has started. It's time for our conference to choose a new speaker," she said.
Johnson's October election led Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.)—who filed the motion to vacate targeting McCarthy—to declare that "MAGA is ascendant," a reference to the "Make America Great Again" campaign slogan of former President Donald Trump, the presumptive GOP nominee for the November election.
While Gaetz voted against the spending package on Friday, he also said that "if we vacated this speaker we'd end up with a Democrat. You know, when I vacated the last one, I made a promise to the country that we would not end up with a Democrat speaker and I was right. I couldn't make that promise again today."
Asked if he thinks Johnson's job is safe, Gaetz responded, "It is."
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) also responded dismissively when questioned about Greene's motion on Friday, tellingPunchbowl News, "She's a joke."
A spokesperson for Johnson, Raj Shah, toldPolitico that the speaker "always listens to the concerns of members, but is focused on governing. He will continue to push conservative legislation that secures our border, strengthens our national defense, and demonstrates how we'll grow our majority."
However, Johnson's limited control over the House is dwindling. Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-Wis.), who backed the spending bill, revealed that he is resigning from his seat effective April 19 after previously saying that he would not seek reelection. Friday was also the last day of Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.), who announced earlier this month that he would step down from his seat.
The Washington Post noted Friday that "Buck and Gallagher are the sixth and seventh members of the House who are quitting midterm simply to leave for the private sector, a trend we dubbed 'the Great Resignation' last weekend. It's also the highest number of lawmakers quitting public service altogether in at least 40 years."
Responding to Gallager's announcement on social media, HuffPost's Jennifer Bendery said that "House Republicans are imploding in plain sight."
In yet another disruption to the chamber's GOP leadership, Rep. Kay Granger (R-Texas)—who announced last year that she wouldn't seek reelection—wrote in a Friday letter to Johnson that she plans to step down as chair of the House Appropriations Committee.
Granger told the speaker she would stay in the post until the Republican Steering Committee chooses her replacement and then remain on the panel through the end of her term to offer "advice and counsel for my colleagues when it is needed."
The Texas Tribunepointed out that "the Appropriations Committee will need to pass another set of federal funding bills before the end of September to keep the government funded. Congress has failed to meet that deadline for nearly 30 years, and Granger acknowledged in her letter that election years in particular often distract Congress from passing spending bills on time."
GOP members of the upper chamber were also accused of sowing chaos on Friday, as the midnight shutdown deadline loomed.
Senate Budget Committee Chair Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) said on social media, "Well, it looks like we're headed for a shutdown at the hands of Senate Republican gremlins who (1) know that amendments can't pass because there's no House to send an amended bill back to (they adjourned) and (2) want amendments anyway."
"And (3) can't decide amongst themselves what won't-pass amendments they want," Whitehouse added. "I sure hope I'm wrong. But the Republican Senate caucus is a rudderless ship right now, so the gremlins are running the show."
Keep ReadingShow Less
AOC Pleads for Biden to End Israel Aid Amid 'Unfolding Genocide' in Gaza
"The time is now to force compliance with U.S. law and the standards of humanity."
Mar 22, 2024
Progressive Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez took to the House floor Friday to demand a suspension of U.S. military aid to Israel as it wages a genocidal war on Gaza and deliberately starves Palestinians to death in the besieged enclave.
"As we speak, in this moment, 1.1 million innocents in Gaza are at famine's door. A famine that is being intentionally precipitated through the blocking of food and global humanitarian assistance by leaders in the Israeli government," Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) said during her speech. "This is a mass starvation of people, engineered and orchestrated following the killing of another 30,000, 70% of whom were women and children."
"If you want to know what an unfolding genocide looks like, open your eyes," she continued. "It looks like the forced famine of 1.1 million innocents. It looks like thousands of children eating grass as their bodies consume themselves, while trucks of food are slowed and halted just miles away. It looks like good and decent people who do nothing. Or too little. Too late."
"As we speak, in this moment, 1.1 million innocents in Gaza are at famine's door."
Noting that much of the death and devastation in Gaza was "accomplished with U.S. resources and weapons," the congresswoman pointed out that "it is against United States law to provide weapons to forces who block United States humanitarian assistance."
"That is exactly what is happening right now," she said. "So much so that the president himself stated, during the State of the Union, that the United States must and will be building its own port to let aid through. It will be too late."
"The time is now to force compliance with U.S. law and the standards of humanity," the lawmaker asserted. "And fulfill our obligations to the American people to suspend the transfer of U.S. weapons to the Israeli government in order to stop and prevent further atrocity."
There is no world in which the forced famine of 1.1 million people cannot be considered genocide. And that is exactly what we are watching unfold in Gaza now.
We must enforce U.S. laws and halt weapons transfers to the Israeli government to stop an atrocity in the making. pic.twitter.com/N40Jk3yKc7
— Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@RepAOC) March 22, 2024
Ocasio-Cortez related that "a decent man" once said: "'Preventing genocide is an achievable goal, a goal that requires a level of government organization and engagement that matches in its intensity the brutality and efficiency required to carry out mass killing. Too often, these efforts have come too late, after the best and least costly opportunities to prevent them have been missed.'"
"The man who said that was then-Vice President and now President Joseph Biden," she revealed. "And he was right."
Ocasio-Cortez was referring to a 2011 speech during which Biden told an audience at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum that "when a state engages in atrocity, it forfeits its sovereignty."
This, as U.S. troops were committing atrocities while violating the sovereignty of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia as the Obama administration continued and expanded the so-called War on Terror launched after 9/11 by then-President George W. Bush.
"This is not just about Israel or Gaza. This is about us," Ocasio-Cortez added. "The world will never be the same. And we will never be the same. And we must write our story in this moment, of what it means and who we are as Americans. And our story must be not that we were good men who did nothing. But that we were a committed democracy that did something."
Ocasio-Cortez's plea came as her House colleagues voted 286-134 on Friday to extend U.S. sanctions on the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) until March 2025, while authorizing another $3.8 billion in military aid to Israel. Ocasio-Cortez was one of just 22 House Democrats to vote against the measure, which also authorizes more than $1 trillion in spending on U.S. militarization.
Responding to unfounded Israeli claims—reportedly resulting from torture—that 12 of UNRWA's more than 13,000 workers in Gaza took part in the October 7 attacks on Israel, the U.S. and more than a dozen other countries suspended funding for the lifesaving agency, even as famine loomed amid Israel's relentless bombardment and siege. Numerous nations have since reinstated financing for UNRWA, most recently Finland on Friday.
The Biden administration—which is seeking an additional $14.3 billion in military aid for Israel—continues to support the country's war on Gaza even as evidence mounts that the key ally is violating an International Court of Justice order to avoid genocidal acts. However, the administration has ramped up its criticism of Israeli war crimes, with Biden imploring the Israel Defense Forces to stop its "indiscriminate bombing" of civilians and Secretary of State Antony Blinken this week asserting that "children should not be dying of malnutrition in Gaza."
"It's time for the president to bring real leverage to bear, in accordance with existing U.S. law, and suspend military assistance to Israel."
But they are dying, and critics say U.S. humanitarian airdrops and construction of an aid port are essentially meaningless as long as Washington also continues to back Israel's genocidal onslaught. And now the world is watching as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and members of his far-right government vow to invade Rafah, where around 1.5 million Palestinians—the vast majority of them refugees forcibly expelled from other parts of Gaza—are sheltering.
"The Biden administration has rightly been sounding the alarm about the threatened Israeli incursion into Rafah, and the looming famine resulting from Israel's indiscriminate war on Gaza," said Matt Duss, executive vice president of the Center for International Policy. "But the devastating last five months have shown the limits of the power of words."
"It's time for the president to bring real leverage to bear, in accordance with existing U.S. law, and suspend military assistance to Israel," Duss added. "We applaud Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez's courageous call today for President Biden to do that."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular