August, 17 2010, 11:07am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Brenda Bowser Soder,bowsersoderb@humanrightsfirst.org,O -202/370-3323, C - 301/906-4460
Retired Military Leaders, Illinois Congressional Candidates to Talk Terrorism
Retired Generals Urge Torture Ban, Federal Trials, Closure of Guantanamo
CHICAGO, Illinois
Retired military leaders committed to making interrogation and
detention policies consistent with America's laws, values and security
interests are in Illinois this week to meet with congressional
candidates of both parties about rejecting torture, closing Guantanamo
and pending legislative restrictions on detainee transfers to the United
States, including for trial and to Illinois' Thomson Correctional
Center. The leaders chose to target Illinois because that state has been
at the epicenter of debate about the transfer of detainees from the
U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
In addition to pressing for closure of the Guantanamo facility, the
retired military leaders will also emphasize the effectiveness of
federal courts in handling terrorism trials.
"Federal courts have convicted more than 400 terrorists since 9/11.
Military commissions have convicted only four," said Major General
William L. Nash, who served in peacekeeping operations in
Bosnia-Herzegovina. "Terrorists are not warriors. They are thugs who
should stand trial in our federal courts, just like any criminal
should."
Joining Major General Nash in Illinois will be General David Maddox,
former Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Army in Europe, Lieutenant General
Harry "Ed" Soyster, former Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency,
and Brigadier General Jim Cullen, former Judge Advocate General (more
complete bios below). This group is slated to meet with more than dozen
Illinois congressional candidates, including Senate hopeful Alexi
Giannoulias. Beyond the frank, one-on-one discussions planned with each
candidate, the retired military leaders plan to hand-deliver a petition
signed by nearly 5,500 people to each nominee. The document reinforces
the retired military leaders' stances and calls on candidates to close
Guantanamo and try suspected terrorists in federal court.
During the retired military leaders' trip to Illinois, the group will also launch an online video advertisement calling on lawmakers to try terrorism suspects in federal courts. The ad will launch on August 17.
These same retired military leaders were active in the last election
cycle and met with eight of the presidential candidates to urge action
on these same issues. President Obama, Vice President Biden, Governor
Huckabee and Secretary Clinton have all publicly credited this group
with influencing their thinking on the treatment of enemy prisoners.
This year, fueled by concerns regarding the hostile tenor that has
shaped the "inside the beltway" debate on detention and interrogation
policies, the military leaders have renewed their commitment to educate
candidates and make themselves available for candid discussions. Earlier
this summer, they held similar meetings with congressional candidates
from Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Among other concerns, Lieutenant General Soyster plans to let
candidates know that combating terrorism depends on winning the support
of local populations. He notes, "Troops in the field depend on local
community members to share information about threats. Our use of torture
and abuse are not only wrong and ineffective, they compromise crucial
relationships that can keep our soldiers safe."
For more information about these retired military leaders and their ongoing efforts, visit https://www.humanrightsfirst.org/us_law/military/index.aspx. To schedule a time to interview the Generals, please contact Brenda Bowser Soder at bowsersoderb@humanrightsfirst.org or 202-370-3323.
Biographical Information
General David M. Maddox, USA (Ret.)
General Maddox served in the U.S. Army from 1960 until 1995. He
retired after serving as Commander in Chief, U.S. Army in Europe. While
on active duty, General Maddox served extensively overseas with four
tours in Germany during which he commanded at every level from platoon
through NATO's Central Army Group, 7th U.S. Army and theater. His last
six years of active duty were in Europe transitioning from the Cold War,
through Desert Storm, to the total reengineering of our presence and
mission in Europe. Since retirement, General
Maddox has been an independent consultant to civilian corporations,
government agencies, and defense industries regarding concepts, systems
requirements, program strategies, operations and systems effectiveness,
and analytic techniques and analyses. He has served on the Defense
Science Board, is a member of the Army Science Board, and is a member of
the National Academy of Engineering, the Corporation of the Draper
Laboratory, and The Washington Institute of Foreign Affairs.
Lieutenant General Harry E. Soyster, USA (Ret.)
Lieutenant General Soyster served as Director, Defense Intelligence
Agency during DESERT SHIELD/STORM. He also served as Deputy Assistant
Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Department of the Army, Commanding
General, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command and in the Joint
Reconnaissance Center, Joint Chiefs of Staff. In Vietnam he was an
operations officer in a field artillery battalion. Upon retirement he
was VP for International Operations with Military Professional Resources
Incorporated and returned to government as Special Assistant to the SEC
ARMY for WWII 60th Anniversary Commemorations completed in 2006.
Major General William L. Nash, USA (Ret.)
General Nash served in the U.S. Army for 34 years, and is a veteran
of Vietnam and Operation Desert Storm. He has extensive experience in
peacekeeping operations, both as a military commander in
Bosnia-Herzegovina (1995- 1996) and as a civilian administrator for the
United Nations in Kosovo (2000). Since his retirement in 1998, General
Nash has been a fellow and visiting lecturer at Harvard's John F.
Kennedy School of Government (1998); Director of Civil-Military Programs
at the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs
(1999-2000); a professorial lecturer at Georgetown University
(2000-2008); a visiting lecturer at Princeton University (2005-2010); a
Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations (2001-2009); and a
military consultant for ABC News (2003-2009). Today, he is an
independent consultant on national security issues, civil-military
relations and conflict management.
Major General Walter L. Stewart, Jr., USA (Ret.)
General Stewart enlisted in the United States Army in 1966 and served
most of almost four decades of military service as a traditional
(part-time) Guardsman in the Pennsylvania Army National Guard. Early in
his service he led an armed helicopter platoon in support of allied
forces in the Mekong Delta of South Vietnam where he participated in the
1970 incursion into Cambodia. In 1994, then Brigadier General Stewart
was selected to form the first ever reserve
component directorate at a unified command, United States European
Command (USEUCOM). While in this assignment he coordinated reserve
support for a wide range of theater activities and was recalled to
active duty for Operation Joint Endeavor in the Balkans. Stewart served
at every level of command within Pennsylvania's 28th Infantry Division
(Mechanized), to include division command. In civilian life, General
Stewart was president of a small business and held elected office in
Pennsylvania. He is now fully retired.
Brigadier General James P. Cullen, USA (Ret.)
Mr. Cullen is a retired Brigadier General in the United States Army
Reserve Judge Advocate General's Corps and last served as the Chief
Judge (IMA) of the U.S. Army Court of Criminal Appeals. He currently
practices law in New York City.
Human Rights First is a non-profit, nonpartisan international human rights organization based in New York and Washington D.C. Human Rights First believes that building respect for human rights and the rule of law will help ensure the dignity to which every individual is entitled and will stem tyranny, extremism, intolerance, and violence.
LATEST NEWS
Listen Live: US Supreme Court Hears Outrageous Argument That Trump Is Above the Law
"The American people deserve a Supreme Court that does not hesitate to declare that no one is above the law, including a former president," said one campaigner.
Apr 25, 2024
After months of delay, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday will hear oral arguments in a closely watched case on whether former President Donald Trump should be immune from criminal charges stemming from his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss—an argument that legal experts say is both absurd and dangerous.
Listen live to the oral arguments, which are set to begin at 10:00 am ET:
Thursday's proceedings mark the high court's final argument of its current term, and pro-democracy campaigners are calling on the justices to quickly reject the former president's sweeping immunity claim so he can face trial on federal election subversion charges before his November rematch with President Joe Biden.
As Bloomberg's Greg Stohr noted earlier this week, Thursday's oral arguments give "Special Counsel Jack Smith only a narrow window to put the former president in front of a Washington jury before voters go to the polls on November 5."
"With the trial on hold until the high court rules," Stohr added, "Smith needs a clear-cut victory, and he needs it quickly."
Sean Eldridge, founder and president of the progressive advocacy group Stand Up America, said in a statement Thursday that "the Supreme Court's right-wing majority has already handed Trump a temporary victory by stalling this case for months, allowing him to delay accountability for his criminal attempts to cling to power."
"With so much at stake for our democracy, the Supreme Court should rule swiftly and decisively in this case," said Eldridge. "Accountability delayed could mean accountability denied."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Grand Jury Indicts Top Trump Aides, 11 Arizona Republicans Over 'Fake Electors' Scheme
Had it succeeded, said the state's attorney general, the scheme would have "deprived Arizona's voters of their right to have their votes counted for their chosen president."
Apr 25, 2024
A grand jury in Arizona on Wednesday charged seven aides to Donald Trump and nearly a dozen Republican officials over a "fake electors" scheme in the state that aimed to keep the former president in power after his 2020 loss to President Joe Biden.
Trump, who is currently facing nearly 90 charges across four criminal cases as he runs for another White House term, was described as "unindicted co-conspirator 1" in the 58-page indictment, which was announced by Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes.
"The people of Arizona elected President Biden," Mayes, a Democrat, said Wednesday. "Unwilling to accept this fact, the defendants charged by the state grand jury allegedly schemed to prevent the lawful transfer of the presidency. Whatever their reasoning was, the plot to violate the law must be answered for."
The indictment names former Arizona Republican Party Chair Kelli Ward, sitting state Republican Sens. Jake Hoffman and Anthony Kern, former U.S. Senate candidate Jim Lamon, and seven others as the "fake electors" who sought to declare Trump the rightful winner of the state's presidential contest.
The names of other individuals indicted by the state grand jury are redacted, but the document's descriptions make clear that former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, former Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, and top Trump legal strategist Boris Epshteyn are among those facing felony charges—including fraud, forgery, and conspiracy.
"In Arizona, defendants, unindicted coconspirators, and others pressured the three groups of election officials responsible for certifying election results to encourage them to change the election results," the document reads. "Discussions about using the Republican electors to change the outcome of the election began as early as November 4, 2020. Those plans evolved during November based on memos drafted by [an attorney for the Trump campaign, Kenneth Chesebro]."
Mayes said Wednesday that had the fake elector scheme succeeded, it would have "deprived Arizona's voters of their right to have their votes counted for their chosen president."
"It effectively would have made their right to vote meaningless," said Mayes.
A state grand jury, made up of everyday, regular Arizonans, has handed down felony indictments in the ongoing investigation into the fake elector scheme in Arizona. pic.twitter.com/Nu8GcD4ZqJ
— AZ Attorney General Kris Mayes (@AZAGMayes) April 24, 2024
Alex Gulotta, state director of All Voting Is Local Action Arizona, said Wednesday that "the indictment of the eleven fake electors is one of the first steps required in holding these election deniers accountable for their alleged attempts to take power away from voters by disrupting our free and fair elections."
"Arizonans deserve to trust the election officials responsible for administering our elections and preserving our democracy," said Gulotta, "and this is a positive step forward as we continue to strengthen the foundations of our democracy and restore faith in our elections."
The Arizona Republicreported Wednesday that "several of the Arizona electors have previously claimed they were merely offering Congress a backup plan, though nothing in the documents they sent to Congress and the National Archives backs up that assertion."
"The indictment includes several statements the false electors made on social media that contradict those claims," the newspaper observed.
Jenny Guzman, director of Common Cause's Arizona program, said the indictment "marks the start of a new chapter for the fake elector scheme that has plagued Arizona."
"Arizonans are still dealing with the fallout from the false electors and the Big Lie about the 2020 elections," said Guzman. "We are relieved that the investigation by Attorney General Mayes has concluded and Arizonans can now know that what comes next is accountability. These efforts by these fake electors to undermine the will of Arizona’s voters have had implications far beyond their failed attempt to overthrow the 2020 election."
"This indictment can reassure all Arizonans that if anyone, regardless of their political affiliation, attempts to undermine their vote, consequences will follow," Guzman added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Watchdog Urges FEC to Investigate Trump Campaign Over Scheme for Legal Fees
"By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much."
Apr 24, 2024
A campaign finance watchdog on Wednesday filed a Federal Election Commission complaint accusing former President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign, affiliated political groups, and an accounting firm of violating U.S. law in a scheme "seemingly designed to obscure the true recipients of a noteworthy portion of Trump's legal bills."
The Washington, D.C.-based Campaign Legal Center (CLC) said that "evidence appears to show an illegal arrangement between several Trump-affiliated committees and a compliance firm named Red Curve Solutions that is designed to obscure the identities of those providing legal services and how much they are being paid."
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money."
CLC alleges that the Trump campaign, Trump's political action committee (PAC) Save America, and three affiliated organizations "violated federal reporting requirements based on a scheme in which the committees reportedly paid over $7.2 million—described as 'reimbursement for legal' costs or expenses"—to Red Curve.
The watchdog also said that Red Curve appears to be "making or facilitating illegal contributions that violate either federal contribution limits or the prohibition on corporate contributions."
According to CLC:
Red Curve is a domestic limited liability company that offers compliance and FEC reporting services but does not appear to offer any legal services. It is managed by Bradley Crate, who also serves as the treasurer for each of the five Trump-affiliated committees concerned in this complaint, as well as over 200 other federal committees.
According to filings with the FEC, Red Curve appears to have been fronting legal costs for Trump since at least December 2022, with Trump-affiliated committees repaying the company later. This arrangement appears to violate FEC rules that require campaigns to disclose not only the entity being reimbursed (here, Red Curve) but also the underlying vendor. By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much they are being paid—through this arrangement.
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money," CLC senior director of campaign finance Erin Chlopak said in a statement. "When campaigns and committees obscure that information from the public, not only do they make it difficult to determine if the law has been violated, but they deny voters the ability to make an informed choice when casting a ballot."
"The steps taken by the Trump campaign, its affiliated committees, and Red Curve Solutions concealed information about how campaign funds were used to pay former President Trump's legal expenditures, including the amounts and ultimate recipients of these expenditures—and the FEC must investigate immediately," Chlopak added.
Trump—who is the presumptive 2024 GOP presidential nominee—faces 91 federal and state felony charges related to his role in the January 6 insurrection and his organization's business practices. He is currently on trial in New York for allegedly falsifying business records related to hush money payments to cover up sex scandals during the 2016 election cycle. The twice-impeached former president has been open about his use of campaign donations to pay his legal costs.
The new CLC filing comes a day after the watchdog filed separate FEC complaints urging investigations into a pair of Trump-affiliated "scam PACs," which "pretend to fundraise for major candidates or issues while secretly diverting almost all of their donors' money back into fundraising or the fraudsters' own pockets."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular