November, 03 2010, 04:33pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
1050 Connecticut Ave NW,Suite 65500,Washington, DC 20035,Phone: 202-393-5177
Election 2010: Gains and Losses on Key Contests Impacting Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender People Nationwide
WASHINGTON
Election 2010 results are proving to be a mixed bag for lesbian, gay,
bisexual and transgender (LGBT) rights. Republicans regained control of
the U.S. House, which will pose challenges for advancing progressive
legislation, including LGBT rights legislation. In state contests,
several gubernatorial candidates who support marriage equality were
victorious, but the GOP made numerous gains in state legislatures across
the country, which could adversely affect LGBT rights legislation. In
Congress, meanwhile, there will be four openly gay and lesbian members.
A new federal landscape
LGBT rights advocates will be working in a new federal landscape come
the next Congress after Republicans regained control of the U.S. House,
and Democrats retained a majority in the Senate. This division will
likely mean greater gridlock and tougher challenges advancing any
legislation.
"We'll cut to the chase: The shift in the balance of power will
very likely slow advancement of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender
rights legislation in Congress. Does this mean a blockade on LGBT
rights? Not if we can help it. Fact is, our community has always had to
fight -- and fight hard -- for equality. This is nothing new to us. But
here's another fact: There are Americans, from every part of the
country, from every background, from every political leaning and of
every faith, who support equality for LGBT people -- and those vast
numbers grow bigger every day," said National Gay and Lesbian Task Force
Executive Director Rea Carey.
"No matter what the political breakdown is in Washington, the
Task Force will continue to identify and work with all fair-minded
members of Congress who are willing to support and defend equality for
LGBT people. Through our New Beginning Initiative, we will continue to
push for the administration and its agencies to make tangible changes
that benefit lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people and our
families -- changes that can be done without Congress. We will continue
working with local partners in communities across the country to secure
equality," she added. "Bottom line: While political winds and players
may shift, the fundamental needs of the people do not. No matter who is
in office, people need jobs, protection from discrimination, a roof over
their heads, a way to feed their families, a fair shake. No one should
settle for less -- we won't." Watch video here.
Local measures see mixed results in Ohio and Texas
Provisional ballots are still being tallied, but preliminary results in Bowling Green, Ohio,
show that Ordinance 7905, which would protect LGBT people from housing
discrimination, is passing 50.15 percent to 49.85 percent with all
precincts reporting. Ordinance 7906, which would ban discrimination
against LGBT people in employment, education and public accommodations,
was losing 50.71 percent to 49.29 percent with all precincts reporting.
It could take several weeks for provisional ballots to be verified and
tabulated.
The Task Force has been working with One Bowling Green,
the locally-driven, grassroots campaign, by committing financial
resources, dispatching on-the-ground organizers to Bowling Green, and
sponsoring trainings. There was also a massive student-led voter turnout
campaign at Bowling Green State University (BGSU). Hundreds of BGSU
students, who study, live and work in Bowling Green, stood up and spoke
out for a fair and welcoming community.
Dan Hawes, who heads up the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force's
organizing efforts, said: "We are pleased that the housing protections
measure appears to have passed, and look forward to a probable victory
on Ordinance 7906. One Bowling Green ran a tough campaign in an effort
to create a more fair and more welcoming Bowling Green for everyone,
including lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people. As the
provisional ballots begin to be counted, we look forward to our
continued work with One Bowling Green to ensure that each and every vote
is counted." More to come on this contest.
In El Paso, Texas, voters approved an initiative to end health
benefits for same-sex and unmarried partners of city employees. The
initiative was supported by conservative religious groups that took aim
at the city's domestic partners ordinance after the City Council passed
it last year.
Pro-marriage equality gubernatorial candidates win
Pro-marriage equality candidates were victorious in several gubernatorial races. In New Hampshire, incumbent Democrat John Lynch defeated Republican challenger John Stephen; in New York, Democrat Andrew Cuomo beat Republican Carl Paladino; in California, Democrat Jerry Brown defeated the GOP's Meg Whitman; in Massachusetts, incumbent Democrat Deval Patrick beat Republican challenger Charlie Baker; in Maryland, Democrat Martin O'Malley won his re-election against Republican Robert Ehrlich; in Rhode Island, Independent Lincoln Chafee won over Republican John Robitaille and Democrat Frank Caprio; in Vermont, Democratic gubernatorial candidate Peter Shumlin defeated Republican nominee Brian Dubie.
"These victories once again show that supporting equality is a
winning issue. Voters in these contests have rejected the politics of
division and have elected candidates who embrace equality and oppose the
scapegoating of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people for
political gain. All across the nation, same-sex couples and our families
are sharing our stories with others in a conversation that is
transforming our country. These electoral victories are a testament to
those personal and powerful discussions, as the tide continues to move
nationwide in favor of marriage equality," says Task Force Executive
Director Rea Carey.
In Minnesota, the race remains too close to call. Democrat Mark Dayton has a small lead over Republican candidate Tom Emmer.
There were disappointments on the marriage equality front, when three Iowa
Supreme Court justices lost their seats. They were among the seven
justices who unanimously found Iowa's ban on marriage equality to be
unconstitutional. Those justices were targeted by right-wing,
out-of-state forces that sought to punish them for the 2009 marriage
equality decision.
GOP gains in state legislatures
In New Hampshire, Republicans won a veto-proof majority in the
state Legislature, which complicates the political landscape in that
state. Now the Republicans have override power in case re-elected Gov.
John Lynch decides to veto a bill to repeal the state's marriage
equality law. As a result of Tuesday elections, Republicans took control
of both houses of the state legislatures in Indiana, Ohio, Minnesota
and Pennsylvania. In summary, 25 state legislatures are controlled by
Republicans, 16 by Democrats and four are divided. The rest have not
been called yet. The domination of Republicans in the state legislatures
could impact next year's redistricting -- likely meaning a more
Republican Congress.
Election of openly gay and lesbian members of Congress
David Cicilline, the openly gay mayor of
Providence, R.I., won election to the U.S. House of Representatives.
Cicilline garnered 50.6 percent of the vote to Republican candidate John
Loughlin's 44.6 percent. He will join U.S. Reps. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), Barney Frank (D-Mass.) and Jared Polis (D-Colo.),
bringing to four the number of openly gay and lesbian members of
Congress. Baldwin won with 62 percent to 31 percent against Republican
challenger Peter Theron. Frank snagged 54 percent of the vote, beating
Republican candidate Sean Bielat. Polis garnered 72 percent of the vote
to beat a challenge by Tea Party-supported candidate Stephen Bailey.
Baldwin, Frank and Polis were all re-elected to the House. Steve Pougnet,
the openly gay mayor of Palm Springs, Calif., lost his bid to unseat
Republican U.S. Rep. Mary Bono Mack. The electoral victories of openly
gay and lesbian candidates reflect that voters, from very different
parts of the country, support LGBT candidates for higher offices.
Reproductive rights, English-only and immigration ballot initiatives
This election, there were a handful of issues up for a vote that
were not directly connected to LGBT issues, but important to the Task
Force. Colorado's Amendment 62, which would have
changed the state Constitution to define a "person" as a human being
"from the moment of biological beginning" was defeated by a margin of 72
percent to 28 percent, similar to an almost identical failed measure in
2008; Arizona's Proposition 107, which would change
the state Constitution to ban affirmative action, passed by a margin of
59.56 percent to 40.44 percent; and Oklahoma's State Question 751,
which would make English the state's official language, mandating all
state business be conducted only in English, passed by a margin of 75.54
percent to 24.46 percent.
The National LGBTQ Task Force advances full freedom, justice and equality for LGBTQ people. We are building a future where everyone can be free to be their entire selves in every aspect of their lives. Today, despite all the progress we've made to end discrimination, millions of LGBTQ people face barriers in every aspect of their lives: in housing, employment, healthcare, retirement, and basic human rights. These barriers must go. That's why the Task Force is training and mobilizing millions of activists across our nation to deliver a world where you can be you. Join us!
LATEST NEWS
Nigerian Village Bombed by Trump Has 'No Known History' of Anti-Christian Terrorism, Locals Say
“Portraying Nigeria’s security challenges as a targeted campaign against a single religious group is a gross misrepresentation of reality,” said Nigeria's information minister.
Dec 27, 2025
When President Donald Trump launched a series of airstrikes in Nigeria on Christmas, he described it as an attack against "ISIS Terrorist Scum in Northwest Nigeria who have been targeting and viciously killing, primarily, innocent Christians."
But locals in a town that was hit during the strike say terrorism has never been a problem for them. On Friday, CNN published a report based on interviews with several residents of Jabo, which was hit by a US missile during Thursday's attack, which landed just feet away from the town's only hospital.
The rural town of Jabo is part of the Sokoto state in northwestern Nigeria, which the Trump administration and the Nigerian government said was hit during the strike.
Both sides have said militants were killed during the attack, but have not specified their identities or the number of casualties.
Kabir Adamu, a security analyst from Beacon Security and Intelligence in Abuja, told Al Jazeera that the likely targets are members of “Lakurawa,” a recently formed offshoot of ISIS.
But the Trump administration's explanation that their home is at the center of a "Christian genocide" left many residents of Jabo confused. As CNN reported:
While parts of Sokoto face challenges with banditry, kidnappings and attacks by armed groups including Lakurawa–which Nigeria classifies as a terrorist organization due to suspected affiliations with [the] Islamic State–villagers say Jabo is not known for terrorist activity and that local Christians coexist peacefully with the Muslim majority.
Bashar Isah Jabo, a lawmaker who represents the town and surrounding areas in Nigeria's parliament, described the village to CNN as “a peaceful community” that has “no known history of ISIS, Lakurawa, or any other terrorist groups operating in the area.”
While the town is predominantly Muslim, resident Suleiman Kagara, told reporters: "We see Christians as our brothers. We don’t have religious conflicts, so we weren’t expecting this."
Nigeria, Africa's most populous nation with more than 237 million people, has a long history of violence between Christians and Muslims, with each making up about half the population.
However, Nigerian officials have disputed claims by Republican leaders—including US Sen. Ted Cruz (Texas)—who have claimed that the government is “ignoring and even facilitating the mass murder of Christians.”
The senator recently claimed, without citing a source for the figures, that "since 2009, over 50,000 Christians in Nigeria have been massacred, and over 18,000 churches and 2,000 Christian schools have been destroyed" by the Islamist group Boko Haram.
Cruz is correct that many Christians have been killed by Boko Haram. But according to reports by the US-based Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project and the Council on Foreign Relations, the majority of the approximately 53,000 civilians killed by the group since 2009 have been Muslim.
Moreover, the areas where Boko Haram is most active are in northeastern Nigeria, far away from where Trump's strikes were conducted. Attacks on Christians cited in October by Cruz, meanwhile, have been in Nigeria's Middle Belt region, which is separate from violence in the north.
The Nigerian government has pushed back on what they have called an "oversimplified" narrative coming out of the White House and from figures in US media, like HBO host Bill Maher, who has echoed Cruz's overwrought claims of "Christian genocide."
“Portraying Nigeria’s security challenges as a targeted campaign against a single religious group is a gross misrepresentation of reality,” said Nigerian information minister Mohammed Idris Malagi. “While Nigeria, like many countries, has faced security challenges, including acts of terrorism perpetrated by criminals, couching the situation as a deliberate, systematic attack on Christians is inaccurate and harmful. It oversimplifies a complex, multifaceted security environment and plays into the hands of terrorists and criminals who seek to divide Nigerians along religious or ethnic lines."
Anthea Butler, a religious scholar at the University of Pennsylvania, has criticized the Trump administration's attempts to turn the complex situation in Nigeria into a "holy war."
"This theme of persecution of Christians is a very politically charged, and actually religiously charged, theme for evangelicals across the world. And when you say that Christians are being persecuted, that’s a thing," she told Democracy Now! in November. "It fits this sort of savior narrative of this American sort of ethos right now that is seeing itself going into countries for a moral war, a moral suasion, as it were, to do something to help other people."
Nigeria also notably produces more crude oil than any other country in Africa. Trump has explicitly argued that the US should carry out regime change in Venezuela for the purposes of "taking back" that nation's oil.
Butler has doubted the sincerity of Trump's concern for the nation's Christians due to his administration's denial of entry for Nigerian refugees, as well as virtually every other refugee group, with the exception of white South Africans.
She said: "I think this is sort of disingenuous to say you’re going to go in and save Christianity in Nigeria, when you have, you know, banned Nigerians from coming to this country."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Russia Launches Drone Barrage on Kyiv Ahead of Zelenskyy-Trump Meeting
The attacks came as Trump and Zelenskyy are expected to discuss critical questions in a Ukraine-Russia peace deal, including its territorial sovereignty, NATO protections, and control over its natural resources.
Dec 27, 2025
As Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy made his way to Florida for a pivotal set of talks this weekend with US President Donald Trump, Russia launched a barrage of drone and missile attacks on Kyiv early Saturday morning.
At least two people were killed in the Ukrainian capital during the 10-hour attack, with 44 more—including two children—injured. Hundreds of thousands of residents are left to brave near-freezing temperatures without heat following the attack, which cut off power supplies.
The attack came as Zelenskyy prepared to stop in Canada before meeting with Trump on Sunday to discuss a 20-point plan to end the nearly four-year war with Russia that has been the subject of weeks of negotiation between US and Ukrainian emissaries.
Zelenskyy is seeking to maintain Ukraine's territorial sovereignty without having to surrender territory—namely, the eastern Donbass region that is largely occupied by Russian forces. He also hopes that any agreement to end the war will come with a long-term security guarantee reminiscent of NATO.
On Friday, Zelenskyy told reporters that the peace deal was 90% complete. But Trump retorted that Zelenskyy "doesn't have anything until I approve it."
Trump has expressed hostility toward Zelenskyy throughout his presidency. In February, before berating him in a now-infamous Oval Office meeting, Trump insisted falsely that Ukraine, not Russia, was responsible for starting the war in 2022.
Zelenskyy's latest peace proposal was issued in response to Trump's proposal last month, which was heavily weighted in Russia's favor.
It called for Ukraine to recognize Russia's illegal annexation of Crimea and cede the entirety of the Donbass, about 2,500 square miles of territory, to Russia, including territory not yet captured. Trump's plan puts a cap of 600,000 personnel on Ukraine's military and calls for Ukraine to add a measure in its constitution banning it from ever joining NATO.
Earlier this year, Trump demanded that Ukraine give up $500 billion worth of its mineral wealth in what he said was "repayment" for US military support during the war (even though that support has only totalled about $175 billion).
In his latest proposal, Trump has pared down his demands to the creation of a "Ukraine Development Fund" that would include the "extraction of minerals and natural resources" as part of a joint US-Ukraine reconstruction effort.
While those terms appear less exploitative, the reconstruction program is expected to be financed by US loans from firms like BlackRock, which have been heavily involved in the diplomatic process.
"The infrastructure rebuilt with these loans—ports, rail lines, power grid—won’t be Ukrainian in any meaningful sense. It’ll be owned by international consortiums, operated for profit, with revenues flowing out to service the debt," wrote the Irish geopolitical commentator Deaglan O'Mulrooney on Tuesday. "In other words, Ukraine will be gutted."
Despite the criticism, Zelenskyy has signaled support in principle for the US reconstruction proposal as an alternative to direct expropriation.
The "red lines" for Zelenskyy heading into his talk with Trump are related to Ukraine's territorial integrity. He has said he will not recognize Russian control of the Donbass, or the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, the largest nuclear facility in Europe, which Russia currently controls. He has also demanded that all terms of a peace agreement come up for a referendum among the Ukrainian people, which is strongly against territorial concessions.
At the same time, however, he insisted Saturday that "Ukraine is willing to do whatever it takes to stop this war."
Keep ReadingShow Less
British Activist Blasts 'Sociopathic Greed' of Big Tech After US Judge Blocks His Detention
"I chose to take on the biggest companies in the world, to hold them accountable, to speak truth to power. There is a cost attached to that," said Imran Ahmed, one of five Europeans targeted by the Trump administration.
Dec 26, 2025
After a US judge on Thursday blocked President Donald Trump's administration from detaining one of the European anti-disinformation advocates hit with a travel ban earlier this week, Imran Ahmed suggested that he is being targeted because artificial intelligence and social media companies "are increasingly under pressure as a result of organizations like mine."
Ahmed is the CEO of the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH). The 47-year-old Brit lives in Washington, DC with his wife and infant daughter, who are both US citizens. While the Trump administration on Tuesday also singled out Clare Melford of the Global Disinformation Index, Josephine Ballon and Anna-Lena von Hodenberg of HateAid, and Thierry Breton, a former European commissioner who helped craft the Digital Services Act, Ahmed is reportedly the only one currently in the United States.
On Wednesday, Ahmed, who is a legal permanent resident, sued top Trump officials including US Attorney General Pam Bondi, Immigration and Customs Enforcement acting Director Todd Lyons, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio in the District Court for the Southern District of New York.
"Rather than disguise its retaliatory motive, the federal government was clear that Mr. Ahmed is being 'SANCTIONED' as punishment for the research and public reporting carried out by the nonprofit organization that Mr. Ahmed founded and runs," the complaint states. "In other words, Mr. Ahmed faces the imminent prospect of unconstitutional arrest, punitive detention, and expulsion for exercising his basic First Amendment rights."
"The government's actions are the latest in a string of escalating and unjustifiable assaults on the First Amendment and other rights, one that cannot stand basic legal scrutiny," the filing continues. "Simply put, immigration enforcement—here, immigration detention and threatened deportation—may not be used as a tool to punish noncitizen speakers who express views disfavored by the current administration."
Just a day later, Judge Vernon Broderick, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, issued a temporary restraining order, blocking the administration from arresting or detaining Ahmed. The judge also scheduled a conference for Monday afternoon.
The US Department of State said Thursday that "the Supreme Court and Congress have repeatedly made clear: The United States is under no obligation to allow foreign aliens to come to our country or reside here."
Ahmed's lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, said that "the federal government can't deport a green-card holder like Imran Ahmed, with a wife and young child who are American, simply because it doesn't like what he has to say."
In the complaint and interviews published Friday, Ahmed pointed to his group's interactions with Elon Musk, a former member of the Trump and administration and the richest person on Earth. He also controls the social media platform X, which sued CCDH in 2023.
"We were sued by Elon Musk a couple of years ago, unsuccessfully; a court found that he was trying to impinge on our First Amendment rights to free speech by using law to try and silence our accountability work," Ahmed told the BBC.
Months after a federal judge in California threw out that case last year, Musk publicly declared "war" on the watchdog.
CCDH's work is being targeted by the U.S. State Department trying to sanction and deport our CEO, Imran Ahmed. This is an unconstitutional attempt to silence anyone who dares to criticize social media giants. But a federal judge has temporarily blocked his detention.More in BBC ⤵️
[image or embed]
— Center for Countering Digital Hate (@counterhate.com) December 26, 2025 at 4:05 PM
"What it has been about is companies that simply do not want to be held accountable and, because of the influence of big money in Washington, are corrupting the system and trying to bend it to their will, and their will is to be unable to be held accountable," Ahmed told the Guardian. "There is no other industry, that acts with such arrogance, indifference, and a lack of humility and sociopathic greed at the expense of people."
Ahmed explained that he spent Christmas away from his wife and daughter because of the Trump administration's track record of quickly sending targeted green-card holders far away from their families. He said: "I chose to take on the biggest companies in the world, to hold them accountable, to speak truth to power. There is a cost attached to that. My family understands that."
The British newspaper noted that when asked whether he thought UK politicians should use X, the former Labour Party adviser told the Press Association, "Politicians have to make decisions for themselves, but every time they post on X, they are putting a buck in Mr. Musk's pocket and I think they need to question their own consciences and ask themselves whether or not they think they can carry on doing that."
Ahmed also said that it was "telling that Mr. Musk was one of the first and most vociferous in celebrating the press release" about the sanctions against him and the others.
"He said it was great, and it is great, but not for the reasons that he thinks," the campaigner said. "Because what it has actually done is give a chance for the system to show that the advocacy that we do is both important and protected by the First Amendment."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


